Bug#828872: devscripts: Please drop licensecheck (moved to separate package)
Quoting Dominique Dumont (2016-06-28 21:23:58) > On Tuesday 28 June 2016 20:27:54 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > To acknowledge my takeover, please drop licensecheck and its > > bash-completion + tests from devscripts, and instead recommend/suggest > > licensecheck. > > As one of the latest contributors to licensecheck, I'm fine with this > takeover. > > On my side, I'll change the libconfig-model-dpkg-perl's dependency from > devscript to the new package. > > Jonas, please give me a heads-up if you plan to change licensecheck output > when used with -m option. Sure, will do. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#828872: devscripts: Please drop licensecheck (moved to separate package)
On Tuesday 28 June 2016 20:27:54 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > To acknowledge my takeover, please drop licensecheck and its > bash-completion + tests from devscripts, and instead recommend/suggest > licensecheck. As one of the latest contributors to licensecheck, I'm fine with this takeover. On my side, I'll change the libconfig-model-dpkg-perl's dependency from devscript to the new package. Jonas, please give me a heads-up if you plan to change licensecheck output when used with -m option. All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#828872: devscripts: Please drop licensecheck (moved to separate package)
Package: devscripts Version: 2.16.5 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have taken over authorship + maintenance of licensecheck, and packaged it as a separate package which entered unstable a moment ago. To acknowledge my takeover, please drop licensecheck and its bash-completion + tests from devscripts, and instead recommend/suggest licensecheck. If you disagree with the takeover, then I guess best is to reassign this bug to licensecheck and use it to discuss further... - Jonas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXcsGnAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhVCgQAIunbFkwsEkr1aorwcO/qY4n e5qXGs2vpf+lfJW6e/EKX+zzcbyeXErdm+WHhc+sDWxFqTbBElJdFoeJ52KU23Fe sxgFxaRr8cpgDRfeWklL8xYhrZPCyLE/sffqdezpjfkidPkpr9y6J9O9TrvL9R8u hNhp4lxD02fdlrkdkLlyzG2T4F4XN0EA/WDx2fGgkfNXjaBIpNQLNxnZPo2uNGL/ 4FGNGhPUz/MtlGPzyxS1rbN7U8f+Gb9+3BuuFCEpEXmRGv9t4jsagJJyr6yLUHvg +Piwh0yny+ctghqESL8yBYiySYINMStwd7OSz+Zm1vVfMEnVOpaJw7BuoVqLHa4u SqjspVJ+jeWdVk9sJnjxBy5SmFBKoR94qypQxmJOP/0VyZm9znpA21wKFjllKALZ ZhH5EUxAI0Wr608alL4zK8coYK+8Hb8U8+76P+pUk16WF+ogmnPqGlDJ2hGA8og8 RO9tuw6bqGoshjvWV3TCf4u6QoWOKZJNvYJD/rP+uIVj7A9qGnQvZO/i732WKRtG 2FdRMi1jX5nSbT76tQy4os+mWtfjPb0F0vTX1i8N0k0fwQzO5gZXZHXeV0WHBOdd kHCz/jNMflMkmrAon0Ac+7N2ReiWFEy5qyaHnuS84noWWOUzbWFVg+yDQ0JD3/Et ZuoogbVxaCSbMh1ErWwJ =F1Wc -END PGP SIGNATURE-
