Re: DSA vs tracker: is CVE-2008-5814 fixed in unstable?

2009-05-11 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On moandei 11 Maaie 2009, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
 security team,

 should the DSA announcement be reissued to correct/clarify?

That should not be necessary. The DSA mails pertain to the state of afairs in 
old/stable; we mention sid fixed versions as a courtesy but I don't see it 
necessary to issue an update just for that.

We can always update the associated DSA web page if a newer sid version is 
available.


Thijs


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: DSA vs tracker: is CVE-2008-5814 fixed in unstable?

2009-05-11 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On moandei 11 Maaie 2009, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
 security team,

 should the DSA announcement be reissued to correct/clarify?

That should not be necessary. The DSA mails pertain to the state of afairs in 
old/stable; we mention sid fixed versions as a courtesy but I don't see it 
necessary to issue an update just for that.

We can always update the associated DSA web page if a newer sid version is 
available.


Thijs


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: DSA vs tracker: is CVE-2008-5814 fixed in unstable?

2009-05-10 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
On Sat, 9 May 2009 17:31:11 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
 Hi everyone!
 
 DSA-1789-1 [1] claims that all the mentioned CVEs are fixed in
 php5/5.2.9.dfsg.1-1 for sid.
 All tracker pages for the mentioned CVEs seem to be consistent, except
 for the one for CVE-2008-5814 [2], which claims that sid is still
 vulnerable.
 
 [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2009/msg00100.html
 [2] http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5814
 
 Now the question is: is CVE-2008-5814 really fixed in
 php5/5.2.9.dfsg.1-1 ?
 If this is case, the tracker seems to be inconsistent.
 
 Please clarify and/or fix the inconsistency.

hi,

thanks for pointing out the inconsistency.  this is not yet fixed in
the sid version.  it has been added to the sid php5 git repo and is
currently pending to be uploaded, but has not happened yet.  in fact
CVE-2009-0754 should have the same status; which i've just fixed.

security team,

should the DSA announcement be reissued to correct/clarify?

mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



DSA vs tracker: is CVE-2008-5814 fixed in unstable?

2009-05-09 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi everyone!

DSA-1789-1 [1] claims that all the mentioned CVEs are fixed in
php5/5.2.9.dfsg.1-1 for sid.
All tracker pages for the mentioned CVEs seem to be consistent, except
for the one for CVE-2008-5814 [2], which claims that sid is still
vulnerable.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2009/msg00100.html
[2] http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5814

Now the question is: is CVE-2008-5814 really fixed in
php5/5.2.9.dfsg.1-1 ?
If this is case, the tracker seems to be inconsistent.

Please clarify and/or fix the inconsistency.


P.S.: Please Cc: me on replies, as I am not a list subscriber.  Thanks.


-- 
 New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
 http://www.inventati.org/frx
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4



pgp1kf39aJ2b0.pgp
Description: PGP signature