Bug#615629: zim misses the emphasis

2011-02-28 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Thomas Prokosch
 wrote:
> Can I make this a wishlist bug?

Already exists: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/539386

-- Jaap



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#615629: zim misses the emphasis

2011-02-27 Thread Thomas Prokosch

On Monday 28 February 2011 12:11 AM, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:

I'm sorry but zim does no translation at all from properties in
style.conf to CSS. The config file is for the style of the user
interface, the CSS is hardcoded in the HTML template used.


Oh, I see. I am glad I used the same spelling of "grey", otherwise I 
would have gotten suspicious :-)


Can I make this a wishlist bug?

Thomas



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#615629: zim misses the emphasis

2011-02-27 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
I'm sorry but zim does no translation at all from properties in
style.conf to CSS. The config file is for the style of the user
interface, the CSS is hardcoded in the HTML template used.

-- Jaap

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Thomas Prokosch
 wrote:
> Package: zim
> Version: 0.48-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When printing to the browser, zim embeds a snippet of CSS for proper 
> formatting. While doing this zim seems to miss the attributes for an emphasis 
> tag.
>
> In my style.conf file I do have the following entry:
>  [Tag emphasis]
>  style=italic
>  foreground=#e69d00
>
> However, there is no corresponding "em" entry in the "style" environment. So, 
> the text will be emphasized, however it will not be shown in the given color. 
> The same is true for bold styles. On the other hand, other formats are 
> displayed properly (in their according color):
>  [Tag strike]
>  strikethrough=true
>  foreground=grey
> gives:
>  strike     { color: grey                }
>
> So, it would be nice if zim could be consistent in this respect and add the 
> missing format directives.
>
> Best,
> Thomas
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 6.0
>  APT prefers stable
>  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), 
> (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 
> (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages zim depends on:
> ii  python                  2.6.6-3+squeeze5 interactive high-level 
> object-orie
> ii  python-gtk2             2.17.0-4         Python bindings for the GTK+ 
> widge
> ii  python-simplejson       2.1.1-1          simple, fast, extensible JSON 
> enco
> ii  python-support          1.0.10           automated rebuilding support for 
> P
> ii  python-xdg              0.19-2           Python library to access 
> freedeskt
>
> Versions of packages zim recommends:
> pn  python-gtkspell                    (no description available)
>
> Versions of packages zim suggests:
> pn  bzr                                (no description available)
> pn  dvipng                             (no description available)
> pn  graphviz                           (no description available)
> pn  scrot                              (no description available)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
>
>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#615629: zim misses the emphasis

2011-02-27 Thread Thomas Prokosch
Package: zim
Version: 0.48-1
Severity: normal

When printing to the browser, zim embeds a snippet of CSS for proper 
formatting. While doing this zim seems to miss the attributes for an emphasis 
tag.

In my style.conf file I do have the following entry:
  [Tag emphasis]
  style=italic
  foreground=#e69d00

However, there is no corresponding "em" entry in the "style" environment. So, 
the text will be emphasized, however it will not be shown in the given color. 
The same is true for bold styles. On the other hand, other formats are 
displayed properly (in their according color):
  [Tag strike]
  strikethrough=true
  foreground=grey
gives:
  strike { color: grey}

So, it would be nice if zim could be consistent in this respect and add the 
missing format directives.

Best,
Thomas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), 
(500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 
(charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages zim depends on:
ii  python  2.6.6-3+squeeze5 interactive high-level object-orie
ii  python-gtk2 2.17.0-4 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
ii  python-simplejson   2.1.1-1  simple, fast, extensible JSON enco
ii  python-support  1.0.10   automated rebuilding support for P
ii  python-xdg  0.19-2   Python library to access freedeskt

Versions of packages zim recommends:
pn  python-gtkspell(no description available)

Versions of packages zim suggests:
pn  bzr(no description available)
pn  dvipng (no description available)
pn  graphviz   (no description available)
pn  scrot  (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org