Re: Port 699 listening

2005-12-15 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:18:29PM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
>Quoting Alex Pankratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>[snip]
>>Did, and that made both 111 and 699 not show up in nmap scan. sweet,
>>thanks Jeffery. I could swear that in the past I saw 111 open and I
>>sort of ignored it, why would 699 be open now, and then closed? why is
>>statd running, i dont use NFS.
>>
>There are several services that use portmapper.  Generally it has to
>be ripped out manually after a clean install (at least for Debian and
>SuSE).

Read the portmap manpage. It tells you about the -i option and
tcp_wrapper support.

>Jeffrey

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Port 699 listening

2005-12-14 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> netstat -na | grep 699
> tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:699 0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN

if you run it as root and use "netstat -lnpo" it will give you the pid and
process name of the open listening socket.

In some rare cases netstat wont help, then you could use "lsof -i :699" also
(as root).

Gruss
Bernd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Port 699 listening

2005-12-14 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Alex Pankratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> Did, and that made both 111 and 699 not show up in nmap scan. sweet,
> thanks Jeffery. I could swear that in the past I saw 111 open and I
> sort of ignored it, why would 699 be open now, and then closed? why is
> statd running, i dont use NFS.
> 
There are several services that use portmapper.  Generally it has to
be ripped out manually after a clean install (at least for Debian and
SuSE).

Jeffrey


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Port 699 listening

2005-12-14 Thread Alex Pankratz
> See interspersed comments below.

My replies interspersed

>
> Quoting Alex Pankratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this, this
> > is my first time asking for help..
> >
> > What is running on port 699? I only have squid, ssh, and dhcpd
> > listening on my 2 internal interfaces, but nothing on my external one
> > (XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX below)
> >
> > I just ran nmap, and it returned:
> > Discovered open port 699/tcp on XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> > Discovered open port 111/tcp on XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> >
> > And netstat shows:
> > netstat -na | grep 699
> > tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:699 0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN
> >
>
> Try: lsof -i4 -P | grep 699

rpc.statd  1789root6u  IPv42165   TCP *:699 (LISTEN)

> > I ran chkrootkit and it returned nothing
> >
> > Google tells me:
> > #  Thomas Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > accessnetwork   699/tcpAccess Network
> > accessnetwork   699/udpAccess Network
> >
> > - What is "Access Network"?
> > - How can I get RPC to not listen on port 111 at all?
>
> apt-get --purge remove portmap

Did, and that made both 111 and 699 not show up in nmap scan. sweet,
thanks Jeffery. I could swear that in the past I saw 111 open and I
sort of ignored it, why would 699 be open now, and then closed? why is
statd running, i dont use NFS.

On a possibly related note, snort is showing me a ton of "SCAN FIN"
messages from the same IP, just recently.

Also on a possibly related note, could that be the reason why snort is
also showing me "(portscan) TCP Portsweep" originating from my
external interface?

>
> or
>
> invoke-rc.d portmap stop
>
> > - Do the 0.0.0.0 results for netstat mean all (3) of my ethernet
> > interfaces listen for those ports?
>
> Yes, 0.0.0.0 means all interfaces.
> >
> > This is a Debian Linux 2.4.27-2-386, and it's been updated/upgraded as
> > much as possible, except for the recent kernel update just released.
> >
> > Your help is appreciated,
> >
> > Alex
> >
>
> HTH,
>   Jeffrey
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



Re: Port 699 listening

2005-12-14 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
See interspersed comments below.

Quoting Alex Pankratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this, this
> is my first time asking for help..
> 
> What is running on port 699? I only have squid, ssh, and dhcpd
> listening on my 2 internal interfaces, but nothing on my external one
> (XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX below)
> 
> I just ran nmap, and it returned:
> Discovered open port 699/tcp on XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> Discovered open port 111/tcp on XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> 
> And netstat shows:
> netstat -na | grep 699
> tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:699 0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN
> 

Try: lsof -i4 -P | grep 699

> I ran chkrootkit and it returned nothing
> 
> Google tells me:
> #  Thomas Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> accessnetwork   699/tcpAccess Network
> accessnetwork   699/udpAccess Network
> 
> - What is "Access Network"?
> - How can I get RPC to not listen on port 111 at all?

apt-get --purge remove portmap

or

invoke-rc.d portmap stop

> - Do the 0.0.0.0 results for netstat mean all (3) of my ethernet
> interfaces listen for those ports?

Yes, 0.0.0.0 means all interfaces.
> 
> This is a Debian Linux 2.4.27-2-386, and it's been updated/upgraded as
> much as possible, except for the recent kernel update just released.
> 
> Your help is appreciated,
> 
> Alex
> 

HTH,
  Jeffrey


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]