Bug#467435: Bug#467267: libtime-piece-perl: new upstream release needed for Perl 5.10
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:29:08 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > libtime-piece-perl 1.12-1 is in svn for some time, but I've left it > > as "UNRELEASED" because I couldn't find anything that at least slight > > resembles a copyright statement in the source code. > Well, as this is not a regression from 1.11, it's a separate issue. > I'm cloning a new bug for it. I'll upload 1.12-1 for the Perl 5.10 > transition soon. Fair enoguh, and thanks for finishing and uploading the package. > Personally, I don't really think missing copyright notices should be a > stopper for us at all, as long as there's the license information. Just > document the assumption that the listed upstream authors are the copyright > holders. As far as I understand, the Berne Convention guarantees automatic > copyright even without the notices, and the notices are mostly required > for proving 'willful infringement' in the US. I do agree with your reasoning, I just was more (overly?) cautious; maybe I'm getting to paranoid about copyright issues. Anyway, it's good to hear a European voice of reason :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-NP: Treibhaus: Colosseum signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#467267: libtime-piece-perl: new upstream release needed for Perl 5.10
clone 467267 -1 retitle -1 libtime-piece-perl: no copyright notices in the upstream source severity -1 normal tag -1 upstream notforwarded 467267 thanks On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:40:12PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:34:17 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > This means that versioned dependencies on libtime-piece-perl can't be > > satisfied with the new version of perl installed, until > > libtime-piece-perl is updated. > > libtime-piece-perl 1.12-1 is in svn for some time, but I've left it > as "UNRELEASED" because I couldn't find anything that at least slight > resembles a copyright statement in the source code. > > Filed as http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=4 , no > reaction so far. Well, as this is not a regression from 1.11, it's a separate issue. I'm cloning a new bug for it. I'll upload 1.12-1 for the Perl 5.10 transition soon. Personally, I don't really think missing copyright notices should be a stopper for us at all, as long as there's the license information. Just document the assumption that the listed upstream authors are the copyright holders. As far as I understand, the Berne Convention guarantees automatic copyright even without the notices, and the notices are mostly required for proving 'willful infringement' in the US. Downgrading the copyright issue to 'normal' for now, but I could be wrong... Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#467267: libtime-piece-perl: new upstream release needed for Perl 5.10
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:34:17 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > This means that versioned dependencies on libtime-piece-perl can't be > satisfied with the new version of perl installed, until > libtime-piece-perl is updated. libtime-piece-perl 1.12-1 is in svn for some time, but I've left it as "UNRELEASED" because I couldn't find anything that at least slight resembles a copyright statement in the source code. Filed as http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=4 , no reaction so far. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-NP: Paco de Lucia: Manteca Colora [Rumba] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#467267: libtime-piece-perl: new upstream release needed for Perl 5.10
Package: libtime-piece-perl Version: 1.11-2 Severity: important User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: perl-5.10-transition There's a newer version of libtime-piece-perl inside perl_5.10.0-4: Replaces: libtime-piece-perl Provides: libtime-piece-perl Conflicts: libtime-piece-perl (<< 1.12-1) This means that versioned dependencies on libtime-piece-perl can't be satisfied with the new version of perl installed, until libtime-piece-perl is updated. Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
