Bug#268153: ITP: cfi-ru -- Copyright does not exist, book about hacker culture
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 13:46 +0400, Al Nikolov wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: cfi-ru > Version : 3.0-5 > Upstream Author : Linus Walleij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://home.c2i.net/nirgendwo/cdne/ > * License : GPL2 > Description : Copyright does not exist, book about hacker culture > > Copyright does not exist: Book about hacker culture, folklore and > history by Linus Walleij. This is a translation from the English text. > In HTML format. In what language? How does an average user is supposed to know what the «ru» suffix means? -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ GPG 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD
Bug#268560: ITP: algae -- A numerical programming language with C like syntax
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2004-08-27 Severity: wishlist * Package name: algae Version : 4.3.6 Upstream Author : Scott Hunziker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://algae.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : A numerical programming language with C like syntax Being packaged by B Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mandelbrot 2.4.19 #1 Tue Aug 3 03:55:16 EDT 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#268494: ITP: varkon -- VARKON is a parametric 2D/3D CAD
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2004-08-27 Severity: wishlist * Package name: varkon Version : 1.17D Upstream Author : The CAD Research Group * URL : http://www.tech.oru.se/cad/varkon/ * License : GPL Description : VARKON is a parametric 2D/3D CAD [EMAIL PROTECTED] filed an wnpp long back when this package was non-free. I am refileing it as varkon is now GPLed and we (him and me [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will be packaging it . -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mandelbrot 2.4.19 #1 Tue Aug 3 03:55:16 EDT 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#252153: marked as done (ITA: libirman -- library for accessing the IRMAN hardware)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:17:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252153: fixed in libirman 0.4.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2004 18:41:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 01 11:41:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BVEC9-0006Zw-00; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 11:41:05 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 18D2E64D42; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 18:41:05 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94A9B101DB; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:55:04 -0300 (BRT) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:55:04 -0300 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: O: libirman -- library for accessing the IRMAN hardware Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package: libirman Binary: libirman-dev Version: 0.4.2-2 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Manuel Estrada Sainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0) Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.5.6 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/libi/libirman Files: 30c0718dd224dcc78c974459e685f9b5 574 libirman_0.4.2-2.dsc b99017d049685cb84a95098190a89de8 52665 libirman_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz 282c2211039979d40eb06273f97d6d00 2716 libirman_0.4.2-2.diff.gz Package: libirman-dev Priority: optional Section: libdevel Installed-Size: 148 Maintainer: Manuel Estrada Sainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Source: libirman Version: 0.4.2-2 Depends: libc6-dev Filename: pool/main/libi/libirman/libirman-dev_0.4.2-2_i386.deb Size: 23878 MD5sum: c24d348e4e7ac891df1715535950d612 Description: library for accessing the IRMAN hardware libirman is a library for accessing the IRMAN hardware from Linux and other Unix systems. . For general applications programming, the preferred interface for infra-red control is `lirc', as lirc supports multiple programs sharing the same infra-red receiver. It does this by providing a socket based interface to which several programs can connect. . lirc uses libirman to interface with the Irman hardware, so in single use applications directly using libirman is simpler and uses less system resources. Currently, lirc only works on Linux systems, so programs written using libirman directly are more portable. . NOTE: This debian package is mainly provided so that Irman support can be enabled in lirc package and there is no libirman0 because upstream doesn't build a shared library. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 252153-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 17:23:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 10:23:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0kRx-0005qZ-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:23:41 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0kLZ-0007PB-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:17:05 -0400 From: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#252153: fixed in libirman 0.4.3-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:17:05 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: libirman Source-Version: 0.4.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libirman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libirman-dev_0.4.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libi/libirman/libirman-dev_0.4.3-1_i386.deb libirman
Bug#248767: Lirc Debian Package
Pierre Machard wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > > Ian Murdock is also interested in Co-Maintaining. I've put him in the > > Uploaders field, tell me if it's fine with you. > > Of course. Done. > We can set-up a group on alioth, such as gnome-team. Name? lirc-deb? debian-lirc-amint? > > Are they merged? Do you want me to take care of that? > > Yes, please do it. Bugs merged. > Do not forget po-debconf translation too. Will get to it really soon. > > Mmm, I just hope this won't get too big for my pants ;-) > > Don't worry :) ;-) -- .''`. Resistance is futile. You will be componentized. : :' : `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.6 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Bug#252153: libirman package
Dear Riku, I see you intend to take care of libirman (June 4th 2004). As it's very closely related to lirc, which I intend to co-maintain with Ian Murdock and Pierre Machard, and you haven't uploaded yet, I want to ask you if you are still interested, and how can we work together in order to fix #242106 (libirman: new upstream release) filed by Manuel (Ranty) himself quite a long time ago (April 4th 2004). It would be a pleasure to work with you if you are still interested. As you may already be aware of, ranty passed away and we were very close friends. I don't want to release sarge with out of date packages of his. I want them to be in great shape! Take care! -- .''`. Resistance is futile. You will be componentized. : :' : `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.6 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Bug#248767: Lirc Debian Package
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > Pierre Machard wrote: > > Of course you can. Do you mind if I co-maintain the package with you ? > > I am using lirc, but to be honnest I lack of time these days. > > That would be wonderful! I am all for it! I intend to learn a lot while > working on lirc, and I am sure you will teach me most of it! :-) > > Ian Murdock is also interested in Co-Maintaining. I've put him in the > Uploaders field, tell me if it's fine with you. Of course. > So, now for the candid question... Do I have to add you to the Uploaders > field for you to be a co-maintainer or is there anything else we need to > do? I don't seem to find enough info on the developer corner... We can set-up a group on alioth, such as gnome-team. > > Out-of-date binaries have to be removed before lirc can enter into > > testing. I filled a bug repport #260565 and Thomas Bushnell also > > #267323 > > Are they merged? Do you want me to take care of that? Yes, please do it. > And a lot of bug reports need to be taken care of... I will start > working on the ones I can handle (i am just dealing with lintian and > linda + wnpp bugs in this upload). Whenever I stumble upon something I > can't quite fix I'll ping either of you. Do not forget po-debconf translation too. > We can also find better ways to work in this more effectively (Alioth?). > I can take care of this too. That way we can have an alioth mailing list > as the maintainer address and we can all be in the Uploaders field, > right? Exact. > Mmm, I just hope this won't get too big for my pants ;-) Don't worry :) -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248767: Lirc Debian Package
Pierre Machard wrote: > Of course you can. Do you mind if I co-maintain the package with you ? > I am using lirc, but to be honnest I lack of time these days. That would be wonderful! I am all for it! I intend to learn a lot while working on lirc, and I am sure you will teach me most of it! :-) Ian Murdock is also interested in Co-Maintaining. I've put him in the Uploaders field, tell me if it's fine with you. So, now for the candid question... Do I have to add you to the Uploaders field for you to be a co-maintainer or is there anything else we need to do? I don't seem to find enough info on the developer corner... > Out-of-date binaries have to be removed before lirc can enter into > testing. I filled a bug repport #260565 and Thomas Bushnell also > #267323 Are they merged? Do you want me to take care of that? And a lot of bug reports need to be taken care of... I will start working on the ones I can handle (i am just dealing with lintian and linda + wnpp bugs in this upload). Whenever I stumble upon something I can't quite fix I'll ping either of you. We can also find better ways to work in this more effectively (Alioth?). I can take care of this too. That way we can have an alioth mailing list as the maintainer address and we can all be in the Uploaders field, right? Mmm, I just hope this won't get too big for my pants ;-) -- .''`. Resistance is futile. You will be componentized. : :' : `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.6 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Processed: retitle 107703 RFP: atris -- A tetris like game
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # I haven't found any sponsor for upload the packages > retitle 107703 RFP: atris -- A tetris like game Bug#107703: ITP: atris -- A tetris like game Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: LIRC: Merging wnpp bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 252156 248767 Bug#248767: ITA: lirc -- Linux Infra-red Remote Control support Bug#252156: ITA: lirc -- Linux Infra-red Remote Control support (X dependent parts) Merged 248767 252156. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#268435: ITP: cubetest -- Small program to train spatial insight
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: cubetest Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : Jos van den Oever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.vandenoever.info/software/cubetest/ * License : GPL Description : Small program to train spatial insight. A small program that allows you to train your spatial insight The idea is to upload this package in the kalyxo project http://www.kalyxo.org (aka kde-debian) until a debian-developer adopt or upload to debian repository.
Bug#268206: Noteedit, Finale, and testing
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Daniel Burrows wrote: > > At the moment I'm leaning towards (2). The reasons are: > [...] > >- major functionality in the program (ie, playing the score I'm > > editing) has never worked for me, maybe because I don't have a > > sound card with a good MIDI synthesizer. > > That shouldn't be a reason for removing the package from Debian. > > >- I don't use this package; I just typeset music in lilypond. > > Dito. I was wondering if someone would point this out. Originally not orphaning the package was an option and these were some of the reasons I was thinking about orphaning it. However, I talked myself into orphaning it immediately by the time I finished the email :-). > >- I don't think Debian should be shipping abandonware in stable > > releases. > > Maybe we should give the community more time for adopting upstream > before removing the package entirely. Finally, it doesn't have open > RC-bugs. Until there is an urgent need, the pressure for potential > upstream adopters of a working program is low. No open RC bugs is no guarantor of future non-RC-bugginess. > > If someone wants to step up and take over Debian *and upstream* > > maintainence for noteedit, please let me know in the near future; if > > there are users who really need noteedit, please let me know. > > Noteedit has a nice list of import (MusicXML, MIDI) and export > (MusicXML, MIDI, ABC, MusiXTeX, PMX, Lilypond) formats, while there is > no competition I know of. Export to Lilypond is broken in sarge and will be unless the unstable version makes it to sarge. Propagation from unstable to sarge is blocked by the KDE freeze, and I just got a rejection notice from testing-proposed-updates...apparently some archs haven't even built the current *unstable* version after 15 days, and as a result it can't go into t-p-u. Furthermore, future versions of Lilypond -- say, what we will release in etch -- are pretty much guaranteed to break backwards compatibility *again*, and if users have started relying on it the Debian maintainer of Noteedit (who may or may not be familiar with Lilypond *and* the ever-changing state of its syntax) will have to patch Noteedit to keep up or tell the users "sorry, you're SOL". That's not to mention keeping it up to date with KDE. > I'm for keeping the package, especially in sarge. Finally, stable > releases are generally not changed (except for security, legal or other > important fixes) during their lifetime, so it doesn't matter much if the > package is maintained actively upstream. As I said before: I don't think we should ship abandonware in stable, and I don't think we should introduce a user program that we know will probably be removed in the next release. If a new upstream appears for noteedit, maybe we can include it, but otherwise I think we should not add it to Debian. We can always add it in etch or later if development starts up again. Daniel -- / Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\ | "...drums...drums in the deep!" | | J. R. R. Tolkien| \--- (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) /
Processed: Closing RFP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 181254 Bug#181254: RFP: yanc -- Small tool to change the nVidia-specific settings easily 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Closing RFP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 215753 Bug#215753: RFP: hotsanic -- HTML overview to System and Network Information Center 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Closing RFP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 140959 Bug#140959: RFP: libfaketime -- Source for replacement of time funcion 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#268206: Noteedit, Finale, and testing
* Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-27 16:21]: > I'm for keeping the package, especially in sarge. Finally, stable > releases are generally not changed (except for security, legal or > other important fixes) during their lifetime, so it doesn't matter > much if the package is maintained actively upstream. I would agree if this package had been part of woody. However, it wasn't, and so we'd release this package new with sarge and people might start using it even though it's basically unsupported both by upstream and in Debian. This is not ideal, especially since there are apparently other alternatives they could use. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#207278: mstassi@wiconn.com.ar
Bug#268206: Noteedit, Finale, and testing
Hi, Daniel Burrows wrote: > At the moment I'm leaning towards (2). The reasons are: [...] >- major functionality in the program (ie, playing the score I'm > editing) has never worked for me, maybe because I don't have a > sound card with a good MIDI synthesizer. That shouldn't be a reason for removing the package from Debian. >- I don't use this package; I just typeset music in lilypond. Dito. >- I don't think Debian should be shipping abandonware in stable > releases. Maybe we should give the community more time for adopting upstream before removing the package entirely. Finally, it doesn't have open RC-bugs. Until there is an urgent need, the pressure for potential upstream adopters of a working program is low. > If someone wants to step up and take over Debian *and upstream* > maintainence for noteedit, please let me know in the near future; if > there are users who really need noteedit, please let me know. Noteedit has a nice list of import (MusicXML, MIDI) and export (MusicXML, MIDI, ABC, MusiXTeX, PMX, Lilypond) formats, while there is no competition I know of. I'm for keeping the package, especially in sarge. Finally, stable releases are generally not changed (except for security, legal or other important fixes) during their lifetime, so it doesn't matter much if the package is maintained actively upstream. Thanks for considering. bye, Roland
Bug#268126: O: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, +16:58:32 EEST (UTC +0300), Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Note that Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is maybe interested (or > > maybe > > not) in taking over this package, he is not a DD though. > > Juhapekka, just ask on debian-tetex-maint - somebody, probably me, will > be a good candidate for a sponsor. It is true that I am not a Debian Developer. But I should be doing my Master's Thesis instead of that Debian package. I have never created Debian package before. -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv "kun aamun veitsi taivaan halkaisee, valo repii huoneen rikki, hajalle. kielen paksuus täyttää koko saastaisen suun. kasvot kuivaa savea ja lantaa." CMX
Bug#266012: marked as done (ITA: atool -- A script for managing archives of various types)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:43:07 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Done, package adopted :-) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 10:24:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 16 03:24:43 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kwisatz.net1.nerim.net (www.rubis.org) [80.65.225.31] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwefT-00037u-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 03:24:43 -0700 Received: from [213.223.184.201] (helo=diamant.tech.sitadelle.com) by www.rubis.org with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BwefL-0006Zd-D8; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:24:38 +0200 Received: from kwisatz by diamant.tech.sitadelle.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BwefK-0003eb-My; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:24:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?iso-8859-15?q?St=C3=A9phane_Jourdois?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:24:34 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Stephane (kwisatz) Jourdois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 213.223.184.201 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: atool: [ITA] Sponsored by Michael Schiansky X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on www.rubis.org) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: atool Version: 0.11.0-0 Severity: wishlist - Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:24:46 +0300 From: Tommi Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: debian package atool To: Stephane Jourdois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux Stephane Jourdois wrote: >I see that you didn't updated the atool package for a long time, > >and the debian package is very old compared to upstream one. > > > >Do you intend to update it, or orphan it perhaps ? > Feel free to adopt atool. - I'm sponsored by Michael Schiansky to adopt this package. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages atool depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 266012-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 11:43:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 04:43:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kwisatz.net1.nerim.net (www.rubis.org) [80.65.225.31] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0f8R-0002Kj-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 04:43:11 -0700 Received: from emeraude.rubis.org ([192.168.0.2] helo=diamant.rubis.org) by www.rubis.org with esmtp (Exim 4.3
Processed: retitle/reassign of #266012
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 266012 ITA: atool -- A script for managing archives of various types Bug#266012: atool: [ITA] Sponsored by Michael Schiansky Changed Bug title. > reassign 266012 wnpp Bug#266012: ITA: atool -- A script for managing archives of various types Bug reassigned from package `atool' to `wnpp'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#225711: marked as done (ITP: gweled -- A Gnome version of the popular game bejeweled)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:21 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225711: fixed in gweled 0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 20:17:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 31 14:17:31 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from durham-24-086.biz.dsl.gtei.net (amanda.mallet-assembly.org) [4.3.24.86] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbmBb-0004WQ-00; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:39:19 -0600 Received: by amanda.mallet-assembly.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A29F74B0EA; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:38:05 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: gweled -- A Gnome version of the popular game bejeweled X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:38:05 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gweled Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Sebastien Delestaing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sebdelestaing.free.fr/gweled/ * License : GPL Description : A Gnome version of the popular game bejeweled The aim of the game is to make alignment of 3 or more gems, both vertically or horizontally by swapping adjacent gems. The game ends when there are no possible moves left. --- Received: (at 225711-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 05:38:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 22:38:25 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0ZRR-0005zs-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:38:25 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0ZKb-00054x-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:21 -0400 From: =?utf-8?b?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#225711: fixed in gweled 0.4-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:21 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: gweled Source-Version: 0.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gweled, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gweled_0.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gweled/gweled_0.4-1.diff.gz gweled_0.4-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gweled/gweled_0.4-1.dsc gweled_0.4-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gweled/gweled_0.4-1_i386.deb gweled_0.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gweled/gweled_0.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. OndÅej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gweled package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:58:17 +0200 Source: gweled Binary: gweled Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: OndÅej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: OndÅej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gweled - A "Diamond Mine" puzzle game Closes: 225711 Changes: gweled (0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial Release. (Closes: #225711) File
Bug#268126: O: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is maybe interested (or maybe > not) in taking over this package, he is not a DD though. Juhapekka, just ask on debian-tetex-maint - somebody, probably me, will be a good candidate for a sponsor. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Bug#265343: ITA: snort -- Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System
retitle 265343 ITA: snort -- Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System thanks Since I use this package intensively and keep updated backports of it (see people.debian.org/~jfs/snort) I intend to adopt this package. Team maintenance would be best, if there is sufficient interest I will try to allocate time to setup a project at Alioth and move all the code there. Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: ITA: snort -- Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 265343 ITA: snort -- Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System Bug#265343: RFA: snort -- Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#268324: RFP: mute-net -- P2P file sharing network using real anonymous connections
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mute-net Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Jason Rohrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mute-net * License : GPL Description : P2P file sharing network using real anonymous connections http://mute-net.sourceforge.net/ MUTE is a secure, anonymous, distributed communications framework Node-to-node connections are encrypted, and messages are routed using an ant-inspired algorithm. The first MUTE-based app supports anonymous file sharing. Pure C/C++ and uses wxWindows cross platform GUI libraries. [ See developer's interview at ] http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/mute.html ...A MUTE network is very similar in form to a traditional P2P network: MUTE nodes connect to each other in a mesh network, with each node maintaining a small number of direct links to neighbor nodes. In addition to routing search requests and results through the mesh, MUTE routes everything else, including file transfers. Thus, a downloader does not need to know the IP address of a file source, since the downloader never needs to make a direct connection, and a download is routed through the chain of nodes that separate the downloader from the file source. Routed downloads are what separates MUTE from other search-and-download P2P networks. Of course, routed downloads alone do not provide anonymity. Even more crucial is the way that MUTE routes messages anonymously. Each MUTE node generates a random virtual address for itself at startup. Messages are tagged as being "from" one virtual address and "to" another virtual address, though only the sending node knows that it owns the "from" address, and only the receiving node knows that it owns the "to" address. None of the other nodes in the network know which node owns either of these addresses. As messages travel through the network, they leave behind local "scent" or routing information for their "from" address at each node that they pass through. For example, if a message from Alice passes through a node, the node records that it has received messages from Alice from one of its neighbors. In the future, if that node receives a message to Alice, it can use this scent to direct the message onward through that neighbor. Each node essentially maintains directional hints about which direction Alice is in, though no one knows for sure which node is actually Alice. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26.20040601 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Check out my free webcam today only :)
Title: i3x210a820d3516277g9524 Want to see my webcam!? Its finally up for you to see! Press this to see my webpage Would you like to stop reciving these?, press
Bug#267694: marked as done (ITP: wininfo -- displays information about X windows under the mouse cursor)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:28:48 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267694: fixed in wininfo 0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2004 23:02:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 23 16:02:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from neo.wh-stuttgart.de [141.70.120.50] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BzNpz-0002il-00; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:02:51 -0700 Received: (qmail 6392 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Aug 2004 23:02:24 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Martin Theiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: wininfo -- displays information about X windows under the mouse cursor X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:02:24 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: wininfo Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Billy Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://dri.freedesktop.org/Software/wininfo * License : GPL Description : displays information about X windows under the mouse cursor This is a window information utility for developers of applications, toolkits, and window managers. wininfo follows your pointer providing information about the windows below. Information presented includes: . - A detailed description of the window hierarchy below the pointer. - Parsed interpretations of standard properties from both the application window and the window manager. - Information about X server resources used by the application. . xwininfo requires an X server supporting the X-Resource extension. The XFree86 server provided by Debian enables this resource by default. . Homepage: http://dri.freedesktop.org/Software/wininfo -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-mini-01 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 267694-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:38:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:38:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0aNs-0007L9-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:38:49 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0aEC-0008EA-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:28:48 -0400 From: Martin Theiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#267694: fixed in wininfo 0.6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:28:48 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: wininfo Source-Version: 0.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wininfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wininfo_0.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wininfo/wininfo_0.6-1.diff.gz wininfo_0.6-1.dsc to pool/main/w/wininfo/wininfo_0.6-1.dsc wininfo_0.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wininfo/wininfo_0.6-1_i386.deb wininfo_0.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/w/wininfo/wininfo_0.6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Theiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated wininfo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the arch
Bug#267579: marked as done (ITP: kompose -- full screen task manager for KDE)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:30:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267579: fixed in kompose 0.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2004 12:13:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 23 05:13:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail1.es.34web.net [213.149.240.3] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BzDhd-0003x8-00; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 05:13:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 5931 invoked by uid 0); 23 Aug 2004 12:13:05 - Received: from unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (213.98.20.56) by 213.149.240.3 with SMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:13:05 + MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" From: Luis Mayoral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: kompose -- full screen task manager for KDE Bcc: Luis Mayoral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:13:09 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: kompose Version : 0.4.1 Upstream Author : Hans Oischinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://kompose.berlios.de/ * License : GPL Description : full screen task manager for KDE Komposé offers a great new way to manage a big number of windows on different Virtual Desktops. It creates a fullscreen view where every window is represented by a scaled screenshot of its own. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 267579-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:38:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:38:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0aNv-0007LN-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:38:51 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0aFU-0008IM-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:30:08 -0400 From: Luis Mayoral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#267579: fixed in kompose 0.4.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:30:08 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: kompose Source-Version: 0.4.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kompose, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kompose_0.4.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kompose/kompose_0.4.1-1.diff.gz kompose_0.4.1-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kompose/kompose_0.4.1-1.dsc kompose_0.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kompose/kompose_0.4.1-1_i386.deb kompose_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kompose/kompose_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luis Mayoral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kompose package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:56:57 +0200 Source: kompose Binary: kompose Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Luis Mayoral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Luis Mayoral <[EMAIL PROTEC
Processed: Changing #253907's ownership [properly]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 253907 ! Bug#253907: ITP: lazarus -- Rapid Application Development (RAD) tool for Free Pascal Owner recorded as Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#267141: marked as done (ITP: silky -- Secure Internet Live Conferencing (SILC) GTK+ client)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:11:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267141: fixed in silky 0.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2004 20:50:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 20 13:50:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mlf.linux.rulez.org [192.188.244.13] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ByGLf-0006WV-00; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:50:55 -0700 Received: from mlf.linux.rulez.org (mlf.linux.rulez.org [192.188.244.13]) by mlf.linux.rulez.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708F38B99E for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:50:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:50:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: silky -- Secure Internet Live Conferencing (SILC) GTK+ client Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I intend to package called silky which is a graphical chat client for the SILC protocol. It uses the previously submitted libsilc reference library. Package: silky License: GPLv2 URL: http://silky.sourceforge.net/ Description: - Description: SILC (Secure Internet Live Conferencing) GTK+ based client Silky is a secure chat client. Silky has a simple and easy to use user interface. Silky runs in Windows, Linux, OS X, NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and possibly in some other systems. Silky doesn't require Gnome desktop to run, just GTK2 runtime libraries. Silky uses the secure SILC Protocol, used in free-for-all chat network SILCNet. -- VWOL Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG public key: http://people.debian.org/~toma/gpgkey-toma.asc GPG ID: 69C0FA93 --- Received: (at 267141-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:23:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:23:59 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0a9W-0006AI-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:23:59 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zxd-0007SF-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:11:41 -0400 From: Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#267141: fixed in silky 0.5.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:11:41 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: silky Source-Version: 0.5.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of silky, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: silky_0.5.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/silky/silky_0.5.1-1.diff.gz silky_0.5.1-1.dsc to pool/main/s/silky/silky_0.5.1-1.dsc silky_0.5.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/silky/silky_0.5.1-1_i386.deb silky_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/silky/silky_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated silky package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:31:09 +0200 Source: silky Binary: silky Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Tamas SZERB
Bug#266831: marked as done (ITP: gfccore -- GTK+ Foundation Classes Core)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:12:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266831: fixed in gfccore 2.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2004 11:15:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 19 04:15:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vangogh.smartprice.com.br [200.162.81.151] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bxktd-0007SY-00; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:15:53 -0700 Received: from smartprice.com.br (miro.smartprice.com.br [192.168.100.12]) by vangogh.smartprice.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id EB473E262; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:17:04 -0300 (BRT) Received: (nullmailer pid 4363 invoked by uid 8723); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:17:47 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: gfccore -- GTK+ Foundation Classes Core X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:17:46 -0300 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gfccore Version : 2.3.0 Upstream Author : Jeff Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/gfc/ * License : LGPL Description : GTK+ Foundation Classes Core GTK+ Foundation Classes (GFC) is a set of integrated C++ foundation classes for developing GTK+ applications. . GFC-Core is a collection of C++ modules that form the core of the GFC library upon which other modules, such as GFC-UI, are built. . GFC-Core modules include a C++ wrapper for GLib, a UTF8 string class, automatic memory management, a typesafe C++ signal and slots system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to pt_BR) --- Received: (at 266831-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:23:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:23:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0a8g-0005xE-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:23:06 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zy5-0007WY-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:12:09 -0400 From: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#266831: fixed in gfccore 2.3.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:12:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: gfccore Source-Version: 2.3.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gfccore, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gfccore_2.3.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gfccore/gfccore_2.3.0-1.diff.gz gfccore_2.3.0-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gfccore/gfccore_2.3.0-1.dsc gfccore_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gfccore/gfccore_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz libgfccore-2.0-0-dbg_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfccore/libgfccore-2.0-0-dbg_2.3.0-1_i386.deb libgfccore-2.0-0_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfccore/libgfccore-2.0-0_2.3.0-1_i386.deb libgfccore-dev_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfccore/libgfccore-dev_2.3.0-1_i386.deb libgfccore-doc_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfccore/libgfccore-doc_2.3.0-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be clo
Bug#264724: marked as done (ITP: wget-el -- an interface for wget on Emacsen)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:09:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#264724: fixed in wget-el 0.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:14:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 10 00:14:59 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 37.1.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (mail.gclab.org) [219.111.1.37] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BuQqZ-0003Xo-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:14:59 -0700 Received: from localhost (chulip [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gclab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8704112660 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:14:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.gclab.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chulip [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28208-04-3 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:14:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (chulip [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gclab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B1E112637 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:14:57 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:13:55 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: wget-el -- an interface for wget on Emacsen Organization: Debian Project X-PGP-key-URL: http://keyring.debian.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x39CCF0C7 X-fingerprint: 2963 D60B 2CBA 075C 9BCC 8376 FCF6 DD45 39CC F0C7 X-URL: http://tagoh.jp/ X-Attribution: AT X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.65 on Emacs 21.3.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at gclab.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: wget-el Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL or Web page : http://pop-club.hp.infoseek.co.jp/emacs/emacs-wget/ * License : GPL2 Description : an interface for wget on Emacsen GNU wget is a free software package for retrieving files using HTTP, HTTPS and FTP, the most widely-used Internet protocols. It is a non-interactive command line tool. This package contains an interface program of GNU wget for Emacsen. --- Received: (at 264724-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:23:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:23:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0a9U-0006A6-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:23:57 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zvg-0007Mx-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:09:40 -0400 From: Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#264724: fixed in wget-el 0.4.2-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:09:40 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: wget-el Source-Version: 0.4.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wget-el, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wget-el_0.4.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wget-el/wget-el_0.4.2-1.diff.gz wget-el_0.4.2-1.dsc to pool/main/w/wget-el/wget-el_0.4.2-1.dsc wget-el_0.4.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/w/wget-el/wget-el_0.4.2-1_all.deb wget-el_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/w/wget-el/wget-el_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Akira
Bug#266863: marked as done (ITP: gfcui -- GTK+ Foundation Classes UI)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:15:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266863: fixed in gfcui 2.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2004 13:14:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 19 06:14:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vangogh.smartprice.com.br [200.162.81.151] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bxmkp-0001rE-00; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:14:56 -0700 Received: from smartprice.com.br (miro.smartprice.com.br [192.168.100.12]) by vangogh.smartprice.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id D9CBBE87A; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:16:06 -0300 (BRT) Received: (nullmailer pid 23798 invoked by uid 8723); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:16:49 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: gfcui -- GTK+ Foundation Classes UI X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:16:49 -0300 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gfcui Version : 2.3.0 Upstream Author : Jeff Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/gfc * License : LGPL Description : GTK+ Foundation Classes UI GTK+ Foundation Classes (GFC) is a set of integrated C++ foundation classes for developing GTK+ applications. . GFC-UI is a collection of C++ modules that form the user interface library of GFC. This is the library you will primarily use to build your applications interface. . GFC-UI includes C++ wrappers for the ATK, GDK, GTK, GdkPixbuf and Pango libraries. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to pt_BR) --- Received: (at 266863-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:24:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:24:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0a9g-0006Ch-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:24:08 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0a1O-0007tJ-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:15:34 -0400 From: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#266863: fixed in gfcui 2.3.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:15:34 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: gfcui Source-Version: 2.3.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gfcui, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gfc-examples_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfc-examples_2.3.0-1_i386.deb gfcui_2.3.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfcui_2.3.0-1.diff.gz gfcui_2.3.0-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfcui_2.3.0-1.dsc gfcui_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfcui_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz libgfcui-2.0-0-dbg_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-2.0-0-dbg_2.3.0-1_i386.deb libgfcui-2.0-0_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-2.0-0_2.3.0-1_i386.deb libgfcui-dev_2.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-dev_2.3.0-1_i386.deb libgfcui-doc_2.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-doc_2.3.0-1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will
Bug#247428: marked as done (ITP: mathomatic -- Portable computer algebra system)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247428: fixed in mathomatic 11.3c-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 05:03:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 04 22:03:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl-200-78-37-163.prod-infinitum.com.mx (Cilantro) [200.78.37.163] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BLEZK-0006nu-00; Tue, 04 May 2004 22:03:42 -0700 Received: from damogar by Cilantro with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BLEZ9-0001vQ-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:03:31 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: mathomatic -- Portable computer algebra system X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 00:03:31 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mathomatic Version : 11.0 Upstream Author : George Gesslein II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.panix.com/~gesslein/ * License : LGPL Description : Portable computer algebra system Mathomatic implements most of the rules of algebra for the mathematical operators +, -, *, /, and power (including roots). . Mathomatic can symbolically: * Solve equations. * Completely simplify equations. * Differentiate. * Do sensitivity and finite series analysis. * Combine and solve simultaneous algebraic equations. * Do complex number and polynomial arithmetic. * Generate efficient "C" code. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=POSIX --- Received: (at 247428-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:09:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 23:09:38 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zvd-0004U0-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:09:38 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zoh-0006yd-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:02:27 -0400 From: MJ Ray (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#247428: fixed in mathomatic 11.3c-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:02:27 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: mathomatic Source-Version: 11.3c-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mathomatic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mathomatic-primes_11.3c-1_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mathomatic/mathomatic-primes_11.3c-1_i386.deb mathomatic_11.3c-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mathomatic/mathomatic_11.3c-1.diff.gz mathomatic_11.3c-1.dsc to pool/main/m/mathomatic/mathomatic_11.3c-1.dsc mathomatic_11.3c-1_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mathomatic/mathomatic_11.3c-1_i386.deb mathomatic_11.3c.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mathomatic/mathomatic_11.3c.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. MJ Ray (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mathomatic package) (This message was generated automatically at their reque
Processed: I intend to package lazarus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner ! Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 253907 ITP: lazarus -- Rapid Application Development (RAD) tool for > Free Pascal Bug#253907: RFP: lazarus -- Lazarus is a free RAD tool for FreePascal Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#266919: marked as done (ITP: randomplay -- command-line based shuffle music player that remembers songs between sessions)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:50:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266919: fixed in randomplay 0.40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2004 18:14:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 19 11:14:35 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from proper.eecs.harvard.edu (bostoncoop.net) [140.247.60.120] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BxrQo-00064Q-00; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:14:34 -0700 Received: from joehill.bostoncoop.net (24.247.229.232.tvc.mi.chartermi.net [24.247.229.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bostoncoop.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F8495AA; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joehill.bostoncoop.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E35586740C8; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:14:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:14:41 -0400 From: Adam Kessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: randomplay -- command-line based shuffle music player that remembers songs between sessions Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: randomplay Version : 0.40 Upstream Author : Adam Rosi-Kessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/randomplay License : GPL Description : command-line based shuffle music player that remembers songs between sessions Randomplay allows you to play your music collection (or execute any arbitrary commands on any arbitrary filetypes) in random order with a memory of songs played preserved across sessions, so you don't "lose your place" if you stop and resume later. It also has many features to make command-line music playing more convenient, including recursive regexp searching for tracks and the ability to specify a certain number of tracks, bytes, or minutes to play. Randomplay will also generate a list of music files to be loaded onto a portable music player device. It also includes a 'random weighting' feature, so songs you prefer are more likely to come up in the random shuffle according to your preferences. . Randomplay is a convenient tool for the user who does everything in an xterm window or console and finds herself constantly devising complex find/grep/sed command lines to play just the right set of songs. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc4-joehill.apm.acpi Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 266919-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 05:53:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 22:53:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zfe-0007NA-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:53:07 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Zd1-0006EK-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:50:23 -0400 From: Adam Kessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#266919: fixed in randomplay 0.40 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:50:23 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: randomplay Source-Version: 0.40 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of randomplay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: randomplay_0.40.
Bug#233298: marked as done (ITP: forrest)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:34:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233298: fixed in forrest 0.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2004 21:56:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 17 13:56:47 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 2k37dm1.cm.chello.no (doohan.bang.priv.no) [80.111.85.245] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AtDCx-0006av-00; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:56:47 -0800 Received: from sb by doohan.bang.priv.no with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AtDCs-0005J4-00; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:56:42 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steinar Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: forrest -- Forrest is an XML standards-oriented project documentation framework based on Apache Cocoon, providing XSLT stylesheets and schemas, images and other resources. Forrest uses these to render the XML source content into a website via command-line, robot, or a dynamic web application. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:56:41 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_16 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_16 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: forrest Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : Apache Software License, Version 1.1 Description : Website creation tool (Include the long description here.) Forrest is an XML standards-oriented project documentation framework based on Apache Cocoon, providing XSLT stylesheets and schemas, images and other resources. Forrest uses these to render the XML source content into a website via command-line, robot, or a dynamic web application. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux doohan 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Tue Jan 6 21:29:44 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 233298-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 05:44:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 22:44:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0ZX3-0006Zv-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:44:13 -0700 Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0ZO1-0005MN-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:34:53 -0400 From: Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#233298: fixed in forrest 0.5.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:34:53 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: forrest Source-Version: 0.5.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of forrest, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: forrest_0.5.1-1.dsc to pool/contrib/f/forrest/forrest_0.5.1-1.dsc forrest_0.5.1-1.tar.gz to pool/contrib/f/forrest/forrest_0.5.1-1.tar.gz forrest_0.5.1-1_all.deb to pool/contrib/f/forrest/forrest_0.5.1-1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated forrest package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:14:05 +0200 Source: forrest Bina
