Bug#208847: ITP monotone: moving forward

2004-09-01 Thread Tomas Fasth 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Waitz wrote:
| Sure, go on. Less work for me :)

Ok, thanks.

| I'll send patches if there's something in your package that I
| don't like ;)

As a good debianeer always should do ;)

Regards,

- --
Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG 0x9FE8D504
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBNYG3wYdzVZ/o1QQRAt9LAJ9lOKOMmbkq7yB94jENnCz/irInOwCeNivC
Wl5txt3bOoKSUknSIFSch18=
=Pux1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#208847: ITP monotone: moving forward

2004-09-01 Thread Martin Waitz 
hi :)

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:55:06AM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> I want to move forward on this now. Do I have Martin and Matt's
> approval to become the active maintainer of this package?

Sure, go on. Less work for me :)

Due to time restrictions I couldn't follow monotone development as close
as I'd wish in the last months.
I wanted to wait for the new changeset (or whatever it's named)
infrastructure to settle before providing packages.
And I really wanted to use more debian libraries, which could be
possible with sqlite 3.

I'll send patches if there's something in your package that I don't like ;)

-- 
Martin Waitz


pgp7QEa6MrrVt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#208847: ITP monotone: moving forward

2004-09-01 Thread Tomas Fasth 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

This ITP seem to have been dormant for a very long time. I need it
to move forward and get the monotone package into unstable. I am
willing to spend time on active maintenance of this package. I am
already using monotone myself, I have good knowledge in C++ (the
implementation language) and I have been using other version control
systems (CVS, RCS, SCCS) for many years.

I have been in contact with the upstream creator and main developer,
Graydon Hoare. He is a former debian developer and already provides
a debian package at www.venge.net/monotone. I have his approval to
take this package in it's current state and do what's necessary to
get it into unstable.

I want to move forward on this now. Do I have Martin and Matt's
approval to become the active maintainer of this package?

Regards,
- --
Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG 0x9FE8D504
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBNR3kwYdzVZ/o1QQRAvI4AJ9mEqQAF8dldGo4p9kJs3aOAJC3dwCfYKo+
lOVhwf4rHST/m1Vc10gmKgQ=
=Dn/j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#208847: ITP monotone: moving forward

2004-08-31 Thread Matt Kraai 
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:55:06AM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> I want to move forward on this now. Do I have Martin and Matt's
> approval to become the active maintainer of this package?

I don't think my opinion matters much, since I've already handed
monotone to Martin, but as far as I'm concerned, you're welcome to
package monotone.

-- 
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature