[Bug 1957716] [NEW] Update for CVE-2021-43860 and second github advisory
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
[Links]
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-qpjc-vq3c-572j
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-8ch7-5j3h-g4fx
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-43860
[Impact]
Versions in Ubuntu right now:
Jammy: 1.12.2-2
Impish: 1.10.2-3ubuntu0.1
Focal: 1.6.5-0ubuntu0.4
Bionic: 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.4
Affected versions:
all
Patched versions:
1.12.3, 1.10.6
[Test Case]
Unknown
[Regression Potential]
Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all relevant
architectures and passes.
There is also a manual test plan
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak .
Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak .
Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any
issues raised.
[Patches]
There are two separate github advisories but only one of them has a CVE.
The advisory with the CVE has 5 patches, the other has 2 patches.
[Other Information]
For the first advisory with the CVE:
Ryan Gonzalez discovered that Flatpak doesn't properly validate that the
permissions displayed to the user for an app at install time match the
actual permissions granted to the app at runtime, in the case that
there's a null byte in the metadata file of an app. Therefore apps can
grant themselves permissions without the consent of the user.
Flatpak shows permissions to the user during install by reading them
from the "xa.metadata" key in the commit metadata. This cannot contain a
null terminator, because it is an untrusted GVariant. Flatpak compares
these permissions to the actual metadata, from the "metadata" file to
ensure it wasn't lied to.
However, the actual metadata contents are loaded in several places where
they are read as simple C-style strings. That means that, if the
metadata file includes a null terminator, only the content of the file
from before the terminator gets compared to xa.metadata. Thus, any
permissions that appear in the metadata file after a null terminator are
applied at runtime but not shown to the user. Maliciously crafted apps
can use this to give themselves hidden permissions.
In addition, a similar weakness was discovered, where if the permissions
in the summary metadata are invalid, they would not be displayed to the
user, but the the actual permissions would be granted, even though it
didn't match the invalid version.
For the second advisory:
flatpak-builder applies finish-args last in the build. At this point the
build directory will have the full access that is specified in the
manifest, so running flatpak build against it will gain that
permissions. Normally this will not be done, so this is not problem.
However, if --mirror-screenshots-url is specified, then flatpak-builder
will launch flatpak build --nofilesystem=host appstream-utils mirror-
screenshots after finalization, which can lead to issues even with the
--nofilesystem=host protection.
These changes result in a behaviour change as debian have noted in their
changelog:
* Behaviour changes, as a result of how GHSA-8ch7-5j3h-g4fx was fixed:
- --nofilesystem=host is now special-cased to negate all --filesystem
permissions. Previously, it would cancel out --filesystem=host but
not --filesystem=/some/dir.
- --nofilesystem=home is now special-cased to negate several
home-directory-related filesystem permssions such as
--filesystem=xdg-config/foo, not just --filesystem=host.
** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-43860
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957716
Title:
Update for CVE-2021-43860 and second github advisory
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1957716/+subscriptions
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1946578] [NEW] Placeholder for CVE-2021-41133
Public bug reported: [Links] https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-67h7-w3jq-vh4q https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995935 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-41133 ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946578 Title: Placeholder for CVE-2021-41133 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1946578/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1944431] Re: Changing the resolution while in the activites overview changes to the desktop
Reported an issue upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/-/issues/4626 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues #4626 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4626 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944431 Title: Changing the resolution while in the activites overview changes to the desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1944431/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1944431] Re: Changing the resolution while in the activites overview changes to the desktop
** Description changed: What Happened - 1) Installed the package gnome-session (ensuring it is the latest version) - 2) At gdm picked "GNOME" and not "Ubuntu" - 3) Reboot and login to the desktop - 4) Notice that initially the activity overview is shown (correctly) - 5) Then within a second or so, something causes the desktop to be focused and activity overview closed (incorrect) - - Further notes: - - if you log out and log back in again, it doesn't happen ? - - if you wait on the gdm login for a long period of time (eg over a minute) then it doesn't happen ? - - this is *not* the Ubuntu session but the GNOME session + 1) Open GNOME Shell to the activities overview + 2) Change the resolution (eg if using a VM resize it) + 3) Notice that we switch to the desktop view What I expected to happen: - At step 5 for the activity overview to stay and not switch to the desktop until the user has interacted. + At step 3 to remain in the activities overview. - - I understand that the Ubuntu session with the dock enabled wants the desktop to be the current state after login. But for the GNOME session with no extensions enabled, the way that if one logs in quickly and something is triggering the activity overview to be dismissed appears to be a bug. - - - $ apt policy gnome-session - gnome-session: - Installed: 40.1.1-1ubuntu1 - Candidate: 40.1.1-1ubuntu1 + $ apt policy gnome-shell + gnome-shell: + Installed: 40.2-1ubuntu6 + Candidate: 40.2-1ubuntu6 Version table: - *** 40.1.1-1ubuntu1 500 - 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/universe amd64 Packages - 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/universe i386 Packages + *** 40.2-1ubuntu6 500 + 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu Impish Indri (development branch) Release: 21.10 ** Package changed: gnome-session (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944431 Title: Changing the resolution while in the activites overview changes to the desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1944431/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1944431] Re: gnome-session impish 40 update login quickly causes desktop rather than activites overview
OK, I've figured out what is going on. If you are on the activities overview and you change the resolution of the VM it then goes back to the desktop. I'll see if there are any bugs upstream as it happens on Fedora rawhide as well ... ** Summary changed: - gnome-session impish 40 update login quickly causes desktop rather than activites overview + Changing the resolution while in the activites overview changes to the desktop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944431 Title: Changing the resolution while in the activites overview changes to the desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1944431/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1944431] [NEW] gnome-session impish 40 update login quickly causes desktop rather than activites overview
Public bug reported: What Happened 1) Installed the package gnome-session (ensuring it is the latest version) 2) At gdm picked "GNOME" and not "Ubuntu" 3) Reboot and login to the desktop 4) Notice that initially the activity overview is shown (correctly) 5) Then within a second or so, something causes the desktop to be focused and activity overview closed (incorrect) Further notes: - if you log out and log back in again, it doesn't happen ? - if you wait on the gdm login for a long period of time (eg over a minute) then it doesn't happen ? - this is *not* the Ubuntu session but the GNOME session What I expected to happen: At step 5 for the activity overview to stay and not switch to the desktop until the user has interacted. I understand that the Ubuntu session with the dock enabled wants the desktop to be the current state after login. But for the GNOME session with no extensions enabled, the way that if one logs in quickly and something is triggering the activity overview to be dismissed appears to be a bug. $ apt policy gnome-session gnome-session: Installed: 40.1.1-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 40.1.1-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 40.1.1-1ubuntu1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/universe amd64 Packages 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/universe i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Impish Indri (development branch) Release:21.10 ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944431 Title: gnome-session impish 40 update login quickly causes desktop rather than activites overview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1944431/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1943769] [NEW] Update impish to 1.10.3 microrelease
Public bug reported: Placeholder ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943769 Title: Update impish to 1.10.3 microrelease To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1943769/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1918482] Re: Update for GHSA-xgh4-387p-hqpp
Hirsute now contains 1.10.2-1 with the fix, so I am marking it as fixed released. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Description changed: [Links] https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-xgh4-387p-hqpp https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/4156 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984859 + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-21381 [Impact] Versions in Ubuntu right now: Hirsute: 1.10.1-4 Groovy: 1.8.2-1ubuntu0.1 Focal: 1.6.5-0ubuntu0.2 Bionic: 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.2 Affected versions: >= 0.9.4 Patched versions: >= 1.10.2 [Test Case] No test case has been mentioned yet, but in the patches there are changes/additions to the unit tests. [Regression Potential] Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all relevant architectures and passes. There is also a manual test plan https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak . Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak . Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any issues raised. [Other information] Sandbox escape via special tokens in .desktop file (flatpak#4146) Flatpak since 0.9.4 has a vulnerability in the "file forwarding" feature which can be used by an attacker to gain access to files that would not ordinarily be allowed by the app's permissions. Impact By putting the special tokens @@ and/or @@u in the Exec field of a Flatpak app's .desktop file, a malicious app publisher can trick flatpak into behaving as though the user had chosen to open a target file with their Flatpak app, which automatically makes that file available to the Flatpak app. A minimal solution is the first commit "Disallow @@ and @@U usage in desktop files". The follow-up commits "dir: Reserve the whole @@ prefix" and "dir: Refuse to export .desktop files with suspicious uses of @@ tokens" are recommended, but not strictly required. Workarounds Avoid installing Flatpak apps from untrusted sources, or check the contents of the exported .desktop files in exports/share/applications/*.desktop (typically ~/.local/share/flatpak/exports/share/applications/*.desktop and /var/lib/flatpak/exports/share/applications/*.desktop) to make sure that literal filenames do not follow @@ or @@u. References Acknowledgements Thanks to @AntonLydike for reporting this issue, and @refi64 for providing the initial solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918482 Title: Update for GHSA-xgh4-387p-hqpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1918482/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1918482] [NEW] Placeholder for GHSA-xgh4-387p-hqpp
Public bug reported: Patches and description coming soon ! I need this to generate a LP bug number :-) ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918482 Title: Placeholder for GHSA-xgh4-387p-hqpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1918482/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1730612] Re: Enable Remote desktop feature during build
@jik, I think that you need the package gnome-remote-desktop, this has a MIR request in bug 1802614. And then another package will need to recommend it to have it installed by default, you can follow this on the Trello board here https://trello.com/c/NnUq5bHv/15-mir-gnome-remote- desktop-and-seed-recommend-it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730612 Title: Enable Remote desktop feature during build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix-default-settings/+bug/1730612/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1911473] Re: Update for ghsa-4ppf-fxf6-vxg2
1.8.5 has landed in hirsute now, so marking hirsute as fixed released. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911473 Title: Update for ghsa-4ppf-fxf6-vxg2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1911473/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1873411] Re: steam installs generic Desktop icons for games that require an explicit 'Allow Launching'
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I can reproduce this issue, but I think that is potentially a security feature of the gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons. As if you navigate to the folder in Nautilus, then select open, it allows for running the game and not opening gedit. And I can see that the permissions of the file has been set correctly by Steam. Therefore I am going to reassign this bug from the Steam package to gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons as it doesn't appear that Steam is doing anything incorrectly and it is likely due to the desktop icons implementation (potentially even a security feature). ** Package changed: steam (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell-extension-desktop- icons (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873411 Title: steam installs generic Desktop icons for games that require an explicit 'Allow Launching' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1873411/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1910613] [NEW] Crash of gnome shell potentially from "JS ERROR: too much recursion" from app indicators
Public bug reported: What Happened: 1) Have gnome-shell-extensions-appindicator enabled 2) The only running app using the indicator was charmtimetracker ( https://github.com/KDAB/Charm ) 3) At some point usually within 1-2 days of office usage gnome shell crashes 4) Notice "JS ERROR: too much recursion" and then a stacktrace coming from appindicator extension in journalctl What I expected to happen: For gnome-shell not to crash :-) Full logs: - Recursion warnings - https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/hfKMmH4Dpx/ - Stack trace - https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2TC6WFVcsG/ Short Summary of Logs: === First sign of incoming crash === Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: JS ERROR: too much recursion set active@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/popupMenu.js:199:29 _init@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/popupMenu.js:104:18 _init@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/popupMenu.js:273:15 createItem@/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:498:29 createItem@/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:520:60 === This continues many times, last instance is like this === Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: child-added: too much recursion PopupSubMenu@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/popupMenu.js:1017:9 _init@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/popupMenu.js:1201:21 createItem@/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:494:29 createItem@/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:520:60 === Then there is a stacktrace (shortened repeats) === Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: Attempting to call back into JSAPI during the sweeping phase of GC. This is most likely caused by not destroying a Clutter actor or Gtk+ widget with ::destroy signals connected, but can also be caused by using the destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs. Because it would crash the application, it has been blocked and the JS callback not invoked. Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: The offending signal was notify on StLabel 0x5615bd3eee80. Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: == Stack trace for context 0x56159bbee930 == Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #0 7ffca7535bb0 b /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:620 (1c7e392cc2e0 @ 100) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #1 7ffca7535c80 b /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:510 (1c7e392cae98 @ 357) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #2 5615a5c69340 i /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:771 (1c7e392cc880 @ 41) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #3 7ffca7536b70 b self-hosted:1013 (264b03e13e20 @ 492) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #4 7ffca7536c60 b self-hosted:1013 (264b03e13e20 @ 492) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #5 7ffca7536d70 b resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/_signals.js:133 (1c7e392a84c0 @ 427) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #6 5615a5c69290 i /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:134 (1c7e392c5c40 @ 74) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #7 7ffca7537c80 b /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:365 (1c7e392ca718 @ 837) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #8 5615a5c690d0 i /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-appindicat...@ubuntu.com/dbusMenu.js:326 (1c7e392ca6a0 @ 423) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #9 7ffca7538970 b self-hosted:1013 (264b03e13e20 @ 492) Jan 05 17:59:01 MACHINE-NAME gnome-shell[3315]: #10 5615a5c69018 i resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/overrides/Gio.js:132 (2784371926a0 @ 312) Versions: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS Release:20.04 $ apt policy gnome-shell mutter gnome-shell-extension-appindicator gnome-shell: Installed: 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 Candidate: 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 Version table: *** 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.36.1-5ubuntu1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages mutter: Installed:
[Bug 1759715] Re: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist
So 1.0.0.67-2 has landed in hiruste (which is much closer to debian sid). I also plan to sync hirsute again before freezes and then intend to continue updating ubuntu devel to be as close as possible to debian sid - I will also investigate any SRU opportunities to fix features that are broken in older releases. So for now lets mark this as invalid, if in the future I am not able to keep steam up to date, then this discussion/bug can be reopened. ** Changed in: steam (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759715 Title: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1759715/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1904640] Re: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904640 Title: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1904640/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1904640] [NEW] Placeholder for 1.8.3 update
Public bug reported: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/releases/tag/1.8.3 ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904640 Title: Placeholder for 1.8.3 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1904640/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1903706] Re: Add flathub repository by default
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The Ubuntu package of flatpak is synced from Debian, so any decision about whether to enable the flathub repository by default should be made there - as I do not want to create a delta between Ubuntu and Debian. Please report a bug against Debian if you think this should be the case, then once it is resolved the package will be synced in the latest Ubuntu development version. Furthermore the approach that Neon has used, by using a service, to enable flathub by default looks non-optimal, I think the preferred approach would be to use something like a drop in configuration file ( as described under custom installations here https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2018/08/26/about-flatpak-installations/ ) - I am not sure if this only supports local repositories or could support flathub too though so it might need work. Until there is movement with Debian, I am going to mark this bug as "opinion". ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903706 Title: Add flathub repository by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1903706/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1759715] Re: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist
For anyone following, I've reported bug 1901689 to attempt to bring Ubuntu hirsute back into sync with the current Debian sid version, I'll update that bug as progress is made. Then we can hopefully close this one if I am successful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759715 Title: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1759715/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1759715] Re: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist
I was planning on seeing if the situation could be improved in any way over the coming weeks. Lets see if we can improve the package to either by updating or in sync with debian (and then look at potential SRU/backports) over this cycle before removing from the archive. As there are currently still advantages to using the deb version from the archive over the flatpak version and not everyone wants to install debs from URLs that are not in the archive ... I'll post if I make any progress over the coming weeks/months :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759715 Title: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1759715/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1900063] [NEW] Sync flatpak 1.8.2-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync flatpak 1.8.2-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current groovy version 1.8.2-2: flatpak (1.8.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * d/p/Skip-parental-controls-checks-on-ServiceUnknown-or-NameHa.patch: Add proposed patch to skip parental controls if accountsservice is not installed. The malcontent package (which activates parental controls support) depends on accountsservice, but the libmalcontent-0-0 client library does not, so we need to cope gracefully with the case where neither malcontent nor accountsservice is installed. Presumably, in such installations the sysadmin did not want the parental controls feature. Ideally libmalcontent would do this itself (#972145). (Closes: #972138) * Add Depends on dbus, for the well-known system bus service. Now that the parental controls feature is enabled, Flatpak will refuse to run apps if the D-Bus system bus is unavailable. Previously, it would have partially worked (but with severely reduced functionality, in particular only --user installations). * d/control: Canonicalize case of Multi-Arch * Update lintian overrides to silence some false-positives -- Simon McVittie Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:47:28 +0100 ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to flatpak in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900063 Title: Sync flatpak 1.8.2-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1900063/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1862158] Re: gnome-software tries to install snap updates in the background, causing unprompted polkit authentication for authorisation to install packages
I believe this issue is because we now show pending snap updates in gnome-software (useful when one has manually set the refresh timer), which causes them to be categorised as "updatable live". gnome-software then has an update monitor that automatically tries to apply any updatable live apps (which causes the polkit dialogs and updates complete notifications) - but we don't want this as snapd does this. I have an untested patch here https://gitlab.gnome.org/ahayzen/gnome- software/commit/0597be6f317a38aa64ac86280d7b05a1aa242a70 which I believe should disable snap app updates from the update monitor. If it looks good let me know and I can proposed it against gnome- software master :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862158 Title: gnome-software tries to install snap updates in the background, causing unprompted polkit authentication for authorisation to install packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1862158/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
Thanks, for the record, I previously discussed this issue with upstream and about them including such a change in a point release. But they didn't want to commit to making and supporting major changes to the old flatpak plugin (from gnome-software 3.30 the plugin was rewritten and the issue doesn't occur). I personally don't have any knowledge of the gnome-software code base, so would not feel confident in fixing the code and ensuring it doesn't break anything else. As stated before, if anyone with knowledge is able to either get a merge approved by upstream for the 3.28 series or has enough knowledge of the code base to be confident in their changes, I would be happy in helping with the SRU verification part of the process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions
OK after much discussion with flatpak developers and testing things in VMs, we have found the reason this happens on wayland only ! Quote from TingPing, "dconf supports distros installing override files into the system, then when queried dconf will look at user setting, then fallback to distro setting, then fallback to default setting. In a sandbox we can ask dconf for the user setting but we don't have disk access to the override files". So what this means is that on wayland the flatpak can't read the default overrides from the session (eg Ubuntu choosing Ambiance and Minimise, Maximise, Close) as it doesn't have permission to read the system files only user ones. (this doesn't affect X11 sessions as gtk reads from xsettings instead). This will be solved when the settings portal [0] is used in xdg-desktop- portal, as that runs on the host outside of the sandbox it is able to read the necessary files. For now the workaround is to install gnome-tweaks, change your theme to something else and then back to Ambiance. Also for the window controls change one of them from true to false to true. This will then write user settings to dconf which the flatpak's can then read. As this will be solved in the next version of xdg-deskop-portal, I will close this bug for the flatpak package and open against xdg-desktop-portal. 0 - https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/245 ** Summary changed: - Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions + dconf overrides are not read by flatpaks on wayland sessions ** Description changed: + "dconf supports distros installing override files into the system, then + when queried dconf will look at user setting, then fallback to distro + setting, then fallback to default setting. In a sandbox we can ask dconf + for the user setting but we don't have disk access to the override + files" + + So what this means is that on wayland flatpaks can't read the default + overrides from the session (eg Ubuntu choosing Ambiance and Minimise, + Maximise, Close etc) as it doesn't have permission to read the system + files only user ones. (this doesn't affect X11 sessions as gtk reads + from xsettings instead). + + This will be solved when the settings portal [0] is used in xdg-desktop- + portal, as that runs on the host outside of the sandbox it is able to + read the necessary files. + + # Workaround + + Install gnome-tweaks, change your theme to something else and then back + to Ambiance. Also for the window controls change one of them from true + to false to true. This will then write user settings to dconf which the + flatpak's can then read. + + + 0 - https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/245 + + + === Original Description === + System: Ubuntu 18.04.1 Flatpak version: 1.0.6-flatpak1~bionic (from https://launchpad.net/~alexlarsson/+archive/ubuntu/flatpak) Description: Flatpaks using GTK3 default to the Adwaita theme in a Wayland Gnome session. In Xorg sesions they are themed correctly. The attached screenshots demonstrate the same version of Gnome Builder running in Communitheme-Wayland and Communitheme-Xorg. However, flatpaks that use Qt5 (like KeepassXC) seem to be themed correctly under Wayland. ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xdg-desktop-portal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: dconf overrides are not read by flatpaks on wayland sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
The good news is that this now correctly installs themes when installing an app. Unfortunately for me test "2.4 Update an app in GNOME Software" from the flatpak test plan [0], fails for me with the package from proposed. After reverting to an older commit hash, then refreshing gnome-software it shows the update. But when I click "Update" the UI shows progress, hides the item and then it reappears again. Furthermore using the CLI you can see that the package hasn't been updated. So this change appears to be breaking an update. When running from the console I get "01:38:32:0760 Gs tried overwriting org.gnome.Recipes.desktop key flatpak::Commit from 6d5f7c35ff1f3fd449b2789324843a89140257bb3cdca468f83a65162b177fa0 to 1ac37481845c65857a64e8c0680bae137b0b56faaf6f11f3f0d415a3205bc1c2" and if i run in verbose mode I get this https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/r8pWhpmcG7/ Note flipping back to 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 it works again. Therefore I am going to have to mark this as verification-failed-bionic for now. $ apt-cache policy gnome-software-plugin-flatpak gnome-software-plugin-flatpak: Installed: 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 Candidate: 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 Version table: *** 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages 3.28.1-0ubuntu4 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages 0 - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-failed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
@Robert, will you be generating a debdiff for the gnome-3-28 branch when it's ready? (I see you are making other changes and I'm not familiar how you are taking the git repo and turning the changes into debian patches). Also I see that 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 [0] is currently stuck [1] in bionic-proposed as bug 1756379 has not been verified. I guess that this should be done before pushing the next release through :-) 0 - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 1 - http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
I believe this issue is resolved in cosmic and is only an issue in bionic. Normally such issues are marked as "Fix Released" for "ubuntu" and then proposed to the series bionic. I don't have the permissions to do this, Robert do you normally work with this workflow ? Also I will test the normal flatpak manual test plan (which includes gnome-software UI tests) against this change once it is in -proposed to confirm this doesn't regress anything. And I am happy to help with any parts of the SRU process :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
This was fixed as part of the 3.30.2 release from bug 1789451, so I marking this bug as fixed released. I have also tested on an Ubuntu Cosmic daily iso that after installing gnome-software-plugin-flatpak that the menu now becomes available. Thanks! ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
(Also if this does get submitted I have a test plan for flatpak itself that includes UI tests for gnome-software, so this would help in doing the QA part) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
@Asciiwolf, Personally I would prefer such a large change (229 additions and 37 deletions across 28 files) to be approved by upstream - especially as this is going into a LTS release. As it is not always clear what other behaviour this may change or break. I understand that this is the patch that Endless are using in their distro, but I would need to understand how the flatpak plugin works before I would be able to make a decision. Ultimately to get this change into Ubuntu it would need to be approved by Robert Ancell, so maybe Robert is the one who can advise if we should require upstream approval or if it is OK to distro patch. As this is quite an important fix for trying to use flatpak with a GUI in bionic. I am happy to help with the SRU process and submitting the patches to the Ubuntu gnome-software git etc, I just feel I don't have enough knowledge of gnome-software's code to state if this is an OK change to carry. (... or maybe we just need to wait until gnome-software is a flatpak/snap/appimage ;-) then we can magically get 3.30 :-) ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1774560] Re: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk malfunctions on Wayland: wl_display@1.error(zxdg_imported_v1@36, 0, "set_parent_of was called with an invalid child")
Is this a bug in mutter that has been fixed ? As I'm wondering why this bug is still open for xdg-desktop-portal-gtk and if it can be closed ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774560 Title: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk malfunctions on Wayland: wl_display@1.error(zxdg_imported_v1@36, 0, "set_parent_of was called with an invalid child") To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1774560/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
(For anyone following this bug, the second merge request for the ubuntu-3-30 branch landed, so this just needs the ubuntu-3-30 code to be pushed into the cosmic). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
I have created a merge request https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu /gnome-software/merge_requests/7/ for the ubuntu-3-30 branch for cosmic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
To keep this bug in the loop, the merge request https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome- software/merge_requests/5 landed in ubuntu-master, but ubuntu-3-30 has different code so the patch couldn't be applied. I will create another merge for ubuntu-3-30. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
I have added (LP: 1791553) to the commit message (as seen in a previous commit). Yes, I agree it could be a good idea to mention that this is currently flatpak only. What would you suggest? Rename "Update Preferences" to "Flatpak Update Preferences" or mention in the dialog itself somewhere ? Maybe Robert has a better idea. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1791553] [NEW] Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
Public bug reported: What happened: 1) Install Ubuntu Cosmic daily build 2) Launch gnome-software 3.30 3) Click on the app menu, notice there is no "update preferences" 4) Install gnome-software-plugin-flatpak 5) Restart gnome-software 3.30 6) Notice there is still no "update preferences" What I expected to happen: I expected "update preferences" to be shown as a menu in gnome-software. However I understand that only packagekit + snap are installed by default - which both don't currently have support for this toggle (maybe snap will in the future?) So I would expect that the "update preferences" menu is shown after installing the flatpak plugin at step 6. I have submitted a merge request here [0] which shows this menu when the flatpak plugin is enabled. I think this is important for this option to be available when the user has installed the flatpak plugin, as it was a feature listed in the GNOME 3.30 release notes and announced across many news publications - having this option not visible in Ubuntu will only result in bad press. 0 - https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-software/merge_requests/5 ** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
@osomon, sure :-) This was the original PR against master https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME /gnome-software/merge_requests/48 but i believe that has been superseded by https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/merge_requests/58 for the stable series 3.28. (jrocha from Endless was working on the code, he hangs around in #gnome-software on GIMPnet/GNOME IRC - i'm sure he'd be happy to answer any questions/help). As as noted in the earlier comments, this is the bug that is tracking it upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues/235 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
@osomon, hey o/ :-) GNOME Web looks like it has been archived on Flathub https://github.com/flathub/org.gnome.Epiphany and removed from the store for now. I believe this was due to security issues, which will hopefully be solved with the new freedesktop runtime. Eolie, looks like there are other people stating that the languages aren't working, so might just be that the translations aren't available for the app. (probably discuss with upstream) Yes runtime extensions are not installed automatically with gnome software 3.28. Eg themes, extra drivers, codecs etc. This works with the CLI as it had extra logic to deal with automatically installing such extensions. Now with newer versions of libflatpak this logic is included as a "FlatpakTransaction API", GNOME Software 3.30 has a new flatpak plugin and will make use of this - resolving the issue for cosmic onwards. However, there was also code submitted upstream which added this logic to the old GNOME Software flatpak plugin to install these extensions automatically - resolving the issue for 3.28 users. If this is approved and lands into a 3.28 point release, I'd be happy to help go through the SRU process to include such a change :-) (ping me on IRC if you want to discuss anything). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
@Ads2, Yup I'm preparing an SRU for the next microrelease, you can track in bug 1767215. I am able to use flatpakref's with 0.11.3-3, if you are still having an issue please report upstream :-) (I have also seen issues discussed as different browsers acting differently, or the browser associating mime types itself - causing issues, wonder if that is the case here). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409 Title: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1719985] Re: flatpak software is not shown in gnome-software
The gnome-software-plugin-flatpak was known to have issues in 3.26, would you be able to try again with Ubuntu 18.04 + gnome-software 3.28 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719985 Title: flatpak software is not shown in gnome-software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1719985/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
@Ad2, Are you using flatpak version 0.11.4 or 0.11.5 from the PPA ? There was a regression which I found and reported here https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1632 where flatpakref's could crash gnome-software. It has since been fixed and released in 0.11.6. ** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #1632 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1632 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409 Title: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1721049] Re: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages
This bug has been fixed with gnome-sofware 3.28, which is found in Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic). I don't have permission to nominate this bug for the series artful so don't want to close this myself, is someone with permission able to set gnome-software (ubuntu) as fixed released and nominate this for artful? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721049 Title: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1721049/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1766137] Re: [regression] Password accepted but login fails (blank purple screen and mouse pointer only)
To add more info, the following steps cause this issue on my machine and are reproducible. - Start machine login to user A - Logout of user A - Try to login to user B - Now have a purple display, need to use the cancel workaround (next login will work) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766137 Title: [regression] Password accepted but login fails (blank purple screen and mouse pointer only) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1766137/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
** Tags added: flatpak-usability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1721049] Re: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages
** Tags added: flatpak-usability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721049 Title: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1721049/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1756098] Re: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing
I've not yet been able to reproduce this yet, but while investigating I've found that the cache folder for gnome-software (and therefore the gnome software flatpak plugin) has changed from 17.10 to 18.04 - so it might not be an issue for "real" users upgrading from 17.10? Eg the flatpak plugin cache folder has changed in the following ways for me: 17.10 ~/.cache/gnome-software/3.26/flatpak 18.04 ~/.cache/gnome-software/flatpak Although this does raise, why is the cache folder not ~/.cache/gnome- software/3.28 ? What will happen with 3.30 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756098 Title: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1756098/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1756098] Re: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing
Sure, when I get a moment I'll firstly try to reproduce the issue with bionic by installing 3.27.92 and upgrading to 3.28 again. Then if I can confirm that the issue really does happen, I'll try an upgrade from artful (3.26.1). (I hope this was only an issue within the development branch and therefore not affect "real" users, but we'll see). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756098 Title: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1756098/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
@jbicha, sure reported an issue here to track the potential cache upgrade issue with 3.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- software/+bug/1756098 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409 Title: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1756098] [NEW] Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing
Public bug reported: What happened 1) Open your browser, navigate to flathub.org, find an app and click to install it 2) Open the resulting flatpakref in gnome-software. 3) Notice how the app info is correctly displayed 4) Try to click install, notice how now you get "cannot install source from https://dl.flathub.org/repo/: flatpak source flathub already exists" Note that I have 3.27.92 installed first and then upgraded to 3.28. After removing all installed apps and remotes I have not been able to reproduce the issue. It has been suggested that it is an issue in cache cleanup between versions - probably within ~/.cache/gnome- software/flatpak/ Furthermore note the actual issue was likely fixed in 3.28, so this is upgrades from lower than 3.28 to 3.28 which will be affected by cache upgrade issues. I have reported the bug upstream here https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME /gnome-software/issues/328 ** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756098 Title: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1756098/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
On Ubuntu 18.04 daily with flatpak 0.11.3, gnome-software-plugin-flatpak 3.28.0 I have not been able to reproduce this issue. I did have a separate issue, which looks like a bug in cleanups between versions of gnome-software as removing all apps, remotes and caches resolved the issue - I have reported this upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME /gnome-software/issues/328. On Ubuntu 17.10, with flatpak 0.8.9 (which I am in the process of SRU'ing - bug 1752381) and gnome-software-plugin-flatpak 3.26.1 I am able to reproduce the issue - "failed to get related refs: using origin io.github.GnomeMpv-origin: Remote "io.github.GnomeMpv-origin" not found". This appears to be an issue with gnome-software-plugin-flatpak, not flatpak itself - I have spoken to hugsie and kalev upstream and they confirmed this. It was also stated that "flatpakrefs in 3.26.1 are known buggy." and "I'd suggest retesting with 3.28.0 or 3.26.7" - 3.28.0 appears to have resolved the issue, 3.26.7 probably needs a SRU? Therefore I am marking this bug as invalid for flatpak. Furthermore I have added a test for installing flatpakref's with gnome- software to the test plan for future flatpak releases https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak once this bug has been resolved. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409 Title: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
** Summary changed: - Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful + Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409 Title: Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1721049] Re: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages
I submitted a patch for the ubuntu-reviews plugin within GNOME Software, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/merge_requests/11, which has now been merged by Robert. Hopefully this fix will now make it into a stable ubuntu release (18.04?). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721049 Title: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1721049/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1716432] [NEW] With dash to dock enabled, title in window is not centred aligned to clock when the window is maximised
Public bug reported: With the dash-to-dock extension enabled and intelli-hide not enabled, the title of applications is not centre aligned with the gnome shell clock, as shown here [0]. Possible solutions are 1) When the window is maximised to align the title to the monitor centre not window centre 2) When dash-to-dock is enabled move the clock to be slightly off monitor centre so it would line up with the window centre 3) Ignore the alignment issue :-) 0 - http://imgur.com/a/5cJ47 ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716432 Title: With dash to dock enabled, title in window is not centred aligned to clock when the window is maximised To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1716432/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1524000] Re: PyGIWarning: UbuntuAppLaunch was imported without specifying a version first
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This is an issue that is related to python gi on Xenial (16.04), therefore I am adding pygobject to this bug and as it affects all the core apps which use this kind of import I'm marking this as invalid for music specifically. ** Also affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: music-app Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524000 Title: PyGIWarning: UbuntuAppLaunch was imported without specifying a version first To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1524000/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 730142] Re: Directory size in properties doesn't count hidden files
Hi jahvascriptmaniac Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I can confirm that when using the package nautilus on Ubuntu 10.10 using the steps provided by jahvascriptmaniac that I can reproduce the bug. Therefore I have set this bug to confirmed. To reproduce this bug I followed the steps below: 1. Create a new folder called test in your home directory 2. Create (or copy) a file inside this folder and make it hidden. 3. Right-click on the folder and click properties 4. Note that properties window says 'Contents: nothing' 5. Press CTRL+H to show hidden files 6. Go back to properties window and note that it still says 'Contents: nothing' What I expected to happen: For the Nautilus properties window to include the size of hidden files and number of hidden files either: -All the time or -When hidden files are selected to be shown (CTRL+H) However someone will need to decide which behaviour should be the default. I personally would expect the second option to be the default and not the current behaviour. Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 nautilus: Installed: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.3 Candidate: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.3 Version table: *** 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.3 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages Andy ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730142 Title: Directory size in properties doesn't count hidden files -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 730142] Re: Directory size in properties doesn't count hidden files
Hi jahvascriptmaniac I did say that this was my personal opinion and it is up to the developers of nautilus how to fix this bug. However after seeing the solution 'Content : 1234 files (2Gb), including 178 hidden elements (15Mb).' I feel that that would be the best way to present the size. The reason that I originally felt that the size should only be shown after showing hidden items is because sometimes people will hide files for a reason so that people don't know that they are there. But when they look at the size of the folder and find that it doesn't match up with the files in it then they would then work out that there are hidden files there. Overall however I feel that the default solution should be: 'Content : 1234 files (2Gb), including 178 hidden elements (15Mb).' But as I said above it is down to the developers (or a person higher up) to decide, not me. Hope that clears up any issues. Andy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730142 Title: Directory size in properties doesn't count hidden files -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 700201] Re: Keyboard Shortcuts are not working
Hi ijeyanthan Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I can confirm that when using the package empathy on Ubuntu 10.10 using the steps provided by ijeyanthan that I can reproduce the bug. Therefore I have set this bug to confirmed. Andy ** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700201 Title: Keyboard Shortcuts are not working -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 662641] Re: Nautilus does not give Show in Folder option to files after running a search
Hi David I can confirm that when using the package nautilus on Ubuntu 10.10 using the steps provided by David that I can reproduce the bug. Therefore I have set this bug to confirmed. However I think that this bug should be categorised as 'wishlist' as it is a feature that needs to be added to Nautilus rather than a bug in a current feature. Andy ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662641 Title: Nautilus does not give Show in Folder option to files after running a search -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 332355] Re: Empathy doesn't alert to new email messages
This would tip the boat to Empathy over Pidgin. As Empathy is the default it would be nice for it to notify you then have a like to the web mail ( like Pidgin ). Otherwise everyone will go back to Pidgin because of this extra functionality. So this is a deciding factor for me and many other people over which client they will use. -- Empathy doesn't alert to new email messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
