Bug#372077: Scary message on new installations

2006-07-03 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:19:59PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > 
> > IME, it only lists NEWS.Debian files on upgrades...
> 
> Mine as well. I had a ton of clueless users early on in the transition to
> 7.0 because I had documented things in NEWS.Debian, which they were never
> shown because the package was new. I don't want to go down that road again.
> 
>  - David Nusinow

Now in #372077 also.

hth
gst


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#372077: Scary message on new installations

2006-07-03 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 04:53:56PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Right, but it might be a sufficient hint so that aptitude, and maybe apt,
> > will do the right thing.
> 
> This change *will* be sufficient to allow aptitude and apt to do the right
> thing *in a greater number of cases*.  Just how large a coverage this will
> give, I can't say -- the only good way to find out is to try it and see what
> upgrade testers have to say about it.
> 
> > Ok... I'll lower the priority of the note to medium and add the
> > xserver-xfree86 dummy package. Hopefully that'll be sufficient. As
> > discussed elsewhere, I'd prefer to use NEWS.Debian, but it won't be shown
> > to the user in this case, so a medium priority debconf abusing note should
> > suffice.
> 
> What do you mean, "in this case"?  I don't see why NEWS.Debian is any less
> appropriate here than in other cases.  Is there some concern about
> apt-listchanges not listing NEWS files for newly-installed packages?
> 
> -- 
> Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#372077: Scary message on new installations

2006-07-03 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > appropriate here than in other cases.  Is there some concern about
> > apt-listchanges not listing NEWS files for newly-installed packages?
> 
> IME, it only lists NEWS.Debian files on upgrades...
> 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Scary message on new installations

2006-07-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:06:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:48:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Would putting back xserver-xfree86 as a transitional package suffice? Since
> > I don't know how to reproduce this problem locally, my best guess is that
> > the server gets removed due to the conflict with x11-common and then
> > nothing is able to install the new one because xserver-xorg doesn't exist
> > to be marked for upgrade. Putting back an empty xserver-xfree86 that pulls
> > in xserver-xorg should suffice in this corner case, letting us remove the
> > note all together.
> 
> It is still valid for aptitude to remove xserver-xfree86, even as a
> transitional package, if the old version is conflicted with.  There's
> nothing in our packaging system that lets you mark a particular package as
> "not to be removed on upgrade".  A dummy xserver-xfree86 package may fix
> this for most users, though.

Bugreport #372077 has now this information also.


I hope this helps,
Geert Stappers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#372077: untested idea

2006-06-23 Thread Geert Stappers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:18:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 June 2006 18:34, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > +# (ugly?) workaround for #372077
> > +##x-org x-server/remove/warning/note seen
> 
> This is a possible (but not optimal workaround for in Debian Installer). 
> We may implement something like this, but it does not really belong in 
> this bug report. Please ignore.

Yes, it is intented for d-i.
Sorry to the X-org people for the invinieance (and spell errors ;- )


Cheers
Geert Stappers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEnCNkOSINbgwa/7sRAvgHAJ4tqMLyDqb711cUfFStEnjLrzfDLACgrD6g
sYxj1cDUFSs5O1RYIsruuTs=
=poBm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#372077: untested idea

2006-06-23 Thread Geert Stappers
Index: installer/build/unstable.cfg
===
--- installer/build/unstable.cfg(revision 38374)
+++ installer/build/unstable.cfg(working copy)
@@ -2,3 +2,6 @@
 # builds and development builds.
 d-i mirror/udeb/suite string unstable
 d-i mirror/udeb/suite seen false
+
+# (ugly?) workaround for #372077
+##x-org x-server/remove/warning/note seen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#286135: Are you sure it's not a mesa related bug?

2005-01-13 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:31:05PM -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> 
> I tried setting the RADEON_NO_VTXFMT environment variable, as mentioned 
> in #273651, and it worked.
> 
> Try executing:
> RADEON_NO_VTXFMT=1 blender
> And hopefully this should work.
> 
> There is also a mention of the LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT environment 
> variable in that report too. You could try this if the other variable 
> does not help you.

LIBGL_DEBUG=1 LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1 RADEON_NO_VTXFMT=1 blender

does also crash the X-server.

I'm not sure if also did get the grey screen (blender background?)
without any environment variable setting. So it could be an improvement.


Cheers
Geert Stappers


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#286135: x-server information

2005-01-13 Thread Geert Stappers
Hello,

Attachment xserver information


Cheers Geert


This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way.  Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository
(http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs).

XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 20040709050738 [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Release Date: 15 August 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.25-powerpc-smp ppc [ELF] 
Build Date: 09 July 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
OS Kernel: Linux version 2.4.25-powerpc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (version gcc 3.3.3 
(Debian 20040401)) #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004 
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Jan 13 23:10:16 2005
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_clip.o":  No 
symbols found
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_norm.o":  No 
symbols found
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_xform.o":  No 
symbols found
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_vertex.o":  No 
symbols found
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a:spencode.o":  No symbols 
found
Warning: font renderer for ".pcf" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.Z" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.gz" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".snf" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".snf.Z" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".snf.gz" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".bdf" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".bdf.Z" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".bdf.gz" already registered at priority 0
Warning: font renderer for ".pmf" already registered at priority 0
SESSION_MANAGER=local/bahrain:/tmp/.ICE-unix/6300
GetModeLine - scrn: 0 clock: 65000
GetModeLine - hdsp: 1024 hbeg: 1048 hend: 1184 httl: 1344
  vdsp: 768 vbeg: 771 vend: 777 vttl: 806 flags: 10

   *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not
   *** be the reason for the server aborting.

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting


When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The application 'gnome-session' lost its connection to the display :0.0;
most likely the X server was shut down or you killed/destroyed
the application.
ICE default IO error handler doing an exit(), pid = 6314, errno = 0
The application 'gnome-panel' lost its connection to the display :0.0;
most likely the X server was shut down or you killed/destroyed
the application.
ICE default IO error handler doing an exit(), pid = 6353, errno = 0
The application 'nautilus' lost its connection to the display :0.0;
most likely the X server was shut down or you killed/destroyed
the application.
The application 'gnome-cups-icon' lost its connection to the display :0.0;
most likely the X server was shut down or you killed/destroyed
the application.
The application 'gnome-terminal' lost its connection to the display :0.0;
most likely the X server was shut down or you killed/destroyed
the application.
xinit:  connection to X server lost.



Re: Bug#286135: hardware info from the submitter

2005-01-13 Thread Geert Stappers
Hello X-server maintainers.

Here hardware information from the bug submitter.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
cpu : 745/755
temperature : 15-17 C (uncalibrated)
clock   : 600MHz
revision: 51.17 (pvr 0008 3311)
bogomips: 1196.03
machine : PowerBook4,1
motherboard : PowerBook4,1 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
board revision  : 0003
detected as : 257 (iBook 2)
pmac flags  : 000b
L2 cache: 256K unified
memory  : 640MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ (lspci ; lspci -n ) | sort
:00:0b.0 0600: 106b:0027
:00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Pangea AGP
:00:10.0 0300: 1002:4c46 (rev 02)
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 
AGP 2x (rev 02)
:10:0b.0 0600: 106b:0028
:10:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Pangea PCI
:10:17.0 ff00: 106b:0025
:10:17.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Pangea Mac I/O
:10:18.0 0c03: 106b:0026
:10:18.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Pangea USB
:10:19.0 0c03: 106b:0026
:10:19.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Pangea USB
:20:0b.0 0600: 106b:0029
:20:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Pangea Internal PCI
:20:0e.0 0c00: 106b:0030
:20:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Pangea FireWire
:20:0f.0 0200: 106b:0024
:20:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Pangea
GMAC (Sun GEM)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ lspci -vvs 0:10.0
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage
Mobility M3 AGP 2x (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 AGP 2x
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- 
SERR- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ lspci -nvvs 0:10.0
:00:10.0 0300: 1002:4c46 (rev 02)
Subsystem: 1002:4c46
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- 
SERR- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$


Cheers
Geert Stappers
(next info is from the X-server)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature