Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Felix Cheung 
On "support"- Think you said it -

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

Should be clear nightly builds should not be on DockerHub, etc


From: Josh Innis 
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:08:30 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of
AGE Viewer before we vote on it.

A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph
related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to
have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE, NodeJs and React before they can
get all the components to work together. I think having a docker image of
AGE-Viewer is a great idea.

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

What support model do you think is going to be needed for this? Giving
people a method of visualizing their data in the most convenient way
possible seems to be a good idea, but what do you think are the drawbacks
of this decision?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support
> model that will be etc.
>
> Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the
> community.
>
>
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
> Viewer as it is for AGE
>
> @Felix
>
> The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
> "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
> DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
> it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
> distribution method."
>
> Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
> dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
> appropriate, or give further specific advice.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> > vote too
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> > 
> > From: Felix Cheung 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Shouldn’t this be a vote?
> >
> > Please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> > 
> > From: Joe Fagan 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at
> hub.docker.com.
> > Is it possible to approve the creation of
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer>
> >
> > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated
> build
> > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> > repository.
> >
> > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra
> Team
> > with the relevant details.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Joe
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Josh Innis 
The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of
AGE Viewer before we vote on it.

A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph
related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to
have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE, NodeJs and React before they can
get all the components to work together. I think having a docker image of
AGE-Viewer is a great idea.

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

What support model do you think is going to be needed for this? Giving
people a method of visualizing their data in the most convenient way
possible seems to be a good idea, but what do you think are the drawbacks
of this decision?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support
> model that will be etc.
>
> Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the
> community.
>
>
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
> Viewer as it is for AGE
>
> @Felix
>
> The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
> "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
> DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
> it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
> distribution method."
>
> Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
> dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
> appropriate, or give further specific advice.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> > vote too
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> > 
> > From: Felix Cheung 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Shouldn’t this be a vote?
> >
> > Please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> > 
> > From: Joe Fagan 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at
> hub.docker.com.
> > Is it possible to approve the creation of
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer>
> >
> > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated
> build
> > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> > repository.
> >
> > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra
> Team
> > with the relevant details.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Joe
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-30 Thread Felix Cheung 
I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support model 
that will be etc.

Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the community.



From: Joe Fagan 
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
Viewer as it is for AGE

@Felix

The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
"Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
distribution method."

Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
appropriate, or give further specific advice.

Thanks
Joe

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> vote too
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> 
> From: Felix Cheung 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Shouldn’t this be a vote?
>
> Please see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at hub.docker.com.
> Is it possible to approve the creation of
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer>
>
> We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated build
> based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> repository.
>
> Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra Team
> with the relevant details.
>
> Thank you
> Joe
>

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-24 Thread Joe Fagan 
Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
Viewer as it is for AGE

@Felix

The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
"Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
distribution method."

Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
appropriate, or give further specific advice.

Thanks
Joe

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> vote too
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> 
> From: Felix Cheung 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Shouldn’t this be a vote?
>
> Please see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at hub.docker.com.
> Is it possible to approve the creation of
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> 
>
> We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated build
> based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> repository.
>
> Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra Team
> with the relevant details.
>
> Thank you
> Joe
>