Re: [Vote] Dev wiki engine

[Gaurav Thakur]

+1 for confluence

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM Thomas Weise  wrote:

> +1 for Confluence
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:00 PM Kai Jiang  wrote:
>
>> +1 Apache Confluence
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 15:18 Lukasz Cwik  wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for confluence.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 3:17 PM Anton Kedin  wrote:
>>>
 +1 for Confluence


 On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:56 PM Andrew Pilloud 
 wrote:

> +1 Apache Confluence
>
> Because .md files in code repo require code review and commit.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 2:22 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> There is a long lasting discussion on starting Beam Dev Wiki
>> 
>> ongoing. Seems that the only question remaining is to decide on what 
>> engine
>> to use for wiki. So far it seems that we have two suggestions: confluence
>> and .md files in repo.
>>
>> Quick summary can also be found in following doc
>> 
>> .
>>
>> I suggest to vote on which approach to use:
>> 1. Apache Confluence
>> 2. .md files in code repository (Those can be rendered by Github)
>>
>> --Mikhail
>>
>>

Cloud Next 2018 : Catch Up

[Gaurav Thakur]

Hi Everyone,

Are any of us going to be at CloudNext 2018? Would you want to point out
any interesting sessions?

I think it would be a great idea to catch up in person if a few of us are
going to be there?

Excuse me, if this is not the right forum for something like this.

Thanks, gaurav

Re: New beam contributor experience?

[Gaurav Thakur]

I agree with Pablo, it would be great if there is place someone new like me
can go and find out what would be some good starting points to start
contributing.

Apologies if there is such a place already somewhere, I would appreciate
some directions in that case.

Thanks, Gaurav

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Pablo Estrada  wrote:

> Some things that we have found working with our friends at IBM are:
>
> - No Python install from code documentation (which I've brought up before,
> and I believe is a known issue)
> - The process to pick up a JIRA is not very clear. It seems that there are
> a lot of implicit conventions (is discussion required? how do I know if I
> can start working on a jira?)
>
> Best
> -P.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:54 AM Anton Kedin  wrote:
>
>> Not sure if it was mentioned in other threads, but it probably makes
>> sense to add gradle instructions there.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:48 AM Alan Myrvold 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There is a contribution guide at https://beam.apache.org/
>>> contribute/contribution-guide/
>>> Has anyone had challenges / pain points when getting started with new
>>> contributions?
>>> Any suggestions for making this better?
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>> --
> Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback
>

Re: [YouTube channel] Add video: Apache Beam meetup London 2: use case in finance + IO in Beam and Splittable DoFns

[Gaurav Thakur]

How can people get access to the channel?

Thanks, Gaurav

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Matthias Baetens <
matthias.baet...@datatonic.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a proposal to launch the Apache Beam YouTube channel and at the
> same time add the first video to the channel.
>
> We would like to use the channel to centralize all videos / recordings
> related to Apache Beam and make it a community driven channel, so people
> have a one stop shop for learnings about Beam.
>
> The first video would be the recording of the second Beam meetup in London:
> Apache Beam meetup London 2: use case in finance + IO in Beam and
> Splittable DoFns. The video can be seen on the channel if you have login
> details (it is currently set to private).
>
> Please let me know if there are any questions or comments!
>
> Best regards,
> Matthias
>