Bug#167407: Any progress on packaging cddbd? ITP is over 3 years old.
Hello! I want to ask if there is any progress in packaging this program? The ITP is over 3 years old now, and the last URL of inofficial packages is dead. TIA /ralph -- Ralph Aichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367659: RFP: gedit-plugins -- Additional plugins for the Gnome text editor gedit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gedit-plugins Version : 2.15.2 Upstream Author : Steve Frecinaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gedit-plugins/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C, Python Description : Additional plugins for the Gnome text editor gedit (From http://live.gnome.org/GeditPlugins, with slight changes) Gedit plugins are ways to extend the basic functionality of gedit. It's an easy and powerful way to increase the functionality as well as your work productivity for lots of applications. Gedit ships with some default plugins which are contained in the Debian "gedit" package. Additional plugins not part of the core are contained in this package, "gedit-plugins". (please note that this is Gnome 2.15!) /ralph -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494175: Gypsy packages
Hi Ross (and readers of bug 494175 ;)! I just downloaded your gps multiplexer packages, and I have some questions: Will this be packaged for Debian proper, or are there reasons for it to stay outside? Is there any user documentation? How do I tell it where to find the GPS? Is this developed upstream at all, or is it a dead project? As a user, should I bother with it right now? I'm asking this now, because with libchamplain and geoclue lots and lots of pieces of a geo-aware desktop are falling into place right now, but gypsy is very "quiet", or so it seems to me as an "outsider". Thanks for your work, and sorry if you get asked that twice a week ;) /ralph -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/sooperkuh/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#444861: RFP: gelemental -- Periodic table viewer for the Gnome desktop
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gelemental Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Kevin Daughtridge * URL : http://www.kdau.com/projects/gelemental/ * License : GPLv3 Description : Periodic table viewer for the Gnome desktop gElemental is a periodic table viewer that provides detailed information on the chemical elements. It uses the GTK+ toolkit and is available for Linux and other GTK+/GNOME platforms. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444877: RFP: intlclock-applet -- Graphical world clock applet for Gnome
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: intlclock-applet Version : Upstream Author : Peter Teichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://jimmyk.org/drop/intlclock-1.0.tar.gz * License : GTK Description : Graphical world clock applet for Gnome Intlclock is a world clock applet for the Gnome desktop that not only displays local time on several configurable locations, but also parts of the world lit by the sun (day-night boundaries). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258097: Beagle loses inotify dependency
I think as of today Beagle has lost its inotify dependancy (or it is supposed to do so shortly). No kernel modification is needed any more to package it for Debian, though of course having inotify is the preferred way of operating. Is there any progress with packaging, now that this problem has been solved? TIA /ralph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258097: Are there inofficial packages?
Hello! If the kernel patch is the main problem now, is the rest of the packaging already done? Could you put up your packages somewhere? Is dbus-sharp already packaged? How about gmime and evolution-sharp? Inofficial packages would surely be very appreciated by people willing to compile their own kernels, but afraid to mess up their dbus/mono/Gnome installations. Actually I think the two library dependencies would be much more useful than beagle itself. TIA /ralph -- who has nothing but problems compiling beagle 0.0.4, but had no problems at all with the inotify patch.
Bug#247286: Any news on your ITP for ink?
Any news? I think "ink" is a nifty utility, it would really help if I would not have to install it by hand on each new computer. Thanks a lot! /ralph
Bug#231025: Are there inofficial packages somewhere?
Until there are official packages, are there some inofficial/provisional packages of nvu somewhere? TIA /ralph -- The truth can't hurt you it's just like the dark It scares you witless But in time you see things clear and stark Elvis Costello
Bug#553359: Any progress on darktable?
Sorry for nagging, but is there any progress for darktable? I have seen lcms2 hang in ftp-master for about a month or two, and then suddenly disappear. Any hope to get darktable into Debian? I have heard it is a really good raw converter, and would like to try it out. TIA /ralph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1302686867.26735.1.camel@glitz
Bug#791965: Z-Wave Specs have been released to the public domain, standard opened up, could you re-evaluate packaging OpenZwave?
It seems the legal status of the Z-Wave stanard has vastly improved. Could you please re-evaluate if packaging would be possible now? See e.g.: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openzwave/3rmb5a-IDWM http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330383 Thanks to everybody involved for the hard work in creating Debian packages! /ralph