Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
The PUT trick does not work There is no way to delete a user in CouchDB 1.0.0. - Mail Original - De: "J Chris Anderson" À: dev@couchdb.apache.org Envoyé: Lundi 12 Juillet 2010 20h00:03 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round On Jul 12, 2010, at 8:32 AM, mickael.bai...@free.fr wrote: > Hello y'all, > > I don't know if it's a showstopper, but the current > _design/auth/validate_doc_update of the _users database seems buggy : > I can't delete a user. I use the tarball of 1.0.0 release, second round. > Thanks for the report. It's not a show-stopper. You should be able to delete a user with a PUT that has the unmodified doc (except with doc._deleted = true) I will fix this for 1.0.1 Chris > When deleting a user, using the DELETE Rest Query, with server admin > credentials, newDoc takes the form of : > > {"_id":"org.couchdb.user:joe","_rev":"1-3aa8c71e227226e1363a759839a572d8","_deleted":true,"_revisions":{"start":1,"ids":["3aa8c71e227226e1363a759839a572d8"]}} > > The type: "user" field is not present. That makes the validate_doc_update > refuse the deletion. > > The fix I found is in the first line of _design/auth/validate_doc_update : > > replace : > > if ((oldDoc && oldDoc.type !== 'user') || newDoc.type !== 'user' ) { > > with > > if ((oldDoc && oldDoc.type !== 'user') || (newDoc.type !== 'user' && > newDoc._deleted !== true ) ) { > > and it works. I'm not sure this fix is enough... > > Perhaps I missed something, but I could not find infos about deleting user in > the wiki nor in the "definitive guide". > > Regard, > > Mickael > > > - Mail Original - > De: "Noah Slater" > À: dev@couchdb.apache.org > Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Juillet 2010 18h55:31 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / > Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne > Objet: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round > > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
[VOTE RESULTS] (was Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round)
Hello, The final tally of the vote is: 15 +1 votes This exceeds the required minimum three +1 votes and the proposal passes. I shall prepare the release as soon as possible. The individual votes are as follows: +1 J Chris Anderson http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c8de5f136-2379-40f6-b6be-9159c860f...@apache.org%3e +1 Damien Katz http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c6f13e193-2b81-45fe-90f3-8dfbb66d7...@apache.org%3e +1 Robert Newson http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktinxh7rwkgxwethuggocu8gdsdvjaxim-k1ov...@mail.gmail.com%3e +1 Randall Leeds http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktimhzk-hzjenwmpxbfglcb8a8gvdsapjljilz...@mail.gmail.com%3e +1 Sebastian Cohnen http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c7cac4bcd-22ea-4672-9db6-e04c2491e...@googlemail.com%3e +1 Robert Dionne http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cc906e73e-4ec5-402d-ac72-c060529db...@dionne-associates.com%3e +1 Jan Lehnardt http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c0c5a5990-89c8-4047-a31e-3f9e774cc...@apache.org%3e +1 Klaus Trainer http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c1278757228.19515.99.ca...@devil%3e +1 Volker Mische http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c4c38540a.40...@gmail.com%3e +1 Dave Cottlehuber http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktiktjt2qvvjuptsf1f7fxh26axaznkcaapcpi...@mail.gmail.com%3e +1 Eric Carlson http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c4c389a9c.8040...@ericcarlson.co.uk%3e +1 Russell Branca http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktim1pe85cslz2xiycqf13c5spqjftkewsizml...@mail.gmail.com%3e +1 Zachary Zolton http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktilgaslbrotoh-wzd0lfec0ankmxb17lrfu1s...@mail.gmail.com%3e +1 Benoit Chesneau http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktin-1p4ll44_ln1htrkixkpgyjeagjzctyy0r...@mail.gmail.com%3e +1 Adam Kocoloski http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cbc0c39d9-a155-4583-b3ab-221df9941...@apache.org%3e Thanks to everyone who voted. Best, N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N Sneaking my +1 in before the vote is called. :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
WinXP SP3, icu 4.2.1, js1.8.0-rc1, curl 7.19.7 Erlang R14A (erts-5.8) [source] [rq:1] [async-threads:0] Futon tests pass! Should `make check` work on windows? It doesn't for me. Here is the result of manually running prove on etap tests. $ (cd test/etap/ && prove *.t) 001-load.t . ok 002-icu-driver.t ... Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00) Failed 3/3 subtests 010-file-basics.t .. ok 011-file-headers.t . Conflicting -start_erl and -boot options 011-file-headers.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 020-btree-basics.t . Conflicting -start_erl and -boot options 020-btree-basics.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 021-btree-reductions.t . Conflicting -start_erl and -boot options 021-btree-reductions.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 030-doc-from-json.t Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 030-doc-from-json.t Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 031-doc-to-json.t .. Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 031-doc-to-json.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 040-util.t . Failed 1/14 subtests 041-uuid-gen.t . Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 041-uuid-gen.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 6/6 subtests 050-stream.t ... ok 060-kt-merging.t ... ok 061-kt-missing-leaves.t ok 062-kt-remove-leaves.t . ok 063-kt-get-leaves.t ok 064-kt-counting.t .. ok 065-kt-stemming.t .. ok 070-couch-db.t . Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 070-couch-db.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 4/4 subtests 080-config-get-set.t ... Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 080-config-get-set.t ... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 081-config-override.t .. Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 081-config-override.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 082-config-register.t .. Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 082-config-register.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 083-config-no-files.t .. ok 090-task-status.t .. ok 100-ref-counter.t .. ok 110-replication-httpc.t Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 110-replication-httpc.t Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 6/6 subtests 111-replication-changes-feed.t . Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 111-replication-changes-feed.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 13/13 subtests 112-replication-missing-revs.t . Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 112-replication-missing-revs.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 12/12 subtests 113-replication-attachment-comp.t .. Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 113-replication-attachment-comp.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 30/30 subtests 120-stats-collect.t ok 121-stats-aggregates.t . Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 121-stats-aggregates.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) No subtests run 130-attachments-md5.t .. Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 130-attachments-md5.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 16/16 subtests 140-attachment-comp.t .. Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 140-attachment-comp.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 78/78 subtests 150-invalid-view-seq.t . Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 150-invalid-view-seq.t . Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 10/10 subtests 160-vhosts.t ... Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () 160-vhosts.t ... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 4/4 subtests Test Summary Report --- 002-icu-driver.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 127 Parse errors: Ba
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On Jul 12, 2010, at 8:32 AM, mickael.bai...@free.fr wrote: > Hello y'all, > > I don't know if it's a showstopper, but the current > _design/auth/validate_doc_update of the _users database seems buggy : > I can't delete a user. I use the tarball of 1.0.0 release, second round. > Thanks for the report. It's not a show-stopper. You should be able to delete a user with a PUT that has the unmodified doc (except with doc._deleted = true) I will fix this for 1.0.1 Chris > When deleting a user, using the DELETE Rest Query, with server admin > credentials, newDoc takes the form of : > > {"_id":"org.couchdb.user:joe","_rev":"1-3aa8c71e227226e1363a759839a572d8","_deleted":true,"_revisions":{"start":1,"ids":["3aa8c71e227226e1363a759839a572d8"]}} > > The type: "user" field is not present. That makes the validate_doc_update > refuse the deletion. > > The fix I found is in the first line of _design/auth/validate_doc_update : > > replace : > > if ((oldDoc && oldDoc.type !== 'user') || newDoc.type !== 'user' ) { > > with > > if ((oldDoc && oldDoc.type !== 'user') || (newDoc.type !== 'user' && > newDoc._deleted !== true ) ) { > > and it works. I'm not sure this fix is enough... > > Perhaps I missed something, but I could not find infos about deleting user in > the wiki nor in the "definitive guide". > > Regard, > > Mickael > > > - Mail Original - > De: "Noah Slater" > À: dev@couchdb.apache.org > Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Juillet 2010 18h55:31 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / > Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne > Objet: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round > > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Hello y'all, I don't know if it's a showstopper, but the current _design/auth/validate_doc_update of the _users database seems buggy : I can't delete a user. I use the tarball of 1.0.0 release, second round. When deleting a user, using the DELETE Rest Query, with server admin credentials, newDoc takes the form of : {"_id":"org.couchdb.user:joe","_rev":"1-3aa8c71e227226e1363a759839a572d8","_deleted":true,"_revisions":{"start":1,"ids":["3aa8c71e227226e1363a759839a572d8"]}} The type: "user" field is not present. That makes the validate_doc_update refuse the deletion. The fix I found is in the first line of _design/auth/validate_doc_update : replace : if ((oldDoc && oldDoc.type !== 'user') || newDoc.type !== 'user' ) { with if ((oldDoc && oldDoc.type !== 'user') || (newDoc.type !== 'user' && newDoc._deleted !== true ) ) { and it works. I'm not sure this fix is enough... Perhaps I missed something, but I could not find infos about deleting user in the wiki nor in the "definitive guide". Regard, Mickael - Mail Original ----- De: "Noah Slater" À: dev@couchdb.apache.org Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Juillet 2010 18h55:31 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. Changes in this round: * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ Happy voting, N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N + 1 js tests pass make check pass tested with some applications tested on OpenBSD 4.7-current (erlang R13B04), OSX 10.6.4 (erlang R14a)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On 11/07/2010 2:06 AM, Eric Carlson wrote: Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on Windows. Has anyone else? I successfully built R14A and the couch trunk a week or so ago and reported the results here (which I believe were subsequently addressed). Unfortunately I'm probably not going to get a chance to try again until I return from my current trip - about a week away... Mark
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 Mac OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04. Make check and Futon test all passed. On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Russell Branca wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Eric Carlson wrote: >> +1 >> >> make check & futon tests all pass sucessfully >> >> Ubuntu Lucid, Erlang R13B03, xulrunner-1.9.2.6, Firefox 3.6.6 >> >> Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on >> Windows. Has anyone else? Given that something like 90% of the computers >> out there are running Windows, it might be good to know if it works >> before releasing 1.0. >> >> Eric >> >> > > +1 > > All futon and make check tests pass on Ubuntu 10.04 64bit with Erlang R13B03. > > > -Russell >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Eric Carlson wrote: > +1 > > make check & futon tests all pass sucessfully > > Ubuntu Lucid, Erlang R13B03, xulrunner-1.9.2.6, Firefox 3.6.6 > > Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on > Windows. Has anyone else? Given that something like 90% of the computers > out there are running Windows, it might be good to know if it works > before releasing 1.0. > > Eric > > +1 All futon and make check tests pass on Ubuntu 10.04 64bit with Erlang R13B03. -Russell
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 make check & futon tests all pass sucessfully Ubuntu Lucid, Erlang R13B03, xulrunner-1.9.2.6, Firefox 3.6.6 Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on Windows. Has anyone else? Given that something like 90% of the computers out there are running Windows, it might be good to know if it works before releasing 1.0. Eric
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 & I sorted my build process out too thanks jan@ make check + futon tests all OK Mac OS X 10.6.4 Erlang R13B04 (erts-5.7.5) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false] icu4c-4.3.1 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 A+ Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 All Futon tests and make check passes on: AMD64, Ubuntu 9.10/10.4 hybrid (64-bit), Erlang R13B01, xulrunner 1.9.1.9, FF 3.6.3 AMD64, Ubuntu 10.4 (32-bit), Erlang R13B03, xulrunner 1.9.2.6, FF 3.6.3 AMD64, Debian testing (64-bit), Erlang R13B04, libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.9, Iceweasel 3.5.9 Cheers, Volker On 09.07.2010 18:55, Noah Slater wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. Changes in this round: * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ Happy voting, N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 All tests (Futon, make check) pass successfully. Ubuntu 10.04 amd64, Erlang R13B03, Spidermonkey 1.8.1.16 - Klaus On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:55 +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On 9 Jul 2010, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote: > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > […] > > Happy voting, +1 (still very happy) Signature and hashes match. `make check` passes, browser tests all pass on: Mac OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Spidermonkey 1.8, Firefox 3.6.6 OpenSolaris 11 / SunOS 5.11, Erlang R14A, Spidermonkey 1.7, Firefox 3.1b3 Ubuntu Lucid (Upgraded from Karmic), Erlang R13B03, Spidermonkey 1.7, Firefox 3.6.6 Cheers Jan --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Yes I ran the test in safe mode. But today it looks better. I redownloaded the archive, did ./configure && make check, and ran the test suite once more. Success on the first run and _much_ faster than yesterday. Looks okay now for me and I'll check 0.11.1 again. Maybe just a system hiccup :) change my vote to +1 and sorry for the noise Sebastian On 09.07.2010, at 23:12, Damien Katz wrote: > Sebastian, is Firebug is completely disabled? Firebug tends to cause some odd > behaviors. It sounds like you already have disabled it (via safe mode?), but > I want to be sure. > > -Damien > > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > >> On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: >>> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 >>> >>> Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache? >> >> I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in >> normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured >> that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration >> test suite more and more). >> >>> Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the >>> source directory: >>> >>> test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes >>> passes) >> >> "ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it >> simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test >> and tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not >> ok 16 cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication >> ReferenceError: $ is not defined"). >> >> >> Sebastian >> >>> Chris >>> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute). -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong) >> >> *snip* >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 checksums match make distcheck and Futon test suite passes. OS X 10.6.4 Erlang R13B04 view compaction works. B. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Damien Katz wrote: > +1, exact same setup. > > -Damien > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:18 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote: > >> +1 >> >> all test pass >> make check passes >> >> OSX Snow Leopard >> Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] >> [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false] >> >> Chris >> >> On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. >>> >>> Changes in this round: >>> >>> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artifacts so >>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >>> Everyone is >>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >>> >>> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ >>> >>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ >>> >>> Happy voting, >>> >>> N >> > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1, exact same setup. -Damien On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:18 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote: > +1 > > all test pass > make check passes > > OSX Snow Leopard > Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] > [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false] > > Chris > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. >> >> Changes in this round: >> >> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ >> >> Happy voting, >> >> N >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Sebastian, is Firebug is completely disabled? Firebug tends to cause some odd behaviors. It sounds like you already have disabled it (via safe mode?), but I want to be sure. -Damien On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote: > >> >> On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: >> >>> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; >>> en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 >>> >> >> Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache? > > I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in > normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured > that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration > test suite more and more). > >> Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the >> source directory: >> >> test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes >> passes) > > "ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it > simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test and > tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not ok 16 > cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication > ReferenceError: $ is not defined"). > > > Sebastian > >> Chris >> >>> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test >>> however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all >>> test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it >>> is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have >>> not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, >>> but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I >>> see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' >>> /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing >>> for about a minute). >>> >>> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong) > > *snip* >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > >> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; >> en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 >> > > Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache? I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration test suite more and more). > Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the > source directory: > > test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes > passes) "ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test and tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not ok 16 cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication ReferenceError: $ is not defined"). Sebastian > Chris > >> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test >> however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all >> test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is >> successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not >> yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but >> I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see >> "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' >> /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing >> for about a minute). >> >> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong) *snip*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 OS X 10.6 Erlang R13B04 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100504 Firefox/3.5.10 make distcheck is ok all Futon test pass. Note: my Firefox is slightly below Sebastian's all tests pass in ./test/javascript/run *except* not ok 25 form_submit false not ok 43 replication ReferenceError: $ is not defined On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; > en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 > Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache? Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the source directory: test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes passes) Chris > signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test > however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all > test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is > successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet > pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I > notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see > "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' > /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for > about a minute). > > -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong) > > On 09.07.2010, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. >> >> Changes in this round: >> >> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ >> >> Happy voting, >> >> N >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute). -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong) On 09.07.2010, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 make check passes futon tests pass Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 Firefox 3.6.6 (xulrunner 1.9.2.6) Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false] On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 09:55, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
+1 all test pass make check passes OSX Snow Leopard Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false] Chris On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. > > Changes in this round: > > * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone > is > free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! > > We are voting on the following release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ > > These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ > > Happy voting, > > N
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round. Changes in this round: * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ Happy voting, N