Re: Interesting apt problem during update
Unfortunately this didn't solve my problem. I tried many difference options from the apt man pages, but kept getting a libc6 (I think) error. This is provided by apt, which can't be upgraded. I couldn't install a 2.6 kernel without this. My uname shows that i'm running Etch, but it's broken :-( Chris. On 28/10/2007, Chris Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That could be worth a try. Even with Etch being the end of 32-bit support, this could be a lifesaver. Thanks, Chris. On 28/10/2007, Ulrich Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, sorry for the noise, but if another user runs into this: [del] Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... gpg: key 2D230C5F: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key 6070D3A1: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key ADB11277: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key BBE55AB3: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: w/o user IDs: 4 dpkg: error processing apt (--configure): [del] The solution for me was to boot into a 2.6 kernel (even a catatonic one without network support...) and: lian:~# dpkg --configure -a Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... gpg: key 2D230C5F: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: key 6070D3A1: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: key ADB11277: Etch Stable Release Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: key BBE55AB3: Debian-Volatile Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) not changed gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: unchanged: 4 Setting up aptitude (0.4.4-4) ... Setting up apt-utils (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... Setting up libapt-pkg-dev (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... All was well. I would like to know *why* gpg needs a 2.6 kernel and fails without giving a proper error message, though HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ A great GNU/Linux distro: http://wiki.gnewsense.org/ -- Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ A great GNU/Linux distro: http://wiki.gnewsense.org/
Re: Interesting apt problem during update
Hi, Unfortunately this didn't solve my problem. I tried many difference options from the apt man pages, but kept getting a libc6 (I think) error. This is provided by apt, which can't be upgraded. I couldn't install a 2.6 kernel without this. Be happy. My box is unbootable right now: SPARCstation 20 MP (2 X 390Z55), No Keyboard ROM Rev. 2.15, 192 MB memory installed, Serial #3528342. Ethernet address 8:0:20:21:68:97, Host ID: 7235d696. Rebooting with command: Boot device: /iommu/sbus/[EMAIL PROTECTED],40/[EMAIL PROTECTED],80/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:a File and args: SProgram terminated Type help for more information #0 ok dis 7 Memory Address not Aligned Looks like a broken silo to me. My uname shows that i'm running Etch, but it's broken :-( [del] I seriously doubt that the default 2.6 kernel from etch will work on your SS20 anyway, because of the old ESP-driver problem when it's build as module. My 2.6.23.1 kernel was self compiled - that was the first version of 2.6 I ever got booted on that box. I'll try to install the sarge lilo next weekend, just came home from work CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interesting apt problem during update
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:51:40PM +0100, Ulrich Teichert wrote: Hi, Unfortunately this didn't solve my problem. I tried many difference options from the apt man pages, but kept getting a libc6 (I think) error. This is provided by apt, which can't be upgraded. I couldn't install a 2.6 kernel without this. Run 'apt-get check' to see what is broken. If you feel up to it you can try an 'apt-get -f' as well, depending on what check reports. Be happy. My box is unbootable right now: SPARCstation 20 MP (2 X 390Z55), No Keyboard ROM Rev. 2.15, 192 MB memory installed, Serial #3528342. Ethernet address 8:0:20:21:68:97, Host ID: 7235d696. Rebooting with command: Boot device: /iommu/sbus/[EMAIL PROTECTED],40/[EMAIL PROTECTED],80/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:a File and args: SProgram terminated Type help for more information #0 ok dis 7 Memory Address not Aligned Looks like a broken silo to me. Ran into the same issue 2 weeks ago. I thought I'd just been hacking away too much. :) Got around this by net-booting a kernel and running silo -f. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interesting apt problem during update
Hi, I've had exactly the same problem. The only way I could get my SparcStation20 to have installed Debian, without any problems like this one, was to do a Sarge install and keep the /etc/apt/sources.list referring to the CD only. The machine works brilliantly, but does not get any updates. Sort of half a win! I tried all sorts of things, including the dist-upgrade route, but still no luck. Thanks, Chris. On 28/10/2007, Ulrich Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm having a problem with apt during a dist-upgrade from sarge to etch on a sparc32 machine (still running a 2.4 kernel - but stock 2.6.23.1 does boot on this box, so after the upgrade I will try to get this running). I had some dpkg-processes being stuck in non-interruptible sleep and had to reboot twice to get rid of them; now I have: Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... gpg: key 2D230C5F: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key 6070D3A1: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key ADB11277: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key BBE55AB3: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: w/o user IDs: 4 dpkg: error processing apt (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of aptitude: aptitude depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11; however: Package libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11 is not installed. Package apt which provides libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing aptitude (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libapt-pkg-dev: libapt-pkg-dev depends on apt (= 0.6.46.4-0.1); however: Package apt is not configured yet. libapt-pkg-dev depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11; however: Package libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11 is not installed. Package apt which provides libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libapt-pkg-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of apt-utils: apt-utils depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11; however: Package libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11 is not installed. Package apt which provides libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing apt-utils (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: apt aptitude libapt-pkg-dev apt-utils Running apt-get update gives me: lian:/etc/apt# apt-get update Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release.gpg [378B] Get:2 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release Err http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release Get:3 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release [22.5kB] Err http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release Get:4 http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release [58.2kB] Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/main Packages Fetched 81.2kB in 2s (29.2kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG A70DAF536070D3A1 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: GPG error: http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG A70DAF536070D3A1 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems gpg is installed and the newest version: lian:/etc/apt# dpkg -s gnupg Package: gnupg Status: install ok installed Priority: standard Section: utils Installed-Size: 4600 Maintainer: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: sparc Version: 1.4.6-2 Replaces: gpg-rsa, gpg-rsaref Provides: gpg-rsa, gpg-rsaref Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (= 2.3.5-1), libldap2 (= 2.1.17-1), libreadline5 (= 5.2), libusb-0.1-4 (= 2:0.1.12), zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1), gpgv, makedev (= 2.3.1-13) | devfsd | hurd Suggests: gnupg-doc, xloadimage Conflicts: gpg-rsa, gpg-rsaref, suidmanager ( 0.50), gpg-idea (= 2.2) Description: GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement GnuPG is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage. It can be used to encrypt data and to create digital signatures. It includes an advanced key management facility and is compliant with the proposed OpenPGP Internet standard as described in RFC2440. . GnuPG does not use any patented algorithms so it cannot be
Re: Interesting apt problem during update
Hi, sorry for the noise, but if another user runs into this: [del] Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... gpg: key 2D230C5F: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key 6070D3A1: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key ADB11277: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: key BBE55AB3: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: w/o user IDs: 4 dpkg: error processing apt (--configure): [del] The solution for me was to boot into a 2.6 kernel (even a catatonic one without network support...) and: lian:~# dpkg --configure -a Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... gpg: key 2D230C5F: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: key 6070D3A1: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: key ADB11277: Etch Stable Release Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: key BBE55AB3: Debian-Volatile Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) not changed gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: unchanged: 4 Setting up aptitude (0.4.4-4) ... Setting up apt-utils (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... Setting up libapt-pkg-dev (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... All was well. I would like to know *why* gpg needs a 2.6 kernel and fails without giving a proper error message, though HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
