RE: 2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread Nicolas WILL

hmmm... I have a 2-3 month old CD (jigdo image) that defaults to 2.2.20,
with no option for a bf24.

I downloaded the latest floppy images (3.0r1a) an couple of days ago and
they default to 2.2.20 as well, no bf24 as far as I could see.

I just finished and burned the jigdo of the 3.0r1 CD. I looked at the
vmlinux contained in /boot/sparc32.gz. I did text search for 2.4 in that
file. Nothing. A search on 2.2 returned plenty of 2.2.20.

The silo.conf only contains references to that /boot/sparc32.gz for sun4cdm
arch.

The sun4u 64bit kernel may well be 2.4.18.

I'll check on the Sun boxes when I arrive home this evening.

I have an SS5-110 and an SMP SS20 (Ross ROM 2.25), both sun4m.

Thanks for answering!

Nico

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> debian 3.0 r0-1 both default to 2.4.18 with the source,headers and images
> for both 2.4.18 and  2.4.19 as well
> Daren
>
> > Nicolas WILL said:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4
> >> kernel (like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?
> >>
> >> I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.
> >>
> >> Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...
> >
> > I downloaded debian 3.0r0 ISO images about 3 weeks ago and they
> > defaulted to 2.4.something, at least on my ultra 1. perhaps if
> > you have a 32bit system it may try to use 2.2.x I'm not sure,
> > SILO wouldn't let me load a 32bit kernel even when I tried(didn't
> > care either way personally). or maybe it did but the kernel
> > wouldn't boot.
> > nate



Re: Next question

2003-01-31 Thread Patrick Morris
Yeah, dselect is still around.  C'mon, the guy's new to Debian.  You 
wouldn't want him to miss out on a classic, wouldya? :)


Chad Miller wrote:


On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:45:23AM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
 


Inhabitant of Zion wrote:

   


BTW on another note is there a specific place that you can go to find
alist of all the apt packages that are currently available under Debain
Sparc?

 


dselect
   



Gag, gag!  dselect is still around?

$ apt-cache search 
(use . to get a list of all packages)

# apt-get install 


 


Also how does one log in as root?
 



Eh, I'm not sure we can help very much with this.

Is there something wrong?

- chad


 






Re: [spamcatcher] Re: 2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread daren
> debian 3.0 r0-1 both default to 2.4.18 with the source,headers and
> images for both 2.4.18 and  2.4.19 as well

Er, make that images for both of those kernels are included as well -

sorry for the typo

Daren

>
> Daren
>
>> Nicolas WILL said:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4
>>> kernel (like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?
>>>
>>> I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.
>>>
>>> Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...
>>
>> I downloaded debian 3.0r0 ISO images about 3 weeks ago and they
>> defaulted to 2.4.something, at least on my ultra 1. perhaps if
>> you have a 32bit system it may try to use 2.2.x I'm not sure,
>> SILO wouldn't let me load a 32bit kernel even when I tried(didn't care
>> either way personally). or maybe it did but the kernel
>> wouldn't boot.
>>
>> nate
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Sparc32 2.4.21-pre4 kernel debs

2003-01-31 Thread Christian Jönsson
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:23:54PM -0500, Rob Radez wrote:
> Good evening,
> I just uploaded a set of 2.4.21-pre4 sparc32 kernel debs for UP and SMP to
> http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ for your enjoyment.  A couple changes
> that I made: ext3 is now compiled in instead of modular, and I finally
> got around to enabling the NFS root config options.  UP kernel image
> boots fine here, but as usual, your mileage might vary.

I just wanted to report that I couldn't use the smp kernel, image too big... 

UP works though :-)


Cheers,

/ChJ



Re: 2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread daren
debian 3.0 r0-1 both default to 2.4.18 with the source,headers and images
for both 2.4.18 and  2.4.19 as well

Daren

> Nicolas WILL said:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4
>> kernel (like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?
>>
>> I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.
>>
>> Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...
>
> I downloaded debian 3.0r0 ISO images about 3 weeks ago and they
> defaulted to 2.4.something, at least on my ultra 1. perhaps if
> you have a 32bit system it may try to use 2.2.x I'm not sure,
> SILO wouldn't let me load a 32bit kernel even when I tried(didn't
> care either way personally). or maybe it did but the kernel
> wouldn't boot.
>
> nate
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Next question

2003-01-31 Thread Chad Miller
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:45:23AM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
> Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
> 
> >BTW on another note is there a specific place that you can go to find
> >alist of all the apt packages that are currently available under Debain
> >Sparc?
> >
> dselect

Gag, gag!  dselect is still around?

$ apt-cache search 
(use . to get a list of all packages)

# apt-get install 
 

> >Also how does one log in as root?

Eh, I'm not sure we can help very much with this.

Is there something wrong?

- chad



Re: 2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread nate
Nicolas WILL said:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4 kernel
> (like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?
>
> I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.
>
> Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...

I downloaded debian 3.0r0 ISO images about 3 weeks ago and they
defaulted to 2.4.something, at least on my ultra 1. perhaps if
you have a 32bit system it may try to use 2.2.x I'm not sure,
SILO wouldn't let me load a 32bit kernel even when I tried(didn't
care either way personally). or maybe it did but the kernel
wouldn't boot.

nate






Re: Next question

2003-01-31 Thread Patrick Morris

Inhabitant of Zion wrote:


BTW on another note is there a specific place that you can go to find
alist of all the apt packages that are currently available under Debain
Sparc?


dselect


Also how does one log in as root?
 

On the console?  Enter "root" as the account name, then enter the root 
password.




new apt

2003-01-31 Thread Inhabitant of Zion
Hi

Just wondering if there was a testing tree where one could post requests for 
apt to be configured for Debian-Sparc.

Only I would like a newer version of Sylpheed or better still Ximian Evolution.

Cheers

John



2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread Nicolas WILL
Hi,

Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4 kernel
(like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?

I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.

Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...

Nico



Re: Next question

2003-01-31 Thread Inhabitant of Zion
Hi

Yes I manged to get it sorted. I had to go down to a depth of 8 to get
the resolution I wanted but the machine is mainly going to be a mail
server so I am not too bothered about fancy looking graphics.

BTW on another note is there a specific place that you can go to find
alist of all the apt packages that are currently available under Debain
Sparc?

Also how does one log in as root?

John

On Fri, 31
Jan 2003 10:23:20+0100 Daniel van Eeden<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
> 
> Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I don't seem to be having much joy with the archives. Another old
> > chestnut that must be there but various searches bring nothing up.
> > 
> > My screen seems to be set to 800x600 and I want to try and make it a
> > bit bigger. 
> > 
> > Xconfigurator seems to be a Redhat thing. What is the Debian
> > equivalent?
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> +-+
> | Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |
> | icq: 36952189   |
> | aim: Compukid128|
> | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> | msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> | phone: +31 343 522622   |
> | http://compukid.no-ip.org/about_me.html |
> +-+
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Sent using Sylpheed. Secure, stable and micro$oft free.

GnomeICU 92791912
aMSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]















Re: Next question

2003-01-31 Thread Daniel van Eeden

dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86

Inhabitant of Zion wrote:

Hi

I don't seem to be having much joy with the archives. Another old
chestnut that must be there but various searches bring nothing up.

My screen seems to be set to 800x600 and I want to try and make it a bit
bigger. 


Xconfigurator seems to be a Redhat thing. What is the Debian equivalent?

John





--
+-+
| Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |
| icq: 36952189   |
| aim: Compukid128|
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| phone: +31 343 522622   |
| http://compukid.no-ip.org/about_me.html |
+-+



[PATCH] fix for "assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) ..."

2003-01-31 Thread David S. Miller

Chris and others, this below should cure the infamous:

KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
KERNEL: assertion 
((1 1.934  
#   net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c1.12-> 1.13   
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# 
# 03/01/30  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   1.934
# [TCP]: In tcp_check_req, handle ACKless packets properly.
# 
#
diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c  Thu Jan 30 23:08:40 2003
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c  Thu Jan 30 23:08:40 2003
@@ -938,6 +938,12 @@
if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN))
goto embryonic_reset;
 
+   /* ACK sequence verified above, just make sure ACK is
+* set.  If ACK not set, just silently drop the packet.
+*/
+   if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK))
+   return NULL;
+
/* If TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set, drop bare ACK. */
if (tp->defer_accept && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == req->rcv_isn+1) {
req->acked = 1;