request for removal of texmacs-extra-fonts

2012-08-01 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
Hi all,

Since texmacs 1.0.7.13, texmacs includes all fonts
of texmacs-extra-fonts so texmacs-common sets 
Conflicts: texmacs-extra-fonts since Sep. 2011 and
it seems there is no problem by now.
So I think texmacs-extra-fonts is obsolete and should 
be removed.

I find science-typesetting sets Recommends: texmacs-extra-fonts
by mistake and I already filed a bug so I think there will be
no dependency on texmacs-extra-fonts.

I'm a maintainer of texmacs but not of texmacs-extra-fonts
which is maintained by QA team.

What is the best way to do in this case.  
Is this mail enough or something more is necessary?

Thanks in advance.
Best regards,   2012-8-2(Thu)

-- 
 Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda 
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120802.151157.409379923.ko...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp



Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] postgresql-* package namespace (was: Re: Bug#683486: ITP: barman -- Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL)

2012-08-01 Thread Christoph Berg
Fwiw, I'm not saying packages must not use the postgresql namespace, I'd just 
leave it to the maintainer to decide.



Martin Pitt  schrieb:

Hello Ansgar, Christoph,

Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:
> The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)

Right, postgresql-X.Y-foo are server-side plugins which are specific
to a major PostgreSQL server version. They need to be versioned just
like PostgreSQL itself for upgrades, parallel installability, etc.

> which follow the example of postgresql-plperl-x.y (built from PG
> core). For real applications like barman, that's not really
> necessary.

Where "real applications" == client-side PostgreSQL users, i. e. which
only use libpq, not build against postgresql-server-dev-X.Y.

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)



Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] postgresql-* package namespace (was: Re: Bug#683486: ITP: barman -- Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL)

2012-08-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Ansgar, Christoph,

Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:
> The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)

Right, postgresql-X.Y-foo are server-side plugins which are specific
to a major PostgreSQL server version. They need to be versioned just
like PostgreSQL itself for upgrades, parallel installability, etc.

> which follow the example of postgresql-plperl-x.y (built from PG
> core). For real applications like barman, that's not really
> necessary.

Where "real applications" == client-side PostgreSQL users, i. e. which
only use libpq, not build against postgresql-server-dev-X.Y.

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120801204318.gc2...@piware.de



Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] postgresql-* package namespace (was: Re: Bug#683486: ITP: barman -- Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL)

2012-08-01 Thread Christoph Berg
I usually prefer packages to use the upstream name so they are easy to find 
(think other distributions).

The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something) which 
follow the example of postgresql-plperl-x.y (built from PG core). For real 
applications like barman, that's not really necessary.

Also, by all means, do not rename existing packages.

postgresql-* package namespace (was: Re: Bug#683486: ITP: barman -- Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL)

2012-08-01 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 08/01/2012 11:18 AM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:56:56AM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
>>
>> * Package name: barman
> 
> postgresql-barman would make it a bit easier for people to find.
> Most of the other postgreql packages use the postgresql- namespace.

The postgresql-* namespace doesn't seem to be used in a consistent way:
we have packages like postgresql-9.1-debversion, but also packages such
as postgresql-plperl-9.1.  And then there is one package which uses a
totally different scheme (libpgsql-9.1-asn1oid).

It would be nice if all packages could use the same scheme, maybe
starting with the packages for 9.2?  As I have no preference myself,
maybe the postgres maintainers could give their view?

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5018fcb8.2030...@debian.org



Re: Bug#683486: ITP: barman -- Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL

2012-08-01 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:56:56AM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> 
> * Package name: barman

postgresql-barman would make it a bit easier for people to find.
Most of the other postgreql packages use the postgresql- namespace.

Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   schroot and sbuild  http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
   `-GPG Public Key  F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120801091825.go25...@codelibre.net



Bug#683486: ITP: barman -- Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL

2012-08-01 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Nenciarini 

* Package name: barman
  Version : 1.0.0
  Upstream Author : 2ndQuadrant Italia (Devise.IT S.r.l.) 
* URL : http://www.pgbarman.org/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL

Barman (backup and recovery manager) is an administration
tool for disaster recovery of PostgreSQL servers written in Python.
It allows to perform remote backups of multiple servers
in business critical environments and help DBAs during the recovery phase.
Barman's most wanted features include backup catalogs, retention policies,
remote recovery, archiving and compression of WAL files and backups.
Barman is written and maintained by PostgreSQL professionals 2ndQuadrant.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120801075656.ga6...@greygoo.devise-it.lan