Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release
+1. I ran a few integration tests with the release and everything checks out. 2011/6/23 Marc-André Laverdière > I agree. This is not a blocker. > Thanks for looking into it. > > Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE > "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, > not lacking anything." -James 1:4 > http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/ > mlaverd.theunixplace.com > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Alex Boisvert > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Alex Boisvert >wrote: > > > >> 2011/6/22 Marc-André Laverdière > >> > >>> That part worked well. Thanks! > >>> > >>> But I got something that didn't :( > >>> > >>> The auto-versioning after a release messed up: > >>> 1.2-RC-5-SNAPSHOT -> 1.2-RC-5 -> 1.03-SNAPSHOT > >>> > >> > >> Did this use to work in previous versions? > >> > >> The release documentation (http://buildr.apache.org/releasing.html) is > >> pretty clear that it will "increment the last digit of the 3-digit > version > >> number if THIS_VERSION ends with -SNAPSHOT." And you have several > >> alternatives to specify the next version number. > >> > >> Unless this used to work, I don't see this bug as a blocker for the > >> release. We can address it for the next version. > >> > > > > I just tested w/ 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 and got the same result. So I'm going > to > > go ahead with the release given that the bug seems to have existed for > some > > time and there are straightforward workarounds. > > > > alex > > >
Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release
I agree. This is not a blocker. Thanks for looking into it. Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything." -James 1:4 http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/ mlaverd.theunixplace.com On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Alex Boisvert > wrote: > >> 2011/6/22 Marc-André Laverdière >> >>> That part worked well. Thanks! >>> >>> But I got something that didn't :( >>> >>> The auto-versioning after a release messed up: >>> 1.2-RC-5-SNAPSHOT -> 1.2-RC-5 -> 1.03-SNAPSHOT >>> >> >> Did this use to work in previous versions? >> >> The release documentation (http://buildr.apache.org/releasing.html) is >> pretty clear that it will "increment the last digit of the 3-digit version >> number if THIS_VERSION ends with -SNAPSHOT." And you have several >> alternatives to specify the next version number. >> >> Unless this used to work, I don't see this bug as a blocker for the >> release. We can address it for the next version. >> > > I just tested w/ 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 and got the same result. So I'm going to > go ahead with the release given that the bug seems to have existed for some > time and there are straightforward workarounds. > > alex >
Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > 2011/6/22 Marc-André Laverdière > >> That part worked well. Thanks! >> >> But I got something that didn't :( >> >> The auto-versioning after a release messed up: >> 1.2-RC-5-SNAPSHOT -> 1.2-RC-5 -> 1.03-SNAPSHOT >> > > Did this use to work in previous versions? > > The release documentation (http://buildr.apache.org/releasing.html) is > pretty clear that it will "increment the last digit of the 3-digit version > number if THIS_VERSION ends with -SNAPSHOT." And you have several > alternatives to specify the next version number. > > Unless this used to work, I don't see this bug as a blocker for the > release. We can address it for the next version. > I just tested w/ 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 and got the same result. So I'm going to go ahead with the release given that the bug seems to have existed for some time and there are straightforward workarounds. alex
Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release
2011/6/22 Marc-André Laverdière > That part worked well. Thanks! > > But I got something that didn't :( > > The auto-versioning after a release messed up: > 1.2-RC-5-SNAPSHOT -> 1.2-RC-5 -> 1.03-SNAPSHOT > Did this use to work in previous versions? The release documentation (http://buildr.apache.org/releasing.html) is pretty clear that it will "increment the last digit of the 3-digit version number if THIS_VERSION ends with -SNAPSHOT." And you have several alternatives to specify the next version number. Unless this used to work, I don't see this bug as a blocker for the release. We can address it for the next version. alex
