Bug#692830: Nemo

2013-03-14 Thread David Weinehall
Any progress on this?  Nautilus 3.7.xx is now available in experimental,
which means that running versions of Nautilus from experimental is no
longer an option (since it removes the split view, rendering it by and
large useless for me as a file manager).


Kind regards, David
-- 
 /) David Weinehall t...@debian.org /) Rime on my window   (\
//  ~   //  Diamond-white roses of fire //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/(/   Beautiful hoar-frost   (/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130314074516.gc26...@suiko.acc.umu.se



Bug#692830: nemo

2012-11-16 Thread Michael Webster
What degree of separation is required before a fork becomes non-redundant?
 How is this evaluated?  You have provided some valid reasoning against
including mdm in its current state, however that is off the topic of this
thread.

A substantial amount of work has gone into Nemo since it was forked some
months ago - 184 in my count (granted, a number of those are merges) - and
it is currently under active development.

Nemo is integral to Cinnamon, part of the intended User Experience, and
becoming more-so every day.

Hopefully this 'decision' is given a bit more thought and consideration...
and feel free to try it out before issuing a blanket dismissal and a 'just
use Nautilus' response.

Thanks