Bug#738671: RFS: whatmask/1.2-1 [ITP]
Hi, That sounds like what sipcalc, ipcalc, gip, subnetcalc etc do. Does whatmask do anything more than the existing packages already in Debian? Thanks for mentioning those - I have installed and compared them, and you are correct - Whatmask doesn't provide anything significantly different to any of those. If I need to withdraw this package, please could you advise how I can go about that? Bit of a shame for my first package, but such is life! Thanks, Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#640150:
This appears to still be an issue: Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.13-1) ... (gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0:20929): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': No such file or directory This likely means that your installation is broken. Try running the command gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache to make things work again for the time being. Thanks, Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#738623: gnome-icon-theme: Cannot open pixbuf loader module file
Package: gnome-icon-theme Version: 3.10.0-1 Severity: normal Hi, I saw the following while updating: Processing triggers for gnome-icon-theme (3.10.0-1) ... (gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0:32480): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linu$ This likely means that your installation is broken. Try running the command gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache to make things work again for the time being. Is this related to #640150 at all? Thanks, Nick -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gnome-icon-theme depends on: ii hicolor-icon-theme 0.13-1 ii libgtk-3-bin3.8.6-1 ii librsvg2-common 2.40.0-1 gnome-icon-theme recommends no packages. gnome-icon-theme suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#738623:
I've done some further testing - hopefully this information is useful. I can only reproduce this when installing XFCE via the Debian Installer (Alternative Desktop Environment), and then updating to testing. A minimal install, updating to testing and *then* installing XFCE doesn't reproduce this problem. Thanks, Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#640150:
I've done some further testing - hopefully this information is useful. I can only reproduce this when installing XFCE via the Debian Installer (Alternative Desktop Environment), and then updating to testing. A minimal install, updating to testing and *then* installing XFCE doesn't reproduce this problem. Thanks, Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607156:
retitle 607156 ITP: whatmask -- Whatmask is a small program to help with calculating a range of network settings owner 607156 ! thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607156: (no subject)
retitle 607156 ITP: whatmask -- Whatmask is a small program to help with calculating a range of network settings owner 607156 ! thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#738671: RFS: whatmask/1.2-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package whatmask. Whatmask parses CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing) IP address notation and displays the netmask, network address, broadcast address and the number of usable IP addresses, including the first and last usable IP addresses. * Package name: whatmask Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Joe Laffey j...@laffeycomputer.com * URL : http://www.laffeycomputer.com/whatmask.html * License : GPL-2 Section : utils It builds these binary packages: whatmask - Help with calculating a range of network settings To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/whatmask Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whatmask/whatmask_1.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #607156) Thanks, Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#738671: RFS: whatmask/1.2-1 [ITP]
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the kind words and for pointing out those lintian warnings - I'll investigate and look at resolving them. Thanks also for the watch file - I'll see if I can make any changes and will incorporate that into the package :-) Regards, Nick On 11 Feb 2014 21:37, Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, Disclaimer: I'm not a DD, so can't upload your package but have looked at it, as it is of interest to me. Generally the package seems to be in very good shape and builds in a clean chroot fine. Just touching on the couple of lintian warnings: X: whatmask source: deprecated-configure-filename I would forward this to upstream for their attention [1] I: whatmask source: debian-watch-file-is-missing I have attached a watch file that seems to work okay (other watch file guru's may be able to optimise it). As upstream sign their releases, you can get uscan to check [2] this as well. I have included the line to check this in the watch file (again, it might not be perfect) The releases have been signed with key ID: E8882FE3 I: whatmask: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/whatmask GNU PUBLIC LICENSE GNU General Public License This will be easy enough to patch and again forward upstream. The error appears in usage.c:60 Hope this review is helpful for you and aids you in finding a sponsor. [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/deprecated-configure-filename.html [2] https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch/#Cryptographic_signature_verification -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+pgdAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJg4AH/RiyxLX1IvkOCHGqfnAyhoED cLNI6BUp6TXHqa11//nySvrSoHrIhBgY+ZJvO+d1WmoUzMI0MShcTC91mUYKgOIi 2zJDOK9PapwK3e7PJGHnIJP9jGykD2OaeEvCIC4LMp2OeAw1sE5K1z2tBDHxCDHL ll6JU7pQsRPFBB/UpuaRvCUScyj+VVLbE1uX1XsK3TivI2naKOeQtuH/pKKiJcz+ VFrNLx6TZFPQe3v96e+RK+yUnwdNjTEaurXPKyiV/Rbk/bEvDIY5CWPQZNGWzZ0c 3P0CdQNF2Ci8kxaGTDyR1+1cza4GwRS9iFlqXZ/BSby92y3zzYZ4EpQD0//UDC8= =OtT3 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
