Re: config.nice should be installed
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:57:26PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: Where should it be installed? $prefix/lib maybe? How about $prefix/conf? vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
RE: config.nice should be installed
From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:38 PM * Aaron Bannert wrote: On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Astrid Keßler wrote: It would be a big help to our users if config.nice was installed by a make install. This is a really good idea. +1 I like this too. +1 +1 here as well. Where should it be installed? $prefix/lib maybe? $prefix/build sounds more naturally to me. +1. Sander
[PATCH] apache_1.3.28/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c
Please consider my suggestion:
--- mod_rewrite.c.old Fri Jul 25 18:07:38 2003
+++ mod_rewrite.c Fri Jul 25 18:12:42 2003
@@ -3823,7 +3823,7 @@
/* ...and sub and main paths differ */ \
strcmp(r-main-uri, r-uri) != 0))) { \
/* process a file-based subrequest */ \
-rsub = subrecfunc(r-filename, r); \
+rsub = subrecfunc(, r); \
/* now recursively lookup the variable in the sub_req */ \
result = lookup_variable(rsub, var+5); \
/* copy it up to our scope before we destroy sub_req's pool */ \
I gues
Thanks in advance.
Re: [PATCH] apache_1.3.28/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:49:07 +1000 (EST), I wrote: -rsub = subrecfunc(r-filename, r); \ +rsub = subrecfunc(, r); \ [..] I gues Oops.. I guess that should be okay for the lookahead, right? I suppose it doesn't matter when r-filename is absolute, but I think it causes an infinite loop with (say) /../dir/ - dir/ and then that doubles itself each time it goes through ap_make_full_path(). Thanks. -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging more http://www.gmx.net +++ Jetzt ein- oder umsteigen und USB-Speicheruhr als Prämie sichern!
Re: config.nice should be installed
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:38 PM * Aaron Bannert wrote: On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Astrid Keßler wrote: It would be a big help to our users if config.nice was installed by a make install. This is a really good idea. +1 I like this too. +1 +1 here as well. Where should it be installed? $prefix/lib maybe? $prefix/build sounds more naturally to me. +1. +1 -Thom
Re: Offering modules for core httpd distro
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Nick Kew wrote: 4. mod_proxy_html (NEW!) Apache as a reverse-proxy has hitherto been incomplete, as it falls down when HTML links in proxied pages fail outside the proxy. mod_proxy_html is an output filter to rewrite HTML links where necessary into the proxy's address space. If you could provide a long-term stable url, we could at least point to this from the ProxyPassReverse docs. It certainly qualifies as a frequently requested feature. Joshua.
Re: Offering modules for core httpd distro
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:17:25PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: 1. mod_diagnostics I'd very much like to see this included. (http://access.www.webthing.com/software/mod_diagnostics.c) 3. mod_xml_gnome_xslt link? 4. mod_proxy_html (NEW!) While this is _very_ useful for reverse proxying, I do not think it should be included mainly because of the dependency on libxml2. vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
Re: Offering modules for core httpd distro
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:33:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: If you could provide a long-term stable url, we could at least point to this from the ProxyPassReverse docs. It certainly qualifies as a frequently requested feature. Or just use http://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=625 vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
Apache 2.0.47 Windows SSL
Hi to all, Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ? Regards
Re: Apache 2.0.47 Windows SSL
On 25/07/2003, at 06:07, Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ? There is a 'over-complete' pre-built Apache 2.0.47 package including mod_ssl and OpenSSL 0.9.7b for Windows: http://www.apachefriends.org/wampp.html But be aware that it's fairly large, around 43MB. Didn't look into it; just stumbled over it recently... Cheers, Erik Regards
Re: config.nice should be installed
$prefix/build sounds more naturally to me. +1. +1 -Thom +1 Kess
Re: Offering modules for core httpd distro
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mads Toftum wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:33:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: If you could provide a long-term stable url, we could at least point to this from the ProxyPassReverse docs. It certainly qualifies as a frequently requested feature. Or just use http://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=625 And that's going to stay consistent through whatever happens to modules.apache.org? Somehow I doubt it. I hate dead links. Joshua.
Re: Apache 2.0.47 Windows SSL
Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ? There is a 'over-complete' pre-built Apache 2.0.47 package including mod_ssl and OpenSSL 0.9.7b for Windows: http://www.apachefriends.org/wampp.html But be aware that it's fairly large, around 43MB. Didn't look into it; just stumbled over it recently... This is really big, ugh. Binary mod_ssl and the neccessary openssl files are also available at http://www.madhon.co.uk/modssl/ (615kb) and an instruction is available at http://plone.org/documentation/developer/ApacheSSLWindows/wikipage_view. I didn't test it, so ... no help, no warranty :) Kess
Re: mod_rewrite: different behaviour on sub-requests - Why?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody enlight me what this code in mod_rewrite.c is good for?
static int hook_fixup(request_rec *r)
{
[...]
/* we shouldn't do anything in subrequests */
if (r-main != NULL) {
return DECLINED;
}
It took me days to track down what is is not good for
(see bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21814 ).
I suggest to disarm this section if not removing it from mod_rewrite.c...
This was added immediately after the inclusion of mod_rewrite into the httpd
code (some years ago). I believe, the only one who can say, _why_ this was
added, is Ralf :).
However, I'll take a look into it. This was probably added in order to avoid
mod_rewrite-loops. Perhaps it isn't necessary any longer.
nd
mod_rewrite.h cleanup?
It's somehow obvious, that I'm currently cleaning up the mod_rewrite code ;-) Now I want to reorder the code in order to get a rid of most of the forward declarations in mod_rewrite.h. In fact, I want to remove all the non-public parts from the header file. (i.e. all, except the ap_register_mapfunc stuff), so that other modules that include mod_rewrite.h (say, in order to register a map function) find a clean file. Are there any objections against? nd
Re: mod_rewrite.h cleanup?
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, André Malo wrote: parts from the header file. (i.e. all, except the ap_register_mapfunc stuff), so that other modules that include mod_rewrite.h (say, in order to register a map function) find a clean file. Are there any objections against? PLEEEASSE do this if you're so inclined... it's always a huge pita to modify mod_rewrite because you have to remember to modify the header file too, and no other module does that, so you end up getting stupid prototype mismatches and you keep having to go back and forth. ++1
Re: mod_rewrite.h cleanup?
André Malo wrote: It's somehow obvious, that I'm currently cleaning up the mod_rewrite code ;-) Now I want to reorder the code in order to get a rid of most of the forward declarations in mod_rewrite.h. In fact, I want to remove all the non-public parts from the header file. (i.e. all, except the ap_register_mapfunc stuff), so that other modules that include mod_rewrite.h (say, in order to register a map function) find a clean file. Are there any objections against? Go for it. +1 Bill
kqueue a poll/select alternative?
Hi, Anyone knows about kqueue, dev/poll implementation in apr, httpd? Thanks. Ranier.
Re: Offering modules for core httpd distro
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Nick Kew wrote: 1. mod_diagnostics Well, the feedback seems to indicate interest in that. Shall I take that as a cue to do a writeup? (BTW, someone said mod_bucketeer, but I can't see any overlap) 2. mod_upload 3. mod_xml_gnome_xslt OK, no interest - fair enough. 4. mod_proxy_html (NEW!) I may reorganise my URLs, but I'm happy to undertake to set up a working 301 if http://www.webthing.com/software/mod_proxy_html/ is affected. -- Nick Kew
kqueue a alternative poll/select?
Hi, Anyone knows about implementation of kqueue, dev/poll in apr, httpd? Thanks. Ranier
Re: kqueue a alternative poll/select?
Ranier wrote: Hi, Anyone knows about implementation of kqueue, dev/poll in apr, httpd? Thanks. Ranier The apr_pollset API in APR would be a suitable wrapper for a kqueue or dev/poll implementation, but no one has spent the time and effort to do it yet. I have a prototype httpd implementation (patch posted to this list months ago) that implements event driven network reads and Ian Holsman wrote up a design for doing event driven writes. That's about it. Bill
