Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > This fix is not enough for these bug reports? >> >> It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to >> compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the >> headers. However, rectifying this silliness probably means extensive >> Imake surgery on the source tree. OK, I understand :-) Perhaps we will solve them. They are additional patches (but they are not tested yet. please wait a moment...) 1) Objects and headers of GLX libraries are not required for X servers build. So I do not know why libGL should built when defined `BuildServersOnly'. When `BuildXF86DRI' defined as YES, `BuildGLXLibrary' is always defined as YES in xfree86.cf. I believe this is a bug of upstream code. The patch perhaps solve this. --- xc/config/cf/xfree86.cf.orig2003-01-02 04:27:21.0 +0900 +++ xc/config/cf/xfree86.cf 2003-01-02 04:33:52.0 +0900 @@ -1167,7 +1167,11 @@ #if BuildXF86DRI #ifndef BuildGLXLibrary -#define BuildGLXLibraryYES +# if defined(BuildServersOnly) && BuildServersOnly +# define BuildGLXLibrary NO +# else +# define BuildGLXLibrary YES +# endif #endif /* With this additional patch, libGL will not built. So, we does not need to build libXext and libX11 for it. 2) Defined `BuildServersOnly' will build only X servers. `Servers' mean `XFree86 server, Xnest server, X virtual fareme buffer server, and Xprint server'. The Xnest server requires libX11, so defined and only definied `BuildServersOnly'. So we should build libX11 for it. We only need XFree86 (static linked with debug flag) server. Xnest, Xvfb and Xprt static linked servers are not needed. I think we can add `-DXnestServer=NO -DXVirtualFramebufferServer=NO -DXprtServer=NO' flags for SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES in debian/rules to solve this. --- debian/rules.orig 2002-12-30 21:17:28.0 +0900 +++ debian/rules2003-01-02 05:44:17.0 +0900 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ # don't get rid of the space in the next line IMAKE_DEFINES+= $(DEBUGFLAGS) endif -SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES:=-DXFree86CustomVersion='\"Debian (static) $(SOURCE_VERSION) $(shell env TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S) $(BUILDER)\"' -DBuilderEMailAddr='\"$(BUILDER_EMAIL_ADDR)\"' -DBuildServersOnly=YES -DDoLoadableServer=NO $(DEBUGFLAGS) +SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES:=-DXFree86CustomVersion='\"Debian (static) $(SOURCE_VERSION) $(shell env TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S) $(BUILDER)\"' -DBuilderEMailAddr='\"$(BUILDER_EMAIL_ADDR)\"' -DBuildServersOnly=YES -DDoLoadableServer=NO -DXnestServer=NO -DXVirtualFramebufferServer=NO -DXprtServer=NO $(DEBUGFLAGS) # Determine our architecture. BUILD_ARCH:=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2) Defined `BuildServersOnly' will build only X servers. >>`Servers' mean `XFree86 server, Xnest server, X virtual fareme >>buffer server, and Xprint server'. >> >> The Xnest server requires libX11, so defined and only definied >>`BuildServersOnly'. So we should build libX11 for it. >> >> We only need XFree86 (static linked with debug flag) server. >>Xnest, Xvfb and Xprt static linked servers are not needed. >> >> I think we can add `-DXnestServer=NO >>-DXVirtualFramebufferServer=NO -DXprtServer=NO' flags for >>SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES in debian/rules to solve this. One more small patch is needed. xc/lib/X11/Imakefile miss depend target if defined `BuildServersOnly' as YES and both `BuildXnestServer' and `BuildGLXLibrary' defined as NO. --- xc/lib/X11/Imakefile.orig 2003-01-02 14:08:53.0 +0900 +++ xc/lib/X11/Imakefile2003-01-02 14:09:04.0 +0900 @@ -1045,5 +1045,7 @@ #else all:: +depend:: + BuildIncludes($(HEADERS),IncSubdir,..) #endif -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsletter Anmeldung
Herzlich Willkommen! Sie wurden soeben beim kostenlosen Newsletter von www.cashgalaxy.de.vu - Geldverdienen im Internet angemeldet. WICHTIG: Bitte bestätigen Sie dieses Abonnement, indem Sie auf folgenden Link klicken: http://www.newsletterboy.de/add_mail.php?id=8878&[EMAIL PROTECTED] Durch diese Bestätigung wird verhindert, dass Ihre Email-Adresse ohne Ihr Einverständnis verwendet wird. Erst nach Ihrer Bestätigung wird Ihr Abonnement aktiviert! Kostenloser Newsletter-Account bei http://www.newsletterboy.de
Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > This fix is not enough for these bug reports? >> >> It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to >> compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the >> headers. However, rectifying this silliness probably means extensive >> Imake surgery on the source tree. OK, I understand :-) Perhaps we will solve them. They are additional patches (but they are not tested yet. please wait a moment...) 1) Objects and headers of GLX libraries are not required for X servers build. So I do not know why libGL should built when defined `BuildServersOnly'. When `BuildXF86DRI' defined as YES, `BuildGLXLibrary' is always defined as YES in xfree86.cf. I believe this is a bug of upstream code. The patch perhaps solve this. --- xc/config/cf/xfree86.cf.orig2003-01-02 04:27:21.0 +0900 +++ xc/config/cf/xfree86.cf 2003-01-02 04:33:52.0 +0900 @@ -1167,7 +1167,11 @@ #if BuildXF86DRI #ifndef BuildGLXLibrary -#define BuildGLXLibraryYES +# if defined(BuildServersOnly) && BuildServersOnly +# define BuildGLXLibrary NO +# else +# define BuildGLXLibrary YES +# endif #endif /* With this additional patch, libGL will not built. So, we does not need to build libXext and libX11 for it. 2) Defined `BuildServersOnly' will build only X servers. `Servers' mean `XFree86 server, Xnest server, X virtual fareme buffer server, and Xprint server'. The Xnest server requires libX11, so defined and only definied `BuildServersOnly'. So we should build libX11 for it. We only need XFree86 (static linked with debug flag) server. Xnest, Xvfb and Xprt static linked servers are not needed. I think we can add `-DXnestServer=NO -DXVirtualFramebufferServer=NO -DXprtServer=NO' flags for SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES in debian/rules to solve this. --- debian/rules.orig 2002-12-30 21:17:28.0 +0900 +++ debian/rules2003-01-02 05:44:17.0 +0900 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ # don't get rid of the space in the next line IMAKE_DEFINES+= $(DEBUGFLAGS) endif -SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES:=-DXFree86CustomVersion='\"Debian (static) $(SOURCE_VERSION) $(shell env TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S) $(BUILDER)\"' -DBuilderEMailAddr='\"$(BUILDER_EMAIL_ADDR)\"' -DBuildServersOnly=YES -DDoLoadableServer=NO $(DEBUGFLAGS) +SERVERDEBUG_IMAKE_DEFINES:=-DXFree86CustomVersion='\"Debian (static) +$(SOURCE_VERSION) $(shell env TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S) $(BUILDER)\"' +-DBuilderEMailAddr='\"$(BUILDER_EMAIL_ADDR)\"' -DBuildServersOnly=YES +-DDoLoadableServer=NO -DXnestServer=NO -DXVirtualFramebufferServer=NO -DXprtServer=NO +$(DEBUGFLAGS) # Determine our architecture. BUILD_ARCH:=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsletter Anmeldung
Herzlich Willkommen! Sie wurden soeben beim kostenlosen Newsletter von www.cashgalaxy.de.vu - Geldverdienen im Internet angemeldet. WICHTIG: Bitte bestätigen Sie dieses Abonnement, indem Sie auf folgenden Link klicken: http://www.newsletterboy.de/add_mail.php?id=8878&[EMAIL PROTECTED] Durch diese Bestätigung wird verhindert, dass Ihre Email-Adresse ohne Ihr Einverständnis verwendet wird. Erst nach Ihrer Bestätigung wird Ihr Abonnement aktiviert! Kostenloser Newsletter-Account bei http://www.newsletterboy.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >>There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my > >>comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) > > > > I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client > > side DRI code and the drivers was changed in a way that renders the SiS > > driver non-working. > > Is there common code inside sis_dri.so? Yes, the common code is part of all the code. :) > >>I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? Well, > >>no one of the DRI folks seems to care about the SiS driver, so this is > >>hopeless anyway. > > > > > > It's not the job of the DRI folks to maintain a driver for hardware they > > don't have. > > That's exactly what I have been doing for a year now. Implementing > support for hardware I don't have (SiS 315, 550, 650, 740, etc) I don't know of any DRI developers having any SiS hardware, and I think this is even harder to do for 3D than it is for 2D. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Bug#170948: marked as done (Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2002 15:42:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 27 09:42:42 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hell.ascs.muni.cz [147.251.60.186] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18H4Kn-0002G4-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:42:42 -0600 Received: from xhejtman by hell.ascs.muni.cz with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18H4Km-0004iv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:42:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:42:40 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Muni: zakazka, vydelek, firma, komerce, vyplata X-echelon: NSA, CIA, CI5, MI5, FBI, KGB, BIS, Plutonium, Bin Laden, Mossad, Iraq, Pentagon, WTC, president, assassination, A-bomb, kua, vic joudu uz neznam X-policie-CR: Neserte mi nebo ukradnu, vyloupim, vybouchnu, znasilnim, zabiju, podpalim, umucim, podriznu, zapichnu a vubec vsechno Sender: Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-4 Distribution: sid/unstable I sometimes see this message Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: Maximum number of clients reached With version 4.2.1-3 I did not. I have today's update of all packages. To aviod that message it helped to restart galeon with java_vm. It reduced 416 opened sockets to 180. However java_vm opens just about 2 sockets to xserver. More I saw that message even if I was not running galeon with java_vm. -- Luká¹ Hejtmánek --- Received: (at 170948-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 00:36:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 18:36:16 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TtLM-0003k2-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:36:16 -0600 Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FE8C6439F; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing bug from unresponsive submitter Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I required more information from the bug submitter and sent email to him or her expressing this request on 27 November 2002, and asked for a reply. I received no information in reply. Closing this bug. --=20 G. Branden Robinson| Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |fsck;more;yes;fsck;fsck;fsck; http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |umount;sleep --ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj4TiX8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonyUuwCgobIW4LhnRPC7XVDTZ0Pm/MO6 SO4AnjiZpr6LqXtcnRu53lzf3sm8HKTK =C3TR -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9--
Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a while. It is, I assume. Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there been success reports with the 4.2.x sis_dri.so? That was my question... > If so, you should look at diffs between upstream and the Debian packages in lib/GL and extras/Mesa. I'll do that asap. There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client side DRI code and the drivers was changed in a way that renders the SiS driver non-working. Is there common code inside sis_dri.so? I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? Well, no one of the DRI folks seems to care about the SiS driver, so this is hopeless anyway. It's not the job of the DRI folks to maintain a driver for hardware they don't have. That's exactly what I have been doing for a year now. Implementing support for hardware I don't have (SiS 315, 550, 650, 740, etc) Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** http://www.winischhofer.net
Processed: some retitling and other triage
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 174589 xlibs: libXrender shlib dependency needs to be bumped to >> > 4.2.0 Bug#174589: libXrender API change, shlibs needs updating Changed Bug title. > retitle 174282 xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol > at compile time Bug#174282: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha Changed Bug title. > severity 174282 important Bug#174282: xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol at compile time Severity set to `important'. > retitle 173849 xfs: [type1] rasterization library handles oversized font > requests very poorly Bug#173849: xfs: Xfree crashed with very big fonts in The Gimp Changed Bug title. > tag 173849 + upstream Bug#173849: xfs: [type1] rasterization library handles oversized font requests very poorly There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > retitle 173314 xbase-clients: [xcalc] only accepts digits typed on numeric > keypad Bug#173314: xbase-clients: xcalc only accepts digits from the numeric pad Changed Bug title. > tag 173314 + upstream Bug#173314: xbase-clients: [xcalc] only accepts digits typed on numeric keypad There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > retitle 173125 xserver-xfree86: [cyrix] SIGILL on Geode GX1 Bug#173125: [cyrix] caght sig 4 with geode gx1 and cs5520 Changed Bug title. > tag 173125 + moreinfo upstream Bug#173125: xserver-xfree86: [cyrix] SIGILL on Geode GX1 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, upstream > severity 173125 important Bug#173125: xserver-xfree86: [cyrix] SIGILL on Geode GX1 Severity set to `important'. > retitle 172550 xlibs-dev: need to split out xft1 so xlibs-dev can coexist > with libxft2-dev Bug#172550: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev) Changed Bug title. > severity 172550 important Bug#172550: xlibs-dev: need to split out xft1 so xlibs-dev can coexist with libxft2-dev Severity set to `important'. > retitle 172172 xlibs: [Xlib] memory leak in imExten.c:_XimExtension() Bug#172172: xlibs: memory leak in imExten.c:_XimExtension() Changed Bug title. > tag 172172 + upstream Bug#172172: xlibs: [Xlib] memory leak in imExten.c:_XimExtension() Tags were: patch upstream Tags added: upstream > retitle 171908 xutils: [makedepend] dependency lists truncated due to > preprocessor barf in /usr/lib/assert.h Bug#171908: makedepend not compatible with latest /usr/include/assert.h Changed Bug title. > tag 171908 + upstream moreinfo help Bug#171908: xutils: [makedepend] dependency lists truncated due to preprocessor barf in /usr/lib/assert.h There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, moreinfo, help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes
severity 173071 important retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it tag 173071 + moreinfo upstream unreproducible thanks On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 09:33:07PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.2.1-4 > > xterm crashes when you try to paste into it a string which contains a > NULL octet at its end. This is not a normal situation and it wouldn't > be reproduced if not for a KHTML bug (a bug would be filled against > KHTML as well). > > This bug can be reproduced with the Konqueror web browser, when you > right-click a link and select 'Copy Link Location'. > At this point, clicking the middle button in xterm (to paste the > selection) would cause it to crash. I was unable to reproduce this problem on my machine, using the procedure you described. How does xterm crash? Does it segfault? Did you get a core dump? -- G. Branden Robinson| The Rehnquist Court has never Debian GNU/Linux | encountered a criminal statute it [EMAIL PROTECTED] | did not like. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Dean pgpfavlKqouEO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#173189: marked as done (xfree86-common: two clipboard?)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173189: xfree86-common: two clipboard? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 17:10:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 11:10:29 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (localhost) [64.32.101.12] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NcHc-0002LX-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:10:29 -0600 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1731A84184; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:09:07 -0400 (AST) From: Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xfree86-common: two clipboard? X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:09:07 -0400 Reply-To: Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "Reply-To" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xfree86-common Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: normal I don't know what package is responsible of that, but I find that in X I have two clipboard. If I do a copy in kmail, the gnome clipboard is void, but the thing I copied is disponible and I can paste it (in gnome) with the middle mouse button. I knew that the clipboard of kde and gnome is the same. Now it seems false. What is it? or is it something of X? -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux misiongenovesa 2.2.19 #2 ven ott 11 11:34:12 AST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=it_IT, LC_CTYPE=it_IT Versions of packages xfree86-common depends on: ii debianutils 1.16.7 Miscellaneous utilities specific t --- Received: (at 173189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 00:19:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 18:19:42 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Tt5K-0003BS-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:19:42 -0600 Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCEED640B5; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#173189: xfree86-common: two clipboard? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.2 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:09:07PM -0400, Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > Package: xfree86-common > Version: 4.2.1-3 > Severity: normal >=20 > I don't know what package is responsible of that, but I find that in X I= =20 > have two clipboard. >=20 > If I do a copy in kmail, the gnome clipboard is void, but the thing I=20 > copied is disponible and I can paste it (in gnome) with the middle mouse= =20 > button. >=20 > I knew that the clipboard of kde and gnome is the same. Now it seems=20 > false. What is it? or is it something of X? Please don't file requests for information as bug reports. The Debian Bug Tracking System is a Bug Tracking System, not the Usenet Oracle. http://www.jwz.org/doc/x-cut-and-paste.html =2E..may help. Closing this spurious report. --=20 G. Branden Robinson|If a man ate a pound of pasta and a Debian GNU/Linux |pound of antipasto, would they [EMAIL PROTECTED] |cancel out, leaving him still http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |hungry? -- Scott Adams --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj4ThZgACgkQ6kxmHytGonyR6QCfck62dQ88yYa2/Vj4Ps9D9ExA bNo
Bug#172550: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:59:02PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > Well, it's up to you, really. If you split out just xft1, that would > work for me. However, as you said on IRC, if you're going to split it, > you might as well split it all the way. That way if anything else comes > along later it will be less of a pain. > > You could still make xlibs-dev a metapackage which depends on all the > others, or something. Yeah. I'll see about addressing this in -6. There are some other bugs I'm trying to rectify for -5 to make it a candidate for testing and I don't want to muddy the waters with this huge infrastructural change yet. -- G. Branden Robinson|I must despise the world which does Debian GNU/Linux |not know that music is a higher [EMAIL PROTECTED] |revelation than all wisdom and http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |philosophy. -- Ludwig van Beethoven pgp1iRAZSNXWS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#173357: marked as done (Dexconf hacked with detect)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:12:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173357: Dexconf hacked with detect has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2002 21:15:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 16 15:15:07 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail2.alphalink.com.au [202.161.124.194] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18O2Zp-0002bM-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:15:06 -0600 Received: from debian.me.null (d421-ps4-mel.alphalink.com.au [202.161.98.105]) by mail2.alphalink.com.au (8.12.5/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gBGLEqIT026578 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:14:53 +1100 Received: by debian.me.null (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 054472D8F6; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:13:01 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:13:01 +1100 From: rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dexconf hacked with detect Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Archive: encrypt Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,UPPERCASE_25_50, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-common Version: 4.2.1-4 Hi, This version only needs one debconf question for monitor size. Rob. #!/bin/sh # /usr/local/sbin/easygui # Adapted from Dexconf: Debian X Configurator # Licensed under the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at your option) any later version. # DEXCONFTMPDIR="/tmp/gui-tmp-$$" rm -rf $DEXCONFTMPDIR mkdir -p $DEXCONFTMPDIR cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/Header << SECTION # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config" at the shell prompt.) SECTION ### SERVERFLAGS cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/ServerFlags << SECTION Section "ServerFlags" EndSection SECTION ### SERVERLAYOUT cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/ServerLayout << SECTION Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Default Layout" Screen "Default Screen" InputDevice "Generic Keyboard" InputDevice "Configured Mouse" SECTION printf "EndSection\n" >> $DEXCONFTMPDIR/ServerLayout ### FILES cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/Files << SECTION Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" EndSection SECTION ### MODULE cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/Module << SECTION Section "Module" Load"ddc" Load"GLcore" Load"dbe" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"glx" Load"record" Load"xie" Load"bitmap" Load"freetype" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"int10" EndSection SECTION ### KEYBOARD / INPUTDEVICE # pc101 keyboard is rare, think it will work with pc104 cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/InputDeviceKeyboard << SECTION Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc104" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection SECTION ### MOUSE / INPUTDEVICE # This assumes that these statements are in modules.conf # alias char-major-13 input # above input mousedev hid usb-uhci # Would need to test for arch first, as usb-uhci is only Intel rm /dev/mouse; /sbin/modprobe input; if ((`dmesg | grep input | grep -c 'Mouse'` > 0)); then ln -s /dev/input/mice /dev/mouse; MOUSE_PORT="/dev/input/mice"; MOUSE_PROTOCOL="ImPS/2"; else ln -s /dev/psaux /dev/mouse; MOUSE_PORT="/dev/psaux"; MOUSE_PROTOCOL="PS/2"; fi printf "Section \"InputDevice\"\n" > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/InputDeviceMouse printf "\tIdentifier\
Processed: severity of 173071 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 173071 important Bug#173071: xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 173071 important Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Severity set to `important'. > retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Changed Bug title. > tag 173071 + moreinfo upstream unreproducible Bug#173071: xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, upstream, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#173229: marked as done ()
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:16:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing untitled, sloppily filed report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 22:40:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 16:40:04 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.home.se [195.66.35.201] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NhQZ-000493-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:40:04 -0600 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [217.215.157.41] by home.se with NetMail ModWeb Module; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:32:02 +0100 Subject: From: "Mr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:32:02 +0100 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJ_MISSING version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: ** Package: debian/xserver Version: 3.0 This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs) XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) Release Date: 21 December 2001 =3D09If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is =3D09newer than the above date, look for a newer version before =3D09reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.17 i686 [ELF]=3D20 Module Loader present (=3D3D=3D3D) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Mon Dec 16 00:11:23 = 2002 (=3D3D=3D3D) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4" Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (=3D3D=3D3D) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (=3D3D=3D3D) ServerLayout "Default Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Fujitsu 17 inch Flatscreen" (**) | |-->Device "Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 4600" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard" (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc104" (**) XKB: model: "pc104" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "Se" (**) XKB: layout: "Se" (**) Option "XkbVariant" "se" (**) XKB: variant: "se" (**) Option "XkbOptions" "se" (**) XKB: options: "se" (=3D3D=3D3D) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse" (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist. =3D09Entry deleted from font path. (**) FontPath set to "unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts= =3D /100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/T= =3D ype1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fon= =3D ts/75dpi" (=3D3D=3D3D) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (=3D3D=3D3D) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Cannot open APM (II) Module ABI versions: =3D09XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 =3D09XFree86 Video Driver: 0.4 =3D09XFree86 XInput driver : 0.2 =3D09XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 =3D09XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor=3D3D"The XFree86 Project" =3D09compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version =3D3D 1.0.0 =3D09Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer =3D09ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor=3D3D"The XFree86 Project" =3D09compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version =3D3D 0.1.0 =3D09ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages =3D3D 0x03, oldVal1 =3D3D 0x, mode1Res1 =3D3D 0x80= 00 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1039,0646 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr = =3D 80 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1039,0001 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr = =3D 01 (II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 1039,0008 card , rev 04 class 06,01,00
Re: Possible bug in installation
#include * Skip Queen [Wed, Jan 01 2003, 12:54:43AM]: > I have tried to install Debian Woody 3.0 a total of six times and each > time the same thing happens. My video is all screwed up. XWindows does > not work. When I pick up video card (i810) it won't work at all. If I > pick VESA it will "sort of" work - i.e., not the resolution I pick so > things "float" across the screen and the resolution will not go above > 800X600. Someone told me there was a bug in the kernel. I have had no > problem with my system using either Mandrake, Redhat, SuSE or Knoppix - > only Debian (Woody). Can you help! Thanks! How is this related to debian-boot, or boot-floppies? Like you passed the installation fine and fail on ocnfiguration. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- > Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there > is nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed > to install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work > for me, dunno why).
Bug#166448: marked as done (xdm: prerm script hangs while stopping xdm)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2002 11:40:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 26 06:40:55 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [212.227.14.2] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 185PJH-00081v-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:40:55 -0500 Received: from zombie.inka.de by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.4) id 185PJG-0005KW-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:40:54 +0200 Received: from schleppi ([192.168.0.234] helo=rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de ident=mail) by zombie with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 185Ox3-0007Ht-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:17:57 +0200 Received: from inet by rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 185Owy-0004CY-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:17:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xdm: prerm script hangs while stopping xdm X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:17:51 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xdm Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: important See subject. When it asks me to stop the running xdm, I confirm with y. Though, it does not kill it and hangs. ps aufwx on another console shows me no idling child process of prerm, so I assume that this is kinda debconf bug, not allowing the script to read keyboard input. MfG, Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux schleppi 2.4.20-pre11-sat-2410-404 #3 Sam Okt 26 00:18:02 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages xdm depends on: ii cpp 2:2.95.4-17 The GNU C preprocessor. ii debconf 1.2.12 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam0g 0.76-7 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libxaw7 4.2.1-3 X Athena widget set library ii xbase-clients4.2.1-3 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs4.2.1-3 X Window System client libraries -- debconf information: xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm --- Received: (at 166448-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2003 23:47:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 17:47:38 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TsaI-0008Pw-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 17:47:38 -0600 Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 948DB640B5; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing bug from unresponsive submitter Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R+My9LyyhiUvIEro" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I required more information from the bug submitter and sent email to him or her expressing this request on 27 October 2002. I received no information in reply. Closing this bug. --=20 G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise -- a Debian GNU/Linux |screaming mob pounding on a greasy [EMAIL PROTECTED] |spot on the pavement, where used to http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |lie the carcass of a dead horse. --R+M
Bug#172325: xlibs fails to install (overwrite problems)
Please don't reply to 172325-quiet; I never saw your reply. If you think its a case of "you last installed some packages when Bruce was around, what do you expect" kind of bug then close it. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some evil overlapping going on. It was evil, but it's been recitifed about as well as it can be. Closing this bug. -- G. Branden Robinson| "Why do we have to hide from the Debian GNU/Linux | police, Daddy?" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Because we use vi, son. They use http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | emacs." pgpUS4TfxRbTF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:29:33AM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote: > Ok, I see. I've tracked down the problem more carefully now: > The SOSYMLINK problem maybe solved by including Library.tmpl in > Imake.rules: I don't think that's the right fix, either. What I need to know is why this construct fails for gnuLib.rules, but appears to work fine in lnxLib.rules. -- G. Branden Robinson|Imagination was given man to Debian GNU/Linux |compensate for what he is not, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] |a sense of humor to console him for http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |what he is. pgpFQYLuLmDNP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: retitle 165146 to xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 165146 xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: tagging 165146
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 165146 + moreinfo Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Tags were: sid upstream Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: XftConfig bullshit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 97506 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#97506: xbase-clients: [XftConfig] suggested additions for default XftConfig file Changed Bug title. > retitle 166335 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#166335: xlibs: default XftConfig file could be improved Changed Bug title. > retitle 171750 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig doesn't map sans/serif/mono Changed Bug title. > reassign 97506 xlibs Bug#97506: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `xlibs'. > reassign 166335 xlibs Bug#166335: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug reassigned from package `xlibs' to `xlibs'. > reassign 171750 xlibs Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug reassigned from package `xlibs' to `xlibs'. > severity 97506 important Bug#97506: xlibs: XftConfig blues Severity set to `important'. > severity 166335 important Bug#166335: xlibs: XftConfig blues Severity set to `important'. > severity 171750 important Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig blues Severity set to `important'. > merge 97506 166335 171750 Bug#97506: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#166335: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig blues Merged 97506 166335 171750. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >>There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my > >>comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) > > > > I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client > > side DRI code and the drivers was changed in a way that renders the SiS > > driver non-working. > > Is there common code inside sis_dri.so? Yes, the common code is part of all the code. :) > >>I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? Well, > >>no one of the DRI folks seems to care about the SiS driver, so this is > >>hopeless anyway. > > > > > > It's not the job of the DRI folks to maintain a driver for hardware they > > don't have. > > That's exactly what I have been doing for a year now. Implementing > support for hardware I don't have (SiS 315, 550, 650, 740, etc) I don't know of any DRI developers having any SiS hardware, and I think this is even harder to do for 3D than it is for 2D. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility > > with upstream XFree86. > > Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable. I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a very rude thing to do to our users. > Im working on pushing them to X.org and hopefully to get atleast an answer > back. If there will be no answer XFree86 will be the next step, and I > perfectly agree with you about a good deep review. IMO you should go XFree86 first. They are the leading implementation of the X Window System and have a reputation for being more responsive. They're certainly more open. > I leave up to you if you wish to close this bug or not. I do not mind > either way and for sure i'm not the one going to play tennis with BTS ;) I'm not going to close it right now. I'm tagging it "moreinfo". The info I need is: * Do these patches change the X protocol? If so, I will tag the bug "wontfix, upstream" and close it. If not, I might be willing to put then in a Debian package as long as I understand the impact. > Thanks a lot to all the people that have answered back with comments and > help. Thanks a lot for working on this. -- G. Branden Robinson| Suffer before God and ye shall be Debian GNU/Linux | redeemed. God loves us, so He [EMAIL PROTECTED] | makes us suffer Christianity. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Aaron Dunsmore pgpZfq3lfGoQk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:17:50AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers > out of the source tree. Right. > Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed. Nor should it ever be. Source packages that Build-Depend on themselves are stupid. > I've tested the build under clean installed chroot sid tree. > The chroot system tree does not have X11 headers. Right. > This fix is not enough for these bug reports? It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the headers. However, rectifying this silliness probably means extensive Imake surgery on the source tree. > I'm confising about `external dependencues'. It means the X build would require something pre-existing on the system; the stuff that is declared in the Build-Depends or implicitly available via Essential and Build-Essential packages. > I believed that "`external dependencues` said in the reports > means xfree86 build depends xfree86 generated files. So, > we should add xfree86 Build-Depends: xlibs-dev or so." No, I think that would be a very poor solution. Thanks for your patch. -- G. Branden Robinson| Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |fsck;more;yes;fsck;fsck;fsck; http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |umount;sleep pgpjVIBfkZiYq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: tagging 172962
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 172962 + moreinfo Bug#172962: IPv6 support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#170948: marked as done (Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2002 15:42:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 27 09:42:42 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hell.ascs.muni.cz [147.251.60.186] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18H4Kn-0002G4-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:42:42 -0600 Received: from xhejtman by hell.ascs.muni.cz with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18H4Km-0004iv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:42:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:42:40 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Muni: zakazka, vydelek, firma, komerce, vyplata X-echelon: NSA, CIA, CI5, MI5, FBI, KGB, BIS, Plutonium, Bin Laden, Mossad, Iraq, Pentagon, WTC, president, assassination, A-bomb, kua, vic joudu uz neznam X-policie-CR: Neserte mi nebo ukradnu, vyloupim, vybouchnu, znasilnim, zabiju, podpalim, umucim, podriznu, zapichnu a vubec vsechno Sender: Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-4 Distribution: sid/unstable I sometimes see this message Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: Maximum number of clients reached With version 4.2.1-3 I did not. I have today's update of all packages. To aviod that message it helped to restart galeon with java_vm. It reduced 416 opened sockets to 180. However java_vm opens just about 2 sockets to xserver. More I saw that message even if I was not running galeon with java_vm. -- Luká¹ Hejtmánek --- Received: (at 170948-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 00:36:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 18:36:16 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TtLM-0003k2-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:36:16 -0600 Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FE8C6439F; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing bug from unresponsive submitter Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I required more information from the bug submitter and sent email to him or her expressing this request on 27 November 2002, and asked for a reply. I received no information in reply. Closing this bug. --=20 G. Branden Robinson| Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |fsck;more;yes;fsck;fsck;fsck; http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |umount;sleep --ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj4TiX8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonyUuwCgobIW4LhnRPC7XVDTZ0Pm/MO6 SO4AnjiZpr6LqXtcnRu53lzf3sm8HKTK =C3TR -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a while. It is, I assume. Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there been success reports with the 4.2.x sis_dri.so? That was my question... > If so, you should look at diffs between upstream and the Debian packages in lib/GL and extras/Mesa. I'll do that asap. There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client side DRI code and the drivers was changed in a way that renders the SiS driver non-working. Is there common code inside sis_dri.so? I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? Well, no one of the DRI folks seems to care about the SiS driver, so this is hopeless anyway. It's not the job of the DRI folks to maintain a driver for hardware they don't have. That's exactly what I have been doing for a year now. Implementing support for hardware I don't have (SiS 315, 550, 650, 740, etc) Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** http://www.winischhofer.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: some retitling and other triage
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 174589 xlibs: libXrender shlib dependency needs to be bumped to >> 4.2.0 Bug#174589: libXrender API change, shlibs needs updating Changed Bug title. > retitle 174282 xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol at >compile time Bug#174282: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha Changed Bug title. > severity 174282 important Bug#174282: xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol at compile time Severity set to `important'. > retitle 173849 xfs: [type1] rasterization library handles oversized font requests >very poorly Bug#173849: xfs: Xfree crashed with very big fonts in The Gimp Changed Bug title. > tag 173849 + upstream Bug#173849: xfs: [type1] rasterization library handles oversized font requests very poorly There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > retitle 173314 xbase-clients: [xcalc] only accepts digits typed on numeric keypad Bug#173314: xbase-clients: xcalc only accepts digits from the numeric pad Changed Bug title. > tag 173314 + upstream Bug#173314: xbase-clients: [xcalc] only accepts digits typed on numeric keypad There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > retitle 173125 xserver-xfree86: [cyrix] SIGILL on Geode GX1 Bug#173125: [cyrix] caght sig 4 with geode gx1 and cs5520 Changed Bug title. > tag 173125 + moreinfo upstream Bug#173125: xserver-xfree86: [cyrix] SIGILL on Geode GX1 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, upstream > severity 173125 important Bug#173125: xserver-xfree86: [cyrix] SIGILL on Geode GX1 Severity set to `important'. > retitle 172550 xlibs-dev: need to split out xft1 so xlibs-dev can coexist with >libxft2-dev Bug#172550: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev) Changed Bug title. > severity 172550 important Bug#172550: xlibs-dev: need to split out xft1 so xlibs-dev can coexist with libxft2-dev Severity set to `important'. > retitle 172172 xlibs: [Xlib] memory leak in imExten.c:_XimExtension() Bug#172172: xlibs: memory leak in imExten.c:_XimExtension() Changed Bug title. > tag 172172 + upstream Bug#172172: xlibs: [Xlib] memory leak in imExten.c:_XimExtension() Tags were: patch upstream Tags added: upstream > retitle 171908 xutils: [makedepend] dependency lists truncated due to preprocessor >barf in /usr/lib/assert.h Bug#171908: makedepend not compatible with latest /usr/include/assert.h Changed Bug title. > tag 171908 + upstream moreinfo help Bug#171908: xutils: [makedepend] dependency lists truncated due to preprocessor barf in /usr/lib/assert.h There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, moreinfo, help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes
severity 173071 important retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it tag 173071 + moreinfo upstream unreproducible thanks On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 09:33:07PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.2.1-4 > > xterm crashes when you try to paste into it a string which contains a > NULL octet at its end. This is not a normal situation and it wouldn't > be reproduced if not for a KHTML bug (a bug would be filled against > KHTML as well). > > This bug can be reproduced with the Konqueror web browser, when you > right-click a link and select 'Copy Link Location'. > At this point, clicking the middle button in xterm (to paste the > selection) would cause it to crash. I was unable to reproduce this problem on my machine, using the procedure you described. How does xterm crash? Does it segfault? Did you get a core dump? -- G. Branden Robinson| The Rehnquist Court has never Debian GNU/Linux | encountered a criminal statute it [EMAIL PROTECTED] | did not like. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Dean msg05157/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#173189: marked as done (xfree86-common: two clipboard?)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173189: xfree86-common: two clipboard? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 17:10:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 11:10:29 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (localhost) [64.32.101.12] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NcHc-0002LX-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:10:29 -0600 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1731A84184; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:09:07 -0400 (AST) From: Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xfree86-common: two clipboard? X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:09:07 -0400 Reply-To: Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <20021215170907.1731A84184@localhost> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "Reply-To" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xfree86-common Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: normal I don't know what package is responsible of that, but I find that in X I have two clipboard. If I do a copy in kmail, the gnome clipboard is void, but the thing I copied is disponible and I can paste it (in gnome) with the middle mouse button. I knew that the clipboard of kde and gnome is the same. Now it seems false. What is it? or is it something of X? -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux misiongenovesa 2.2.19 #2 ven ott 11 11:34:12 AST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=it_IT, LC_CTYPE=it_IT Versions of packages xfree86-common depends on: ii debianutils 1.16.7 Miscellaneous utilities specific t --- Received: (at 173189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 00:19:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 18:19:42 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Tt5K-0003BS-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:19:42 -0600 Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCEED640B5; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#173189: xfree86-common: two clipboard? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <20021215170907.1731A84184@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021215170907.1731A84184@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.2 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:09:07PM -0400, Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > Package: xfree86-common > Version: 4.2.1-3 > Severity: normal >=20 > I don't know what package is responsible of that, but I find that in X I= =20 > have two clipboard. >=20 > If I do a copy in kmail, the gnome clipboard is void, but the thing I=20 > copied is disponible and I can paste it (in gnome) with the middle mouse= =20 > button. >=20 > I knew that the clipboard of kde and gnome is the same. Now it seems=20 > false. What is it? or is it something of X? Please don't file requests for information as bug reports. The Debian Bug Tracking System is a Bug Tracking System, not the Usenet Oracle. http://www.jwz.org/doc/x-cut-and-paste.html =2E..may help. Closing this spurious report. --=20 G. Branden Robinson|If a man ate a pound of pasta and a Debian GNU/Linux |pound of antipasto, would they [EMAIL PROTECTED] |cancel out, leaving him still http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |hungry? -- Scott Adams --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj
Bug#172550: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:59:02PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > Well, it's up to you, really. If you split out just xft1, that would > work for me. However, as you said on IRC, if you're going to split it, > you might as well split it all the way. That way if anything else comes > along later it will be less of a pain. > > You could still make xlibs-dev a metapackage which depends on all the > others, or something. Yeah. I'll see about addressing this in -6. There are some other bugs I'm trying to rectify for -5 to make it a candidate for testing and I don't want to muddy the waters with this huge infrastructural change yet. -- G. Branden Robinson|I must despise the world which does Debian GNU/Linux |not know that music is a higher [EMAIL PROTECTED] |revelation than all wisdom and http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |philosophy. -- Ludwig van Beethoven msg05155/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#173357: marked as done (Dexconf hacked with detect)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:12:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173357: Dexconf hacked with detect has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2002 21:15:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 16 15:15:07 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail2.alphalink.com.au [202.161.124.194] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18O2Zp-0002bM-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:15:06 -0600 Received: from debian.me.null (d421-ps4-mel.alphalink.com.au [202.161.98.105]) by mail2.alphalink.com.au (8.12.5/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gBGLEqIT026578 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:14:53 +1100 Received: by debian.me.null (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 054472D8F6; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:13:01 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:13:01 +1100 From: rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dexconf hacked with detect Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Archive: encrypt Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,UPPERCASE_25_50, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-common Version: 4.2.1-4 Hi, This version only needs one debconf question for monitor size. Rob. #!/bin/sh # /usr/local/sbin/easygui # Adapted from Dexconf: Debian X Configurator # Licensed under the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at your option) any later version. # DEXCONFTMPDIR="/tmp/gui-tmp-$$" rm -rf $DEXCONFTMPDIR mkdir -p $DEXCONFTMPDIR cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/Header << SECTION # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config" at the shell prompt.) SECTION ### SERVERFLAGS cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/ServerFlags << SECTION Section "ServerFlags" EndSection SECTION ### SERVERLAYOUT cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/ServerLayout << SECTION Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Default Layout" Screen "Default Screen" InputDevice "Generic Keyboard" InputDevice "Configured Mouse" SECTION printf "EndSection\n" >> $DEXCONFTMPDIR/ServerLayout ### FILES cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/Files << SECTION Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" EndSection SECTION ### MODULE cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/Module << SECTION Section "Module" Load"ddc" Load"GLcore" Load"dbe" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"glx" Load"record" Load"xie" Load"bitmap" Load"freetype" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"int10" EndSection SECTION ### KEYBOARD / INPUTDEVICE # pc101 keyboard is rare, think it will work with pc104 cat > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/InputDeviceKeyboard << SECTION Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc104" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection SECTION ### MOUSE / INPUTDEVICE # This assumes that these statements are in modules.conf # alias char-major-13 input # above input mousedev hid usb-uhci # Would need to test for arch first, as usb-uhci is only Intel rm /dev/mouse; /sbin/modprobe input; if ((`dmesg | grep input | grep -c 'Mouse'` > 0)); then ln -s /dev/input/mice /dev/mouse; MOUSE_PORT="/dev/input/mice"; MOUSE_PROTOCOL="ImPS/2"; else ln -s /dev/psaux /dev/mouse; MOUSE_PORT="/dev/psaux"; MOUSE_PROTOCOL="PS/2"; fi printf "Section \"InputDevice\"\n" > $DEXCONFTMPDIR/InputDeviceMouse printf "\tIdentifier\
Processed: severity of 173071 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 173071 important Bug#173071: xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 173071 important Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Severity set to `important'. > retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Changed Bug title. > tag 173071 + moreinfo upstream unreproducible Bug#173071: xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, upstream, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173229: marked as done ()
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:16:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing untitled, sloppily filed report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 22:40:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 16:40:04 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.home.se [195.66.35.201] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NhQZ-000493-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:40:04 -0600 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [217.215.157.41] by home.se with NetMail ModWeb Module; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:32:02 +0100 Subject: From: "Mr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:32:02 +0100 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJ_MISSING version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: ** Package: debian/xserver Version: 3.0 This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs) XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) Release Date: 21 December 2001 =3D09If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is =3D09newer than the above date, look for a newer version before =3D09reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.17 i686 [ELF]=3D20 Module Loader present (=3D3D=3D3D) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Mon Dec 16 00:11:23 = 2002 (=3D3D=3D3D) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4" Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (=3D3D=3D3D) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (=3D3D=3D3D) ServerLayout "Default Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Fujitsu 17 inch Flatscreen" (**) | |-->Device "Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 4600" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard" (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc104" (**) XKB: model: "pc104" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "Se" (**) XKB: layout: "Se" (**) Option "XkbVariant" "se" (**) XKB: variant: "se" (**) Option "XkbOptions" "se" (**) XKB: options: "se" (=3D3D=3D3D) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse" (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist. =3D09Entry deleted from font path. (**) FontPath set to "unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts= =3D /100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/T= =3D ype1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fon= =3D ts/75dpi" (=3D3D=3D3D) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (=3D3D=3D3D) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Cannot open APM (II) Module ABI versions: =3D09XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 =3D09XFree86 Video Driver: 0.4 =3D09XFree86 XInput driver : 0.2 =3D09XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 =3D09XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor=3D3D"The XFree86 Project" =3D09compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version =3D3D 1.0.0 =3D09Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer =3D09ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor=3D3D"The XFree86 Project" =3D09compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version =3D3D 0.1.0 =3D09ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages =3D3D 0x03, oldVal1 =3D3D 0x, mode1Res1 =3D3D 0x80= 00 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1039,0646 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr = =3D 80 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1039,0001 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr = =3D 01 (II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 1039,0008 card , rev 04 class 06,01,00 h
Re: Possible bug in installation
#include * Skip Queen [Wed, Jan 01 2003, 12:54:43AM]: > I have tried to install Debian Woody 3.0 a total of six times and each > time the same thing happens. My video is all screwed up. XWindows does > not work. When I pick up video card (i810) it won't work at all. If I > pick VESA it will "sort of" work - i.e., not the resolution I pick so > things "float" across the screen and the resolution will not go above > 800X600. Someone told me there was a bug in the kernel. I have had no > problem with my system using either Mandrake, Redhat, SuSE or Knoppix - > only Debian (Woody). Can you help! Thanks! How is this related to debian-boot, or boot-floppies? Like you passed the installation fine and fail on ocnfiguration. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- > Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there > is nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed > to install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work > for me, dunno why). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#166448: marked as done (xdm: prerm script hangs while stopping xdm)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2002 11:40:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 26 06:40:55 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [212.227.14.2] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 185PJH-00081v-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:40:55 -0500 Received: from zombie.inka.de by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.4) id 185PJG-0005KW-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:40:54 +0200 Received: from schleppi ([192.168.0.234] helo=rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de ident=mail) by zombie with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 185Ox3-0007Ht-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:17:57 +0200 Received: from inet by rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 185Owy-0004CY-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:17:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xdm: prerm script hangs while stopping xdm X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:17:51 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xdm Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: important See subject. When it asks me to stop the running xdm, I confirm with y. Though, it does not kill it and hangs. ps aufwx on another console shows me no idling child process of prerm, so I assume that this is kinda debconf bug, not allowing the script to read keyboard input. MfG, Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux schleppi 2.4.20-pre11-sat-2410-404 #3 Sam Okt 26 00:18:02 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages xdm depends on: ii cpp 2:2.95.4-17 The GNU C preprocessor. ii debconf 1.2.12 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam0g 0.76-7 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libxaw7 4.2.1-3 X Athena widget set library ii xbase-clients4.2.1-3 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs4.2.1-3 X Window System client libraries -- debconf information: xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm --- Received: (at 166448-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2003 23:47:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 17:47:38 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TsaI-0008Pw-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 17:47:38 -0600 Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 948DB640B5; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing bug from unresponsive submitter Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R+My9LyyhiUvIEro" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I required more information from the bug submitter and sent email to him or her expressing this request on 27 October 2002. I received no information in reply. Closing this bug. --=20 G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise -- a Debian GNU/Linux |screaming mob pounding on a greasy [EMAIL PROTECTED] |spot on the pavement, where used to http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |lie the carcass of a dead horse. --R+My9
Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. > [...] > > At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be > > ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the > > patches I do not see any other simple solution in a short term. Of course > > we can just wait and see but of course the final decision is up to > > Branden. > > I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility > with upstream XFree86. Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable. > > I am on the fence regarding these patches until I know whether they do > so or not. fair enough... > > In any case, getting these patches aired upstream (XFree86, not > necessarily X.Org) is a very, very good idea, because people much > savvier with X protocol design and implementation details can thus get a > good, critical look at it. > Im working on pushing them to X.org and hopefully to get atleast an answer back. If there will be no answer XFree86 will be the next step, and I perfectly agree with you about a good deep review. I leave up to you if you wish to close this bug or not. I do not mind either way and for sure i'm not the one going to play tennis with BTS ;) Thanks a lot to all the people that have answered back with comments and help. Best Regards Fabio -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+E2TahCzbekR3nhgRAoobAJ4+R331Gvsp3oOBkBd4XdvwQv6QjACgnB2C uZP1BiQnZheXXjXwHojN/fQ= =wMdE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#172325: xlibs fails to install (overwrite problems)
Please don't reply to 172325-quiet; I never saw your reply. If you think its a case of "you last installed some packages when Bruce was around, what do you expect" kind of bug then close it. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some evil overlapping going on. It was evil, but it's been recitifed about as well as it can be. Closing this bug. -- G. Branden Robinson| "Why do we have to hide from the Debian GNU/Linux | police, Daddy?" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Because we use vi, son. They use http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | emacs." msg05149/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:29:33AM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote: > Ok, I see. I've tracked down the problem more carefully now: > The SOSYMLINK problem maybe solved by including Library.tmpl in > Imake.rules: I don't think that's the right fix, either. What I need to know is why this construct fails for gnuLib.rules, but appears to work fine in lnxLib.rules. -- G. Branden Robinson|Imagination was given man to Debian GNU/Linux |compensate for what he is not, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] |a sense of humor to console him for http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |what he is. msg05148/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: retitle 165146 to xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 165146 xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 165146
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 165146 + moreinfo Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Tags were: sid upstream Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: XftConfig bullshit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 97506 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#97506: xbase-clients: [XftConfig] suggested additions for default XftConfig file Changed Bug title. > retitle 166335 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#166335: xlibs: default XftConfig file could be improved Changed Bug title. > retitle 171750 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig doesn't map sans/serif/mono Changed Bug title. > reassign 97506 xlibs Bug#97506: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `xlibs'. > reassign 166335 xlibs Bug#166335: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug reassigned from package `xlibs' to `xlibs'. > reassign 171750 xlibs Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug reassigned from package `xlibs' to `xlibs'. > severity 97506 important Bug#97506: xlibs: XftConfig blues Severity set to `important'. > severity 166335 important Bug#166335: xlibs: XftConfig blues Severity set to `important'. > severity 171750 important Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig blues Severity set to `important'. > merge 97506 166335 171750 Bug#97506: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#166335: xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#171750: xlibs: XftConfig blues Merged 97506 166335 171750. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility > > with upstream XFree86. > > Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable. I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a very rude thing to do to our users. > Im working on pushing them to X.org and hopefully to get atleast an answer > back. If there will be no answer XFree86 will be the next step, and I > perfectly agree with you about a good deep review. IMO you should go XFree86 first. They are the leading implementation of the X Window System and have a reputation for being more responsive. They're certainly more open. > I leave up to you if you wish to close this bug or not. I do not mind > either way and for sure i'm not the one going to play tennis with BTS ;) I'm not going to close it right now. I'm tagging it "moreinfo". The info I need is: * Do these patches change the X protocol? If so, I will tag the bug "wontfix, upstream" and close it. If not, I might be willing to put then in a Debian package as long as I understand the impact. > Thanks a lot to all the people that have answered back with comments and > help. Thanks a lot for working on this. -- G. Branden Robinson| Suffer before God and ye shall be Debian GNU/Linux | redeemed. God loves us, so He [EMAIL PROTECTED] | makes us suffer Christianity. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Aaron Dunsmore msg05144/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:17:50AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers > out of the source tree. Right. > Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed. Nor should it ever be. Source packages that Build-Depend on themselves are stupid. > I've tested the build under clean installed chroot sid tree. > The chroot system tree does not have X11 headers. Right. > This fix is not enough for these bug reports? It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the headers. However, rectifying this silliness probably means extensive Imake surgery on the source tree. > I'm confising about `external dependencues'. It means the X build would require something pre-existing on the system; the stuff that is declared in the Build-Depends or implicitly available via Essential and Build-Essential packages. > I believed that "`external dependencues` said in the reports > means xfree86 build depends xfree86 generated files. So, > we should add xfree86 Build-Depends: xlibs-dev or so." No, I think that would be a very poor solution. Thanks for your patch. -- G. Branden Robinson| Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |fsck;more;yes;fsck;fsck;fsck; http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |umount;sleep msg05143/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: tagging 172962
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 172962 + moreinfo Bug#172962: IPv6 support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. >> >> Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way >> but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead. Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers out of the source tree. Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed. I've tested the build under clean installed chroot sid tree. The chroot system tree does not have X11 headers. This fix is not enough for these bug reports? I'm confising about `external dependencues'. I believed that "`external dependencues` said in the reports means xfree86 build depends xfree86 generated files. So, we should add xfree86 Build-Depends: xlibs-dev or so." -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. > [...] > > At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be > > ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the > > patches I do not see any other simple solution in a short term. Of course > > we can just wait and see but of course the final decision is up to > > Branden. > > I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility > with upstream XFree86. Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable. > > I am on the fence regarding these patches until I know whether they do > so or not. fair enough... > > In any case, getting these patches aired upstream (XFree86, not > necessarily X.Org) is a very, very good idea, because people much > savvier with X protocol design and implementation details can thus get a > good, critical look at it. > Im working on pushing them to X.org and hopefully to get atleast an answer back. If there will be no answer XFree86 will be the next step, and I perfectly agree with you about a good deep review. I leave up to you if you wish to close this bug or not. I do not mind either way and for sure i'm not the one going to play tennis with BTS ;) Thanks a lot to all the people that have answered back with comments and help. Best Regards Fabio -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+E2TahCzbekR3nhgRAoobAJ4+R331Gvsp3oOBkBd4XdvwQv6QjACgnB2C uZP1BiQnZheXXjXwHojN/fQ= =wMdE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#168178: [savage] runs out of MTRRs on unknown chipset (0x8c2e) rev 5
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:42:23PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > This is fixed in upstream CVS. It is due to the 4.2 version of the > Savage driver mis-detecting the video memory size. > > A workaround is to set the size in your XF86Config-4 explicitly using > the VideoRam keyword. A proper solution is to remove the code that > (mistakenly) probes for the memory size using the VESA BIOS in > SavagePreInit in savage_driver.c. I have a fix pending for 4.2.1-5: * patch #000_stolen_from_HEAD_savage_driver: new + Fixed memory leaks in S3 Savage driver (Egbert Eich). + Savage driver updates (#5203, Tim Roberts). + [...] xf86SetOperatingState() call cleanups in most drivers (Marc La France). + Savage driver updates. - Support for ProSavage DDR (PCI ID 0x8D04) - TV output fixes - support for -pixmap24 flag - XAA fixes to cure lockups (#5412, Tim Roberts). + Fix Mono8x8 code in savage driver, needed ROP_NEEDS_SOURCE, also add NO_PLANEMASK to ScreenToScreen as code doesn't handle that case (Alan Hourihane). + Remove "Option VideoRam" from savage driver, there's no need for it, and utilize the entities given VideoRam size (Alan Hourihane). -- G. Branden Robinson|A committee is a life form with six Debian GNU/Linux |or more legs and no brain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Robert Heinlein http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | pgpzHfi0FwUpF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. [...] > At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be > ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the > patches I do not see any other simple solution in a short term. Of course > we can just wait and see but of course the final decision is up to > Branden. I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility with upstream XFree86. I am on the fence regarding these patches until I know whether they do so or not. In any case, getting these patches aired upstream (XFree86, not necessarily X.Org) is a very, very good idea, because people much savvier with X protocol design and implementation details can thus get a good, critical look at it. -- G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson pgp8bEBOHKjrW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#174915: marked as done (xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2003 13:22:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 07:22:49 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lutetium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.116] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Tipc-00026D-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:22:48 -0600 Received: from host217-36-6-112.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.36.6.112] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by lutetium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18TipY-0005qi-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:22:44 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 18TipX-0001Am-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:22:43 + Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by riva.lab.dotat.at with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 18TdQ4-iJ-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:36:04 + Received: from mccoy.flatline.org.uk [195.8.183.24] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.11) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:36:04 + (GMT) Received: from mail by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TdNF-0005Xh-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:33:14 + Received: from (master.debian.org) [65.125.64.135] (mail) by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TdNE-0005Xc-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:33:08 + Received: from debbugs by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TdN5-00017x-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:32:59 -0600 Received: from mail1.pas.rochester.edu (mail.pas.rochester.edu) [128.151.144.211] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TdN4-00017B-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:32:58 -0600 Received: from alfalfa.pas.rochester.edu (alfalfa.pas.rochester.edu [128.151.144.13]) by mail.pas.rochester.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EAE1E15B7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 02:32:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 02:32:27 -0500 (EST) From: Sungjong Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1753215600-2111077081-1041406347=:22875" Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:22:43 + Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,RESENT_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. ---1753215600-2111077081-1041406347=:22875 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Package: XFree86 Version: 4.1.0.1 I am sending this e-mail once again since I didn't include Package information before. When I ran /usr/bin/x11/xf86cfg, it gave me this error message. XFree86 found a valid card configuration. Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h. Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team. - The whole log file of running xf86cfg is attached 'XFree86.8.log'. 'scanpci -v' output is also attached as a file named 'scanpciresult'. When I ran 'starx', it failed to show me xwindow. It said 'No device detected', even though I thought I put a proper module for the device. The attached file, 'XFree86.0.log' is the log file for running 'startx'. The device I am using is ATI Rage 128 Pro (as is shown on the video card). The monitor I am using is SAMSUNG SyncMaster 750s. Horizontal frequency range is 30-70kHz and vertical frequency is 50-160kHz, which I found from manufacturer'
Processed: tagging 174282
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 174282 + upstream Bug#174282: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead. Oh well, that's upstream's problem, I guess. Thanks again. -- G. Branden Robinson| Psychology is really biology. Debian GNU/Linux | Biology is really chemistry. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Chemistry is really physics. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Physics is really math. pgplYN4IlCDir.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#174685: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:29:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#174685: xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 06:08:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 30 00:08:39 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (pyre.virge.net) [24.157.37.105] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18St6K-0001qR-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:08:36 -0600 Received: by pyre.virge.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA3991873DE; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 01:08:34 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 01:08:34 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BALANCE_FOR_LONG_20K,BALANCE_FOR_LONG_40K, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-4 Severity: normal After upgrading to 4.2.1-4, the mouse stopped working in quake3. Clicking the mouse buttons works (judging from the audiable tones generated when the mouse is clicked), but the pointer can not be moved. Downgrading the xserver-xfree86 package to version 4.2.1-3 fixes the problem. -- Package-specific info: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon VE QY 01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:5159 # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexter, the # Debian X Configuration tool. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config" at the shell prompt.) ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION ### END DEBCONF SECTION Section "Files" #FontPath "unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these # Original Pyre fonts #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/freefont/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" #ce01533 Fonts FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/freefont/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" Option "DontZap" "true" Option "StandbyTime" "20" Option "SuspendTime" "30" Option "OffTime" "40" EndSection Section "Module" Load"ddc" Load"dbe" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"glx" Load"record" Load"bitmap" Load"freetype" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"int10" Load"v4l" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc104" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" #Option "Protocol" "MouseManPlusPS/2" Opti
Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. >> >> Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way >> but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead. Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers out of the source tree. Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed. I've tested the build under clean installed chroot sid tree. The chroot system tree does not have X11 headers. This fix is not enough for these bug reports? I'm confising about `external dependencues'. I believed that "`external dependencues` said in the reports means xfree86 build depends xfree86 generated files. So, we should add xfree86 Build-Depends: xlibs-dev or so." -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#168178: [savage] runs out of MTRRs on unknown chipset (0x8c2e) rev 5
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:42:23PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > This is fixed in upstream CVS. It is due to the 4.2 version of the > Savage driver mis-detecting the video memory size. > > A workaround is to set the size in your XF86Config-4 explicitly using > the VideoRam keyword. A proper solution is to remove the code that > (mistakenly) probes for the memory size using the VESA BIOS in > SavagePreInit in savage_driver.c. I have a fix pending for 4.2.1-5: * patch #000_stolen_from_HEAD_savage_driver: new + Fixed memory leaks in S3 Savage driver (Egbert Eich). + Savage driver updates (#5203, Tim Roberts). + [...] xf86SetOperatingState() call cleanups in most drivers (Marc La France). + Savage driver updates. - Support for ProSavage DDR (PCI ID 0x8D04) - TV output fixes - support for -pixmap24 flag - XAA fixes to cure lockups (#5412, Tim Roberts). + Fix Mono8x8 code in savage driver, needed ROP_NEEDS_SOURCE, also add NO_PLANEMASK to ScreenToScreen as code doesn't handle that case (Alan Hourihane). + Remove "Option VideoRam" from savage driver, there's no need for it, and utilize the entities given VideoRam size (Alan Hourihane). -- G. Branden Robinson|A committee is a life form with six Debian GNU/Linux |or more legs and no brain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Robert Heinlein http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | msg05139/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Fwd: Possible bug in installation
This message appeared on debian-boot. Skip, please check for responses on debian-x. - Forwarded message from Skip Queen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: 01 Jan 2003 00:54:43 -0500 From: Skip Queen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8-3mdk To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Subject: Possible bug in installation I have tried to install Debian Woody 3.0 a total of six times and each time the same thing happens. My video is all screwed up. XWindows does not work. When I pick up video card (i810) it won't work at all. If I pick VESA it will "sort of" work - i.e., not the resolution I pick so things "float" across the screen and the resolution will not go above 800X600. Someone told me there was a bug in the kernel. I have had no problem with my system using either Mandrake, Redhat, SuSE or Knoppix - only Debian (Woody). Can you help! Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - End forwarded message -
Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. [...] > At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be > ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the > patches I do not see any other simple solution in a short term. Of course > we can just wait and see but of course the final decision is up to > Branden. I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility with upstream XFree86. I am on the fence regarding these patches until I know whether they do so or not. In any case, getting these patches aired upstream (XFree86, not necessarily X.Org) is a very, very good idea, because people much savvier with X protocol design and implementation details can thus get a good, critical look at it. -- G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson msg05138/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#174915: marked as done (xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2003 13:22:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 07:22:49 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lutetium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.116] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Tipc-00026D-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:22:48 -0600 Received: from host217-36-6-112.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.36.6.112] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by lutetium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18TipY-0005qi-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:22:44 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 18TipX-0001Am-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:22:43 + Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by riva.lab.dotat.at with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for cjwatson@localhost id 18TdQ4-iJ-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:36:04 + Received: from mccoy.flatline.org.uk [195.8.183.24] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.11) for cjwatson@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:36:04 + (GMT) Received: from mail by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TdNF-0005Xh-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:33:14 + Received: from (master.debian.org) [65.125.64.135] (mail) by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TdNE-0005Xc-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 07:33:08 + Received: from debbugs by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TdN5-00017x-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:32:59 -0600 Received: from mail1.pas.rochester.edu (mail.pas.rochester.edu) [128.151.144.211] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18TdN4-00017B-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:32:58 -0600 Received: from alfalfa.pas.rochester.edu (alfalfa.pas.rochester.edu [128.151.144.13]) by mail.pas.rochester.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EAE1E15B7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 02:32:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 02:32:27 -0500 (EST) From: Sungjong Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1753215600-2111077081-1041406347=:22875" Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:22:43 + Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,RESENT_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. ---1753215600-2111077081-1041406347=:22875 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Package: XFree86 Version: 4.1.0.1 I am sending this e-mail once again since I didn't include Package information before. When I ran /usr/bin/x11/xf86cfg, it gave me this error message. XFree86 found a valid card configuration. Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h. Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team. - The whole log file of running xf86cfg is attached 'XFree86.8.log'. 'scanpci -v' output is also attached as a file named 'scanpciresult'. When I ran 'starx', it failed to show me xwindow. It said 'No device detected', even though I thought I put a proper module for the device. The attached file, 'XFree86.0.log' is the log file for running 'startx'. The device I am using is ATI Rage 128 Pro (as is shown on the video card). The monitor I am using is SAMSUNG SyncMaster 750s. Horizontal frequency range is 30-70kHz and vertical frequency is 50-160kHz, which I found from manufacturer's h
Processed: tagging 174282
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 174282 + upstream Bug#174282: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170510: X server build problem fix
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead. Oh well, that's upstream's problem, I guess. Thanks again. -- G. Branden Robinson| Psychology is really biology. Debian GNU/Linux | Biology is really chemistry. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Chemistry is really physics. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Physics is really math. msg05135/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#174685: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:29:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#174685: xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 06:08:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 30 00:08:39 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (pyre.virge.net) [24.157.37.105] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18St6K-0001qR-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:08:36 -0600 Received: by pyre.virge.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA3991873DE; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 01:08:34 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 01:08:34 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BALANCE_FOR_LONG_20K,BALANCE_FOR_LONG_40K, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-4 Severity: normal After upgrading to 4.2.1-4, the mouse stopped working in quake3. Clicking the mouse buttons works (judging from the audiable tones generated when the mouse is clicked), but the pointer can not be moved. Downgrading the xserver-xfree86 package to version 4.2.1-3 fixes the problem. -- Package-specific info: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon VE QY 01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:5159 # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexter, the # Debian X Configuration tool. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config" at the shell prompt.) ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION ### END DEBCONF SECTION Section "Files" #FontPath "unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these # Original Pyre fonts #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/:unscaled" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/freefont/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" #ce01533 Fonts FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/freefont/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" Option "DontZap" "true" Option "StandbyTime" "20" Option "SuspendTime" "30" Option "OffTime" "40" EndSection Section "Module" Load"ddc" Load"dbe" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"glx" Load"record" Load"bitmap" Load"freetype" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"int10" Load"v4l" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc104" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" #Option "Protocol" "MouseManPlusPS/2" Opti
Fwd: Possible bug in installation
This message appeared on debian-boot. Skip, please check for responses on debian-x. - Forwarded message from Skip Queen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: 01 Jan 2003 00:54:43 -0500 From: Skip Queen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8-3mdk To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Possible bug in installation I have tried to install Debian Woody 3.0 a total of six times and each time the same thing happens. My video is all screwed up. XWindows does not work. When I pick up video card (i810) it won't work at all. If I pick VESA it will "sort of" work - i.e., not the resolution I pick so things "float" across the screen and the resolution will not go above 800X600. Someone told me there was a bug in the kernel. I have had no problem with my system using either Mandrake, Redhat, SuSE or Knoppix - only Debian (Woody). Can you help! Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - End forwarded message - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.
Package: XFree86 Version: 4.1.0.1 I am sending this e-mail once again since I didn't include Package information before. When I ran /usr/bin/x11/xf86cfg, it gave me this error message. XFree86 found a valid card configuration. Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h. Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team. - The whole log file of running xf86cfg is attached 'XFree86.8.log'. 'scanpci -v' output is also attached as a file named 'scanpciresult'. When I ran 'starx', it failed to show me xwindow. It said 'No device detected', even though I thought I put a proper module for the device. The attached file, 'XFree86.0.log' is the log file for running 'startx'. The device I am using is ATI Rage 128 Pro (as is shown on the video card). The monitor I am using is SAMSUNG SyncMaster 750s. Horizontal frequency range is 30-70kHz and vertical frequency is 50-160kHz, which I found from manufacturer's homepage. I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1, kernel 2.2.20. Thank you, Sungjong Woo This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs) XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) Release Date: 21 December 2001 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.17 i686 [ELF] Module Loader present (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.8.log", Time: Wed Jan 1 00:54:57 2003 (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Cannot open APM (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.4 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.2 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1106,0305 card 1043,8033 rev 02 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1106,8305 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 1106,0686 card 1043,8033 rev 22 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:04:1: chip 1106,0571 card , rev 10 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:04:2: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 10 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:04:3: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 10 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:04:4: chip 1106,3057 card , rev 30 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 125d,1969 card 125d,8898 rev 02 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 10ec,8029 card a0a0,0026 rev 00 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 105a,0d30 card 105a,4d33 rev 02 class 01,80,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,5446 card 1002,0008 rev 00 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) LoadModule: "scanpci" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) UnloadModule: "scanpci" (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (-1,0,0), BCTRL: 0x08 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x08 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 1 I/O range: [0] -1 00xd000 - 0xdfff (0x1000) IX[B] (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00xdf00 - 0xdfdf (0xe0) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00xdff0 - 0xe3ff (0x410) MX[B] (II) Bus -1: b
Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.
Package: XFree86 Version: 4.1.0.1 I am sending this e-mail once again since I didn't include Package information before. When I ran /usr/bin/x11/xf86cfg, it gave me this error message. XFree86 found a valid card configuration. Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h. Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team. - The whole log file of running xf86cfg is attached 'XFree86.8.log'. 'scanpci -v' output is also attached as a file named 'scanpciresult'. When I ran 'starx', it failed to show me xwindow. It said 'No device detected', even though I thought I put a proper module for the device. The attached file, 'XFree86.0.log' is the log file for running 'startx'. The device I am using is ATI Rage 128 Pro (as is shown on the video card). The monitor I am using is SAMSUNG SyncMaster 750s. Horizontal frequency range is 30-70kHz and vertical frequency is 50-160kHz, which I found from manufacturer's homepage. I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1, kernel 2.2.20. Thank you, Sungjong Woo This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs) XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) Release Date: 21 December 2001 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.17 i686 [ELF] Module Loader present (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.8.log", Time: Wed Jan 1 00:54:57 2003 (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Cannot open APM (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.4 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.2 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1106,0305 card 1043,8033 rev 02 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1106,8305 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 1106,0686 card 1043,8033 rev 22 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:04:1: chip 1106,0571 card , rev 10 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:04:2: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 10 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:04:3: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 10 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:04:4: chip 1106,3057 card , rev 30 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 125d,1969 card 125d,8898 rev 02 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 10ec,8029 card a0a0,0026 rev 00 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 105a,0d30 card 105a,4d33 rev 02 class 01,80,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,5446 card 1002,0008 rev 00 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) LoadModule: "scanpci" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) UnloadModule: "scanpci" (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (-1,0,0), BCTRL: 0x08 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x08 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 1 I/O range: [0] -1 00xd000 - 0xdfff (0x1000) IX[B] (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00xdf00 - 0xdfdf (0xe0) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range:
