Bug#902062: node-bunyan status
Hi Xavier, On 2020-10-12 10:34, Xavier wrote: > over a year later, node-bunyan is still in NEW queue. I guess ftpmasters > don't like it. > I have no time to waste trying to get node-ldapjs in Debian 12 (too late > now for bullseye), so I don't need node-bunyan anymore. Do you plan to > embed it? If yes, feel free to close this ITP. I have switched away from working on nodejs packages for a while due to the dependency hell and long delays in NEW. Nevertheless, node-bunyan seems quite popular, and I think it is worth to be in Debian on its own. If not in bullseye, then at least in bullseye+1. I can take care of it if it gets rejected again. Best, Andrius
Bug#902062: node-bunyan status
More than a year ago, Andrius wrote: > Hi, > > On 2019-08-21 11:55, Xavier wrote: > > no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not > > ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you > > need it for another reason ? > > Yes, I am investigating packaging possibilities of overleaf > dependencies. One of them, clsi, ultimately needs node-bunyan. > > Andrius Hi, over a year later, node-bunyan is still in NEW queue. I guess ftpmasters don't like it. I have no time to waste trying to get node-ldapjs in Debian 12 (too late now for bullseye), so I don't need node-bunyan anymore. Do you plan to embed it? If yes, feel free to close this ITP. Cheers, Xavier
Bug#902062: node-bunyan status
On 2019-08-21 15:51, Xavier wrote: > I just pushed it to NEW queue with its dependencies. Great, thanks a lot! Andrius
Bug#902062: node-bunyan status
Le 21/08/2019 à 11:03, mer...@debian.org a écrit : > Hi, > > On 2019-08-21 11:55, Xavier wrote: >> no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not >> ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you >> need it for another reason ? > > Yes, I am investigating packaging possibilities of overleaf > dependencies. One of them, clsi, ultimately needs node-bunyan. > > Andrius I just pushed it to NEW queue with its dependencies. Cheers, Xavier
Bug#902062: node-bunyan status
Hi, On 2019-08-21 11:55, Xavier wrote: > no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not > ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you > need it for another reason ? Yes, I am investigating packaging possibilities of overleaf dependencies. One of them, clsi, ultimately needs node-bunyan. Andrius
Bug#902062: node-bunyan status
Le 21/08/2019 à 10:47, mer...@debian.org a écrit : > Hello, > > What is the current status of node-bunyan? Are there any blockers > keeping it from being uploaded? > > Best, > Andrius Hi, no real reason, node-bunyan is needed for node-ldapjs which is not ready. It requires also node-dtrace-provider and node-vasync. Do you need it for another reason ?
