Re: package version problem
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:44:47PM +0800, jianan wrote: When I try a 'apt-get install kdeblibs4 the msg was that current version of kdelibs4 is the latest. When I checked the Debian package directory, the version of kdelibs4 is 4:3.3.1-4, why is dpkg reporting that what I have on my system is 4:3.2.3-2? You probably indeed have 3.2 on your system. kdelibs4 may have been updated recently to the new 3.3 version and you don't yet have that info on your system. Did you run apt-get update first? That will update your list of available packages. If this doesn't help, please post some more info, like which Debian version you are using (stable/testing/unstable). And tell where you got knemo, as it isn't on official Debian mirrors. -- Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ [Dutch/Nederlands] Public GnuPG key: keyserver.net ID 0x1735C5C2 Let your advance worrying become advance thinking and planning. - Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: package version problem
Hi, Forgot to mention it, but I had done an update before install. I'm using 'testing'. The download site for 'knemo' is www.mpe.mpg.de/~ach/debian/sarge. Jianan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: package version problem
BM I have no clue why it deletes it since there is no mention of any BM ssh package higher than 2.5.2p2 from debian... so what can I do to BM make this work. And another question.. when I create some package BM from the debian source (for instance by running apt-get -b source BM somepackage). When I install that newly created .deb file and than BM run apt-get upgrade, that same package is marked as old and BM replaced by the original debian file... what does one have to do BM for the package only be replaced by higher version number and not BM the same version... Because ssh package on debian has epoch in its Version field. $ dpkg -s ssh Package: ssh ... Version: 1:2.3.0p1-0.11 ^^^ 1: in Version field is epoch. Package with higher epoch is considered as always having higher version number. Default epoch is 0. You need to set epoch for your package to 1. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)| | GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B DEE6 | | AGAVA Software Company (http://www.agava.com/) | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: package version problem
* On 04-05-01 at 17:36 Ilya Martynov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: +Here quoted text begins+ Because ssh package on debian has epoch in its Version field. $ dpkg -s ssh Package: ssh ... Version: 1:2.3.0p1-0.11 ^^^ 1: in Version field is epoch. Package with higher epoch is considered as always having higher version number. Default epoch is 0. You need to set epoch for your package to 1. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)| | GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B DEE6 | | AGAVA Software Company (http://www.agava.com/) | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- +and here the quote ends+ Nope that was not it... mine has epoch too ;) I read the packaging manual and found no reason that the package should be deleted... dpkg -s ssh |grep Version Version: 1:2.9p1-1 Any other clues? anyone?? B. -- Boštjan Müller [NEONATUS], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://neonatus.net/~neonatus For my PGP key finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED], RSA id: 0x90178DBD, ICQ #:7506644 Celular: +386(0)41243189, Powered by Debian GNU/LiNUX , Student of VFUL Press to test. *click* Release to detonate.
Re: package version problem
For one idea that just screams out to me is that they both have the same epoch (1) however the versions themselves are different. I would assume in the case of epochs being equal it would handle the version as normal and pick the one with the highest version. In this case 1:2.3.0p1-0.11 1:2.9p1-1 so the first one would override the second... Jeremy T. Bouse An unidentified person was said to been seen saying: * On 04-05-01 at 17:36 Ilya Martynov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: +Here quoted text begins+ Because ssh package on debian has epoch in its Version field. $ dpkg -s ssh Package: ssh ... Version: 1:2.3.0p1-0.11 ^^^ 1: in Version field is epoch. Package with higher epoch is considered as always having higher version number. Default epoch is 0. You need to set epoch for your package to 1. +and here the quote ends+ Nope that was not it... mine has epoch too ;) I read the packaging manual and found no reason that the package should be deleted... dpkg -s ssh |grep Version Version: 1:2.9p1-1 Any other clues? anyone?? B. -- ,-, |Jeremy T. Bouse, CCNA - UnderGrid Network Services, LLC - www.UnderGrid.net | |Public PGP/GPG fingerprint and location in headers of message| | If received unsigned (without requesting as such) DO NOT trust it! | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - NIC Whois: JB5713 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `-' pgpqnqY3pchy9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: package version problem
Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In this case 1:2.3.0p1-0.11 1:2.9p1-1 so the first one would override the second... What numeric system is that using? In mine, 9 3. -- Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors! Loneliness is a terrible price to pay for independence.
Re: package version problem
* On 04-05-01 at 18:59 Jeremy T. Bouse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: +Here quoted text begins+ For one idea that just screams out to me is that they both have the same epoch (1) however the versions themselves are different. I would assume in the case of epochs being equal it would handle the version as normal and pick the one with the highest version. In this case 1:2.3.0p1-0.11 1:2.9p1-1 so the first one would override the second... Jeremy T. Bouse +and here the quote ends+ Hmm I don't think that was it... so I raised epoch number to two (2) and it still gets deleted... what gives here??? B. -- Boštjan Müller [NEONATUS], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://neonatus.net/~neonatus For my PGP key finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED], RSA id: 0x90178DBD, ICQ #:7506644 Celular: +386(0)41243189, Powered by Debian GNU/LiNUX , Student of VFUL Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach him to use the Net and he won't bother you for weeks.
