Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 29, 2004
Hello, On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote: Package: screen (debian/main) Maintainer: Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] 269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen Where does the [U] come from? I do not see the upstream bug tag set on http://bugs.debian.org/269366 The problem is in fact Debian specific: the Debian package patches configure.in but uses the old (non-regenerated) configure. This makes detection of libncursesw fail. I hope this helps, Jochen -- http://seehuhn.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 29, 2004
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: Hello, On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote: Package: screen (debian/main) Maintainer: Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] 269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen Where does the [U] come from? I do not see the upstream bug tag set on U has two meanings there. If it appears in the left [], it means the upstream tag, if it appears in the right [], it means the sid tag. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 29, 2004
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: 269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen Where does the [U] come from? I do not see the upstream bug tag set on It is for sid in this case. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/