Re: [gradle-dev] upgrade gradle to groovy 2
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 08:05:17AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > Miguel, (Including debian-java) Hi Russel, > How long does approval normally take, the package has been ready for > 5 > weeks. This is up to Debian FTPMaster team who are the ones in charge of reviewing new packages. I have to admit this wait has been a little longer than usual but I believe in one or two weeks this package should be available in sid. > Is there a version in experimental? Unfortunately, no. groovy2 is a new package so it has to be accepted first. > I cannot start something from scratch but if there was a previous > package build framework that just needed amending, I could give it a go. > I am not really up on Debian packaging, is there a good tutorial I could > read in conjunction with working on the previous Gradle build framework? packaging-tutorial [1] is a good package to take a look at for this topic. After that, you could take a look at packages already packaged with gradle. This is a list of packages build-depending on gradle ordered by complexity: multiverse-core [2] groovy2 [3] gradle [4] > > 1. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-1.html > > This seems to have the indy Groovy 2.2.2 in one place and Groovy 2.2.1 > artefacts elsewhere as well. I guess I am a bit confused by the package > contents. This is most likely because I am not au fait with the Debian > Java/Groovy policy and set up/ Thanks for commenting about this. It turns out I did a mistake packaging it and that was a typo with the versioning, so I'll upload a new package soon. Cheers, 1. https://packages.debian.org/sid/packaging-tutorial 2. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/multiverse-core.git 3. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/gradle.git 4. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/groovy2.git -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: openjfx/8u5-b13-1
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that openjdk-8 has entered the NEW queue I'm looking for a sponsor > to upload OpenJFX. The package can be checked out here: > > git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/openjfx > Hi Emmanuel, I'm already reviewing it. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: hawtjni 1.10-1 [RC]
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:10:30PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated the hawtjni source package and imported the latest upstream > release, 1.10. Now I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the package. This > update also fixes a security vulnerability (#708293). I am not sure if > it warrants a DSA since only Jansi is theoretically affected but I think > it should be fixed in a stable update at least. I will prepare a fix for > wheezy tomorrow. Hi Markus, I'll sponsor it. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
plan to update libcomplete-clojure to 0.2.3
Eugenio: Wolodja (babilen) and I are working to update the leiningen package and one of the deps we have is libcomplete-clojure 0.2.3 (currently 0.2.2 is in the archive). Let us know if you'd like to make the update. Separately babilen is proposing we move packages which list Maintainer as Debian Clojure Maintainers to Debian Java Maintainers. Regards, --Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/57dzjgglv8s@ficelle.info9.net
RFS: hawtjni 1.10-1 [RC]
Hi all, I updated the hawtjni source package and imported the latest upstream release, 1.10. Now I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the package. This update also fixes a security vulnerability (#708293). I am not sure if it warrants a DSA since only Jansi is theoretically affected but I think it should be fixed in a stable update at least. I will prepare a fix for wheezy tomorrow. Changelog: * Team upload. * Imported Upstream version 1.10. - Fixes /tmp race condition with arbitrary code execution. (Closes: #708293) * Use compat level 9 and require debhelper >= 9. * wrap-and-sort -sa * Remove obsolete "DM-Upload-Allowed" field. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 3.9.5. * Use canonical Vcs-URI. * Update get-orig-source target and add versioned dpkg-dev build-dependency to debian/control. Drop orig-tar.sh. * Update debian/copyright to copyright format 1.0. Mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hawtjni/hawtjni_1.10-1.dsc Git: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/hawtjni.git Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: gnome panel icon missing when launching jar file from command line
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 06:56 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Monday 23 June 2014 06:08 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have created a package from gnukhata (you can install it from >> people.debian.org/~praveen/gnukhata - I'm waiting for a tarball release >> from upstream to add it to team repo). When I launch gnukhata from the >> menu gnukhata icon is visible on the panel and it is shows as GNUKhata. >> But when I run gnukhata from the command line, gnome panel shows SWT >> with a default icon. How do I add this icon to the jar file? This is fixed upstream https://gitlab.com/pravi/deskapp/commit/b99956083a779fb90f0067b179294b4efab6f5db https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18941454/ubuntu-deb-installer-makes-all-java-applications-have-the-same-icon >> Thanks >> Praveen >> > > Once image is part of the jar file, we can call getResource to access > image and set it as icon. > > > javabuild: > gnukhata.jar src > > there is images directory inside src, but it doesn't get included in the > jar file. > > Is there a javahelper option I'm missing? I looked at javahelper > documentation but couldn't find it. > I created a build.xml file and now images are included in the jar file. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: eclipse-wtp 3.6.0-1
Dear java packagers, I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-wtp". * Package name: eclipse-wtp Version : 3.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Eclipse Web Tools Platform team * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/ * License : EPL-1.0 Section : devel It builds those binary packages: eclipse-wtp - Eclipse Web Tools Platform eclipse-wtp-xmltools - Eclipse XML tools and editors eclipse-wtp-webtools - Eclipse HTML, CSS and Javascript tools eclipse-wtp-xsl - Eclipse Extensible Stylesheet Language tools eclipse-wtp-ws - Eclipse web services tools eclipse-wtp-servertools - Eclipse WTP server tools w3c-xsd-xslt - XML Schema for W3C EXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) Package source code can be accessed at pkg-java git repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-wtp.git This is a new upstream release. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package into sid for me. Regards, Jakub -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bede2e.7030...@ktknet.cz
RFS: openjfx/8u5-b13-1
Hi all, Now that openjdk-8 has entered the NEW queue I'm looking for a sponsor to upload OpenJFX. The package can be checked out here: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/openjfx Thank you, Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53beace9.5000...@apache.org
Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)
Matthias has restarted the packaging from the latest version of openjdk-7 and merged some of my changes. The repository is on Launchpad: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openjdk/openjdk/openjdk8/files Now if I could be added to the OpenJDK Team I'd be happy to continue on this repository, but it's up to Matthias to decide. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53be58c1.6000...@apache.org
Re: Bug#708350: transition: java7
On 02/07/14 10:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/07/14 10:42, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I would like to keep openjdk-6 in unstable (with a RC issue so that it >> doesn't >> migrate) to prepare and test security updates. > > You may want to close #720911 then. There were just two packages in testing still depending on openjdk-6, so I removed them from testing together with openjdk-6. There is #675495 so it will not enter jessie again. Closing. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53be42d5.4050...@debian.org
