Re: X apparently not releases memory
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/analyse-x.pl > Why not use depth 16? AFAIK depth 16 is a 2 bytes not much difference from 15 (almost 2 bytes) what makes it worth over depth 16? -- Carlos Barros.
building xfree 4.0.2-1. (report)
Hello The problems that I had. debhelper must be less than 2.2.12. dh_suidregister is no longer valid. You need to download from unstable freetype-2.0.1, glide2000.11.02.07, debhelper-2.2.11. ( in http://packages.debian.org/$package ) Build those packages. After that, install them. And finally build xfree. Now I'm going to install them over 4.0.1-8. dpkg-buildpackage time: 5418.94user 540.66system 1:46:07elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (17628712major+7857414minor)pagefaults 0swaps (using a dual PII400/128MB/SCSI, but only 1 cpu was used) The log was about 9MB -- Carlos Barros.
building xfree 4.0.2-1. (report)
Hello The problems that I had. debhelper must be less than 2.2.12. dh_suidregister is no longer valid. You need to download from unstable freetype-2.0.1, glide2000.11.02.07, debhelper-2.2.11. ( in http://packages.debian.org/$package ) Build those packages. After that, install them. And finally build xfree. Now I'm going to install them over 4.0.1-8. dpkg-buildpackage time: 5418.94user 540.66system 1:46:07elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (17628712major+7857414minor)pagefaults 0swaps (using a dual PII400/128MB/SCSI, but only 1 cpu was used) The log was about 9MB -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: > Hi, > > I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are > using. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and > newer? Oh, BTW thank you. -- Carlos Barros.
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: > Hi, > > I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are > using. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and > newer? Yep, I see it now. Trying that... -- Carlos Barros.
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: > Hi, > > I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are > using. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and > newer? Oh, BTW thank you. -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: > Hi, > > I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are > using. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and > newer? Yep, I see it now. Trying that... -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
building xfree 4.0.2-1
Hello! Im building 4.0.2-1 under potato. (glide 3 and libfreetype6 included). Now I'm lost. It doesn't make all packages. It stopped in xserver-xfree86 with this error dpkg-deb: parse error, in file 'Debian/xserver-xfree86/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package 'xserver-xfree86': line 'Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected dh_builddeb: command returned error code make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 1 MANIFEST's files ar Ok.(all files are where they should, AFAIK) Can you give-me any hint? -- Carlos Barros.
building xfree 4.0.2-1
Hello! Im building 4.0.2-1 under potato. (glide 3 and libfreetype6 included). Now I'm lost. It doesn't make all packages. It stopped in xserver-xfree86 with this error dpkg-deb: parse error, in file 'Debian/xserver-xfree86/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package 'xserver-xfree86': line 'Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected dh_builddeb: command returned error code make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 1 MANIFEST's files ar Ok.(all files are where they should, AFAIK) Can you give-me any hint? -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xkb for a la-latin keyboard
Hello! How can I configure a la-latin keyboard. It is a variant of the spanish. kbd has a la-latin. -- Carlos Barros.
xkb for a la-latin keyboard
Hello! How can I configure a la-latin keyboard. It is a variant of the spanish. kbd has a la-latin. -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:37:02PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:53:53PM -0300, Carlos Barros wrote: > > I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and > > then try to make the packages. > > > > Why dh_movefiles failed? > > Is it anything to do with dpkg >= 1.7? > > If it is, where is a potato dpkg >= 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed > > updates nor experimental) > > For the the 20th time, read: > http://cpbotha.net/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO :) WOW! Ok. Is there any hint(doc) about how to use make -j on building X? And how to make it pentium optimized? I change debian/rules but didn't work. :( -- Carlos Barros.
My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
Hello! I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and then try to make the packages. 1- try to simple debuild, and failed in compiling 2- read the docs and findout build-depends ;-) 3- installed almost everything, couldn't find dpkg 1.7 nor glide3-dev. 4- debuild again... failed agin... but redirect the output to a file. 5- discover that was required for some tdfx*. 6- I disabled in the xc/config/cf/host.def the HasGlide3 and debuild again. 7- compiled ok, but no .deb created. 8- in rules I saw in install the checking for MANIFEST.i386 <> MANIFEST.i386.new. The problem was the missing *tdfx* 9- deleted that line, dbuild again but some .deb failed. It stop when making xserver-xfree86. The problem was the malformed Depends: line in the control file generated. 10- looking further I discover that dh_movefiles didn't move the files, so dh_shlibdeps didn't make the Depends line correctly. 11- It also didn't move the files of xutils. 12- the contents of xutils.files and xserver-xfree86.list ar ok. They exist in th tmp/ dir in the right locations. 13- I saw some errors about dpkg not found. Why dh_movefiles failed? Is it anything to do with dpkg >= 1.7? If it is, where is a potato dpkg >= 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed updates nor experimental) -- Carlos Barros.
Re: My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:37:02PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:53:53PM -0300, Carlos Barros wrote: > > I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and > > then try to make the packages. > > > > Why dh_movefiles failed? > > Is it anything to do with dpkg >= 1.7? > > If it is, where is a potato dpkg >= 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed > > updates nor experimental) > > For the the 20th time, read: > http://cpbotha.net/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO :) WOW! Ok. Is there any hint(doc) about how to use make -j on building X? And how to make it pentium optimized? I change debian/rules but didn't work. :( -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
Hello! I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and then try to make the packages. 1- try to simple debuild, and failed in compiling 2- read the docs and findout build-depends ;-) 3- installed almost everything, couldn't find dpkg 1.7 nor glide3-dev. 4- debuild again... failed agin... but redirect the output to a file. 5- discover that was required for some tdfx*. 6- I disabled in the xc/config/cf/host.def the HasGlide3 and debuild again. 7- compiled ok, but no .deb created. 8- in rules I saw in install the checking for MANIFEST.i386 <> MANIFEST.i386.new. The problem was the missing *tdfx* 9- deleted that line, dbuild again but some .deb failed. It stop when making xserver-xfree86. The problem was the malformed Depends: line in the control file generated. 10- looking further I discover that dh_movefiles didn't move the files, so dh_shlibdeps didn't make the Depends line correctly. 11- It also didn't move the files of xutils. 12- the contents of xutils.files and xserver-xfree86.list ar ok. They exist in th tmp/ dir in the right locations. 13- I saw some errors about dpkg not found. Why dh_movefiles failed? Is it anything to do with dpkg >= 1.7? If it is, where is a potato dpkg >= 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed updates nor experimental) -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: potato X and i810
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > 1) Upgrade to the beta XFree86 4.x packages at the URL above > 2) Downgrade your kernel to 2.2.17 Well, Im downloading the sources of XFree86 4.x to build the packages for potato. I'll tell you what happend in building XFree86. BTW Do I need to update kernel-headers to 2.2.18-pre17 to build XFree86? -- Carlos Barros.
Re: potato X and i810
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > 1) Upgrade to the beta XFree86 4.x packages at the URL above > 2) Downgrade your kernel to 2.2.17 Well, Im downloading the sources of XFree86 4.x to build the packages for potato. I'll tell you what happend in building XFree86. BTW Do I need to update kernel-headers to 2.2.18-pre17 to build XFree86? -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
