Bug#357312: ITP: cryptonit -- A client side PKI cryptographic tool
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: cryptonit Version : 0.9.6 (Not yet published) Upstream Author : IDEALX S.A.S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cryptonit.org/ * License : GPL Description : A client side PKI cryptographic tool Cryptonit is a client side cryptographic tool which allows you to encrypt/decrypt and sign/verify files with PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) certificates. . It Comes with : o Encryption / Decryption based on ciphers provided by openssl o RSA Cryptography o Documents Signature / Verification o Generation of self-decrypting files (Use a password to encrypt your files either for GNU/Linux or Microsoft Windows) o LDAP Interface for certificate import o CRL Download o Addressbook . Cryptonit provides a graphical user interface written in C++ with wxWidgets. . Homepage: http://www.cryptonit.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#206113: ITA: freedict -- Freedict
Hi Guys, On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:34:21PM +0300, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote: > Hi, > > I'm thinking about adopting this package. Now I have almost prepared > the new version. There is the extract from the .changes file: > ->8-->8-->8- > Closes: 159304 186044 205417 206113 215014 226895 226904 302549 309814 > 310857 317078 318024 > Changes: > freedict (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* New maintainer (Closes: #206113). >* Updated with the new upstream versions (all, except eng-hun, > hun-eng and eng-por). Added new dictionaries: eng-ara, eng-rom, > eng-scr, ita-eng (Closes: #309814) and wel-eng. So, the source > tarbal version bumped to 1.2. >* All the dictionaries unformated, fixed the headers, removed the > many duplicated entries for most words in the dictionaries (but > not all) (Closes: #186044), and formated using locale en_US.UTF-8 > again: > - now all dictionaries have header 00-database-utf8 in dict >files (Closes: #317078). > - fixed some spelling mistakes in the eng-fra dictionary >(Closes: #302549, #310857). > - corrected the references to "Africaan" in the afr-deu dictionary >to "Afrikaans" (Closes: #318024). >* Added the file debian/README.Debian with a note about encoding. > (Closes: #226895, #159304). >* Removed the files from debian directory: control.tmpl, > gencontrol.py and namefixup.py (no need any more) > (Closes: #215014). >* debian/control: > - bumped Standards-Version to 3.6.2 (no changes required). > - removed Build-Depends on python2.3 and python2.3-dictdlib >packages and added Build-Depends on dictfmt package. > - removed dict-freedict meta-package, and added providing the >virtual dict-freedict package (Closes: #205417). > - added the new binary packages for dictionaries eng-ara, eng-rom, >eng-scr, ita-eng and wel-eng. >* debian/copyright: > - fixed the text formating (Closes: #226904). > - changed the postall adress of the FSF. > ->8-->8-->8- > > I will close many more bugs at the end of this work, I think. > What you can say about it? > Artur, what you think about my intention? You are the official > owner of ITA. I am attending the qa-meeting this week-end. If you need some help or sponsoring let me know and I'll help you, Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#312804: ITP: gnome-peercast -- Graphical user interface for PeerCast
Hi, On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:46:47PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: gnome-peercast > Version : 0.1 > Upstream Author : Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://takuo.jp/gnome-peercast/ > * License : GPL > Description : Graphical user interface for PeerCast > > This software is a GNOME user interface for PeerCast with full features of > original PeerCast. > . > PeerCast is a new, free way to listen to radio and watch video on the > Internet. You should probably remove the "is a new". Currenlty, it's probably new, but it will may be obsolete in few months. Morover it adds nothing usefull that ease the understanding of this description. Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#276096: Any news about the eclipse package for Debian ?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:25:39PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> When I can get a d-d to build it properly. =(
Can you please elaborate ? I am not sure that I understand what you
mean.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#276096: Any news about the eclipse package for Debian ?
Hi,
I've read the bug repport about eclipse. In which state are your
package? When will you upload it into the archive?
Thanks for your work,
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#277426: News about flumotion
Hi Jeff, I am writting you this email to know the status of flumotion. A friend of mine (in Cc:) is looking for this package. Do you have anything ready or a repository publicaly available ? Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248767: Lirc Debian Package
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > Pierre Machard wrote: > > Of course you can. Do you mind if I co-maintain the package with you ? > > I am using lirc, but to be honnest I lack of time these days. > > That would be wonderful! I am all for it! I intend to learn a lot while > working on lirc, and I am sure you will teach me most of it! :-) > > Ian Murdock is also interested in Co-Maintaining. I've put him in the > Uploaders field, tell me if it's fine with you. Of course. > So, now for the candid question... Do I have to add you to the Uploaders > field for you to be a co-maintainer or is there anything else we need to > do? I don't seem to find enough info on the developer corner... We can set-up a group on alioth, such as gnome-team. > > Out-of-date binaries have to be removed before lirc can enter into > > testing. I filled a bug repport #260565 and Thomas Bushnell also > > #267323 > > Are they merged? Do you want me to take care of that? Yes, please do it. > And a lot of bug reports need to be taken care of... I will start > working on the ones I can handle (i am just dealing with lintian and > linda + wnpp bugs in this upload). Whenever I stumble upon something I > can't quite fix I'll ping either of you. Do not forget po-debconf translation too. > We can also find better ways to work in this more effectively (Alioth?). > I can take care of this too. That way we can have an alioth mailing list > as the maintainer address and we can all be in the Uploaders field, > right? Exact. > Mmm, I just hope this won't get too big for my pants ;-) Don't worry :) -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#235526: New package ready - searching a sponsor
Hi Clément, On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:38:00PM +0200, Clément Stenac wrote: > Hello, > > new package for spong is ready and available at > http://debian.zorglub.org/packages/spong > > Here is the changelog : > > spong (2.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=low > . >* New maintainer >* Cleaned up the rules script and use debhelper when possible >* Added manpages for all binaries (pod2man or written) >* Fixed packaging glitches, makes lintian happier >* Fixed RRD domain directory permissions (Closes:#229965) >* Added User-Agent HTTP header (Closes:#245972) >* Made RRD link domain-specific (Closes:#229966) >* Remove useless GIF files (Closes:#229998) >* Added README.Debian for spong-www about rrdtool (Closes:#229934) > > > I am currently searching for a sponsor for this package. If you are > interested, please contact me. I can upload these packages. I'll take a look at it tonight. Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#220431: [glynn@info.ucl.ac.be: Mozart Debian package]
Forwarding this email to the BTS -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 --- Begin Message --- Yes, I am very interested. I am on vacation until the 28th July, we (the Mozart developers) have just made a mozart 1.3.1 release. My intention was to package that when I got back and then look for a mentor. We would very much like to get Mozart back into the official debian release. Are you willing to sponsor the packages for me? In the longer term I would like to become a Debian Developer myself. cheers, and thanks for your well-timed intervention! Kevin Pierre Machard writes: > Hi, > > I am a Debian Developer interested in QA on the Debian project. As you > perhaps know, the mozart package is in a bad shape in our distribution. > I am emailing you because, I've found your package on upstream > website[0] (I am curently building mozart, but it took longer than what > I had expected). > > If nothing is done, mozart will be removed from Debian. Since the > packages you did seem in good shape, I believe that they could be added > into the distribution. > > Do you have any experience with Debian and packaging ? It would be nice > if you could maintain this package so that the whole community will > benefit of it. I'll be glad to help you to include your package into the > official distribution. Are you interested in it ? > > Thanks in advance for your answer, > [0] : http://www.mozart-oz.org/download/debian/ > -- > Pierre Machard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org > GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 > -- - you're invited to: - The Second International Mozart/Oz Conference (MOZ 2004) Charleroi, Belgium, Oct. 7-8, 2004 http://www.cetic.be/moz2004 -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- End Message --- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#257167: ITP: debian-builder -- Rebuild Debian packages from Source
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2004-07-01
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: debian-builder
> Version : 0.3
> Upstream Author : Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/debian-builder
> * License : (GPL)
> Description : Rebuild Debian packages from Source
What difference with apt-build ?
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#223819: RFA: murasaki -- another HotPlug Agent
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-12-12
Severity: normal
In last august I adopted murasaki. Despite many emails I've sent to the
upstream author I never received any news from him.
Last week a RC bug was filled on this package (#223197). A good solution
to close this bug is probably to upload a newer version, but the lastest
developpment version dosen't meet requirements to be include in
Debian[1].
Since I have neither interest nor ressource to handle this package, I
request for an adopter.
I don't believe that this package is much use. People are generaly using
the hotplug package. So if nobody is willing to adopt this package after
a week, I will ask for its removal from Debian.
[1] : http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/murasaki/news/2.html
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#206113: ITA: freedict -- Freedict
Hello,
I send you this email because I've just made a QA upload of freedict to
close some bugs. (closes 1 RC and 1 wishlist + moving to python2.3)
Do you still intend to Adopt this package ?
In case you are not, I would like to adopt it.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#208339: Other greeds
Hi, On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:28:05PM -0400, Thomas Thurman wrote: > FWIW, there have been a few other programs called "greed" that people > have attempted to package for debian already. There are no reference in the WNPP database. > One of these is an emacs-based RGTP client, which never made it into > Debian (unfortunately: I'd have liked to have seen it in the Project). In that case why don't you fill a RFP. > Despite this, several people including me use the software installed > from its .deb, which does use the name "greed". That may cause a bit of > confusion for its users. Before packaging this games I made a apt-cache and I did not recieve any answer. I did not see any RFP related to greed. > See > <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~owend/free/greed_1.3.0a_all.deb> > from <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~owend/free/GREED.html>. > > There have also been attempts to package other "greed" programs, e.g. > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/debian-devel-199904/msg01568.html>, > > an ftp client. I don't know what happened to that in the end. Nothing. > Maybe it would be good to change the name of this package to something > like "greed-game"? No. Because, I am not supposed to know every code name that exists on the internet. Greed is in the section Games, its description explain that it's a game. What about more controversial games like nethack ? Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgp04yeo1zYg2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#208339: ITP: greed - A UNIX-hosted, curses-based clone of the DOS freeware game Greed
retitle 208339 ITP: greed -- A UNIX-hosted, curses-based clone of the DOS
freeware game Greed
thanks
* Package name: greed
Version : 3.4
Upstream Author : Eric S. Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://catb.org/~esr/greed
* License : BSD-like
Description : A UNIX-hosted, curses-based clone of the DOS freeware game
Greed
Try to eat as much as possible of the board before munching yourself
into a corner.
.
Author: Eric S. Raymond
Homepage: http://www.catb.org/~esr/greed/
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
pgpxSSGgOsxoF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#207495: ITP: smarty -- Template engine for PHP
Hi dim,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:27:45PM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: smarty
> Version : 2.5.0
> Upstream Author :
> * URL or Web page : http://smarty.php.net
> * License : GPL
> Description : Template engine for PHP
Please can you supply a long description?
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
pgpRjd8AmUTBL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#205705: ITP: jext a source code editor written in Java
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 05:24:53PM +0200, asbin wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Whith the accord of Sylvain Borde, I am the new maintainor of the Jext debian
> package.
Debian has procedures. Read first http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
before claiming you are the "new maintainer". I'll be glad to add you as
a Co-Maintainers once I get a package ready for upload.
> The current version is temporarely avaible here : http://asbin.free.fr/debs
I took a look at your packages. Thanks for the link. Unfortunately your
packages don't meet debian's requirement, mainly because you rely on
/usr/local in your debian/rules
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-4.9.html
[...]
Let's discuss in private if you are intersted by co-maintaining the
package.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
pgpwILk4jDS4b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#205705: ITP: jext a source code editor written in Java
Hi, Le samedi 16 août 2003 à 20:19 +0200, Romain FRANCOISE a écrit : > Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Package name: jext > > Version : 3.2pre3 > > Upstream Author : Romain GUY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://www.jext.org/ > > * License : GPL > > Description : A source code editor written in Java > > The homepage has links to Debian packages provided by Sylvain Borde > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Did you get in touch with him? I am not in touch with him. I am in touch with Romain GUY, jext's upstream author. I last saw Romain yesterday and he agreed the fact I maintain the official Debian package. > And if yes, > are you going to upload his package, or package the software yourself? I did not take a look at this package. I plan to do it. I filled this ITP in order to prevent other people from working on jext's debian package. I plan to upload a Debian package. To me the most important is that jext get in Debian. The earliest would be the best! > > Jext meets all your needs! Developers will also appreciate the open > > architecture of Jext. Based on GPLed libraries, internal Python > > interpreter and many XML files, improving Jext is an easy job. > > You can even write your own plugins (in Python or Java). > > Could you please provide an original description and not a rip of the > project's homepage? Comments like "Jext meets all your needs!" don't > sound really helpful to me. Yeah, I know i should have removed this sentence, but I don't see where the problem is. The description is quite explicit. What do you want me to add ? Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
Bug#205705: ITP: jext a source code editor written in Java
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-16 Followup-For: Bug #205705 * Package name: jext Version : 3.2pre3 Upstream Author : Romain GUY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.jext.org/ * License : GPL Description : A source code editor written in Java Jext was created to support Java programming language. But nowadays it can edit many other types of source codes. Among them you'll find C, C++, C#, ASP, PHP, Python, Perl, Ruby, TeX, XHTML, XSLT, Eiffel, JSP... Besides it provides advanced features to ease you work. Manage your projects with the bookmarks tool, categorize your opened files through workspaces, directly open zipped files, get a file straight from the Internet, mail your source code, executes system commands within the internal console, type faster thanks to HyperTyper and to the customizable code snippets library, add new features with plugins, discover the advanced editing capabilities, use the internal Python interpreter... Jext meets all your needs! Developers will also appreciate the open architecture of Jext. Based on GPLed libraries, internal Python interpreter and many XML files, improving Jext is an easy job. You can even write your own plugins (in Python or Java). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux twinette 2.5.74 #1 Wed Jul 16 13:10:35 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#203894:
Hello, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:49:03PM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote: > > I use AIM and I use emacs, but I've never used TNT. > I've no time to adopt TNT this month, however, if no one else steps > forward, I'll adopt TNT in "a few days" I made a qa upload of tnt last sunday. I fixed the very anoying problem which made tnt uninstalable. While preparing this upload, I took a look to upstream. It seems that the developement has been stalled for 2 years now. I don't really believe that it's usefull to take care of this package. Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TuxFamily.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> techmag.info +33(0)668 178 365http://migus.tuxfamily.org/gpg.txt GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgpAciwprnrb3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#196200: Shouldn't we remove request-tracker from the archive ?
Hello, I am sending you this e-mail because Jamie Wilkinson was interested by adopting request-tracker. It seems that Andrew Stribblehill and Stephen Quinney are already maintaining a package nammed request-tracker3. Could you confim that the package nammed request-tracker3 include the lastest release of request-tracker? If Yes, what do you think about asking for a remove of request-tracker? Thanks, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgpZSpnQsxgmW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#180634: News about this ITP ?
Hello, I would like to know if you could give us informations about the advacement on this package? Thanks, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgp728nl61WLp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#184605: ITP: eagle-adsl -- Drivers and tools for USB ADSL modems based on the Eagle chipset
Hi On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:56:38PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote: > Somehow I forgot to X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel. Here's my ITP for the > driver for the ADSL modem I use. Bug number is #184605, if you have > remarks or suggestions. > > Roland. > > From: Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:39:35 +0100 > Subject: ITP: eagle-adsl -- Drivers and tools for USB ADSL modems based on > the Eagle chipset > > Package: wnpp > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-13 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: eagle-adsl > * Version : 1.0.3 > * Upstream Author : Multiple, see below. > * URL : http://eagle-usb.fr.st/ (French only, I'm afraid) > * License : GPL As far as I know there are some some vagueness about the license of the firmware and associated files. Could you clarify it ? Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TuxFamily.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> techmag.info +33(0)668 178 365http://migus.tuxfamily.org/gpg.txt GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgpcDXDwFDUJU.pgp Description: PGP signature
