Bug#989001: memtest86+: Fails to run in Grub graphical(?) mode?
Package: memtest86+ Version: 5.01-3.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I think I default installed Debian bullseye and Grub is configured to use graphical framebuffer and render text. When invoked from there memtest86+ doesn't seem to update the screen at all (presumably trying to write to text buffer?). -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages memtest86+ depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.75 memtest86+ recommends no packages. Versions of packages memtest86+ suggests: pn grub-pc | grub-legacy pn hwtools pn kernel-patch-badram pn memtest86 pn memtester pn mtools -- debconf information: shared/memtest86-run-lilo: false
Bug#989001: memtest86+: Fails to run in Grub graphical(?) mode?
Hi, thanks for replt, is high probable you don't have issue with grub itself but memtest86+, the version in stable/testing/unstable don't work in major of case as I saw, experimental one with latest upstream version and other patches have many fixes for newer hardware and newer gcc and also other improvements related to grub, can you test it please? OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#989001: memtest86+: Fails to run in Grub graphical(?) mode?
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, 23 May 2021 09:02:40 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Package: memtest86+ > Version: 5.01-3.1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I think I default installed Debian bullseye and Grub is configured to > use graphical framebuffer and render text. When invoked from there > memtest86+ doesn't seem to update the screen at all (presumably trying > to write to text buffer?). > We have now memtest86+ 6.10 which has many rewritten code. Can you please test if that works now fine?