Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:29:49AM -0800, cruvolo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > According to Mike, the real test would be 'real' OpenGL apps like Quake, > > does it pass that? > > Quake1, Quake2 and Q3A all work. Tested for several minutes of play and > demo playback. I may have spoken too soon. Subsequently, X crashed with a SIGSEGV upon starting Quake. It is certainly intermittent. I didn't have this problem with 4.2.1. Would a stack trace be helpful? I'll try installing the -dbg package when I get home from work. -Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > According to Mike, the real test would be 'real' OpenGL apps like Quake, > does it pass that? Quake1, Quake2 and Q3A all work. Tested for several minutes of play and demo playback. -Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
retitle 234388 xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB Voodoo Banshee rev 3 and Voodoo3 rev 1 -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:51:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > This is due to the patch 035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff, > which contains the comment: Michel, thanks for the pointer to this patch. I have made a build without this patch, and it is functioning normally on my Voodoo3 rev 1. DRI is working with an X res of 1600x1200. I am able to change VTs and am able to change X resolutions without issue. I do not use a framebuffer console. I'm also changing the title to reflect that this is not exclusive to the Banshee: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB Voodoo Banshee rev 3 and Voodoo3 rev 1 If anyone else is having the same problem, feel free to try my build. It is versioned as 4.3.0-3.0.tdfx: deb http://chris.ruvolo.net/debian/ xfree86-tdfx/binary-i386/ deb-src http://chris.ruvolo.net/debian/ xfree86-tdfx/source/ Thanks, - -Chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFARX78KO6EG1hc77ERAkZtAKCcYVoB0+ZBLZrEHnEz4J0b/wag7gCZAcpG PWo1RImfvjlfUu592VHohFY= =/N8I -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:43:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > XFree86 refuses to use DRI at resolutions higher than 1024x768 on a > > 3dfx Voodoo Banshee and complains with this message on the logs: > > > > (WW) TDFX(0): [dri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, > > you must invoke the server using a maximum resolution of 1024x768 or > > lower. > > > > I think this behaviour is not justified by any technical reason, > > This seems a hasty conclusion to reach if you're not very familiar with the > driver code and the video hardware. Branden, I am seeing this too. The important point here is that this is a regression from 4.2.1, where the hardware is capable of DRI within an X session of 1600x1200. Note that the resolution in question here is not the resolution of the GLX graphic, but the resolution of the X display. That is, the accelerated graphic I had working was at 640x480 and would appear windowed or fullscreen via DGA. Now glxinfo with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose is reporting: libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable failed > Perhaps you could review the changes made to the tdfx driver between > XFree86 4.2.1 and 4.3.0 (the tdfx driver has not, to date, been changed > on xf-4_3-branch). > > It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not > added in 4.3.0. I don't see anything that is obviously causing this to be triggered. However, I am unsure about how this code fits in the wider implementation. -Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#229984: radeon_dri.so: undefined symbol: sse_test_dummy
tags: patch On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:04:41PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Since I upgraded to xfree 4.3.0-1, OpenGL stopped to work on my ATI Radeon > 7500 QW card. glxinfo returns me "direct rendering: No". Seeing the same thing on my voodoo3 (except tdfx_dri.so). > I am not sure if the two problems are related. I believe they are. Here is a patch that I found, but I have not tested it. Found at url: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/xfree/redhat/XFree86-4.3.0-45/XFree86-4.3.0-Mesa-SSE-fixes-from-MesaCVS-v2.patch -Chris Index: xc/extras/Mesa/src/X86/common_x86_asm.S diff -u xc/extras/Mesa/src/X86/common_x86_asm.S:1.16 xc/extras/Mesa/src/X86/common_x86_asm.S:1.17 --- xc/extras/Mesa/src/X86/common_x86_asm.S:1.16Mon Dec 16 11:18:33 2002 +++ xc/extras/Mesa/src/X86/common_x86_asm.S Sun Sep 28 15:17:08 2003 @@ -64,11 +64,6 @@ GLNAME( found_intel ): STRING( "Genuine Intel processor found\n\0" ) GLNAME( found_amd ): STRING( "Authentic AMD processor found\n\0" ) -#ifdef USE_SSE_ASM -GLNAME( sse_test_dummy ): - D_LONG 0x3f80, 0x3f80, 0x3f80, 0x3f80 -#endif - SEG_TEXT @@ -222,7 +217,13 @@ LDMXCSR ( REGOFF( -8, EBP ) ) XORPS ( XMM0, XMM0 ) - MOVUPS ( CONTENT( GLNAME( sse_test_dummy ) ), XMM1 ) + + PUSH_L ( CONST( 0x3f80 ) ) + PUSH_L ( CONST( 0x3f80 ) ) + PUSH_L ( CONST( 0x3f80 ) ) + PUSH_L ( CONST( 0x3f80 ) ) + + MOVUPS ( REGIND( ESP ), XMM1 ) DIVPS ( XMM0, XMM1 ) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
