Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
Am 27.07.2011 17:20, schrieb Otavio Salvador: ... I think I understood the problem. Basically the ISOs now doesn't include the stable symlink they used to have (being it stable or not). Now they provide the symlink that reflects the suite they are: testing - wheezy in this case. I fixed iso-scan to handle it (but couldn't test it locally); please check if tomorrow's daily works for you. The hd-media installer from 20110728 is working without problems now Thank you Ritchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
Am 27.07.2011 01:08, schrieb Adam Baxter: Thanks for testing that, Please see if you can attach a text version of those logs - also, The sylog from the installation system is attached which ISO did you use? Was it a daily/weekly build? Which version of debian-installer? I used this hd-media kernel and initrd: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20110726-00:16/hd-media/vmlinuz http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/20110726-00:16/hd-media/initrd.gz and this iso: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20110726-3/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso put them on an usb stick and boot the kernel and the initrd with grub without passing any kernel parameters. isolinux have not been used for startup Ritchi Jul 27 07:57:21 syslogd started: BusyBox v1.18.5 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: klogd started: BusyBox v1.18.5 (Debian 1:1.18.5-1) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Linux version 2.6.39-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.39-3) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.4.6 (Debian 4.4.6-6) ) #1 SMP Tue Jul 5 02:51:22 UTC 2011 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/installer-wheezy/amd64/hd-media/vmlinuz_20110726 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: - 0009f400 (usable) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0009f400 - 000a (reserved) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0010 - 257fd000 (usable) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: 257fd000 - 2580 (reserved) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: feffc000 - ff00 (reserved) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] BIOS-e820: fffc - 0001 (reserved) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] DMI 2.4 present. Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] DMI: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] e820 update range: - 0001 (usable) == (reserved) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] e820 remove range: 000a - 0010 (usable) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] No AGP bridge found Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] last_pfn = 0x257fd max_arch_pfn = 0x4 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] MTRR default type: write-back Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] MTRR fixed ranges enabled: Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 0-9 write-back Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] A-B uncachable Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] C-F write-protect Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] MTRR variable ranges enabled: Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 0 base 00E000 mask FFE000 uncachable Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 1 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 2 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 3 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 4 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 5 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 6 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 7 disabled Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x70406, new 0x7010600070106 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] found SMP MP-table at [880fdc00] fdc00 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] initial memory mapped : 0 - 2000 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] Base memory trampoline at [8809a000] 9a000 size 20480 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] init_memory_mapping: -257fd000 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 00 - 002560 page 2M Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] 002560 - 00257fd000 page 4k Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] kernel direct mapping tables up to 257fd000 @ 257fa000-257fd000 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] RAMDISK: 1bcf3000 - 1c23e000 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: RSDP 000fdbb0 00014 (v00 BOCHS ) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: RSDT 257fdc40 00034 (v01 BOCHS BXPCRSDT 0001 BXPC 0001) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: FACP 257ffe70 00074 (v01 BOCHS BXPCFACP 0001 BXPC 0001) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: DSDT 257fde40 01FB7 (v01 BXPC BXDSDT 0001 INTL 20100528) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: FACS 257ffe00 00040 Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 257fdda0 0009E (v01 BOCHS BXPCSSDT 0001 BXPC 0001) Jul 27 07:57:21 kernel: [0.00] ACPI: APIC 257fdcc0 00072
Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:27, Richard Rafalski debianb...@richard-rafalski.de wrote: Am 27.07.2011 01:08, schrieb Adam Baxter: Thanks for testing that, Please see if you can attach a text version of those logs - also, The sylog from the installation system is attached ... I think I understood the problem. Basically the ISOs now doesn't include the stable symlink they used to have (being it stable or not). Now they provide the symlink that reflects the suite they are: testing - wheezy in this case. I fixed iso-scan to handle it (but couldn't test it locally); please check if tomorrow's daily works for you. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
Thanks for testing that, Please see if you can attach a text version of those logs - also, which ISO did you use? Was it a daily/weekly build? Which version of debian-installer? On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Richard Rafalski debianb...@richard-rafalski.de wrote: Hi, Am 25.07.2011 06:22, schrieb Christian PERRIER: Quoting Adam Baxter (volta...@voltagex.org): It certainly does help! Maybe there should be a menu displayed to select the suite, or even better, **select the ISO** There is one now, in unstable. You can check this with the latest daily builds of D-I. Right. But the error occurs after choosing one iso. More details are on the attached screen shot Ritchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
Quoting Adam Baxter (volta...@voltagex.org): It certainly does help! Maybe there should be a menu displayed to select the suite, or even better, **select the ISO** There is one now, in unstable. You can check this with the latest daily builds of D-I. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#629146: OT: How to keep the threading when repyling to reports. (was: Not reproducable (bug #629146))
Dear Richard, Am Sonntag, den 24.07.2011, 21:38 +0200 schrieb Richard Rafalski: […] Maybe this information helps thank you very much for following up on this report. I do not know if you know this already, but to keep the threading working although you have not received the original messages you can do the following. $ bts show --mbox 629146 # downloads the mbox file with all messages `bts` is packaged in `devscripts` and you can import the downloaded mbox file saved in `~/.devscripts/bts/` in your mail program like Iceweasel. Thanks, Paul signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#629146: Not reproducable (bug #629146)
--snip-- After putting this stuff on an usb stick and booting the kernel with grub whithout passing any kernel parameters the error occured during the installation. I have searched in the unpacked initrd for the word stable and found in the file usr/lib/debian-installer/retriever/cdrom-retriever the lines # Not really nice defaulting codename to a suite... codename=stable Changing the second line to codename=testing solved the problem. Maybe this information helps It certainly does help! Maybe there should be a menu displayed to select the suite, or even better, **select the ISO** --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146: installation-reports: netinst ISO from 6/3/2011 faulty: cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:14, Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote: I can confirm this with the images from today (16-Jul-2011). The installer looks in dists/stable but the iso has dists/testing. I downloaded and tested an image yestarday and failed to reproduce it; mind to give it a new try? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146: Not reproducable
Hello, I did a try to reproduce this today and I couldn't reproduce it. It worked fine for me. Can you please give it a try using a new image? Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146:
I can confirm this is still an issue with the businesscard and netinst amd64 images from 2011-07-17. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146: installation-reports: netinst ISO from 6/3/2011 faulty: cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:53:29PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: [..snip..] Jun 3 21:33:09 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such file or directory Jun 3 21:33:09 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release. Jun 3 21:33:48 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file Jun 3 21:33:48 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such file or directory Jun 3 21:33:48 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release. Jun 3 21:33:49 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file Jun 3 21:33:49 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such file or directory Jun 3 21:33:49 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release. Jun 3 21:34:11 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file I can confirm this with the images from today (16-Jul-2011). The installer looks in dists/stable but the iso has dists/testing. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629146: installation-reports: netinst ISO from 6/3/2011 faulty: cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB Image version: 1. http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/hd-media/initrd.gz 03-Jun-2011 00:16 2. http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/hd-media/vmlinuz 03-Jun-2011 00:16 3. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 03-Jun-2011 19:11 Date: 6/3/2011 Machine: Lenovo G555 Partitions: did not get it Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: The ISO image is detected but it cannot be used. […] Jun 3 21:33:09 iso-scan: Detected ISO with 'testing' (wheezy) distribution Jun 3 21:33:09 iso-scan: Detected ISO with distribution 'testing' (wheezy) Jun 3 21:33:09 anna-install: Queueing udeb apt-mirror-setup for later installation Jun 3 21:33:09 anna-install: Queueing udeb apt-cdrom-setup for later installation Jun 3 21:33:09 anna-install: Queueing udeb -support for later installation Jun 3 21:33:09 main-menu[340]: (process:1189): [sdb1] debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (testing) Jun 3 21:33:09 main-menu[340]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Jun 3 21:33:09 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'load-iso' selected Jun 3 21:33:09 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such file or directory Jun 3 21:33:09 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release. Jun 3 21:33:48 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file Jun 3 21:33:48 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such file or directory Jun 3 21:33:48 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release. Jun 3 21:33:49 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file Jun 3 21:33:49 anna[1861]: grep: /cdrom/dists/stable/Release: No such file or directory Jun 3 21:33:49 cdrom-retriever: error: No components listed in /cdrom/dists/stable/Release. Jun 3 21:34:11 anna[1861]: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file Jun 3 21:34:11 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'load-iso' succeeded but requested to be left unconfigured. Jun 3 21:34:11 main-menu[340]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Jun 3 21:34:16 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'save-logs' selected Jun 3 21:34:24 main-menu[340]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Jun 3 21:34:29 main-menu[340]: INFO: Menu item 'save-logs' selected […] The ISO should be fine since the checksums match [1]. e7ea8d241d9006d007e91c38f7252c456d4965bcae0412e8a1339fce64591122 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso $ sha256sum /media/debian-installer/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso e7ea8d241d9006d007e91c38f7252c456d4965bcae0412e8a1339fce64591122 /media/debian-installer/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso [1] http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/SHA256SUMS.small signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
