Re: Sponsor sought for resolvconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 31 December 2003 22:04, Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a new version of resolvconf ready but my current sponsor isn't finding the time to upload it. Is there a resolvconf-using DD out there who can help? Where are your files? If no-one can help before then, I should be able to have a look tomorrow evening. Paul Cupis - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj/zU/cACgkQIzuKV+SHX/m36ACeIIODoyMI7QciJKXRCDi51+9G T0AAmgOH6aauHc/ScBG3awFKBu4iGFqs =jHyJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
openMSX: opengl builtin or split package?
Hi, openMSX supports opengl output, which improves its quality considerably. Should I compile it with opengl support (that would make it run-depend on xlibmesa-gl, right?) or should I split it in two packages, an openmsx and an openmsx-opengl? The first scenario requires everybody to get opengl libs even if the user can't run that (like me, actually). He/She will just get strange error messages if h/she tries to run it with opengl output. The second would be a tuff job to a beginner like me. Not that I am afraid of challanges, though :) Thanks in Advance. Yves 'nictuku'.
RFS: update to libchipcard
Hi. I'm maintaining the libchipcard package and would be very pleased if someone could sponsor a the following bug-fix update: libchipcard (0.9.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * Don't let father (in daemon mode) remove pid file after spawn. (closes: #225137) * Include copyright in copyright. -- Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:02:25 +0100 libchipcard (0.9.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * Improved package description spelling. * Bump standards version. * Add reload to init.d-script. (Suggested by Joerg Sommer.) * Lower priority of -dev-package to extra (policy 2.5 and dependency on libpcsclite-dev). -- Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:15:36 +0100 Further information on libchipcard can be obtained by executing apt-cache show libchipcard20, one notable indirect dependency is gnucash. I don't think I need to mention it's lintian/linda cleanness (save the standards version too new for the former). Of course any suggestions for improvement are welcome as well. Kind Regards Thomas pgpEU9B1g7MNn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: update to libchipcard
Thomas Viehmann wrote: [an attempt at an elaborate sponsorship request] If I could only learn to include the URL: http://vman.de/debian/libchipcard/. Cheers Thomas pgpNyoyUiBBVH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pbuilder ${shlibs:Depends} yields libc6-2.2.4-4 ???
Rene Engelhard wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: Why does building a package with pbuilder generate the seemingly wrong version for Depends: of 2.2.4-4 regarldless that 2.2.5-11.5 is the installed library? What am I doing wrong? Nothing. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo chroot chroots/stable cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs libc 6 libc6 (= 2.2.4-4) Thanks for taking the time to answer. I am not unappreciative but unfortunately I did not find this very informative to me. Even that reference to the libc6.shlibs file, while correct, was obtuse to me. So before the mailling list archive gets split into the new month I decided I would get another in with an update with an expansion of this topic. Digging through the dpkg-shlibdeps perl script and I can see where it is reading the file you referenced. Therefore it appears that shared library packages can specify an ABI version separate from their installed package version. The glibc package specifies 2.2.4-4 as the ABI so that even though version 2.2.5-11.5 is installed. The installed value is overridden with the libc6 package specified version from the shlibs file. Digging into the glibc package I see that they manually set the ABI version to 2.2.4-4 in the debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk file. Now knowing a little more about what to look for I was able to locate documentation on the process. Here is the pointer. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-shlibdeps Thanks again, Bob pgps4sIwm0slr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Sponsor sought for resolvconf
I have a new version of resolvconf ready but my current sponsor isn't finding the time to upload it. Is there a resolvconf-using DD out there who can help? -- Thomas Hood
Re: openMSX: opengl builtin or split package?
* Yves Junqueira M. Teixeira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, openMSX supports opengl output, which improves its quality considerably. Should I compile it with opengl support (that would make it run-depend on xlibmesa-gl, right?) or should I split it in two packages, an openmsx and an openmsx-opengl? The first scenario requires everybody to get opengl libs even if the user can't run that (like me, actually). He/She will just get strange error messages if h/she tries to run it with opengl output. I'm in favour of having two packages so people without opengl support can still use openmsx. -- Goedson Teixeira Paixao pgphVETLcbQOP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sponsor sought for resolvconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 31 December 2003 22:04, Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a new version of resolvconf ready but my current sponsor isn't finding the time to upload it. Is there a resolvconf-using DD out there who can help? Where are your files? If no-one can help before then, I should be able to have a look tomorrow evening. Paul Cupis - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj/zU/cACgkQIzuKV+SHX/m36ACeIIODoyMI7QciJKXRCDi51+9G T0AAmgOH6aauHc/ScBG3awFKBu4iGFqs =jHyJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
