Re: Kernel 2.6.38 for squeeze
Am 17.04.11 06:01, schrieb Thomas Goirand: I have an old laptop with a bad internal WiFi board, so I bought a newer RaLink driver. To make it work, I had to add the option "rt2800usb - Include support for rt33xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL)" and "rt2800usb - Include support for rt35xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL)". These are not activated in your build (I've just checked). I believe that one of the most important point of running a backported kernel is to have such drivers for newer hardware. Could you please include the option above? The options to activate are as below: CONFIG_RT2800PCI_RT33XX CONFIG_RT2800PCI_RT35XX CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT33XX CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX If you include the above options, I'll be able to test your backport instead of the quick and dirty one that I did myself. That's something that should be done in the package itself, not just in the backport. I added the debian-kernel mailinglist to CC, but you should just file a bugreport against the package in unstable. Regards Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4daae8c9.60...@tretkowski.de
Re: [Debian-ha-maintainers] drbd in linux-2.6
Hi Dann, Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier: > 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of > the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package I finally found time to upload drbd8 with the -source package dropped. Do you intend to update the patch in linux-2.6 to drbd 8.3.8? If yes, please ping me, so I can update the drbd8-utils package (I think I should rename it to drbd-utils anyway) to 8.3.8 as well. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1276196017.1649.3.ca...@membata.intern.tretkowski.de
Re: [Debian-ha-maintainers] drbd in linux-2.6
Hi Dann, Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I'd appreciate it if an existing drbd user could test it. > > I didn't hear back from the drbd maintainers, but I did get some > testing feedback from a drbd user (thanks to Lukasz Oles, bcc'd) sorry for not coming back to you earlier, I was quite out-of-order for the last weeks because of a skiing accident. > My plan is therefore to: > 1) Commit these changes for inclusion in the next linux-2.6 upload > 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of > the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package No problem from my side. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1270633379.2354.4.ca...@moonlight.office.ip-exchange.de
Bug#511085: 60 seconds timeout for ipconfig is not enough
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92n Hi, in 0.92m, the timeout for ipconfig in scripts/functions was set to 60 seconds. This broke our iscsi-rootfs setups. It took me a while to debug this, but it seems that 60 seconds is not enough for switches which have spanning-tree enabled, they need some more time before they take up a port, in our case between 62 and 65 seconds. Please raise the timeout to 90 or 120 seconds. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Towards consensus of our usage of the Uploaders field
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:32 -0600, dann frazier wrote: [...] > Does this match other people's interpretations? Yes. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305330: starfire NIC driver on alpha
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 01:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Norbert said he was going to contact the upstream maintainer of the driver, > but there's no information about what came of that. Unfortunately I never got a reply. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Areca ARC1110 SATA RAID adapter
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 15:43 +0100, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > Or would it be possible to have the Areca driver backported to the > Debian 2.4.18 kernel? The Areca driver is part of the Debian kernel since 2.6.18-2. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410933: alpha: Could not allocate X bytes percpu data
* Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > Norbert, do you have any further thoughts on this? It's still on my radar, I hope to find some time to take a closer look at it next weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410933: alpha: Could not allocate X bytes percpu data
* Andras HORVATH wrote: > linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp still suffers from "Could not > allocate X bytes percpu data" when loading modules (for example, > xfs, eepro100 and e100). > > I've found this discussion (regarding the previous version, > linux-image-2.6.18-3-alpha-smp): > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-alpha@lists.debian.org/msg23999.html > > where this patch was suggested: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116593521703170&w=2 > > Could (the|a) fix please be included in the next release please? I'd > be all too happy to go back to distro kernels from self-built ones. Unfortunately, that patch doesn't really help: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/12/msg00565.html Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'
tags 409222 +moreinfo thanks * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both > ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each > plus several 5 second retries. Sounds like #391867 which was fixed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9, please retry with the latest kernel. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391867: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: confirmed : problem fixed
* Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > Targeting this kernel for etch would be appreciated. It is targeted for etch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r8239 - dists/sid/linux-latest-2.6/debian/templates
* Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:56:55AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > Modified: > >dists/sid/linux-latest-2.6/debian/templates/control.source.in > > Log: > > Add myself to uploaders. > > No. > > You are listed as alpha maintainer and the last regular config > update for new kernel versions was for 2.6.16. I don't know what you mean with "the last regular config update for new kernel versions was for 2.6.16", but I wanted to upload a new version of linux-latest-2.6, that's why I added myself as an uploader (otherwise the upload would be an NMU). > Please do that or really step back. Do _what_? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402823: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
* Michael Richters wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Michael Richters wrote: > > > I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian > > > kernels cannot access /dev/rtc: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] > > > # hwclock --show > > > select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out > > > > > > This same error occurs when the system is booting. > > > > Could you please retry the above command using the --directisa > > option? > > That works: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] > # hwclock --directisa --show > Fri Dec 22 09:52:27 2006 -0.565819 seconds Okay... as a temporary workaround, add the --directisa option to $HWCLOCKPARS in /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402823: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
* Michael Richters wrote: > I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels > cannot access /dev/rtc: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] > # hwclock --show > select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out > > This same error occurs when the system is booting. Could you please retry the above command using the --directisa option? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402823: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
* Michael Richters wrote: > I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels > cannot access /dev/rtc: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] > # hwclock --show > select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out > > This same error occurs when the system is booting. Same here on a Dell Optiplex GX620. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Frederik Schueler wrote: [...] > The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes. Is there a new schedule already? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330664: feed back: logs of crashing SMP kernel with QLA1040
* DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote: > Could not allocate 16 bytes percpu data 2.6.18-2 and newer include a workaround for this problem. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch > > It's on my TODO list for this weekend. This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was also reported by James Andrewartha on debian-alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391867: "port is slow to respond" on computer with SATA disk
* David Lazar wrote: > Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version > 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620. Could you please try if the kernel from http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/ fixes this problem? If it works for you, I'm going to add this patch to 2.6.18-9. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Holger Levsen wrote: > On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI > > which version of the patch is it? >2.0.2.2-rc6 and <2.0.2.2-rc9 has > a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic > while restarting vservers. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Frederik Schueler wrote: > > If you have any last minute changes which are that important they > > cannot wait for the first point release kernel, please list them > > here so we can discuss them. > > You may want to apply this patch. This problem was reported before > on debian-alpha > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch It's on my TODO list for this weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391867: "port is slow to respond" on computer with SATA disk
* David Lazar wrote: > Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version > 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620. Same hardware here, same problem. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13408 If this patch is part of 2.6.19 or 2.6.20, it should be added. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.18-5 schedule
* maximilian attems wrote: > nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies. Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.18-5 schedule
* maximilian attems wrote: > nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies. Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#397139: ftbfs alpha + ia64
* Falk Hueffner wrote: > This updated patch instead of alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch should > help: Are you going to add this patch to the next gcc-4.1 upload? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > - alpha gcc-4.1 migration It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r7634 - in dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian: . arch arch/alpha
* Bastian Blank wrote: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > Log: > > Switched alpha to gcc-4.1, bumped ABI revision. > > I don't see a discussion about the ABI name change. There was a discussion about switching alpha to gcc-4.1 about two weeks ago. > I revert that. Then you also need to revert the compiler switch on alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: > FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs > testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch Included in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 22:52]: > > * Jurij Smakov wrote: > > > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1? > > > > Yes. > > > > > Anybody can run a build and make the log available? > > > > Tomorrow. > > FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs > testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch Thanks, I'll give it a try. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
* Jurij Smakov wrote: > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1? Yes. > Anybody can run a build and make the log available? Tomorrow. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing linux-2.6 2.6.18-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > Linux 2.6.18 has been released, and it looks like we can do a first > upload today. Is there an .orig.tar.gz already? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
* maximilian attems wrote: > > It didn't fix the problem. > > one first shot would be to lower CONFIG_NR_CPUS in config.alpha-smp Tried that already. > or otherwise one could use a similar hack than the one proposed here: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115507250028744&w=2 Didn't work either. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
* Andras Horvath wrote: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new > > kernel currently... It didn't fix the problem. > if that's 2.6.17-2 then I'm sorry to report that -smp still doesn't > work (same scsi errors; see attached log). -generic works fine > though. Since smp on alpha seems quite broken currently, I'm going to drop the smp flavour with the next upload. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing 2.6.17-7
* Steve Langasek wrote: > Frederik Schueler wrote: > > #369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; > > fails to allocate percpu data > > The alpha smp kernel didn't work in sarge either. I would suggest > dropping this flavor until someone steps up to maintain it. Agreed, I'm going to drop the smp flavour in 2.6.17-10. > My alphas have always been UP, so I have no interest in it myself. Same for me, none of my alphas have more than one processor. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Andras Horvath wrote: > > but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems.. > > Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend. I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel currently... Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - compiler
* Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Bastian Blank wrote: > > > At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this > > > have to be solved quickly. > > > > Aha. > > Really? No. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to allocate percpu data
tags 369517 +confirmed thanks * Andras Horvath wrote: [...] > but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems.. Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - compiler
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this > > > have to be solved quickly. > > > > Aha. > > How is the alpha-vserver flavour coming along? ;-) It's still on my todo list, but due to some personal and job-related changes in my life I didn't find the time for it until now. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-2.6 - compiler
* Bastian Blank wrote: > The following arches did not yet switch to gcc-4.1: > - alpha Linux 2.6.17 doesn't compile with gcc 4.1 on alpha. > At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this have > to be solved quickly. Aha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn games
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After repeating my question a few times, I was able to deduce from > Bastian's one-word replies that he talked to someone else on > ftp-master team and was assured that the rejection of sparc binaries > was still possible. Bastian tends to ignore uncomfortable questions. Nothing new. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Frederik Schueler wrote: > > What is the status of the other architectures? > > > > alpha > > Test-build is running currently. 2.6.17 is ready on alpha, kernel built and works fine. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > What is the status of the other architectures? > > alpha Test-build is running currently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Overtake ITP
owner 304330 [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner 333695 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks * Bastian Blank wrote: > As there was no progress over 2 months in this two ITP and the > kernel team was asked to provide support for the kernel included > iscsi support, I overtake both ITP in favour of the kernel team. Next time just ask before doing something. Packages are ready for upload, and I'm going to upload them within the next days. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367570: unknown symbols in sound modules
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:47:43PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > > After the upgrade to 2.6.16 (from 2.6.15), I started seeing the > > following errors during boot: > > rerunning alsaconf fixes this. No, it doesn't, I'm still seeing these errors during boot after rerunning alsaconf. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367518: FTBFS in unstable: UTS Release version does not match the current version
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: > kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable. Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduling the first upload of 2.6.17-rc to experimental
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > I would like to upload 2.6.17-rc3 to experimental next monday, > this leaves 4 days for preparations. I have no chance to update the alpha configs before leaving to debconf6, and I'm not sure if alpha available there, so I don't know if I'm able to update the configs. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were > > > > uploaded. > > > > > > There was. > > > > Where? > > Bastian? I'm still interested where the uploads of 2.6.16-8 and > 2.6.16-9 have been announced. Bastian? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
python2.4-minimal dependency
Currently the linux-patch-debian-* and linux-support-* packages depending on python2.4-minimal. According[0] to Steve, the python-minimal package should not be used as a dependency by other packages. I think it's the same for python2.4-minimal. Norbert [0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/04/msg01063.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upload of 2.6.16-10
Hi, 2.6.16.10 was just released, hence I'd like to upload 2.6.16-10 as soon as possible (tomorrow), to fix the FTBFS on alpha. Any objections? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Bastian Blank wrote: > > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were > > > uploaded. > > > > There was. > > Where? Bastian? I'm still interested where the uploads of 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 have been announced. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which > > are available for alpha. > > Which sort of machine? EV56, 433 MHz, 192 MB RAM. > What happens if you use ccache? It faster? I haven't tried it recently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > Do we have the resources to check the next upload for all > architectures within a day or two? No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which are available for alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were > > uploaded. > > There was. Where? > > 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just > > wanted to fix it. > > 2.6.16.10 is scheduled for tomorrow. Does it fix the build problem on alpha? Otherwise I don't care. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uncoordinated upload
* Bastian Blank wrote: > Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice. I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded. 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted to fix it. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364206: linux-source-2.6.16: 2.6.16.6 patch to arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c references "for_each_possible_cpu"
tags 364206 +pending thanks * Nicholas Riley wrote: > The 2.6.16.6 patch contains a reference to "for_each_possible_cpu", > which is not present until 2.6.17. It should be replaced with > "for_each_cpu". This causes the package to fail to build on Alpha. Thanks, I added your patch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backports of linux-2.6 and dependencies
* Bastian Blank wrote: > The backports.org archive carries current versions of most needed > packages to run new kernels on Sarge but some of them (eg > initramfs-tools) are outdated, That's because backports.org is based on testing, not unstable. It's the same reason why 2.6.16 isn't available on backports.org yet, but I already prepared updated linux-image, udev and initramfs-tools backports on http://people.backports.org/~tretkowski/upload/ > some are seriously broken (linux-2.6 uses the same abiname as the > versions in sid/etch but provides a different abi due to the usage > of another compiler). Indeed. > The advantages of this solution, compared to the current status, are > automatic updates on new release of udev/klibc/whatever And automatic breakage when something in unstable breaks. That's why we're using testing. > To implement this solution, we need help from both the backport and > the kernel team: we need autobuilders and we need someone for every > arch to verify and approve the packages for the archive. An updated version of kernel-package (and make as it's dependency) is also needed. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.16 released -> 2.6.16-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > As of now, the following architectures still need updated configs: > > alpha Nope, buildd had no problems. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=linux-2.6&ver=2.6.16-1&arch=alpha&file=log Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: preparing 2.6.16-rc2-1
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > The svn branch to be used is dists/trunk/linux-2.6/ It's based on 2.6.15-3, what about the changes in -4, -5, -6 and the not yet uploaded -7? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6 ftbfs on testing
It's currently not possible to build linux-2.6 with testing, because 2.6.15-4 build-depends on kernel-package (>= 10.029), but testing has 9.008.4. Looks like the testing scripts don't consider build-depends. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352274: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: udevd-event errors during boot
reassign 352274 udev severity 352274 minor thanks * Mikael Nilsson wrote: > I'm getting a *long* list of udev errors on boot, like: > > udevd-event[xxx]: run_program: exec of program '/lib/udev/udev_run_hotplugd' > failed > > and so on. This is a (harmless) issue in udev, reassigning. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel security patch howto ?
* Freels, James D. wrote: > The way the patches are made available, one must apply the patch to > the entire level zero (2.6.15) source. Is there a way to > incrementally patch to minimize the compile time? You could use interdiff (from the patchutils package) to create an incremental patch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble with kernel 2.6.15
* Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote: > I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd with > yaird, so maybe some sysfs poking by yaird is the cause. This seems > very bizarre. I just uploaded a backport of klibc and initramfs-tools, could you try to rebuilt the initrd with initramfs-tools? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347186: linux-image-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: garbled Matrox framebuffer
* Sven Luther wrote: > matroxfb is problematic, since the matroxfb maintainer didn't agree > on the 2.4->2.6 fbdev API change, and thus things broke all over, > and has a huge patch that reverses the new fbdev stuff. At least > this was the case a year or two back at least. Last time I tried matroxfb on alpha (IIRC it was with 2.5.68), this patch helped to get it working correctly: ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/linux/matrox-latest/ I thought that patch was integrated upstream already, but there's a patch against 2.6.15-rc4, so I don't think it was integrated already. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346173: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: kernel BUG at mm/swap.c:49! (possibly fglrx related)
* James McCaw wrote: > Since upgrading to kernel 2.6.15 (from 2.6.14) I now get this kernel > message consistently when running fgl_glxgears (provided by fglrx > driver package) or standard glxgears. It may be an error with the > binary fglrx driver, but given the specific reference to > mm/swap.c:49 I thought I should post the bug report here. As you can > see, below is 4th time since reboot that I ran a GL program: Sounds like bug #345040... please retry with this updated package of flgrx-driver: http://people.debian.org/~nobse/fglrx-driver/ Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339080: Frequent crash in handle_IRQ_event on alpha with kernel 2.6
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > Alpha was switched to the generic irq framework a few hours ago in > the git-tree. I'm thinking about adding that patch to 2.6.15-2. http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=eee45269b0f5979c70bc151c6c2f4e5f4f5ababe http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0595bf3bca9d9932a05b06dd438f40f01d27cd33 Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339080: Frequent crash in handle_IRQ_event on alpha with kernel 2.6
tags 339080 +pending thanks * Uwe Schindler wrote: > Looking through the kernel surces of the different architectures I > have seen that almost all architectures use the same irq.c code. In > newer kernels (> 2.6.8) for example x86, ia64, amd64, powerpc, > parisc change to a generic IRQ handler code. The others are not yet > changed, others have different IRQ handlers. Alpha was switched to the generic irq framework a few hours ago in the git-tree. I'm thinking about adding that patch to 2.6.15-2. Thanks for your time, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346141: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7-smp: the package doesn't configure
reassign 346141 yaird severity 346141 important merge 341524 346141 thanks * Fabien COUTANT wrote: > You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version > 2.6.15-1-k7-smp) on a machine currently running kernel version > 2.4.31-k7-smp. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341524 In short, yaird doesn't work on kernel 2.4. Known limitation in yaird, and not a bug in the kernel. As a workaround, update to 2.6.8-2-k7-smp first. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346107: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: missing acpi sleep support
severity 346107 normal reassign 346107 klaptopdaemon merge 337502 346107 thanks * Jim Hague wrote: > On Thursday 05 Jan 2006 18:25, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote: > > > after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore > > > (/proc/acpi/sleep is missing). > > > > What's wrong with /sys/power/state? > > Currently klaptopdaemon for one only works with /proc/acpi/sleep. In > this particular case it seems (Bug#337502) a fix will be coming in > the KDE 3.5 packages. Not a kernel bug, reassigning to klaptopdaemon and merging with #337502. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346107: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: missing acpi sleep support
* Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote: > after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore > (/proc/acpi/sleep is missing). What's wrong with /sys/power/state? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bits from the release team
* Gabor Gombas wrote: > Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for > Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases, > and this is what upstream needs the most. We already had some -rc releases in experimental for 2.6.14 and 2.6.15. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing 2.6.15-rc7 for experimental
* Frederik Schueler wrote: > The following architectures need their configs still to be > updated: > > alpha Current svn (and rc7.experimental1 too) builds fine on alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342931: doesn't work on alpha
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.42 Severity: normal I gave initramfs-tools a new try on my alpha, but it failed to create a working initrd: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! The qla1280 module is the right one for my rootfilesystem, the ext3 module is also loaded. Using break=mount: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Using break=init: SCSI subsystem initialized qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8 scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Firmware version: 7.65.06, Driver version 3.25 Vendor: MICROPModel: 3391WSRev: X502 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Wide SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 17780058 512-byte hdwr sectors (9103 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Please ask if you need more informations. I'm really interested to get initramfs-tools working on alpha, because it's not possible to upgrade from a running 2.4 kernel to a 2.6 kernel with yaird. Regards, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Proposed Kernel Updates for Sid: Round 1
* Horms wrote: > * Recently fixed, in the most need of testing > kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha > kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha I'm going to take a look at those next weekend. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ABI changes on specific architectures only
Hi, I switched the alpha build from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.0 in the not yet uploaded 2.6.14-3, and Jurij said he'll also switch sparc from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.0. How to handle these ABI changes for specific architectures? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: i2o controller probe failed err -110
* Bill Gatliff wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 > Version: 2.6.12-10 Can you please give 2.6.14-2 a try? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [kernel] r4732 - in dists: sid trunk
* Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary) > > moves. They add unnecessary confusion and I (and likely others) > > find it frustrating. > > Hu? It disappeared without notice. It was announced in #debian-kernel. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337497: initramfs-tools: [powerpc] doesn't work on pegasos - ALERT! /dev/hda1 does
* Sven Luther wrote: > ALERT!: /dev/hda1 does not exist, Dropping to a shell! I saw the same on my notebook (i386) when using MODULES=dep in initramfs.conf. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit messages
* Horms wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:32:05AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > would it be possible to apply the following patchlet to > > /srv/svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/hooks/post-commit? [...] > Sure, though I don't seem to be able to check hooks/post-commit out > :( You have to login at costa and edit it there directly. I already did that. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337072: linux-image-2.6.14-1-386: XFS Quota Support missing
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Kim Hansen wrote: > > The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason > > (bug in configfile) and fix is explained here: > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html > > Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's not worth to > add a new patch to svn yet. It's indeed in the queue for 2.6.14.1. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333842: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333842: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-2)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now there is shown as the content of > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-1-686/.extraversion > 2.6.14-1-686 > > This is the full version, rather than the persumably desired > EXTRAVERSION component This is fixed in 2.6.14-2 from unstable. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337072: linux-image-2.6.14-1-386: XFS Quota Support missing
* Kim Hansen wrote: > The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason > (bug in configfile) and fix is explained here: > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's not worth to add a new patch to svn yet. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel package
* roberto wrote: > i am looking for the latest downloadable kernel-source-2.6.x package > for sarge, but i did not find anything later than 2.6.8 in > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages.en-gb.html#search_packages The kernel-source package is architecture independent, you can use the one from unstable: http://debian.n-ix.net/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.14_2.6.14-1_all.deb Regards, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: udev issue
* Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > $ -depmod -a > zsh: command not found: -depmod > > if it is a shell command that won't work. >From the GNU make documentation: , | To ignore errors in a command line, write a `-' at the beginning of | the line's text (after the initial tab). ` http://www.cs.utah.edu/dept/old/texinfo/make/make_toc.html#SEC46 Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: x86 kernel flavours was: 2.6.14-1 in incoming, status and future
* Anand Kumria wrote: > I can recall quite a number of incident where i've moved a disk from > an athlon k6 to k7 (and vice versa) and found random failures until > I picked the right kernel package. Hu? Running a k6 kernel on a k7 shouldn't be a problem. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.14-1 in incoming, status and future
* Sven Luther wrote: > but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few > hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the > build success, we can do -2. Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds fine. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
* Horms wrote: > I've put the packages in > http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4/ > incase they dissapear from other sources. The ABI revision in the version number is missing in those packages. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
* Horms wrote: > I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and > assuming the i386 build completes I will upload. I already know it > doesn't compile on HPPA, and I expect other FTBFS. It will fail on alpha too, I hope I'll find time next weekend to update the configs. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: volatile backport
* Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Andres Salomon wrote: > > > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is > > > to not have it require any further backports. > > > > Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for > > backports.org, but I used a backported kernel-package for the > > build. > > > > http://www.backports.org/pending/linux-2.6/ > > Is this the same backported kernel-package that i provide? Or your > own stuff? It's a separate backport of kernel-package. > What do you do for udev and futur yaird/initramfs ? There's also a udev backport. And I need to add a yaird/initramfs backport when I add add the backport of 2.6.13. > How does backports.org work? Is it autobuilt? If yes we could use > that and forget about volatile for now. Not yet, but Joerg Jaspert is working on the setup currently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: volatile backport
* Andres Salomon wrote: > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to > not have it require any further backports. Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for backports.org, but I used a backported kernel-package for the build. http://www.backports.org/pending/linux-2.6/ Regards, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.13 kernel
* Allyn, Mark A wrote: > Does anyone know what the plans are for 2.6.13, which is now > available from www.kernel.org? I notice that unstable (sid) is still > at 2.6.12. http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/09/msg00458.html > I have just subscribed to this email list; I apologize if this > question was repeated recently. Here's the list archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/ Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#328424: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: does not update grub/menu.lst
* Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several > times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to > manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive > any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched. Have you tried to run 'update-grub' by hand? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328424: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: does not update grub/menu.lst
* Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several > times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to > manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive > any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched. Have you tried to run 'update-grub' by hand? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > 2.4.27 is building. > > And done: > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/sparc/2.4.27 Works fine on my sparc64. Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Horms wrote: > > 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security > > 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security > > Builds finished on alpha. http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/alpha/sarge/ Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324008: Fails to compile with gcc 4.0
* Holger Jaekel wrote: > Building kernel 2.6.8 with gcc 4.0.1 gives an error. Package > dependencies should be changed. 2.6.8 is already marked for removal from unstable. Please use 2.6.12, which works fine with gcc 4.0. Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* Horms wrote: > 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security > 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security Builds finished on alpha. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
* Horms wrote: > I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed for > some m68k flavours (mac users who want a working keyboard IRRC). 2.4.27 is also still needed for the alpha installer. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.12 upload
* Andres Salomon wrote: > - there are 3 patches that were in 2.6.11 that have been dropped due to > lack of interest; sparc, alpha, and powerpc folks should determine > their value, at some point. The dropped alpha patch is no longer required with 2.6.12, at least on my systems the kernel works fine without it. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine
severity 311357 grave thanks * Alan W. Irwin wrote: > This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module > for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel. Sounds like a RC bug, so I'm setting it's severity to grave. > I "upgraded" today from kernel-image-2.6.8.2-386 version 2.6.8-13 to > 2.6.8-16, and my network card (D-link 10/100 DFE-530TX) that is > controlled by the via-rhine module immediately quit working Too bad this bug didn't get realized when -16 was in unstable... looks like it's too late to fix this for 3.1r0. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel updates accepted for sarge
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Steve Langasek wrote: > > If there are updates to unstable pending for any other > > architectures, please let debian-release know. > > I'm currently compiling updates for alpha 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, > upload tomorrow. Uploaded, please approve for sarge. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
