Bug#1032882: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#1032882: Bug#1032882: uuu: New upstream release available
Hello Guido, On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 02:20:45PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi Andreas, > [..snip..] > > I've forked and updated the packaging at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ah/mfgtools > > > > The relevant commit (apart from `gbp import-orig --uscan`) is > > https://salsa.debian.org/ah/mfgtools/-/commit/a7a75a60f5e0e923ef1deb1b08469d0a9553a8ed > > (and then updating debian/changelog ofcourse). > > > > It build, installs and runs basic commands fine, but I haven to yet > > tested it against an actual imx target. > > Testing on an imx target would be good before upload ;) I'll be testing tomorrow when I'm at the board I'm working on. Since this is only experimental I might be my usual trigger-happy self and upload in advance. > > > If there's a lack of people interested in maintaing uuu/mfgtools I'd be > > willing to help out. I don't have any particular interest in the Debian > > on Mobile effort (right now), apart from uuu/mfgtools, though. > > Would you be willing to give me access or consider if maybe it's > > better if mfgtools repo live under the "debian" group on salsa? > > I've added you as maintainer to the uuu repo so we keep things > together. As Henry is the maintainer I'd rather not move repos around if > not absolutely needed. O.k.? Thanks. > > > I don't like leaving git repos out of sync, so if I'm given commit > > access I'd also be willing to upload to experimental. > > I could even consider adding myself to Uploaders as I am a semi-regular > > user of uuu and would like to see it be kept up to date. > > Sure, go ahead. Thanks, I've added myself. > > > Please advice on what you think is appropriate. > > (I'm @ah on salsa). > > > > Regards, > > Andreas Henriksson > > > > PS. my personal preference is to include full upstream commit history in > > the upstream branch, if you're also open to making that change in the > > repo please tell me. > > We usually use `gbp import-orig --upstream-vcs-tag=` within DebianMobile > so if that's what you're referring to, that would be a desirable change. Exactly, added and reimported from upstream. Now tagged and pushed. Pending upload. > > Cheers, > -- Guido Regards, Andreas Henriksson
Bug#1032882: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#1032882: Bug#1032882: uuu: New upstream release available
Hi Andreas, [..snip..] > I've forked and updated the packaging at: > https://salsa.debian.org/ah/mfgtools > > The relevant commit (apart from `gbp import-orig --uscan`) is > https://salsa.debian.org/ah/mfgtools/-/commit/a7a75a60f5e0e923ef1deb1b08469d0a9553a8ed > (and then updating debian/changelog ofcourse). > > It build, installs and runs basic commands fine, but I haven to yet > tested it against an actual imx target. Testing on an imx target would be good before upload ;) > If there's a lack of people interested in maintaing uuu/mfgtools I'd be > willing to help out. I don't have any particular interest in the Debian > on Mobile effort (right now), apart from uuu/mfgtools, though. > Would you be willing to give me access or consider if maybe it's > better if mfgtools repo live under the "debian" group on salsa? I've added you as maintainer to the uuu repo so we keep things together. As Henry is the maintainer I'd rather not move repos around if not absolutely needed. O.k.? > I don't like leaving git repos out of sync, so if I'm given commit > access I'd also be willing to upload to experimental. > I could even consider adding myself to Uploaders as I am a semi-regular > user of uuu and would like to see it be kept up to date. Sure, go ahead. > Please advice on what you think is appropriate. > (I'm @ah on salsa). > > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson > > PS. my personal preference is to include full upstream commit history in > the upstream branch, if you're also open to making that change in the > repo please tell me. We usually use `gbp import-orig --upstream-vcs-tag=` within DebianMobile so if that's what you're referring to, that would be a desirable change. Cheers, -- Guido
Bug#1032882: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#1032882: uuu: New upstream release available
Hello Guido, Thanks for your quick reply. More below. On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:50:50AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Package: uuu > > Version: 1.4.193-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > As currently reported on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mfgtools > > the latest packaged version of uuu is 1.4.193-1 while as reported > > on the same page the latest upstream version is 1.5.21. [...] > I think Henry isn't very active atm so an upload to experimental would > be fine. I've forked and updated the packaging at: https://salsa.debian.org/ah/mfgtools The relevant commit (apart from `gbp import-orig --uscan`) is https://salsa.debian.org/ah/mfgtools/-/commit/a7a75a60f5e0e923ef1deb1b08469d0a9553a8ed (and then updating debian/changelog ofcourse). It build, installs and runs basic commands fine, but I haven to yet tested it against an actual imx target. If there's a lack of people interested in maintaing uuu/mfgtools I'd be willing to help out. I don't have any particular interest in the Debian on Mobile effort (right now), apart from uuu/mfgtools, though. Would you be willing to give me access or consider if maybe it's better if mfgtools repo live under the "debian" group on salsa? I don't like leaving git repos out of sync, so if I'm given commit access I'd also be willing to upload to experimental. I could even consider adding myself to Uploaders as I am a semi-regular user of uuu and would like to see it be kept up to date. Please advice on what you think is appropriate. (I'm @ah on salsa). Regards, Andreas Henriksson PS. my personal preference is to include full upstream commit history in the upstream branch, if you're also open to making that change in the repo please tell me.
Bug#1032882: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#1032882: uuu: New upstream release available
Hi, On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Package: uuu > Version: 1.4.193-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > As currently reported on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mfgtools > the latest packaged version of uuu is 1.4.193-1 while as reported > on the same page the latest upstream version is 1.5.21. > > I'm opening this bug report to discuss around updating the uuu > packaging. Are there any known blockers? Lack of volunteers? etc. > > (As we're currently in freeze for bookworm it might be best to just > prepare updates targeting experimental for now. I do volunteer to look > into it if the problem is lack of volunteers, but if you do have known > issues or blockers then please share!) I think Henry isn't very active atm so an upload to experimental would be fine. Cheers, -- Guido
Bug#1032882: uuu: New upstream release available
Package: uuu Version: 1.4.193-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, As currently reported on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mfgtools the latest packaged version of uuu is 1.4.193-1 while as reported on the same page the latest upstream version is 1.5.21. I'm opening this bug report to discuss around updating the uuu packaging. Are there any known blockers? Lack of volunteers? etc. (As we're currently in freeze for bookworm it might be best to just prepare updates targeting experimental for now. I do volunteer to look into it if the problem is lack of volunteers, but if you do have known issues or blockers then please share!) Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing-security APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Kernel: Linux 6.2.0-rc3-asahi (SMP w/8 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages uuu depends on: ii libbz2-1.01.0.8-5+b1 ii libc6 2.36-8 ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14 ii libssl3 3.0.8-1 ii libstdc++612.2.0-14 ii libusb-1.0-0 2:1.0.26-1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 uuu recommends no packages. uuu suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
