Processed: Re: Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 409253 sid Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given Tags were: sid Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
tags 409253 sid thanks Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-02 09:24]: I haven't tried but given upstream's comment I guess it the version in etch should be okay. Yeah, etch is fine. Since this depends on the version of other software (fuse), I guess a sid tag is the right way to indicate this, correct? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:00:11PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Since this depends on the version of other software (fuse), I guess a sid tag is the right way to indicate this, correct? Yes. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-02 09:24]: I haven't tried but given upstream's comment I guess it the version in etch should be okay. Yeah, etch is fine. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-01 16:13]: sshfs.c: In function 'main': sshfs.c:2514: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [sshfs-sshfs.o] Error 1 Is this building against etch or against sid? They have different versions of fuse, which seems a likely explanation. sid. I haven't tried but given upstream's comment I guess it the version in etch should be okay. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
Package: sshfs-fuse Version: 1.6-1 Severity: serious Automatic build of sshfs-fuse_1.6-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52 ... make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sshfs-fuse-1.6' if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=26 -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/fuse -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -W -Icompat -MT sshfs-sshfs.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo -c -o sshfs-sshfs.o `test -f 'sshfs.c' || echo './'`sshfs.c; \ then mv -f .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Po; else rm -f .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo; exit 1; fi sshfs.c:2352:65: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c: In function 'sshfs_opt_proc': sshfs.c:2352: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) sshfs.c:2352: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sshfs.c:2352: error: for each function it appears in.) sshfs.c:2359:65: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c:2514:66: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c: In function 'main': sshfs.c:2514: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [sshfs-sshfs.o] Error 1 -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
Package: sshfs-fuse Version: 1.6-1 Severity: serious Automatic build of sshfs-fuse_1.6-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52 ... make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sshfs-fuse-1.6' if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=26 -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/fuse -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -W -Icompat -MT sshfs-sshfs.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo -c -o sshfs-sshfs.o `test -f 'sshfs.c' || echo './'`sshfs.c; \ then mv -f .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Po; else rm -f .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo; exit 1; fi sshfs.c:2352:65: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c: In function 'sshfs_opt_proc': sshfs.c:2352: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) sshfs.c:2352: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sshfs.c:2352: error: for each function it appears in.) sshfs.c:2359:65: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c:2514:66: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c: In function 'main': sshfs.c:2514: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [sshfs-sshfs.o] Error 1 Mea culpa. Please upgrade to 1.7 Thanks, Miklos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409253: FTBFS: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given
Hi Martin, On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:14:09PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Automatic build of sshfs-fuse_1.6-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52 make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sshfs-fuse-1.6' if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=26 -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/fuse -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -W -Icompat -MT sshfs-sshfs.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo -c -o sshfs-sshfs.o `test -f 'sshfs.c' || echo './'`sshfs.c; \ then mv -f .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Po; else rm -f .deps/sshfs-sshfs.Tpo; exit 1; fi sshfs.c:2352:65: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c: In function 'sshfs_opt_proc': sshfs.c:2352: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) sshfs.c:2352: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sshfs.c:2352: error: for each function it appears in.) sshfs.c:2359:65: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c:2514:66: error: macro fuse_main requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given sshfs.c: In function 'main': sshfs.c:2514: error: 'fuse_main' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [sshfs-sshfs.o] Error 1 Is this building against etch or against sid? They have different versions of fuse, which seems a likely explanation. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
