Re: Accepting .Xdefaults by default

2004-04-01 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:26:23AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:

> > Debian does not use the name .Xdefaults bu default, but instead
> > .Xdefaults-. That is presumably intentional.

> It is.  The reason is that because the application-defaults are loaded
> client-side, you may want to customize them on a per-host basis.  You
> already get this with the server-side resources because your X session
> runs out of $HOME.

Not necessarily. In fact I have accounts on three different university
sites where my $HOME is shared between all workstations and xdm
servers in the department. They all load the same .Xresources when I
log in. That would have caused me trouble if I had happened to
physically move between differently-equipped workstations often.

(Of course I know how to solve this by appropriate ad-hoc magic in
.xsession, and splitting .Xresources by hostname would not be a good
solution nevertheless, so I'm not proposing to change the default
behavior of Debian's X packages).

> > If that does not work (and you're sure its not your own fault, or
> > the individual application's), file a bug report against libXt6.

> The package's name is libxt6 (all lowercase), but yes.

Curses, foiled again! I just tried 'dpkg -L libXt6' and it worked.

-- 
Henning Makholm "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"



Re: Accepting .Xdefaults by default

2004-04-01 Thread Branden Robinson
[CCing debian-x]

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:26:23AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Jacobo221 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > Currently, Debian doesn't support ~/.Xdefaults but does support
> > ~/.Xresources. The ways to walk around this are to soft link or to change
> > it's name.
> 
> Beware! The intended semantics of .Xresources and .Xdefaults is *not
> the same*!
> 
> .Xresources is meant to be loaded into the X *server* when a user logs
> in. It will affect all clients started during the X session, even
> clients running on remote machines.
> 
> .Xdefaults is loaded locally by each *client* as it starts up. Settings
> in it will affect all clients *running* on that machine and account,
> even if they connect to a remote server.
> 
> Each kind of settings is useful, and I daresay that there are Debian
> users out there who depend on the ability to define either kind of
> settings - even though the vast majority are probably not aware of the
> difference, and many of them misuse the files because they don't know
> the difference.

All true.  Thanks for offering this clarification.

> If you read the manpage X(7x) you'll find that Debian does not use the
> name .Xdefaults bu default, but instead .Xdefaults-. That is
> presumably intentional.

It is.  The reason is that because the application-defaults are loaded
client-side, you may want to customize them on a per-host basis.  You
already get this with the server-side resources because your X session
runs out of $HOME.

> You should be able to override this by setting $XENVIRONMENT in your
> .profile or .login file. If that does not work (and you're sure its
> not your own fault, or the individual application's), file a bug
> report against libXt6.

The package's name is libxt6 (all lowercase), but yes.  It's also worth
noting that, as far as I know, *only* Xt-based applications use
application-defaults.  So if an X client isn't linked against libXt,
please don't blame libXt.  :)

Thanks again.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|It may be difficult to to determine
Debian GNU/Linux   |where religious beliefs end and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |mental illness begins.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Elaine Cassel


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Accepting .Xdefaults by default

2004-03-31 Thread Jacobo221
Currently, Debian doesn't support ~/.Xdefaults but does support
~/.Xresources. The ways to walk around this are to soft link or to change
it's name.
Since a $HOME directory might be shared between varius ditributions (on
boxes which might be used for testing distros, for example), to rename the
file may not work, so soft linking si the only way to walk around it. Any
way, it'd be far much better if Debian supported .Xdefaults in
/etc/X11/Xsession.d/30xfree86-common_xresources

Instead of:
if grep -qs ^allow-user-resources "$OPTIONFILE"; then
  if [ -f "$USRRESOURCES" ]; then
xrdb -merge $USRRESOURCES
  fi
fi

It could have something like:
if grep -qs ^allow-user-resources "$OPTIONFILE"; then
  for USRRESOURCE in $USRRESOURCES; do
if [ -f "$USRRESOURCE" ]; then
  xrdb -merge $USRRESOURCES
fi
  done
fi

And /etc/X11/Xsession wouldn't contain:
USRRESOURCES=$HOME/.Xresources

But instead would contain:
USRRESOURCES="$HOME/.Xresources $HOME/.Xdefaults"

I'd like to know what other Debian users think. Thanx.