Re: key sign
Em Qua, 2007-06-27 às 19:28 +0330, Amin Shali escreveu: > Hi :) > Can anyone please sign my key? No. Quoting http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning: "You should never sign a key for somebody else you haven't met personally. Signing a key based on anything other than first-hand knowledge destroys the utility of the Web of Trust. If ones friend presents other developers with your ID card and your fingerprint, but you are not there to verify that the fingerprint belongs to you, what do other developers have to link the fingerprint to the ID? They have only the friend's word, and the other signatures on your key -- this is no better than if they signed your key just because other people have signed it! "It is nice to get more signatures on ones key, and it is tempting to cut a few corners along the way. But having trustworthy signatures is more important than having many signatures, so it's very important that we keep the keysigning process as pure as we can. Signing someone else's key is an endorsement that you have first-hand evidence of the keyholder's identity. If you sign it when you don't really mean it, the Web of Trust can no longer be trusted." If you want more information on how to get your key signed, you might want to take a look at http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php -- Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package
Em Sáb, 2007-06-23 às 12:59 +0100, Chris Lamb escreveu: > Charles Plessy wrote: > > > as said in another mail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is definitely non-free. Hovever, > > if Debian would become an "authorized distributor", the licence would be > > suitable for non-free. > > What about Debian derivatives? They would not, but that is not a problem for non-free. -- Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error with dh_gencontrol
Em Ter, 2006-09-19 às 13:30 +, Rodrigo Tavares escreveu: > I add the fisrt line the field : > > Source : missing > > But the error continue the same. It's not only the Source: field, it's the whole stanza, like Wouter said. Again, pretty please, read the Debian New Maintainer's Guide and *** ask questions on the debian-mentors mailing list. *** Cheers, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore fatalerror -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#341894: ITP: pessulus -- lockdown editor for GNOME
Em Sex, 2005-12-30 às 12:19 +0100, Ondrej Sury escreveu: > Since I have some free time today, I took pessulus from pkg-gnome svn, > updated it to 0.3 and did GNOME Team upload. Thanks! > (Guilherme: Also moved it from desktop/experimental to packages/unstable > in svn, since I think that desktop/ is meant for packages included in > official GNOME release). It was in desktop/ because it is proposed for inclusion in 2.14 and there have been no objections either by people on desktop-devel-list or the release team itself. We'll probably have to move it back soon... -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: not getting CCs from the bugs I reported
Hi there, Em Qua, 2005-12-28 às 23:49 -0600, Adam Heath escreveu: > You'll only get mails if the sender sends to ###-submitter. Mail sent to just > ### is not forwarded, and only stored. Not that this really matters for the points in this discussion, but just for the record, messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] get forwarded to the package maintainer. > This is not a bug in the software, but in the person sending the mail. Agreed. -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Curso Interativo HP12C - Função da Máquina GRATIS
English speakers: I am deeply sorry, I have already replied to this one, but forgot to Cc: the person, who is obviously not subscribed. Em Sáb, 2005-12-17 às 20:24 -0200, Hector R.Farias escreveu: > Prezados senhores:Como devo proceder para obter este curso interativo > e obter informações/manual de funcionalidades deste produto? > Grato > Héctor Olá, Hector, não sei como você chegou até esse endereço, mas a debian-devel é uma lista de discussão que concentra o desenvolvimento do sistema operacional universal e 100% livre Debian, e não tem nenhuma relação com a calculadora financeira em que você tem interesse ou em cursos de utilização dela. Para maiores informações sobre nós, visite http://www.debian.org/ Por favor, se enviar mensagens para esta lista novamente, faça-o em inglês, que é o idioma adequado devido ao fato de ela ser um meio de comunicação que reúne pessoas de todo o mundo. Atenciosamente, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: curso interativo maq.HP12 c
English speakers: Hector is asking about a course on a specific HP calculator. I am telling him debian-devel has nothing to do with it, and also explaining he should use English. Em Sex, 2005-12-16 às 17:14 -0200, Hector escreveu: > Prezados senhores:Como poderia ter acesso a este curso,com > material/apostilas e ou manual de forma a poder utilizar basicamente e > corretamente esta calculadora financeira e seus recursos? > Desde já,obrigado pela atenção Olá, Hector, não sei como você chegou até esse endereço, mas a debian-devel é uma lista de discussão que concentra o desenvolvimento do sistema operacional universal e 100% livre Debian, e não tem nenhuma relação com a calculadora financeira em que você tem interesse ou em cursos de utilização dela. Para maiores informações sobre nós, visite http://www.debian.org/ Por favor, se enviar mensagens para esta lista novamente, faça-o em inglês, que é o idioma adequado devido ao fato de ela ser um meio de comunicação que reúne pessoas de todo o mundo. Atenciosamente, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#341894: ITP: pessulus -- lockdown editor for GNOME
Em Sáb, 2005-12-03 às 22:54 +0100, Jerome Warnier escreveu: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: pessulus Sorry I didn't open an ITP for it, but I really intended it to be on the archive already. It's been packaged on the Debian GNOME Team svn repository for almost a month now. May I take the ownership of this ITP? Cheers, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#276871 acknowledged by developer (Bug#276871: fixed in gdm 2.8.0.6-1)
Em Qui, 2005-11-17 às 17:46 -0200, Guilherme de S. Pastore escreveu: > I also suggest you look for discussions about this on the debian-devel > archives... It's already been exhaustingly discussed several times > before. I apologize for not giving any pointers, as I thought they would be too difficult to find. However, the first result of a quick google search is already good enough: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/04/msg00291.html See ya, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#276871 acknowledged by developer (Bug#276871: fixed in gdm 2.8.0.6-1)
Em Qui, 2005-11-17 às 11:12 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez escreveu: > Personally, I will list multiple bugs in the new upstream release line > in my changelog, if they are actually fixed. And I surely hope you figure out it's a bad thing and stop doing that. I suggest you take a look at the gnome-applets 2.12.1-1 changelog[0]. Don't you think it's far more useful and makes people waste less time when looking at it or looking for changes at a later date? I also suggest you look for discussions about this on the debian-devel archives... It's already been exhaustingly discussed several times before. [0]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnome-applets/news/1.html Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#333844: override changes are not announced to the package maintainers
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 19:22 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar escreveu: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:55:30PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: > > Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 11:34 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu: > > > And he get only warnings for binary packages he uploaded, not for the > > > packages which are only built by the autobuilders. > > > > Perhaps because the override check is all about Section and Priority, > > which are source package characterics, and because katie only performs > > the check on sourceful uploads? > > No, you misunderstand. Indeed, thanks for the help =) See ya, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#333844: override changes are not announced to the package maintainers
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 11:34 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:04:20AM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: > > What doko meant, if I understand this correctly, is that, if a package > > has already been uploaded when an ftpmaster modifies the overrides, the > > maintainer will not get to know about it until s/he uploads a new > > package and gets an override disparity warning message (the one you > > attached). > > And he get only warnings for binary packages he uploaded, not for the > packages which are only built by the autobuilders. Perhaps because the override check is all about Section and Priority, which are source package characterics, and because katie only performs the check on sourceful uploads? -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#333844: override changes are not announced to the package maintainers
Em Qui, 2005-10-13 às 22:36 -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg escreveu: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > >Package: general > > > >override change are not announced to the package maintainers, _after_ > >a package is uploaded. > > > I don't beleive this is true. I just got the following email from the > archive: [snip] What doko meant, if I understand this correctly, is that, if a package has already been uploaded when an ftpmaster modifies the overrides, the maintainer will not get to know about it until s/he uploads a new package and gets an override disparity warning message (the one you attached). It would be great, indeed, if the maintainer were notified when the change occurs, so the next release of the package would already have the appropriate information. See ya, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!
Em Sáb, 2005-10-01 às 21:43 -0400, Travis Crump escreveu: > That's the stale 0.3.3 aptitude, looks like the new one won't hit the > archives til tomorrow[or it needs to be autobuilt]... The dinstall run will happen in approximately 4h30, according to http://people.debian.org/~joerg/dinstall.html =D Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access to debian mirror pools
Em Ter, 2005-09-20 às 09:34 -0500, Carlo Segre escreveu: > Any insights? Is this a bug, if so for what package? I have no idea and haven't investigated what causes this, but it seems like perfectly reasonable behaviour to me, for a simple reason: it's more than one machine, and they all have to sync with ftp-master separately, AFAIK. If you get different related files from different machines, you're likely to run into inconsistency when some of them are in sync and some are not, and, hence, breakage. Just my $0.02. Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libsvn-javahl: call for help
Hi all, as some might have noticed, the last subversion upload do unstable introduced a package for the java bindings, libsvn-javahl. However, David Kimdom added support for this because people asked and it "Just Worked (tm)", AFAICT. The current situation, though, is that it's completely broken, and making the build of subversion fail on several arches (not counting those such as arm on which kaffe is not available). And the problem is that not a single member of the Debian Subversion Team (among which, actually, only Peter Samuelson and I seem to be active) has the knowledge or interest to fix that properly. Now, we have two possible situations for the next days: either someone will volunteer and get that fixed soon, so it "Just Works (tm)" once again and we can leave it there for people who really care for it, or it will be dropped, as, more than under-maintained, it's broken and breaking the rest of subversion. That's why I'm sending this message =) If you think you can help, please, join us on the pkg-subversion-maintainers[0] mailing list, or meet us on #debian-svn @ irc.oftc.net. [0]: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-subversion-maintainers Cheers, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Newly archived bugs are displayed when setting "archive=no"
Em Qui, 2005-08-18 às 08:41 +0200, Andreas Tille escreveu: > Hi, > > is there any reason that > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=maint&data=tille%40debian.org&archive=no > > shows two archived bugs? I guess the archived bugs are shown also on other > queries, but this was just the query which was especially interesting for me. > ;-) I think it's because bug archival has been disabled since the implementation of version tracking in the BTS, as something still needs to be done with regard to distribution tags. Colin Watson's message to debian-devel-announce mentioned this =) Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which CD is a package on?
Em Sex, 2005-07-29 às 19:33 -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore escreveu: > http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/list.txt > http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/cdpkglist.sh. Sorry, it doesn't work. Just replace the name of the service with the real name of the machine currently hosting it. http://haydn.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/list.txt http://haydn.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/cdpkglist.sh -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which CD is a package on?
Em Sex, 2005-07-29 às 14:25 +0200, Jerome Warnier escreveu: > But is it available somewhere online? There is a list of packages in each CD automatically generated from jigdo files on http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/list.txt, where list.txt is a symlink to list_.txt, currently list_3.1_r0a.txt. The (ugly) script that generated it is on http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/cdpkglist.sh. It's not exactly what you're looking for, but I thought it might be of help. I might look into writing some look up/search thing soon, too. Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Debian AMD64 Archive Move
Em Qua, 2005-05-11 Ãs 03:07 -0500, Jaime Ochoa MalagÃn escreveu: > Hi everybody, Hello, > > I'm only have a doubt, if someone make a mirror of the official debian > (including non-free) and all that packages are ditributed is in danger > to being sued? Non-free is only *distributed* by Debian, it's *not* Debian. The software in there does not comply with the Debian Free Software Guidelines, so, yes, you can have just about (almost) anything there. According to the DFSG, for example, permission must *not* be given specifically to Debian, but again, software in non-free doesn't necessarily comply with that, so Debian may have the permission to distribute specific software, while you may not. That's why you should read the license of every single package from non-free you deal with before using, redistributing, whatever. Yes, you may be sued. Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ddtp.d.o is not alive
Em Qui, 2005-04-07 Ãs 17:53 -0300, Daniel MacÃdo Batista escreveu: > Hi! Hey, Daniel, > Is there any idea to when ddtp.d.o will come back? The ddtp server is hosted on gluck, which imploded some days ago (disk failure?). When I saw that, I even thought about messaging -l10n-pt to warn you guys, but didn't have the time to do so, sorry. gluck has been put back online today, though, so your problems should already be solved. =) Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#205927: ITP: eggdrop -- Advanced IRC Robot
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:47:36 -0700 Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday August 17 2003 09:35 am, Peter Makholm wrote: > > "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Package name: eggdrop > > > Version : 1.6.15 > > > Upstream Author : EggHeads <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * URL : > > > ftp://ftp.eggheads.org/pub/eggdrop/source/1.6/eggdrop1.6.15.tar.gz * > > > License : GPL > > > Description : Advanced IRC Robot > > > > > > Eggdrop is an IRC bot written in C. Eggdrop, being a bot, sits on a > > > channel > > > > Seems to be packaged allready. > > > He's taking it over from me. > > Guilherme, I believe that all you need to do is upload your package with your > name in the Maintainer field of debian/control. > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/RAiYHJcvLJR6wWoRAk3mAKCOEnerAsFWI2SD065pI1bb7gInwACgoxuP > dPNJhspnj9j05ek0UsRoTYw= > =ICeZ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- As I may take some time to finish the package, I thought of avoiding duplicated work. But in fact, now I remembered you haven't asked for a new maintainer, so we don't run that risk. Sorry for that. Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpIeJJ3MEHD4.pgp Description: PGP signature
CGI:IRC on Debian
Hello people! =) I became a maintainer recently, when I took the prozilla package from Gustavo Noronha Silva (kov), a few days ago. I am now trying to finish my second Debian Package: cgiirc. Unfortunately, the program puts all its files in the same directory, causing problems with the FHS. I contacted the upstream author, asking for changes, and even offering myself to do the job. I got surprised when I received his response, telling me he wanted the program to be entirely coded by him, following his own coding style, but he wouldn't do anything by now. I think I'm going to release the first version of the package "dodging" the problem with sym links, and start changing the code from the second release on, if I don't get a better answer from him. What do you all think I should do? Regards, -- Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpgTmSl6aDNZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
