Bug#996199: RFS: filezilla/3.56.0-1 [Team] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla": * Package name: filezilla Version : 3.56.0-1 Upstream Author : Tim Kosse * URL : https://filezilla-project.org/ * License : CC0-1.0, MIT, BSD-like, GPL-2+, permissive * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/filezilla Section : net It builds those binary packages: filezilla - Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client filezilla-common - Architecture independent files for filezilla To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/filezilla/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/filezilla/filezilla_3.56.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: filezilla (3.56.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload * New upstream version 3.56.0 * Update libgnutls28-dev Build-Depends to >= 3.7.0 Note: This will need libfilezilla21 (0.34.0-1) to be processed via new queue before upload. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** WWW: https://kathenas.org Twitter: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#996199: RFS: filezilla/3.56.0-1 [Team] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:35:32AM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote: > * Package name: filezilla >Version : 3.56.0-1 > filezilla (3.56.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Team upload >* New upstream version 3.56.0 >* Update libgnutls28-dev Build-Depends to >= 3.7.0 > > Note: This will need libfilezilla21 (0.34.0-1) to be processed via new queue > before upload. Then this RFS is not actionable yet; please remove "moreinfo" once the situation changes. I see there are DLLs bundled within the source tarball. While both of them are freely licensed, I see no entry for the NSIS project (UAC.dll) in the copyright file -- and the other one (nsis_appid.dll) requires MSVC to recompile. I don't see a need to remove them, but could you please at least document their provenience? Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Polexit is brewing? Let's skip that smelly Polsha and reactivate ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the Free City of Danzig and/or reapply to the Hansa. ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#996199: RFS: filezilla/3.56.0-1 [Team] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 21:20 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:35:32AM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote: > > * Package name: filezilla > >Version : 3.56.0-1 > > filezilla (3.56.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Team upload > >* New upstream version 3.56.0 > >* Update libgnutls28-dev Build-Depends to >= 3.7.0 > > > > Note: This will need libfilezilla21 (0.34.0-1) to be processed via new > > queue before upload. > > Then this RFS is not actionable yet; please remove "moreinfo" once the > situation changes. > > I see there are DLLs bundled within the source tarball. While both of them > are freely licensed, I see no entry for the NSIS project (UAC.dll) in the > copyright file -- and the other one (nsis_appid.dll) requires MSVC to > recompile. > > I don't see a need to remove them, but could you please at least document > their provenience? > > > Meow! Hi, libfilezilla 034.0-1 is now in unstable and filezilla can be processed. I will look at adding info regarding NSIS files in a future release. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** WWW: https://kathenas.org Twitter: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part