[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist stopped working

2002-06-29 Thread Andy Schmidt

Notice - how the following email came from 63.107.174.32 - yet, it STILL has
the X-RBL-Warning!

That IP is my backup SMTP server (so its set to IPBYPASS) AND it runs a few
auxiliary services that send automated emails (so its set to WHITELIST).

IPBYPASS63.107.174.32
IPBYPASS65.86.89.162
WHITELIST   IP  63.107.174.
WHITELIST   IP  65.86.89.162


Received: from maywood-is-0003 [63.107.174.32] by hm-software.com
  (SMTPD32-7.07) id AE9A18BA01FE; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 02:00:58 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Weekly Server Summary
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 02:00:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0035_01BE01C7.112C2CE0"
Message-Id: <200206300200257.SM04980@maywood-is-0003>
X-RBL-Warning: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [420e]. See:
http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php?code=420e
X-Declude: Version 1.55i; D9e9a18ba01fe629b.SMD from  [63.107.174.32]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 323384276

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] Filters

2002-06-29 Thread Don Brown

Scott,

Can we put comments in the filter file using a # and, if so, can they
also be in-line, following a filter line?

Will the filter which cause the failure be reported in the log file?

Thanks,



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] 155i - now REVDNS is broken

2002-06-29 Thread Andy Schmidt

Scott:

The moment I put on the latest 155i this afternoon, I started getting
massive false reports of Reverse DNS missing.  It took until now before I
realized it was NOT my DNS servers etc.

The problem is, that Declude does not look up the IP address, but rather
looks up " ".

Here is a sample message:

06/29/2002 03:19:44 Q5f8d234b01021e89 REVDNS:5 HELOBOGUS:3 .  Total weight =
8
06/29/2002 03:19:44 Q5f8d234b01021e89 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was
sent from a mail server  with no reverse DNS entry.).
06/29/2002 03:19:44 Q5f8d234b01021e89 Msg failed HELOBOGUS (Domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] by has no MX/A records.).
06/29/2002 03:19:44 Q5f8d234b01021e89 Msg failed WEIGHT8 (Weight of 8
reaches or exceeds the limit of 8.).
06/29/2002 03:19:44 Q5f8d234b01021e89 Subject: (no subject)
06/29/2002 03:19:44 Q5f8d234b01021e89 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Notice how it has a single blank in the REVDNS warning where the IP would
normally go. But, if you inspect the X-Declude header, it correctly
identifies the IP address as: [152.163.225.105].

Received: from imo-r09.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.105] by hm-software.com with
ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-7.07) id AF8D234B0102; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 03:19:41 -0400
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.21.) id 5.138.1083966e (1320)
 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 03:19:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 03:19:35 EDT
Subject: SPAM: [See Headers]  (no subject)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="part1_138.1083966e.2a4eb987_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509
X-RBL-Warning: Suspected SPAM. Domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]   by has no MX/A
records.
X-Declude: Version 1.55i; D5f8d234b01021e89.SMD from [No Reverse DNS]
[152.163.225.105]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 323384196


I'm also suddenly seeing a LARGE amount of messages like this - with all
kind of strange "strings", such as "App1":
06/29/2002 03:21:18 Q5fec03b2029e92bb WARNING: DNS server returned a SERVER
FAILURE error for App1.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] Publishers of Web Sites File Suit to Stop Pop-Up Ads

2002-06-29 Thread Tom

If anyone is interested, read on...
POP up ads - Spam or Not?

--
>From the NY Times
By BOB TEDESCHI
June 28 2002
--

A group of 10 Web site publishers is suing Gator, an online advertising and
information storage company, to stop it from placing pop-up ads over their
sites without permission.

The publishers, which include the Washington Post Company, Dow Jones &
Company, Tribune Interactive and The New York Times Company, filed suit on
Tuesday in United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia.

A spokeswoman for Gator, Mandy Mladenoff, said last night that the company
had issued a statement that it was considering a countersuit against the
publishers.

The suit against Gator maintains that its pop-up ads violate both copyright
and trademark laws and that they allow Gator to profit unjustly from the
user traffic generated by these Web sites.

Gator's eWallet software helps consumers fill out password and shipping
information and remembers it as they visit different Web sites. But the
software comes bundled with technology that displays pop-up ads over Web
sites visited by Gator users. Thirty-three million Gator users viewed such
ads last month, according to Media Metrix.

Sometimes those ads display ads for direct competitors of the sites being
visited. For instance, the complaint contends that some Gator users saw an
ad for the online employment site HotJobs.com when they visited Dow Jones'
CareerJournal .com.

When one of Gator's pop-up ads appears over a publisher's Web site, "the
inference consumers make is that the publisher has authorized it to be
there, so it must be legitimate," said Terence Ross, a Washington-based
lawyer with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, which is arguing the case on the
publishers' behalf. But that practice, he said, constitutes a trademark
violation.

Gator issued a written response to the suit yesterday, saying that the
publishers' contention that software programs cannot lawfully display pop-up
windows is "ridiculous."

"It would mean that AOL Instant Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, Microsoft
Outlook, and dozens of other software applications that automatically
display information in separate windows, are illegal," said Gator's chief
executive, Jeff McFadden.

On its Web site, Gator informs customers that its OfferCompanion software
"delivers advertising, information and software based on Web sites you view"
and is included with the password software.

Mr. Ross, the publishers' lawyers, said such messages were not effective
enough, and he pointed to surveys, conducted by the plaintiffs, showing that
16 percent of Gator customers did not know the service placed ads on their
computers.

In the last two years, Gator has filed several lawsuits in California
against companies and organizations that complained about its online
advertising technology.

Because little case law has been created along these lines, "this is an
important case," said Jeffrey D. Neuburger, a partner with the New York law
firm of Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner. "This sets a precedent for
guiding the use of emergent technologies in the advertising market."

The publishers are seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent Gator from
delivering pop-up ads to visitors to the plaintiffs' Web sites while the
trial continues. Ultimately, the publishers want that remedy made permanent,
along with monetary damages for advertising revenue Gator made on their Web
sites and punitive damages.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .