Bug#963109: libreoffice: Please drop clang from build-dependencies for alpha and ia64

2020-06-23 Thread Skye
> Why do I need to be helpful to dead architectures unless it's a LO issue?

Because it is what we do as maintainers.  So much of what we do, in this case 
don't do, has knock-on consequences across open source.

Cheers

Skye


-Original Message-
From: r...@rene-engelhard.de [mailto:r...@rene-engelhard.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:34 AM
To: Helge Deller; John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Cc: 963...@bugs.debian.org; debian-al...@lists.debian.org; debian-ia64
Subject: Re: Bug#963109: libreoffice: Please drop clang from build-dependencies 
for alpha and ia64

Hi,

Am 23. Juni 2020 12:05:18 MESZ schrieb Helge Deller :
>Hello Rene,
>
>I'm one of the maintainers for the hppa/parisc architecture

Which didn't build since 2018. And is constantly bd-uninststallable.

>On 19.06.20 19:12, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Am 19.06.20 um 17:46 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>>> On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
>>>> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>:
>>> I have honestly no clue why you would deny porters to build
>LibreOffice on non-release
>>> architectures given these circumstances.
>>
>> It is. That line needs to be maintained.
>
>Sure does it needs to be maintained.
>And for that reason it's important to get libreoffice built on the
>non-release architectures.

No, why?

And please maintain your port wrt installabity of packages before me accusing 
of not caring, thanks.

>> Ah, right, so you fix the stuff?
>>
>> - alpha broken for ages
>> - hppa broken for ages
>> - sparc64 BD-Unistallable for ages due to KDE
>> - kfreebsd-* BD-Uninstallable for ages
>
>> See  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice  
>(sid).
>
>Yes, I'm sure Adrian will fix lots of issues in libreoffice for those
>architectures

I am not.

You haven't even remotely looked at the link did you? Look at how long alpha is 
broken?

>He did in the past together with the ports maintainers.
>Speaking for hppa, libreoffice was fixed in 2017, then cleanly compiled
>until 2018:
>https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice=hppa

Wow, 2018. We are mid-2020.

I know he contributed patches for some Arch's (e.g. m68k), that does not change 
e.g. the alpha situation.

>[...]
>
>>> Would it be okay if I send a pull request to make the necessary
>changes?
>>
>> I am perfectly able to implement what you want. But whatever.
>> You can send any pull request.
>> That doesn't mean I'll merge it.
>
>It would be really nice and helpful for the debian-ports platforms if
>you would
>merge those, unless they break the release architectures.

Why do I need to be helpful to dead architectures unless it's a LO issue?

It is not a new architecture where I could understand this until it's 
up-to-date - it's dead ones.

Regards

Rene



Bug#950591: O: aboot

2020-02-03 Thread Skye
Thank you Adrian!

-Original Message-
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [mailto:glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de] 
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2020 2:57 PM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#950591: O: aboot

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha

Hi!

I am orphaning aboot on behalf of the current maintainer now as he
has agreed on removing the package [1].

I would like to adopt aboot and address the open RC bugs so it can
be kept in the main archive. This way we don't have to upload the
package to the Debian Ports unreleased archive in order to be able
to build installation images for the alpha architecture.

I will update the package to use the fork of aboot that is being
maintained by a Gentoo developer on Github [2].

Thanks,
Adrian

> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949711#10
> [2] https://github.com/mattst88/aboot

--
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913