Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so
* Ben Collins | It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname | libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by | ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without | the -dev package installed. So reassigning the bug against libsocks-dev is the right thing to do? Thanks! -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upstream new version
Am 30.03.01 um 02:08:47 schrieb Timshel Knoll: On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: - copy the debian/changelog file and add a new entry there. (is there a tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do ?) debchange (in the devscripts package). Or debian-changelog-mode in emacs (from the dpkg-dev-el package) Or, of course, the debian-changelog mode for vim, which will be part of Vim 6.0 (it's already in the beta versions). Bye, Mike -- |=| Michael Piefel[EMAIL PROTECTED] |=| Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin http://www.piefel.de |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upstream new version
Michael Piefel wrote: Or debian-changelog-mode in emacs (from the dpkg-dev-el package) Or, of course, the debian-changelog mode for vim, which will be part of Vim 6.0 (it's already in the beta versions). I smell a feature competition coming on... (just joking :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
strange apt-get problem
I've made potato versions of my webmin packages available at an aptable archive. One of those, webmin-ssl has a depends line like this: Depends: perl, debconf,libnet-ssleay-perl,libauthen-pam-perl I'm getting reports when people do an apt-get install webmin-ssl, they get the following error message. Even though they have debconf, and libnet-ssleay-perl installed: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: webmin-ssl: Depends: debconf Depends: libnet-ssleay-perl but it is not going to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Q1: Why is apt-get refusing to install libnet-ssleay-perl? Q2: Even after manually install the dependencies, why does apt-get refuse to install webmin-ssl? Any insights welcome. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Build-Depends
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:46:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? build it in a clean chroot, after getting all the files in build-essential and those listed in build-depends. if your compile fails, add the missing package to the chroot, and the build-depends line. continue until it compiles -john -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs-- can't remember initial vendor tag
How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial vendor tag that I used to import previous versions! -- Chris Ruffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP signature
Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so
* Ben Collins | It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname | libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by | ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without | the -dev package installed. So reassigning the bug against libsocks-dev is the right thing to do? Thanks! -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
Re: upstream new version
Am 30.03.01 um 02:08:47 schrieb Timshel Knoll: On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: - copy the debian/changelog file and add a new entry there. (is there a tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do ?) debchange (in the devscripts package). Or debian-changelog-mode in emacs (from the dpkg-dev-el package) Or, of course, the debian-changelog mode for vim, which will be part of Vim 6.0 (it's already in the beta versions). Bye, Mike -- |=| Michael Piefel[EMAIL PROTECTED] |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin http://www.piefel.de |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: upstream new version
Michael Piefel wrote: Or debian-changelog-mode in emacs (from the dpkg-dev-el package) Or, of course, the debian-changelog mode for vim, which will be part of Vim 6.0 (it's already in the beta versions). I smell a feature competition coming on... (just joking :-)
strange apt-get problem
I've made potato versions of my webmin packages available at an aptable archive. One of those, webmin-ssl has a depends line like this: Depends: perl, debconf,libnet-ssleay-perl,libauthen-pam-perl I'm getting reports when people do an apt-get install webmin-ssl, they get the following error message. Even though they have debconf, and libnet-ssleay-perl installed: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: webmin-ssl: Depends: debconf Depends: libnet-ssleay-perl but it is not going to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Q1: Why is apt-get refusing to install libnet-ssleay-perl? Q2: Even after manually install the dependencies, why does apt-get refuse to install webmin-ssl? Any insights welcome. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends
Hi, I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm missing some. What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! pgp362ymmuIXd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Build-Depends
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:46:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? build it in a clean chroot, after getting all the files in build-essential and those listed in build-depends. if your compile fails, add the missing package to the chroot, and the build-depends line. continue until it compiles -john
RE: Build-Depends
On 02-Apr-2001 Carlos Laviola wrote: Hi, I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm missing some. What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? best thing is to build in a chroot. There is a package called debootstrap which will help with this.
cvs-- can't remember initial vendor tag
How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial vendor tag that I used to import previous versions! -- Chris Ruffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpW53pCDhFar.pgp Description: PGP signature
