Bug#208459: Time may be running out

2005-02-15 Thread Celia Costa
Today is a new day for your residence. With levels 
at their headline-making historic lows, our programs 
are better now than ever before. Even if you've recently 
closed on a property, now is the time to check your 
numbers.

Our advisors are here to help you decide your options.
In fact, did you know that a 30 year fixed program may 
not always be the best option? 

There are other ways to do it, and we would like to tell 
you about it.

Find out what all your neighbors are talking about:

http://www.lendzx.info/index.php?refid=vik




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295331: maintenance of fetchmail package

2005-02-15 Thread Lucas Wall
On 02/16/05 01:14, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:29:21AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
On 02/16/05 00:21, Graham Wilson wrote:
Three people have stepped up to maintain the package. Would all of you
be interested in working together to co-maintain the pacakge? The
fetchmail source is already maintained in Subversion, so it seems this
could be coordinated easily.
Co-maintain is fine for me. Do you have an alioth project? or just an 
independent repo?

An independent repository. I suggest everyone who is interested to
subscribe to the fetchmail mailing lists at Berlios [1] and at CCIL [2].
I'll ask the other current project admins if I can create a list just
for Debian packaging.
Perfect. A mailing list would be very useful to collect bug reports and 
discuss packaging issues. Its much simpler than CCing. Any mailing list 
will do, if you can't create one there we can set up a project in Alioth.

Since upstream work is going slow, ideally everybody who is interested
would eventually help participate upstream.
Fine.
It also seems that only one of the people interested is a developer. I'd
be happy to sponsor uploads if needed.
Perfect. If we co-maintain sponsor uploads won't be generally needed, 
but its good to know you have time to sponsor in case I'm not around.

Yes, I'd be glad for you to do uploads normally, and for me just to
serve as backup.
Perfect. Then we should just wait to see what Nico and Goswin feel about 
all this.

K.
--
Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  .''`.
Buenos Aires, Argentina: :ø :   Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.kadath.com.ar   `. `'  http://www.debian.org
PGP: 1024D/84FB46D6  `-
 5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356Ahttp://people.debian.org/~lwall
 4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#295331: maintenance of fetchmail package

2005-02-15 Thread Graham Wilson
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:29:21AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> On 02/16/05 00:21, Graham Wilson wrote:
> >Three people have stepped up to maintain the package. Would all of you
> >be interested in working together to co-maintain the pacakge? The
> >fetchmail source is already maintained in Subversion, so it seems this
> >could be coordinated easily.
> 
> Co-maintain is fine for me. Do you have an alioth project? or just an 
> independent repo?

An independent repository. I suggest everyone who is interested to
subscribe to the fetchmail mailing lists at Berlios [1] and at CCIL [2].
I'll ask the other current project admins if I can create a list just
for Debian packaging.

Since upstream work is going slow, ideally everybody who is interested
would eventually help participate upstream.

> >It also seems that only one of the people interested is a developer. I'd
> >be happy to sponsor uploads if needed.
> 
> Perfect. If we co-maintain sponsor uploads won't be generally needed, 
> but its good to know you have time to sponsor in case I'm not around.

Yes, I'd be glad for you to do uploads normally, and for me just to
serve as backup.

[1] http://developer.berlios.de/mail/?group_id=1824
[2] http://lists.ccil.org/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail 

-- 
gram


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



New pharm site new great prices Summer

2005-02-15 Thread Stacie Arredondo
Refill Notification Ref: KM-196680952722

Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Our automated system has identified that you most likely are ready to refill 
your recent online pharmaceutical order.

To help you get your needed supply, we have sent this reminder notice.

Please use the refill system http://crania.discounthavenshop.com/?wid=100069 to 
obtain your item in the quickest possible manner.

Thank you for your time and we look forward to assisting you.

Sincerely,

Stacie Arredondo




rap rhj listen ffo garlic mdq cross muo 
craig sx lund wax clare xph denton cap attach qim recital aly 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295331: maintenance of fetchmail package

2005-02-15 Thread Lucas Wall
On 02/16/05 00:21, Graham Wilson wrote:
Three people have stepped up to maintain the package. Would all of you
be interested in working together to co-maintain the pacakge? The
fetchmail source is already maintained in Subversion, so it seems this
could be coordinated easily.
Co-maintain is fine for me. Do you have an alioth project? or just an 
independent repo?

It also seems that only one of the people interested is a developer. I'd
be happy to sponsor uploads if needed.
Perfect. If we co-maintain sponsor uploads won't be generally needed, 
but its good to know you have time to sponsor in case I'm not around.

K.
--
Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  .''`.
Buenos Aires, Argentina: :ø :   Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.kadath.com.ar   `. `'  http://www.debian.org
PGP: 1024D/84FB46D6  `-
 5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356Ahttp://people.debian.org/~lwall
 4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#295331: maintenance of fetchmail package

2005-02-15 Thread Graham Wilson
Three people have stepped up to maintain the package. Would all of you
be interested in working together to co-maintain the pacakge? The
fetchmail source is already maintained in Subversion, so it seems this
could be coordinated easily.

It also seems that only one of the people interested is a developer. I'd
be happy to sponsor uploads if needed.

-- 
gram


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: ITA

2005-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 268126 ITA: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
Bug#268126: O: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
Changed Bug title.

> owner 268126 !
Bug#268126: ITA: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
Owner recorded as Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> # I am not a DD but am looking for a sponsor
> # My key has been signed by a DD
> 
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295331: O: fetchmail

2005-02-15 Thread Lucas Wall
On 02/15/05 03:56, Graham Wilson wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I haven't been able to take good care of the fetchmail package, and
therefore I'm orphaning it.
I'd like whoever adopts it to be able to spend a good amount of time
with the package. Upstream has been slow lately, and the adopter would
likely end up working with upstream. Whoever adopts the package should
be very familiar with C and Bourne shell scripting.
I'd also ideally like to find someone who uses the system-wide fetchmail
setup, since I was never able to test that very well.
Fetchmail is a central part of my mail system. I use it system wide to 
harvest mail from several acounts for me and my wife.

Whatever is needed (maintain, co-maintain, sponsor) please count with my 
help.

K.
--
Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  .''`.
Buenos Aires, Argentina: :ø :   Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.kadath.com.ar   `. `'  http://www.debian.org
PGP: 1024D/84FB46D6  `-
 5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356Ahttp://people.debian.org/~lwall
 4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#275775: marked as done (RFA: bplay -- Buffered audio file player/recorder)

2005-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:09:58 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I'm rescinding the RFA
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2004 07:11:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 10 00:11:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-170-97-3.idc.ajato.com.br (qmail-out.ajato.com.br) 
[200.170.97.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CGXrH-0006RQ-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 00:11:08 -0700
Received: (qmail 20354 invoked by uid 0); 10 Oct 2004 07:08:50 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by dance with SMTP; 10 Oct 2004 07:08:50 -
Received: from claviola by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CGXrH-0004ec-F7; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 04:11:07 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: bplay -- Buffered audio file player/recorder
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 04:11:07 -0300
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the bplay package.

The package description is:
 The bplay package provides a simple command-line utility for playing
 and recording audio files in raw sample, VOC and WAV formats.
 .
 To use this program you need a soundcard of some kind and the
 appropriate driver configured into your kernel.
 .
 When run the program creates two processes which share a memory
 buffer.  It does reading/writing on the disk and the sound device
 simultaneously, in order to be less liable to `pause' because the
 disk is too slow or too busy.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (999, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 275775-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 01:09:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 17:09:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1DhX-0005Lb-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:59 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b11so8213rne
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:58 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;

b=kehNvmg5OK1qYtIaKe3ie32ZnPGg4f2Zc7IhJNlgXeHVPZz34WlvSzj9sudON/++5iFstsXFNqMbwgcl+Av25dT0xpCigLraierCW8WHWAlJVmESfKjHKX++SVxo/z9HGp/06IDJymlFTv6/Fgf90xXSsZyjHKpAy2GLALLkBLg=
Received: by 10.38.71.71 with SMTP id t71mr27199rna;
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.10.12 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:09:58 -0200
From: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I'm rescinding the RFA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Since no one stepped up to adopt bplay, I'll keep maintaining it.

-- 
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#236384: marked as done (ITA: bplay -- Buffered audio file player/recorder)

2005-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:09:58 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I'm rescinding the RFA
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 23:42:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 15:42:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-170-97-3.smtp1.ajato.com.br (qmail-out.ajato.com.br) 
[200.170.97.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzOxL-0006Am-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:42:15 -0800
Received: (qmail 7576 invoked by uid 0); 5 Mar 2004 23:42:10 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by dance with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 23:42:10 -
Received: from claviola by localhost with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AzOxG-0006Ui-29
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:42:10 -0300
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:42:09 -0300
From: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: bplay -- Buffered audio file player/recorder
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to orphan the bplay package.
The package description is:
 The bplay package provides a simple command-line utility for playing
 and recording audio files in raw sample, VOC and WAV formats.
 .
 To use this program you need a soundcard of some kind and the
 appropriate driver configured into your kernel.
 .
 When run the program creates two processes which share a memory
 buffer.  It does reading/writing on the disk and the sound device
 simultaneously, in order to be less liable to `pause' because the
 disk is too slow or too busy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-mm4
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 275775-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 01:09:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 17:09:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1DhX-0005Lb-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:59 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b11so8213rne
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:58 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;

b=kehNvmg5OK1qYtIaKe3ie32ZnPGg4f2Zc7IhJNlgXeHVPZz34WlvSzj9sudON/++5iFstsXFNqMbwgcl+Av25dT0xpCigLraierCW8WHWAlJVmESfKjHKX++SVxo/z9HGp/06IDJymlFTv6/Fgf90xXSsZyjHKpAy2GLALLkBLg=
Received: by 10.38.71.71 with SMTP id t71mr27199rna;
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.10.12 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:09:58 -0200
From: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I'm rescinding the RFA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Since no one stepped up to adopt bplay, I'll keep maintaining it.

-- 
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-15 Thread Reto Schuettel
Hi Matthew

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:40:36AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Reto Schuettel wrote:
> > I made a mistake, I asked the author, created a package and AFTER that I
> > filed an ITP.
> 
> Oooh.  Did you check wnpp before you started, in case someone else was
> working on the package?

Of course :). But I didn't expect a 'hey, we already have that'-problem :). 
Next time...
 
> > Hmm... I'll try to find a sponsor, with a pointer to this discussion
> > here. The sponsor should decide if it's worth to upload the package. Do
> > you agree with this procedure?
> 
> I think that's a good idea.  A potential sponsor will hopefully look
> at bontmia with reference to the other alternatives available, and
> make a judgment call on whether it's sufficiently different.

Okay!

Thanks for your advices!

Regards
Reto Schüttel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#243938: Progress?

2005-02-15 Thread Micah Anderson
Sounds good -- this bug had just gone radio silent, so I wanted to see
if it had been dropped or something, nice to see there is good reason
behind it.

If you have a package that works, and is good it might be a good idea
to upload it so it gets a spot in the new queue, and as you may know
things in the new queue don't necessarily get processed in order.
Getting things in there, and then updating the package with a
different installer is an option.

Thanks for the update!
micah


Frederik Dannemare schrieb am Tuesday, den 15. February 2005:

> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 23:12, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Its been a month since the last viewable activity on this ITP. There
> > recently was a new release of rkhunter and I am very interested in
> > seeing it packaged for Debian, so I guess I am just being irritating
> > in asking whats going on, but I will offer my help if any is needed.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I emailed upstream author 3 weeks ago with some (rather big) patches to 
> suggest a much more flexible installer process.
> 
> When I saw the 1.2.0 release last week I yet again emailed upstream and 
> asked about my suggestion. He wrote back to me that he was a bit behind 
> on unread mails in his inbox, but he would let me know when he had had 
> time to review my patches.
> 
> Until then I'm a bit hessitating as to package rkhunter (I'm also very 
> busy with my NM process, atm). Anyways, the NEW queue is *huge* these 
> days, so an upload of rkhunter tomorrow most likely would be waiting in 
> the NEW queue for months, I estimate.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare
> http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-15 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Reto Schuettel wrote:
> I made a mistake, I asked the author, created a package and AFTER that I
> filed an ITP.

Oooh.  Did you check wnpp before you started, in case someone else was
working on the package?

> Hmm... I'll try to find a sponsor, with a pointer to this discussion
> here. The sponsor should decide if it's worth to upload the package. Do
> you agree with this procedure?

I think that's a good idea.  A potential sponsor will hopefully look at
bontmia with reference to the other alternatives available, and make a
judgment call on whether it's sufficiently different.

- Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#295311: RFH: mysql-dfsg -- mysql database client library

2005-02-15 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Sean

On 2005-02-15 sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:26:09PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > This would be great. If you register yourself in the package 
> > tracking system you get all the mysql related bug reports.
> okay, just registered myself.

Hooray :-)

> anyway, let me know once you have the svn repository set up, and if
> there's something specific you'd like me to start with, or whether
> i should just starting hacking at bts reports.  

Starting with the bug reports would be good... e.g. from time to time I 
have to close all unreproducible bugs that are older than 2 month and check
if new bugs came in without me noticing them. Also forwarded upstream bugs
that may be closed in the meantime have to be checked regulary.
(BTW: I tag them "forwarded 12354 http://..."; so that I can jump there
in the web browser)

bye,

-christian-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295311: RFH: mysql-dfsg -- mysql database client library

2005-02-15 Thread sean finney
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:26:09PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> This would be great. If you register yourself in the package 
> tracking system you get all the mysql related bug reports.

okay, just registered myself.

> Closing one bug per week is enough to make me happy, although I would not
> complain about more engagement :)

alright, let's see how that goes then :)

> If you like to prepare new upstream versions you can also do if you like.
> I'm currently setting up a subversion repository for the debian/ directory
> on alioth.debian.org to easy colaboratory maintainership.

i think i'll leave new upstream releases to someone with a little more
time on their hands, but would be willing to contribute any needed
ideas/comments.  

anyway, let me know once you have the svn repository set up, and if
there's something specific you'd like me to start with, or whether
i should just starting hacking at bts reports.  


sean

-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#243938: Progress?

2005-02-15 Thread Frederik Dannemare
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 23:12, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Its been a month since the last viewable activity on this ITP. There
> recently was a new release of rkhunter and I am very interested in
> seeing it packaged for Debian, so I guess I am just being irritating
> in asking whats going on, but I will offer my help if any is needed.

Hi,

I emailed upstream author 3 weeks ago with some (rather big) patches to 
suggest a much more flexible installer process.

When I saw the 1.2.0 release last week I yet again emailed upstream and 
asked about my suggestion. He wrote back to me that he was a bit behind 
on unread mails in his inbox, but he would let me know when he had had 
time to review my patches.

Until then I'm a bit hessitating as to package rkhunter (I'm also very 
busy with my NM process, atm). Anyways, the NEW queue is *huge* these 
days, so an upload of rkhunter tomorrow most likely would be waiting in 
the NEW queue for months, I estimate.

Best regards,
-- 
Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295311: RFH: mysql-dfsg -- mysql database client library

2005-02-15 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Sean

On 2005-02-15 sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Although I'm happy for anybody who helps a but, I'm looking specifically
> > for an official Debian Developer as a Co-Maintainer who is able to upload
> > packages.
> 
> i've got a pretty full plate as it is, but i can offer to help with
> doing uploads and some of the less involved bug fixes if it would
> be of any help.  since much of my current work (nagios, dbconfig-common)
> is closely tied into mysql, i'd be happy to help with what i can.

This would be great. If you register yourself in the package 
tracking system you get all the mysql related bug reports.

Closing one bug per week is enough to make me happy, although I would not
complain about more engagement :)

If you like to prepare new upstream versions you can also do if you like.
I'm currently setting up a subversion repository for the debian/ directory
on alioth.debian.org to easy colaboratory maintainership.

bye,

-christian-

P.S. Please register for both mysql-dfsg and mysql-dfsg-4.1!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#274472: Moria, as in the Author of

2005-02-15 Thread Clint Adams
> Do you think moria still has a place in Debian? Or do you gather it
> might be better removed?

A better question is whether Mr. Koeneke is willing to relicense his
code under a free software license so that moria and angband and
derivatives can finally be free.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#243938: Progress?

2005-02-15 Thread Micah Anderson
Hello,

Its been a month since the last viewable activity on this ITP. There
recently was a new release of rkhunter and I am very interested in
seeing it packaged for Debian, so I guess I am just being irritating
in asking whats going on, but I will offer my help if any is needed.

Thanks,
micah


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-15 Thread Reto Schuettel
Hi

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:53:12AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:49:45PM +0100, Reto Schuettel wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:25:15AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > > bontmia creates incremental snapshots of a list of given directories
> > > > over the network by using rsync over ssh and hard links. Every snapshot
> > > > looks for the user like a complete copy of all the files, but as a 
> > > > result
> > > > of using hard links every unchanged copy of a file is stored only once 
> > > > on
> > > > the hard disk.
> > > 
> > > What advantages does this package have over, say, dirvish or backuppc?
> > 
> > I never used dirvish nor backuppc, so I can't really say what the
> > difference are. But it seems like bontmia is simpler than both
> > (especially backuppc).
> 
> Simpler in terms of features available, or simpler in terms of configuration
> for the same level of features?

Fewer features, shorter script and easier configuration... but it isn't
a big difference.

> > I can't really say if that's a reason for creating a new package, I
> > personally would like it, because it's already running on several of my
> > machines, but beside of that, it wouldn't be a big problem for me to close
> > my ITP.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> It's a tricky one.  I'm a firm believer in not duplicating effort, and with
> the existence of at least two other packages which appear to do a similar
> job, I'm just worried that we'll end up with a lot of packages doing the
> same thing, which does nothing except dissipate effort and fragment the user
> base of all of the alternatives.  However, at the end of the day, you're the
> one expending the effort, so if you think it's worthwhile, I've got no
> reason to stop you.

I made a mistake, I asked the author, created a package and AFTER that I
filed an ITP. So, my effort isn't the problem anymore. Splitting up the
user base is one... 

Hmm... I'll try to find a sponsor, with a pointer to this discussion
here. The sponsor should decide if it's worth to upload the package. Do
you agree with this procedure?

Regards,
Reto Schüttel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#275935: marked as done (ITA: quik -- Bootloader for PowerMac or CHRP systems)

2005-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:33:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275935: fixed in quik 2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2004 06:34:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 10 23:34:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de [129.187.111.42] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CGtlq-0008Cb-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:34:58 -0700
Received: by alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 951C752EE7; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:34:57 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFA: quik -- Bootloader for PowerMac or CHRP systems
Organization: Lehrstuhl fuer vergleichende Astrozoologie
X-Mahlzeit: Das ist per Saldo Gemuetlichkeit
Reply-To: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11 Oct 2004 08:34:57 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 20
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Hi,

I intend to orphan the PowerPC bootloader quik.  I haven't used it
myself for a long time, and don't feel like spending the time and
effort needed for getting it in shape again.  Apart from the two
important bugs already in the bts, quik lacks the capability of
loading a ramdisk, which makes it quite useless with the current
official kernels.

I do hope that someone steps up and takes over.  If this does not
happen within a week, I will orphan the package for good.

Regards, Jens.=20

--=20
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je p=E9zqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!

---
Received: (at 275935-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 20:38:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 12:38:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D19Sc-0002T3-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:38:18 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D19Nm-0007IK-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:33:18 -0500
From: Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#275935: fixed in quik 2.1-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:33:18 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: quik
Source-Version: 2.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
quik, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

quik_2.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/q/quik/quik_2.1-4.diff.gz
quik_2.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/q/quik/quik_2.1-4.dsc
quik_2.1-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/q/quik/quik_2.1-4_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated quik package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:08:25 +0100
Source: quik
Binary: quik
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EM

Bug#295430: marked as done (ITP: cpufrequtils -- Tools to access to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem)

2005-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:38:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295430: Acknowledgement (ITP: cpufrequtils -- Tools to 
access  to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 19:16:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 11:16:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gauss.dacya.ucm.es [147.96.67.15] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D18Bi-00070Z-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:16:47 -0800
Received: from javier by gauss.dacya.ucm.es with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D18Bh-0005Sb-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:16:45 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: cpufrequtils -- Tools to access to the Linux kernel cpufreq 
subsystem
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:16:45 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: cpufrequtils
  Version : 0.2-pre1
  Upstream Author : Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
  Description : Tools to access the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem

 To make access to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem easier for users and
 cpufreq userspace tools, a cpufrequtils package was created. It contains
 command line tools to determine current CPUfreq settings and to modify
 them (cpufreq-info and cpufreq-set).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to es_ES.UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 295430-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 20:38:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 12:38:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gauss.dacya.ucm.es [147.96.67.15] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D19Sz-0002W6-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:38:41 -0800
Received: from javier by gauss.dacya.ucm.es with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D19Sz-0005dy-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:38:41 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:38:41 +0100
From: Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#295430: Acknowledgement (ITP: cpufrequtils -- Tools to access  
to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


There was an ITP already.

--=20
---
Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint: A8AF 1F06 8663 F150 ABD8 1122 27E0 6415 A49E 9022
Key server: pgp.rediris.es
---

--O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCEl3QJ+BkFaSekCIRAiHDAKCpoWj6THcd3/92aBxdokCooCks9QCgu8th
TsWe/wFf22DUeVBGm05RvmQ=
=YR53
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Bug#295430: ITP: cpufrequtils -- Tools to access to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem

2005-02-15 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:16:45PM +0100, Javier Setoain wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> * Package name: cpufrequtils
>   Version : 0.2-pre1
>   Upstream Author : Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : GPL
>   Description : Tools to access the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem

http://bugs.debian.org/278767
http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW.html

Already ITP'd and uploaded, currently waiting in the NEW queue.

-- 
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295155: ITP: steam -- environment for cooperative knowledgemanagment

2005-02-15 Thread Alain Schroeder
Am Dienstag, den 15.02.2005, 17:27 + schrieb Thaddeus H. Black:
> Good idea.
> 
> > Different from most other cooperation tools is the novel possibility of
> > self-organisation and self-administration by the members within the virtual
> > environment.
> 
> Can server and client both be installed with minimal dependencies?  For
> example, without xlibs?
> 
I am focused on the server at the moment, which offers a webinterface
(it has it's own webserver) as well as the possibility to connect with a
news, email, irc, ftp and jabber client. We need it, because we use it
as a backend in a PHP based website. 

There are clients for the Zaurus and Java available. There also seems to
be another client written in Pike, but I don't know the status.

Bye,
   Alain



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295430: ITP: cpufrequtils -- Tools to access to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem

2005-02-15 Thread Javier Setoain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Javier Setoain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: cpufrequtils
  Version : 0.2-pre1
  Upstream Author : Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
  Description : Tools to access the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem

 To make access to the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem easier for users and
 cpufreq userspace tools, a cpufrequtils package was created. It contains
 command line tools to determine current CPUfreq settings and to modify
 them (cpufreq-info and cpufreq-set).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to es_ES.UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#274472: Moria, as in the Author of

2005-02-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:23:19PM +0430, Robert Koeneke wrote:
>Not sure why people are looking for me, but I received an e-mail
>containing a conversation thread claiming I am "unreachable".  Last I
>checked I was pretty easy to reach through [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>Moria is a game I wrote some 20 years ago.  Hard to believe anyone would
>still be playing it. 
> 
>Anyway, if someone is trying to reach me please pass along my e-mail
>address.  If you don't know what this e-mail is about then perhaps it was
>a prank on me so delete it.

Hi Robert!

The package is still part of Debian. It was the Debian maintainer that
lost interest in the package. See:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=274472

Apparantly, people still use it, see:

http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=moria

I'm cc'ing this mail to bug#274472, so that it can be considered by
people wanting to do something with it.

Do you think moria still has a place in Debian? Or do you gather it
might be better removed?

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295311: RFH: mysql-dfsg -- mysql database client library

2005-02-15 Thread sean finney
hi christian,

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Although I'm happy for anybody who helps a but, I'm looking specifically
> for an official Debian Developer as a Co-Maintainer who is able to upload
> packages.

i've got a pretty full plate as it is, but i can offer to help with
doing uploads and some of the less involved bug fixes if it would
be of any help.  since much of my current work (nagios, dbconfig-common)
is closely tied into mysql, i'd be happy to help with what i can.


sean

-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#295155: ITP: steam -- environment for cooperative knowledgemanagment

2005-02-15 Thread Thaddeus H. Black
Good idea.

> Different from most other cooperation tools is the novel possibility of
> self-organisation and self-administration by the members within the virtual
> environment.

Can server and client both be installed with minimal dependencies?  For
example, without xlibs?

-- 
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpfPZ636PWmB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#295394: RFP: hula -- calendar and mail server

2005-02-15 Thread Moray Allan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: hula
  Upstream Author : Novell
* URL : http://hula.cam.novell.com/index.php/Hula_Server
* License : LGPL/MPL
  Description : calendar and mail server

Hula features:

* SMTP server 
* IMAP server 
* POP server 
* Server-side rules 
* Calendar 
* AntiVirus scanner 
* List server 
* Free-busy scheduling 
* Web interface to mail and calendar. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#290426: RFP: xapian -- Probabilistic Information Retrieval library

2005-02-15 Thread Richard Boulton
I am the Xapian developer who put together the Debian packages on the
Xapian website.

Unfortunately, I haven't had the time to learn all the details of Debian
policy (or I would have applied to become a Debian maintainer), but the
packages function reasonably well.  They need some work to be made fully
Debian policy compliant, but I would be happy to liaise with and assist
any Debian developer - whether they wish to build on my existing
packages, or start afresh.

Please feel free to contact either me, or the Xapian development list at
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

-- 
Richard Boulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295331: O: fetchmail

2005-02-15 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Graham,

* Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-15 11:50]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> 
> I haven't been able to take good care of the fetchmail package, and
> therefore I'm orphaning it.
> 
> I'd like whoever adopts it to be able to spend a good amount of time
> with the package. Upstream has been slow lately, and the adopter would
> likely end up working with upstream. Whoever adopts the package should
> be very familiar with C and Bourne shell scripting.
> 
> I'd also ideally like to find someone who uses the system-wide fetchmail
> setup, since I was never able to test that very well.

Do you have a todo list with things that have to be done?
I am interrested in maintaining this package.
Regards Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'"`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de   (  grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps`._,'   
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred


pgpGmuLicqXnD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#295331: O: fetchmail

2005-02-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I haven't been able to take good care of the fetchmail package, and
> therefore I'm orphaning it.

Hi,

as a constant fetchmail user I would be very disapointed if it
disapears but being a non DD I'm not willing to add another sponsoring
hunt to my list.

I would be willing to do comaintainership with a DD though so that
there is a fixed person to do uploads, esspecialy since fetchmail
might need someone that can upload a security fix emidiatly (lets hope
this never happens :).

So if anyone is up for half the job contact me.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295288: ITP: sendemail -- smtp email from console sending tool

2005-02-15 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include 
* David Moreno Garza [Mon, Feb 14 2005, 02:56:12PM]:

> * Package name: sendemail
>   Version : 1.51
>   Upstream Author : Brandon Zehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://caspian.dotconf.net/menu/Software/SendEmail/
> * License : GPL with a non-free clause (non-free package)

You should have good reasons to get non-free crap into Debian.

>   Description : smtp email from console sending tool
> 
>  SendEmail is a lightweight, completly command line based, SMTP email
>  agent. 

And we have already at least two packages serving this purpose (ssmtp,
nullmailer). How is this one different?

Rgards,
Eduard.

PS: instead of the 1001st smtp-mailer agent, I would like to see a
compact local-nullmailer (sendmail command just writing to
/var/spool/mail or procmail pipe).
-- 
Nur wer im Wohlstand lebt, schimpft auf ihn.
-- Ludwig Marcuse


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]