Re: Re: how to apply DSA-2157-1

2011-02-07 Thread Edoardo Panfili

thank you for your prompt response.
Edoardo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d50159d.30...@aspix.it



Some obsolete packages on squeeze-security

2011-02-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hi,

squeeze-security (i386 at least) has the following binary packages
which are not in squeeze. They are therefore selected as candidates for
install even though they represent an unmaintained branch of code.
The i386 packages are listed by way of illustration, although the
analysis should perhaps be done for the other archs too.

They (at minimum) should probably be removed from squeeze-security
(all the other packages were also older than their squeeze counterparts,
so should be removed too, which would save the exhaustive analysis on
per-binary-package case).

This is particularly likely to cause problems for people upgrading,
where the obsolete packages are more likely to be selected.

gs-aladdin
gs
kvm-source
linux-doc-2.6.30
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-486
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-686
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-all-i386
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-all
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-common
linux-image-2.6.30-2-486
linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
linux-manual-2.6.30
linux-patch-debian-2.6.30
linux-source-2.6.30
linux-support-2.6.30-2
linux-tree-2.6.30
openoffice.org-l10n-lo

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207171845.ge4...@urchin.earth.li



Re: Some obsolete packages on squeeze-security

2011-02-07 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Dominic,

On Mon, February 7, 2011 18:18, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
 squeeze-security (i386 at least) has the following binary packages
 which are not in squeeze. They are therefore selected as candidates for
 install even though they represent an unmaintained branch of code.
 The i386 packages are listed by way of illustration, although the
 analysis should perhaps be done for the other archs too.

Thanks for reporting this. That obsolete packages are not cleaned from the
security archive is a known issue which also posed problems for Lenny
(e.g. libapache-mod-php4 still present while Apache 1.x had been removed,
which caused repeated bugreports and people keeping obsolete packages
installed).

We've brought this to the attention of the ftpmasters in the past but as
it seems they unfortunately didn't yet find the time to solve this
structurally, e.g. through a periodic cleaning operation of sorts. I do
not blame them for this as they've done tremendous amounts of other work
for the security archive last year, and you can't do everthing.

FTPmasters: can you please remove below mentioned packages from
squeeze-security? A permanent solution would of course be even greater!


Thanks,
Thijs


 They (at minimum) should probably be removed from squeeze-security
 (all the other packages were also older than their squeeze counterparts,
 so should be removed too, which would save the exhaustive analysis on
 per-binary-package case).

 This is particularly likely to cause problems for people upgrading,
 where the obsolete packages are more likely to be selected.

 gs-aladdin
 gs
 kvm-source
 linux-doc-2.6.30
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-486
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-686
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-all-i386
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-all
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64
 linux-headers-2.6.30-2-common
 linux-image-2.6.30-2-486
 linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
 linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
 linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
 linux-manual-2.6.30
 linux-patch-debian-2.6.30
 linux-source-2.6.30
 linux-support-2.6.30-2
 linux-tree-2.6.30
 openoffice.org-l10n-lo

 Cheers,
 Dominic.

 --
 Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
 PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207171845.ge4...@urchin.earth.li




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/78f4ad20ba597b966dd6cb541ab38cee.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl



Some obsolete packages in squeeze-security

2011-02-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
[reposting to ftpmaster on request]

Hi,

squeeze-security (i386 at least) has the following binary packages
which are not in squeeze. They are therefore selected as candidates for
install even though they represent an unmaintained branch of code.
The i386 packages are listed by way of illustration, although the
analysis should perhaps be done for the other archs too.

They (at minimum) should probably be removed from squeeze-security
(all the other packages were also older than their squeeze counterparts,
so should be removed too, which would save the exhaustive analysis on
per-binary-package case).

This is particularly likely to cause problems for people upgrading,
where the obsolete packages are more likely to be selected.

gs-aladdin
gs
kvm-source
linux-doc-2.6.30
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-486
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-686
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-all-i386
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-all
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64
linux-headers-2.6.30-2-common
linux-image-2.6.30-2-486
linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
linux-manual-2.6.30
linux-patch-debian-2.6.30
linux-source-2.6.30
linux-support-2.6.30-2
linux-tree-2.6.30
openoffice.org-l10n-lo

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207181333.gf4...@urchin.earth.li