RE: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 - translations requested
hi helma i have create an entry in bugzilla http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015 with the greek version of FormsMessages.xml, OtherMessages.xml plus one more .xml (MoreMessages.xml) contain the extra messages you have request for let me know in your need more help regards stavros On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Linden H van der (MI) wrote: THANKS a lot. I'm putting some i18n text in to make the localized samples more interesting. It would be great if you could provide a translation of the following in your native language: message key=titleTitle/message message key=MRMr./message message key=MSMs./message message key=MRSMrs./message message key=MISSMiss./message message key=firstnameFirst Name/message message key=surnameSurname/message message key=birthdateBirthdate (dd/MM/)/message message key=birthdate.failmessageDead and not born yet should not bother filling this form/message message key=emailEnter your bemail/b address/message message key=email.helpAn email address must be in i[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i format./message message key=remembermeRemember me/message message key=addressAddress/message message key=usernameUsername/message message key=username.hintThe username must contain exactly 5 characters./message message key=countryCountry/message message key=passwordPassword/message message key=password.verifyRetype Password/message I'm sorry it's not yet complete, but every bit helps. Thanks. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 12 March 2005 15:06 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 Le 12 mars 05, 14:52, Linden H van der (MI) a crit : ...So at least the styling will remain the same, but are there differences (big or small) in the widget definitions etc. that require a rewrite of the current form samples?.. Like you I haven't been able to follow everything. File comparison, however, shows very few differences, it seems like the branch and trunk are well in sync. You might want to look at the status.xml file in the trunk for more info. -Bertrand
RE: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 - translations requested
THANKS a lot. I'm putting some i18n text in to make the localized samples more interesting. It would be great if you could provide a translation of the following in your native language: message key=titleTitle/message message key=MRMr./message message key=MSMs./message message key=MRSMrs./message message key=MISSMiss./message message key=firstnameFirst Name/message message key=surnameSurname/message message key=birthdateBirthdate (dd/MM/)/message message key=birthdate.failmessageDead and not born yet should not bother filling this form/message message key=emailEnter your bemail/b address/message message key=email.helpAn email address must be in i[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i format./message message key=remembermeRemember me/message message key=addressAddress/message message key=usernameUsername/message message key=username.hintThe username must contain exactly 5 characters./message message key=countryCountry/message message key=passwordPassword/message message key=password.verifyRetype Password/message I'm sorry it's not yet complete, but every bit helps. Thanks. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 12 March 2005 15:06 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 Le 12 mars 05, à 14:52, Linden H van der (MI) a écrit : ...So at least the styling will remain the same, but are there differences (big or small) in the widget definitions etc. that require a rewrite of the current form samples?.. Like you I haven't been able to follow everything. File comparison, however, shows very few differences, it seems like the branch and trunk are well in sync. You might want to look at the status.xml file in the trunk for more info. -Bertrand
RE: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 - translations requested
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Linden H van der (MI) wrote: hi helma do you want a grrek translation too, or it would be difficult to handle greek language? regards stavros THANKS a lot. I'm putting some i18n text in to make the localized samples more interesting. It would be great if you could provide a translation of the following in your native language: message key=titleTitle/message message key=MRMr./message message key=MSMs./message message key=MRSMrs./message message key=MISSMiss./message message key=firstnameFirst Name/message message key=surnameSurname/message message key=birthdateBirthdate (dd/MM/)/message message key=birthdate.failmessageDead and not born yet should not bother filling this form/message message key=emailEnter your bemail/b address/message message key=email.helpAn email address must be in i[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i format./message message key=remembermeRemember me/message message key=addressAddress/message message key=usernameUsername/message message key=username.hintThe username must contain exactly 5 characters./message message key=countryCountry/message message key=passwordPassword/message message key=password.verifyRetype Password/message I'm sorry it's not yet complete, but every bit helps. Thanks. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 12 March 2005 15:06 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 Le 12 mars 05, 14:52, Linden H van der (MI) a crit : ...So at least the styling will remain the same, but are there differences (big or small) in the widget definitions etc. that require a rewrite of the current form samples?.. Like you I haven't been able to follow everything. File comparison, however, shows very few differences, it seems like the branch and trunk are well in sync. You might want to look at the status.xml file in the trunk for more info. -Bertrand
RE: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 - translations requested
I think any language is welcome, but you'd have to fill me in on how to display it. If you want to go into the trouble of translating the list below, please provide the rest of FormsMessages.xml and OtherMessages.xml as well. Ah, and to make things complete: please provide the Greek word for Calendar. Thanks. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 12 March 2005 17:33 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: RE: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 - translations requested On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Linden H van der (MI) wrote: hi helma do you want a grrek translation too, or it would be difficult to handle greek language? regards stavros THANKS a lot. I'm putting some i18n text in to make the localized samples more interesting. It would be great if you could provide a translation of the following in your native language: message key=titleTitle/message message key=MRMr./message message key=MSMs./message message key=MRSMrs./message message key=MISSMiss./message message key=firstnameFirst Name/message message key=surnameSurname/message message key=birthdateBirthdate (dd/MM/)/message message key=birthdate.failmessageDead and not born yet should not bother filling this form/message message key=emailEnter your bemail/b address/message message key=email.helpAn email address must be in i[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i format./message message key=remembermeRemember me/message message key=addressAddress/message message key=usernameUsername/message message key=username.hintThe username must contain exactly 5 characters./message message key=countryCountry/message message key=passwordPassword/message message key=password.verifyRetype Password/message I'm sorry it's not yet complete, but every bit helps. Thanks. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 12 March 2005 15:06 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on CForms - relevant for 2.1.7 Le 12 mars 05, 14:52, Linden H van der (MI) a crit : ...So at least the styling will remain the same, but are there differences (big or small) in the widget definitions etc. that require a rewrite of the current form samples?.. Like you I haven't been able to follow everything. File comparison, however, shows very few differences, it seems like the branch and trunk are well in sync. You might want to look at the status.xml file in the trunk for more info. -Bertrand
