Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)
Hi Salvatore Bonaccorso writes: Hi Gaudenz, and hi James, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:48:14PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: James Page writes: > https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial > I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu a while back for which > I picked 3 rocksdb patches - see above URL - 000*.patch. Thanks James. It looks like these patches actually fix the build issue. I already had these patches applied to the build in unstable, but I did not make the connection to the infinite loop. Salvatore, do you agree to an upload of 10.2.11-2 with these patches to stretch-security? Or how should we proceed? Yes we should release a regression update for ceph via stretch-security. Can you ping us when you have it ready? I'm currently building a new fixed version (10.2.11-2). Should I just upload to stretch-security or do you want to have a look at it first? I attached the debdiff to the previous stretch-security upload. Gaudenz ceph_10.2.11-1to2.debdiff Description: Binary data > > Regards, > Salvatore > -- PGP: 836E 4F81 EFBB ADA7 0852 79BF A97A 7702 BAF9 1EF5
Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)
Hi Gaudenz, and hi James, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:48:14PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > James Page writes: > > https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial > > > > I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu a while back for which I picked 3 > > rocksdb patches - see above URL - 000*.patch. > > Thanks James. It looks like these patches actually fix the build issue. I > already had these patches applied to the build in unstable, but I did not > make the connection to the infinite loop. > > Salvatore, do you agree to an upload of 10.2.11-2 with these patches to > stretch-security? Or how should we proceed? Yes we should release a regression update for ceph via stretch-security. Can you ping us when you have it ready? Regards, Salvatore
Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)
James Page writes: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu a while back for which I picked 3 rocksdb patches - see above URL - 000*.patch. Thanks James. It looks like these patches actually fix the build issue. I already had these patches applied to the build in unstable, but I did not make the connection to the infinite loop. Salvatore, do you agree to an upload of 10.2.11-2 with these patches to stretch-security? Or how should we proceed? Gaudenz -- PGP: 836E 4F81 EFBB ADA7 0852 79BF A97A 7702 BAF9 1EF5 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)
Hi Gaudenz On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 07:51 Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: [...] > I did the same and the build hanged as well. Retrying the hanging > call with all the -O2 arguments removed succeeds. So this seems to > be a bug in GCC with optimizations. I'm unsure on how to proceeed > from here. It's quite clear this is not a bug in Ceph. Is there a > chance that GCC will get fixed in stable? Would it make sense to > open a bug on g++-6? To workaround this in Ceph I would need to > find a way to disable optimizations just for this file on i386. > Because I suspect that generally disabling -O2 would have some > performance implications. > > The failing call is: > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/6/cc1plus -quiet -I . -I ./include > -imultiarch i386-linux-gnu -D_GNU_SOURCE -D ROCKSDB_PLATFORM_POSIX > -D ROCKSDB_LIB_IO_POSIX -D _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D OS_LINUX -D > ROCKSDB_FALLOCATE_PRESENT -D SNAPPY -D ZLIB -D BZIP2 -D > ROCKSDB_MALLOC_USABLE_SIZE -D ROCKSDB_PTHREAD_ADAPTIVE_MUTEX -D > ROCKSDB_BACKTRACE -D ROCKSDB_RANGESYNC_PRESENT -D NDEBUG -isystem > ./third-party/gtest-1.7.0/fused-src monitoring/statistics.cc > -quiet -dumpbase statistics.cc -momit-leaf-frame-pointer > -mtune=generic -march=i686 -auxbase-strip monitoring/statistics.o > -g -g1 -g -g -g1 -g -g1 -O2 -O2 -O2 -O2 -Wformat=1 > -Werror=format-security -Wextra -Wall -Wsign-compare -Wshadow > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat=1 -Werror=format-security > -Wformat=1 -Werror=format-security -Woverloaded-virtual > -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-missing-field-initializers -std=c++11 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/gaudenz/ceph=. -fstack-protector-strong > -fPIC -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/gaudenz/ceph=. > -fstack-protector-strong -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/gaudenz/ceph=. > -fstack-protector-strong -fno-builtin-memcmp > -fno-omit-frame-pointer -o /tmp/ccWWcwWO.s > > Running in src/rocksdb. https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu a while back for which I picked 3 rocksdb patches - see above URL - 000*.patch. HTH (and I really need to work towards re-sync between Ubuntu and Debian). James
