Re: Fwd: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 11.01.02: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in Abuse

2002-11-04 Thread Peter Cordes
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:36:36PM +, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Phillip Hofmeister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What's this about? _
> 
> 
> > 2. Remove the setuid bit from the XaoS binary by executing the
> > following command:
> > 
> > # chmod -s /usr/lib/games/abuse/abuse.*
> 
> (noticing -rwsr-xr-x root root 37 Jul 27 17:34 /usr/bin/xaos)
>  ^

 Yikes.  I recommend:
dpkg-statoverride --update --add root root 755 /usr/bin/xaos
 This is permanent across upgrades, removals, and reinstalls of the xaos
package.  (--update tells statoverride to effect the change itself.)

-- 
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ;  e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)

"The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
 Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack
 my day so wretchedly into small pieces!" -- Plautus, 200 BC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: DSA 187-1 and FrontPage extensions

2002-11-04 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:17:46AM +0200, George Karaolides wrote:

> 1. The debs I build from the Debian apache source package come out with
> version number 1.3.26-0woody1 whereas the debs released to cover this
> vulnerability have version 1.3.26-0woody3.  Why is this?  Have the source
> packages not been updated?

You must have downloaded an older source package.  Use the URLs in the
advisory to get 1.3.26-0woody3.

> 2. (Related) Are the binary debs I build from the current debian
> 1.3.26 source package safe from this vulnerability?

You should use the latest package from security.debian.org.

-- 
 - mdz



Re: DSA 187-1 and FrontPage extensions

2002-11-04 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:17:46AM +0200, George Karaolides wrote:

> 1. The debs I build from the Debian apache source package come out with
> version number 1.3.26-0woody1 whereas the debs released to cover this
> vulnerability have version 1.3.26-0woody3.  Why is this?  Have the source
> packages not been updated?

You must have downloaded an older source package.  Use the URLs in the
advisory to get 1.3.26-0woody3.

> 2. (Related) Are the binary debs I build from the current debian
> 1.3.26 source package safe from this vulnerability?

You should use the latest package from security.debian.org.

-- 
 - mdz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




DSA 187-1 and FrontPage extensions

2002-11-04 Thread George Karaolides

Hi all,

I run a FrontPage-enabled apache server on Woody.  I apply the 1.3.22
FrontPage patch which is claimed by rtr.com to work with versions 1.3.22,
1.3.24, 1.3.26 and 1.3.27 to the Debian Apache sources and then build
Debian binary packages.  I append the procedure I use to do this below.
The server has been running OK so far.

I have two questions:

1. The debs I build from the Debian apache source package come out with
version number 1.3.26-0woody1 whereas the debs released to cover this
vulnerability have version 1.3.26-0woody3.  Why is this?  Have the source
packages not been updated?

2. (Related) Are the binary debs I build from the current debian
1.3.26 source package safe from this vulnerability?

Does anyone have any input?  Please copy me directly as I am not
subscribed to the list.


Debian Apache FrontPage Patch and Compile Procedure
---

The patch is at ftp://ftp.rtr.com/pub/fp-patch-apache_1.3.22.Z

To patch the server I follow the following procedure:

Download and gunzip patch file fp-patch-apache_1.3.22.Z

apt-get source apache
cd apache-1.3.26/upstream/tarballs
tar xvzf apache_1.3.26.tar.gz
cd apache_1.3.26
patch -p1 fp-patch-apache_1.3.22
cd apache-1.3.26
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
cd ..
dpkg -i apache-common
dpkg -i apache


Best regards,

George Karaolides




Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 187-1] New Apache packages fix several vulnerabilities

2002-11-04 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:55:53AM -0500, andrew lattis wrote:

> i'm assuming these also apply to apache-ssl, but there doesn't appear to
> be a new package. is it still in the works or is apache-ssl not
> vulnerable?

The former.

-- 
 - mdz



DSA 187-1 and FrontPage extensions

2002-11-04 Thread George Karaolides

Hi all,

I run a FrontPage-enabled apache server on Woody.  I apply the 1.3.22
FrontPage patch which is claimed by rtr.com to work with versions 1.3.22,
1.3.24, 1.3.26 and 1.3.27 to the Debian Apache sources and then build
Debian binary packages.  I append the procedure I use to do this below.
The server has been running OK so far.

I have two questions:

1. The debs I build from the Debian apache source package come out with
version number 1.3.26-0woody1 whereas the debs released to cover this
vulnerability have version 1.3.26-0woody3.  Why is this?  Have the source
packages not been updated?

2. (Related) Are the binary debs I build from the current debian
1.3.26 source package safe from this vulnerability?

Does anyone have any input?  Please copy me directly as I am not
subscribed to the list.


Debian Apache FrontPage Patch and Compile Procedure
---

The patch is at ftp://ftp.rtr.com/pub/fp-patch-apache_1.3.22.Z

To patch the server I follow the following procedure:

Download and gunzip patch file fp-patch-apache_1.3.22.Z

apt-get source apache
cd apache-1.3.26/upstream/tarballs
tar xvzf apache_1.3.26.tar.gz
cd apache_1.3.26
patch -p1 fp-patch-apache_1.3.22
cd apache-1.3.26
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
cd ..
dpkg -i apache-common
dpkg -i apache


Best regards,

George Karaolides



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 187-1] New Apache packages fix several vulnerabilities

2002-11-04 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:55:53AM -0500, andrew lattis wrote:

> i'm assuming these also apply to apache-ssl, but there doesn't appear to
> be a new package. is it still in the works or is apache-ssl not
> vulnerable?

The former.

-- 
 - mdz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 187-1] New Apache packages fix several vulnerabilities

2002-11-04 Thread andrew lattis
i'm assuming these also apply to apache-ssl, but there doesn't appear to
be a new package. is it still in the works or is apache-ssl not
vulnerable?

thanks,
andrew

On 2002/11/04 04:26:57PM +0100, Mon, Martin Schulze wrote:
> 
> Package: apache
> Vulnerability  : several
> Problem-Type   : remote, local
> Debian-specific: no
> CVE Id : CAN-2002-0839 CAN-2002-0840 CAN-2002-0843 CAN-2001-0131 
> CAN-2002-1233
> BugTraq ID : 5847 5884 5887


pgpVhafO4LTXN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: tiger reporting thousands of files with "undefined groups ownership"

2002-11-04 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Carlos Sousa said:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:56:34 +0100 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > > 
> > > # pwck -r
> > > user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
> > > user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
> > > user majordom: directory /usr/lib/majordomo does not exist
> > > user postgres: directory /var/lib/postgres does not exist
> > > user msql: directory /var/lib/msql does not exist
> > > user list: directory /var/list does not exist
> > > user gnats: directory /var/lib/gnats/gnats-db does not exist
> > > user telnetd: directory /usr/lib/telnetd does not exist
> > > user mysql: directory /var/lib/mysql does not exist
> > > pwck: no changes
> > 
> > Should this be there? I'm pretty sure there should be there.
> > $ dpkg -S /var/lib/mysql
> > mysql-server: /var/lib/mysql
> 
> Actually, the msql entry also seems suspicious:
> 
> $ dpkg -S /var/lib/msql
> dpkg: /var/lib/msql not found.
> 
> What is it doing there? I haven't mini SQL installed, I couldn't even
> find mini SQL in the Debian packages... Should it be safe to remove msql
> from passwd/shadow?
> 
> > If you have mysql-server installed (and I bet you do since you
> > have the 'mysql' user) then that directory might have been lost in the
> > crash.
> 
> I shouldn't have mysql installed.
> 
> $ dpkg -l 'mysql*'
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: 
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name   VersionDescription
> +++-==-==-
> un  mysql   (no description available)
> un  mysql-base  (no description available)
> pn  mysql-client(no description available)
> ii  mysql-common   3.23.52-2  mysql database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql
> un  mysql-dev   (no description available)
> un  mysql-devel (no description available)
> pn  mysql-doc   (no description available)
> pn  mysql-gpl-clie  (no description available)
> un  mysql-gpl-dev   (no description available)
> pn  mysql-gpl-doc   (no description available)
> pn  mysql-manual(no description available)
> pn  mysql-navigato  (no description available)
> pn  mysql-server(no description available)
> pn  mysqltcl(no description available)
> 
> Hmm, bit of a mess here...
> 
> Why do I have a few mysql packages in a Desired=Unknown state? How
> could I upgrade the to a Desired=Purged state?
> 
> Anyway, the avalanche of files reported by tiger surely cannot be
> totally explained by this mysql breakage...

'un' means that it is not installed, and you've never tried to install
it, unlike 'pn' which means that you once installed it, but later purged
it.  It looks like you have had a mysql server/client setup on this box
at one point in the past, but the passwd/group entries for mysql were 
never removed, probably because you weren't removing mysql-common at 
the same time.  None of this looks like a real problem.  Sorry I can't
help with your real problem, but this doesn't look like it.

Steve

-- 
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free.
-- Linus Torvalds


pgpJ0UxmwPCPh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 187-1] New Apache packages fix several vulnerabilities

2002-11-04 Thread andrew lattis
i'm assuming these also apply to apache-ssl, but there doesn't appear to
be a new package. is it still in the works or is apache-ssl not
vulnerable?

thanks,
andrew

On 2002/11/04 04:26:57PM +0100, Mon, Martin Schulze wrote:
> 
> Package: apache
> Vulnerability  : several
> Problem-Type   : remote, local
> Debian-specific: no
> CVE Id : CAN-2002-0839 CAN-2002-0840 CAN-2002-0843 CAN-2001-0131 
>CAN-2002-1233
> BugTraq ID : 5847 5884 5887



msg07614/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Fwd: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 11.01.02: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in Abuse

2002-11-04 Thread David Wright
Quoting Phillip Hofmeister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> From: "David Endler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]In a default abuse installation in
> Debian Linux, both abuse.console and abuse.x11R6 can be used in
> exploitation; both files are set group id games, and abuse.console is
> set user id root.

What's this about? _


> 2. Remove the setuid bit from the XaoS binary by executing the
> following command:
> 
> # chmod -s /usr/lib/games/abuse/abuse.*

(noticing -rwsr-xr-x root root 37 Jul 27 17:34 /usr/bin/xaos)
 ^

Cheers,

-- 
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: +44 1908 653 739  Fax: +44 1908 655 151
Snail:  David Wright, Earth Science Dept., Milton Keynes, England, MK7 6AA
Disclaimer:   These addresses are only for reaching me, and do not signify
official stationery. Views expressed here are either my own or plagiarised.



Re: tiger reporting thousands of files with "undefined groups ownership"

2002-11-04 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Carlos Sousa said:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:56:34 +0100 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > > 
> > > # pwck -r
> > > user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
> > > user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
> > > user majordom: directory /usr/lib/majordomo does not exist
> > > user postgres: directory /var/lib/postgres does not exist
> > > user msql: directory /var/lib/msql does not exist
> > > user list: directory /var/list does not exist
> > > user gnats: directory /var/lib/gnats/gnats-db does not exist
> > > user telnetd: directory /usr/lib/telnetd does not exist
> > > user mysql: directory /var/lib/mysql does not exist
> > > pwck: no changes
> > 
> > Should this be there? I'm pretty sure there should be there.
> > $ dpkg -S /var/lib/mysql
> > mysql-server: /var/lib/mysql
> 
> Actually, the msql entry also seems suspicious:
> 
> $ dpkg -S /var/lib/msql
> dpkg: /var/lib/msql not found.
> 
> What is it doing there? I haven't mini SQL installed, I couldn't even
> find mini SQL in the Debian packages... Should it be safe to remove msql
> from passwd/shadow?
> 
> > If you have mysql-server installed (and I bet you do since you
> > have the 'mysql' user) then that directory might have been lost in the
> > crash.
> 
> I shouldn't have mysql installed.
> 
> $ dpkg -l 'mysql*'
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name   VersionDescription
> +++-==-==-
> un  mysql   (no description available)
> un  mysql-base  (no description available)
> pn  mysql-client(no description available)
> ii  mysql-common   3.23.52-2  mysql database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql
> un  mysql-dev   (no description available)
> un  mysql-devel (no description available)
> pn  mysql-doc   (no description available)
> pn  mysql-gpl-clie  (no description available)
> un  mysql-gpl-dev   (no description available)
> pn  mysql-gpl-doc   (no description available)
> pn  mysql-manual(no description available)
> pn  mysql-navigato  (no description available)
> pn  mysql-server(no description available)
> pn  mysqltcl(no description available)
> 
> Hmm, bit of a mess here...
> 
> Why do I have a few mysql packages in a Desired=Unknown state? How
> could I upgrade the to a Desired=Purged state?
> 
> Anyway, the avalanche of files reported by tiger surely cannot be
> totally explained by this mysql breakage...

'un' means that it is not installed, and you've never tried to install
it, unlike 'pn' which means that you once installed it, but later purged
it.  It looks like you have had a mysql server/client setup on this box
at one point in the past, but the passwd/group entries for mysql were 
never removed, probably because you weren't removing mysql-common at 
the same time.  None of this looks like a real problem.  Sorry I can't
help with your real problem, but this doesn't look like it.

Steve

-- 
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free.
-- Linus Torvalds



msg07613/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


unsubscribe

2002-11-04 Thread Jouni Ollila




Re: tiger reporting thousands of files with "undefined groups ownership"

2002-11-04 Thread Carlos Sousa
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:56:34 +0100 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > 
> > # pwck -r
> > user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
> > user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
> > user majordom: directory /usr/lib/majordomo does not exist
> > user postgres: directory /var/lib/postgres does not exist
> > user msql: directory /var/lib/msql does not exist
> > user list: directory /var/list does not exist
> > user gnats: directory /var/lib/gnats/gnats-db does not exist
> > user telnetd: directory /usr/lib/telnetd does not exist
> > user mysql: directory /var/lib/mysql does not exist
> > pwck: no changes
> 
>   Should this be there? I'm pretty sure there should be there.
> $ dpkg -S /var/lib/mysql
> mysql-server: /var/lib/mysql

Actually, the msql entry also seems suspicious:

$ dpkg -S /var/lib/msql
dpkg: /var/lib/msql not found.

What is it doing there? I haven't mini SQL installed, I couldn't even
find mini SQL in the Debian packages... Should it be safe to remove msql
from passwd/shadow?

>   If you have mysql-server installed (and I bet you do since you
> have the 'mysql' user) then that directory might have been lost in the
> crash.

I shouldn't have mysql installed.

$ dpkg -l 'mysql*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
un  mysql   (no description available)
un  mysql-base  (no description available)
pn  mysql-client(no description available)
ii  mysql-common   3.23.52-2  mysql database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql
un  mysql-dev   (no description available)
un  mysql-devel (no description available)
pn  mysql-doc   (no description available)
pn  mysql-gpl-clie  (no description available)
un  mysql-gpl-dev   (no description available)
pn  mysql-gpl-doc   (no description available)
pn  mysql-manual(no description available)
pn  mysql-navigato  (no description available)
pn  mysql-server(no description available)
pn  mysqltcl(no description available)

Hmm, bit of a mess here...

Why do I have a few mysql packages in a Desired=Unknown state? How
could I upgrade the to a Desired=Purged state?

Anyway, the avalanche of files reported by tiger surely cannot be
totally explained by this mysql breakage...

-- 
Carlos Sousa
http://vbc.dyndns.org/



Re: Fwd: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 11.01.02: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in Abuse

2002-11-04 Thread David Wright
Quoting Phillip Hofmeister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> From: "David Endler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]In a default abuse installation in
> Debian Linux, both abuse.console and abuse.x11R6 can be used in
> exploitation; both files are set group id games, and abuse.console is
> set user id root.

What's this about? _


> 2. Remove the setuid bit from the XaoS binary by executing the
> following command:
> 
> # chmod -s /usr/lib/games/abuse/abuse.*

(noticing -rwsr-xr-x root root 37 Jul 27 17:34 /usr/bin/xaos)
 ^

Cheers,

-- 
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: +44 1908 653 739  Fax: +44 1908 655 151
Snail:  David Wright, Earth Science Dept., Milton Keynes, England, MK7 6AA
Disclaimer:   These addresses are only for reaching me, and do not signify
official stationery. Views expressed here are either my own or plagiarised.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




unsubscribe

2002-11-04 Thread Jouni Ollila



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: tiger reporting thousands of files with "undefined groups ownership"

2002-11-04 Thread Carlos Sousa
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:56:34 +0100 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > 
> > # pwck -r
> > user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
> > user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
> > user majordom: directory /usr/lib/majordomo does not exist
> > user postgres: directory /var/lib/postgres does not exist
> > user msql: directory /var/lib/msql does not exist
> > user list: directory /var/list does not exist
> > user gnats: directory /var/lib/gnats/gnats-db does not exist
> > user telnetd: directory /usr/lib/telnetd does not exist
> > user mysql: directory /var/lib/mysql does not exist
> > pwck: no changes
> 
>   Should this be there? I'm pretty sure there should be there.
> $ dpkg -S /var/lib/mysql
> mysql-server: /var/lib/mysql

Actually, the msql entry also seems suspicious:

$ dpkg -S /var/lib/msql
dpkg: /var/lib/msql not found.

What is it doing there? I haven't mini SQL installed, I couldn't even
find mini SQL in the Debian packages... Should it be safe to remove msql
from passwd/shadow?

>   If you have mysql-server installed (and I bet you do since you
> have the 'mysql' user) then that directory might have been lost in the
> crash.

I shouldn't have mysql installed.

$ dpkg -l 'mysql*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
un  mysql   (no description available)
un  mysql-base  (no description available)
pn  mysql-client(no description available)
ii  mysql-common   3.23.52-2  mysql database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql
un  mysql-dev   (no description available)
un  mysql-devel (no description available)
pn  mysql-doc   (no description available)
pn  mysql-gpl-clie  (no description available)
un  mysql-gpl-dev   (no description available)
pn  mysql-gpl-doc   (no description available)
pn  mysql-manual(no description available)
pn  mysql-navigato  (no description available)
pn  mysql-server(no description available)
pn  mysqltcl(no description available)

Hmm, bit of a mess here...

Why do I have a few mysql packages in a Desired=Unknown state? How
could I upgrade the to a Desired=Purged state?

Anyway, the avalanche of files reported by tiger surely cannot be
totally explained by this mysql breakage...

-- 
Carlos Sousa
http://vbc.dyndns.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: tiger reporting thousands of files with "undefined groups ownership"

2002-11-04 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> 
> # pwck -r
> user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
> user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
> user majordom: directory /usr/lib/majordomo does not exist
> user postgres: directory /var/lib/postgres does not exist
> user msql: directory /var/lib/msql does not exist
> user list: directory /var/list does not exist
> user gnats: directory /var/lib/gnats/gnats-db does not exist
> user telnetd: directory /usr/lib/telnetd does not exist
> user mysql: directory /var/lib/mysql does not exist
> pwck: no changes

Should this be there? I'm pretty sure there should be there.
$ dpkg -S /var/lib/mysql
mysql-server: /var/lib/mysql

If you have mysql-server installed (and I bet you do since you
have the 'mysql' user) then that directory might have been lost in the
crash.


> Visual inspection of passwd and shadow doesn't help, both look OK.

Yes, they might be ok. The problem is that the filesystem
structure is not ok.
> 
> Any more thoughts?

System crash. Ouch.

Javi


pgp0a8PdSNp9a.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: tiger reporting thousands of files with "undefined groups ownership"

2002-11-04 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> 
> # pwck -r
> user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
> user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
> user majordom: directory /usr/lib/majordomo does not exist
> user postgres: directory /var/lib/postgres does not exist
> user msql: directory /var/lib/msql does not exist
> user list: directory /var/list does not exist
> user gnats: directory /var/lib/gnats/gnats-db does not exist
> user telnetd: directory /usr/lib/telnetd does not exist
> user mysql: directory /var/lib/mysql does not exist
> pwck: no changes

Should this be there? I'm pretty sure there should be there.
$ dpkg -S /var/lib/mysql
mysql-server: /var/lib/mysql

If you have mysql-server installed (and I bet you do since you
have the 'mysql' user) then that directory might have been lost in the
crash.


> Visual inspection of passwd and shadow doesn't help, both look OK.

Yes, they might be ok. The problem is that the filesystem
structure is not ok.
> 
> Any more thoughts?

System crash. Ouch.

Javi



msg07609/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature