Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

We are fine in @dev list to include VOTE from our PPMC members.

We still need to bring this to general@ list which where we need binding 3
VOTES

- Henry

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Johnu  wrote:

> Thanks Henry and Patrick.  We need 1 more binding vote to announce the
> result. Can someone help?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
> > Signature file looks good
> > Hash files look good
> > LICENSE file exists
> > NOTICE file exists
> > DISCLAIMER file exists
> > No exes in source artifacts
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM Johnu George  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> >> 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> >> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >>
> >> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> >>
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> >>
> >> The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> >>
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> >>
> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >>
> >> KEYS file available:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >>
> >> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> >> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> >> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> >> please vote:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

Signature file looks good
Hash files look good
LICENSE file exists
NOTICE file exists
DISCLAIMER file exists
No exes in source artifacts

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM Johnu George  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

I would argue this is not a blocker since the pom.xml define the target JVM:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/pom.xml#L104

Gary, when you said regression, did you mean it was working with Java9
before and now it was not?
If it has not been working with Java9 from beginning this should not be
release blocker.

- Henry

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
> Thanks for the reply. Currently,Mnemonic doesn't support
> Java 9 due to incompatible interface changes. We verified the release with
> Java8. (Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-401)  If it
> is a blocker, I will cancel the rc vote. Else, we will fix it in the next
> release.  Please let us know.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On Nov 6, 2017 11:38 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out how to
> > fix this issue you found.
> >
> > Best,
> > Gary.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> > > ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote, fix
> > it,
> > > and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't
> believe
> > > there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for folks
> > > using it certainly.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > >
> > > > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Gary.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is this a feature or a regression?
> > > > >
> > > > > Patrick
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > > > > >   Can you please vote for the release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Johnu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this
> > > issue
> > > > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix
> it
> > > for
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a
> > > > blocker
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> $java -version
> > > > > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to
> compile?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > $java -version
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Best,
> > > > > > >> > Gary.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <
> > ph...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > > > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:
> compile
> > > > > > >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation
> > > failure:
> > > > > > >> > > Compilation failure:
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/
> main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/
> main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/
> main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <
> > > jo...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > > > > >> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > > > > >> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

Got it, me culpa from me for the confusion.

- Henry

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi Henry
>
> Our project has not yet graduated since Mnemonic was not on the agenda of
> Oct. board meeting for some reasons,
> but fortunately, our project would be evaluated in next board meeting.
> Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Gary.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
>
> > I think Apache Mnemonic has gotten board approval to be top level project
> > (TLP), right?
> >
> > This should be the first release as TLP instead.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> The
> > > please vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

I think Apache Mnemonic has gotten board approval to be top level project
(TLP), right?

This should be the first release as TLP instead.

- Henry

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

[Henry Saputra]

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:04 PM James Taylor  wrote:

> +1. Nice work, everyone!
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Gangumalla, Uma <
> uma.ganguma...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Uma
> >
> > On 9/7/17, 3:00 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
> >
> > >Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for
> > >Mnemonic.
> > >
> > >This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > >three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > >[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
> > >[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> > >[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet becauseŠ
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Henry Saputra]

t; wrote:
> > >>>>> > +1 support for graduation.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Wei HE
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org
> > >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
> > >>>>> readiness
> > >>>>> >> for the graduation.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the
> > following
> > >>>>> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that
> brought
> > >>>>> me to
> > >>>>> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless
> > >>>>> you're on
> > >>>>> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
> > >>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of
> > >>>>> website. we
> > >>>>> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link
> > >>>>> from
> > >>>>> >> navigator menu on website.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this
> > >>>>> item, from
> > >>>>> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to
> > "centos:latest"
> > >>>>> which
> > >>>>> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed)
> and
> > >>>>> >> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
> > >>>>> committers
> > >>>>> >> or from contributors.  If I take
> > >>>>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
> > >>>>> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an
> > >>>>> example, the
> > >>>>> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source
> code.*
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit
> > >>>>> messages must
> > >>>>> >> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the
> > use
> > >>>>> of
> > >>>>> >> *most*)*
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source
> > >>>>> repository
> > >>>>> >> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that
> generated
> > >>>>> by mvn
> > >>>>> >> building process would be excluded and all other project files
> > have
> > >>>>> been
> > >>>>> >> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
> > >>>>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> but that doesn't
> > >>>>> include any
> > >>>>> >> download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.
> apache.org/downloads/
> > >>>>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/> does include
> > >>>>> download
> > >>>>> >> links to the proper release mirrors.*
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> That has been corrected by replacing it with the link
> > >>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

[Henry Saputra]

Signature file looks good
Hash files look good
LICENSE file exists
DISCLAIMER file looks good
NOTICE file exists
Source compiled
No third party exes in source artifact

+1 (binding)

- Henry


On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.9.0-incubating, release candidate rc2. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> .git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.9.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Henry Saputra]

The "checklist" suppose to just provide guide for readiness our graduation.
It was NOT mandatory checklist.

This should be used primarily for self check to make sure we are ready for
graduation.


- Henry

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> So first, I'll say its always great to see a podling aim to graduate.  Its
> not up to me to measure whether the podling has been successful or not, but
> instead the IPMC as a whole.  I can give you some feedback on the APMM
> assessment, but I'll point out that I'm not a fan of this form and
> completing this form is not a requirement for graduation.
>
> So please, when reviewing the below list, understand that completing this
> is not a requirement for graduation.  Even then, podlings who think they
> pass it may be missing things.
>
> CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to your
> source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on gitbox,
> the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.
>
> CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item, from
> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest" which
> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.
>
> CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from committers
> or from contributors.  If I take
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60 as an example, the
> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.
>
> LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> *most*)
>
> RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/ but that
> doesn't include any download links.
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/ does include download
> links
> to the proper release mirrors.
>
> RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).
>
> RE30 - Again, not using mirror.
>
> RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary releases."
>
> RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.
>
> QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use linters,
> sonar, etc.
>
> QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm this.
>
> QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.
>
> CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
> questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs
> >
> > We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation, please
> > guide us to graduate our project, thanks.
> >
> > All comments and suggestions are welcome!
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi John
> >>
> >> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
> >>
> >> Very truly yours
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please take a look at
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi John
> 
>  This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review
>  it, Thanks!
> 
>  Very truly yours
>  Gary
> 
> 
>  On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>  wrote:
> 
> > Hi John
> >
> > I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
> > will correct this according to your guidance.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Very truly yours
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
> >>
> >> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you
> >> should be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
> >> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases
> should
> >> be archived.
> >>
> >> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find
> anything
> >> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
> >> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want
> >> to grab your specific version from there.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi John,
> >>>
> >>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home
> page,
> >>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for
> the
> >>> suggestion.
> >>>
> >>> Very truly yours
> >>> Gary
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi John,
> 
>  You can download all versions of th

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

NOTICE file exists
LICENSE file exists
DISCLAIMER file exists
Signature file looks good
Hash files look good
Source artifact does not contain 3rd party exes
License in source header.

+1 (binding)

- Henry


On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
> 
> 0.8.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.8.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v
>  mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v%3Cversion>
> 0.8.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 2941b87:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
>  mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=%3Ccommit_hash_code>
> 2941b87
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 8.0-incubating-rc
>  incubating-rc%3Crc_number>
> 1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic--incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Debo~ Dutta, on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file exist
Header copyright exist.
No 3rd party executables in source artifacts.
Source compiled

+1 (binding)

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.7.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.7.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE file exists
DISCLAIMER file exists
NOTICE file looks good
Hash files look good
Signature file looks good
No 3rd party exes in source artifact


+1 (binding)

- Henry


On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.6.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE files looks good
DISCLAIMER file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
Signature file looks good
Checksum files look good
No 3rd party exes in source artifact


+1 (binding)

- Henry


On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 5.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.5.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.5.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 5.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.4.0-incubating [rc1]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE file exists
NOTICE exists but need update the year (not blocker)
DISCLAIMER file looks good
Signature file looks good
Hash checksum files look good
Source compiled
No 3rd party exes in source artifacts

+1 (binding)

Thanks so much for driving the RELEASE.

Gary, could you file JIRA to update year in the NOTICE file ?

- Henry


On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.4.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 4.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.4.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.4.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=7799e7094545db9640269d14543bf28d7a7e0335
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 4.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.4.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Quarterly Board Report

[Henry Saputra]

Just saw the updated report and signed off on it.

Agree with Patrick. The podling need to make more releases, and add more
contributors.

Like Yanping has  said, need to add more integration with existing open
source projects, like maybe with Apache HBase, Apache Flink or Apache Spark.

-  Henry

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Those are great goals, however the only things really gating graduation at
> this point IMO (other mentors can chime in if they feel otw) is; 1)
> continue driving releases, esp with different release managers to show that
> a number of people understand "the Apache way" (one aspect granted), 2)
> increase community involvement, esp diversity (typically we talk about this
> in terms of not having a single company represented, but overall diversity
> is a good goal as well) in committer/pmc membership.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Gary  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick
> >
> > Thank you very much for your guiding and advice, I have corrected that as
> > follows.
> >
> >   2. Introduced women developers to our incubating project.
> >   3. Improved dev. docker to facilitate development.
> >   4. provided information to potential customers e.g. bank user, other
> > Apache project's committers
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
> >
> > Please review it again, Thanks !
> >
> > Very truly yours,
> > +Gary
> >
> >
> > On 12/5/2016 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > > I signed off on the report. One thing I noticed is that you list your
> > "top
> > > 3 for graduation", however that's not really what's gating your
> > graduation.
> > > Please review
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.htm
> > l#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
> > >
> > > Item 1 in your report is on point (experience delivering releases,
> > ensuring
> > > apache release guidelines/requirements are followed) however the other
> > two
> > > are not gaiting your graduation. I would say instead that building
> > > community (including committers/pmc) and increasing diversity, so that
> > you
> > > can stand alone as a TLP, is missing.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Gary  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi PMCs and Developers
> > >>
> > >> We have submitted the quarterly board report as follows, Please
> review,
> > >> feedback and approve this report, Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
> > >>
> > >> Very truly yours,
> > >> +Gary
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc2]

[Henry Saputra]

To avoid confusion could you send [CANCEL] thread to the RC2 vote?

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi Patrick
>
> The vote for Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc2] has been cancelled
> because I found there is an issue that was introduced by underlying nvm
> library. it reported as "MNEMONIC-132: Terminate called without an active
> exception" for your reference. we are working to prepare the rc3 for you
> voting, Thanks!
>
> B.R,
> Gary
>
> On 10/5/2016 8:51 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > +1, sig/xsum verify, rat ran clean, everything looks fine to me and I was
> > able to build (excluding a few modules which I don't have pre-reqs on my
> > machine for.).
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Gary  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> >> 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate 2. This
> >> is the third release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >>
> >> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> >> 3.0-incubating-rc2/src/
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted upon is v0.3.0-incubating:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> >> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.3.0-incubating
> >>
> >> The release hash is 6203b6f06177a48c860d63f72afb78eaae556ebc:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> >> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=55a211fc56f760dfb84574a7640c2353ae836d61
> >>
> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >>
> >> KEYS file available:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >>
> >> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> >> 3.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> >> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> >> please vote:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating
> >>
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc4]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
License header exist
No 3rd party exes in source artifact
Hash file look good
Sig files looks good

+1

- Henry

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate 4. This
> is the third release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 3.0-incubating-rc4/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.3.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.3.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 3.0-incubating-rc4/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: welcome new developers to Mnemonic project

[Henry Saputra]

Welcome!

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:47 PM, xiaomin song 
wrote:

> Hi Yanping/Developers,
>
> I am Xiaomin Song and I work for Intel. I am interested in software
> development and would like to contribute to Apache Mnemonic project. I am
> looking forward to be a committer in the future. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Xiaomin Song
> Intel Corp.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Yanping Wang  wrote:
>
> > Hi, Dev
> >
> > I am glad to see we had new developers joined us recently and started
> > working on some JIRAs.
> >
> > It would be great if new developers can introduce themselves to our PPMC
> > members, such as a short background, interests, and affiliation, etc
> >
> > again welcome and thanks
> >
> > yanping
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc3]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file exists
src compile
No 3rd party executables in source artifacts
version has incubating
Signature file looks good
Hash files look good

+1 (binding)

- Henry

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 3. This
> is the second release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.2.0-incubating-rc3/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.2.0-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.2.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 6203b6f06177a48c860d63f72afb78eaae556ebc:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=6203b6f06177a48c860d63f72afb78eaae556ebc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.2.0-incubating-rc3/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Who is adding karma to push changes to mnemonic git repo?

[Henry Saputra]

Hi All,

I am so sorry for cross posting to private, but I am wondering who added
karma to make changes to mnemonic git repository?

I dont see mnemonic entry in the
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure-puppet.git
authorization template file.

- Henry

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2]

[Henry Saputra]

LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file exists
Signature file looks good
Hash files look good
Source compiled
No 3rd party exes in source release artifact

+1


On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.1.2-incubating, release candidate 2. This
> is the first release of Mnemonic.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.2-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.2-incubating
>
> The release hash is 8b26f1480bd4d3fd9ced65f6598d5fa1378015ad:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=8b26f1480bd4d3fd9ced65f6598d5fa1378015ad
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-0.0.1
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>

Re: [IPMC SUPPORT] Help to fire a ticket to create a distribution folder for Mnemonic release

[Henry Saputra]

Ah cool, thanks for the quick turnaround, Uma

- Henry

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> I have just created a folder ³mnemonic² under
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On 5/12/16, 9:22 AM, "Wang, Yanping"  wrote:
>
> >Daniel Gruno added a comment - 6 days ago
> >Please have a mentor or another member of the IPMC set this up, they have
> >the access to do so.
> >
> >It looks like we need someone who has write access to go
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ and create a
> >subfolder Mnemonic there. So Gary can send release to:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic
> >
> >I am not sure if I have the access, I don't see where for me to login
> >even.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Yanping
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.sapu...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:53 AM
> >To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [IPMC SUPPORT] Help to fire a ticket to create a
> >distribution folder for Mnemonic release
> >
> >Ok, will take a look what is missing here.
> >
> >- Henry
> >
> >On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Gary  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi  Henry
> >>
> >>I currently use the following place to store RCs.
> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/  (staging
> >> repo)
> >>
> >>However once get voted, I think it should be moved to the following
> >> place.
> >>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic
> >> (release repo)
> >>
> >>if I understand correctly, Please help us to fire a ticket to ask
> >> infrastructure for release repo creation. Thanks.
> >>
> >> B.R,
> >> +Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/9/2016 11:11 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> >> > Hi Gary,
> >> >
> >> > I believe this has been solved?
> >> >
> >> > I see that there is now mnemonic distribution folder for the proposed
> >>RC.
> >> >
> >> > - Henry
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Gary  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Please help to create a ticket as following, Thanks.
> >> >>
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11812
> >> >> INFRA-11812: Create a distribution folder for Mnemonic release
> >> >>
> >> >> B.R
> >> >> +Gary.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: [IPMC SUPPORT] Help to fire a ticket to create a distribution folder for Mnemonic release

[Henry Saputra]

Ok, will take a look what is missing here.

- Henry

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi  Henry
>
>I currently use the following place to store RCs.
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/  (staging
> repo)
>
>However once get voted, I think it should be moved to the following
> place.
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic
> (release repo)
>
>if I understand correctly, Please help us to fire a ticket to ask
> infrastructure for release repo creation. Thanks.
>
> B.R,
> +Gary
>
>
> On 5/9/2016 11:11 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > I believe this has been solved?
> >
> > I see that there is now mnemonic distribution folder for the proposed RC.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Gary  wrote:
> >
> >> Please help to create a ticket as following, Thanks.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11812
> >> INFRA-11812: Create a distribution folder for Mnemonic release
> >>
> >> B.R
> >> +Gary.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Re: [IPMC SUPPORT] Help to fire a ticket to create a distribution folder for Mnemonic release

[Henry Saputra]

Hi Gary,

I believe this has been solved?

I see that there is now mnemonic distribution folder for the proposed RC.

- Henry

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Please help to create a ticket as following, Thanks.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11812
> INFRA-11812: Create a distribution folder for Mnemonic release
>
> B.R
> +Gary.
>
>
>

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Incubator Mnemonic Release v0.1.0-incubating

[Henry Saputra]

I am canceling this VOTE thread per input from Patrick

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hello
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache 
> Mnemonic (incubating)
> mnemonic-0.1.0-incubating.
>
> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found 
> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemnemonic-1035
>
> The Git tag is mnemonic-parent-0.1.0-incubating
> The Git commit ID is 
> 5e6e930d5c96568f8369f8123188d009359ba11chttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=c85ec4941cfba6be0da796c27cd650d92199405d
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following 
> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/garyw.asc
>
> KEYS file available 
> here:https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/KEYS
>
> 35 issues were closed/resolved for this 
> release:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items 
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The 
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-0.0.1
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> B.R,
> +Gary.
>
>
>

Re: May report draft

[Henry Saputra]

Looks good to me. Thanks for writing up the report.

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Wang, Yanping 
wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> I have following report for May 4th deadline.
> Please let me know if we have anything else to report. Or remove anything
> from following:
>
> =
>
> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> structured
> data processing and computing.
>
> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
>
>   Various metrics for April are as follows:
>
>   ++
>   |   Metric | counts  |
>   ++
>   | Non Merge Commits|  16 |
>   | Contributors |   4 |
>   | Jira New Issues  |  20 |
>   | Resolved Issues  |  24 |
>   | Pull Requests merged |   6 |
>   | Pull Requests proposed   |   7 |
>   ++
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
>   2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
> adding new contributors
>a. Mnemonic website is up:
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>b. Mnemonic cwiki is up:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/Apache+Mnemonic+Home
>   3. Develop new features: We are working in Native computing layer design.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
>   Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> We completed setting up infrastructure. Both project website and cwiki are
> up running. We are working on adding contents and documentation to the
> sites so new contributors and community members can get better view of what
> this project is and how to get involved.
> We realized, unlike other application level projects, library (or API)
> projects traditionally had less contributors until certain amount of
> adopters successfully integrated those libraries. We plan to help some
> integrations, such as HBase, Arrow, etc. after our first official code
> release.
> We submitted 2 proposals for Strata Hadoop World NYC.
> We will present Mnemonic project in upcoming ApacheCon Big Data conference
> on 5/11.
>
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>   We are designing the native computing infrastructure, built native
>   computing interface code.
>   In preparing first official release:
>1. Defined coding guidelines for the project. Reformatted
> all code based on defined coding style.
>2. Added the checkstyle to automate the checking process.
>3. Formalized the names of annotations, classes and methods.
>4. Removed the dependency of property mnemonic.core.version.
>5. Added a new profile for artifacts releasing and signing.
>6. Added release plugin and configuration for releasing.
>
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
>   No election, since the project is just starting.
>

Re: discuss website, logo, release, and integration ideas

[Henry Saputra]

Thanks for starting the discussion, Yanping.

As for IRC, would it be preferable to have IRC channels or Slack?

One of the advantages of Slack channel is ability to record history of the
chats.

- Henry

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Wang, Yanping 
wrote:

> Thanks Debo, yes, these are great to have.
> Based on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html we
> will work on documentations this week.
>
> Thanks,
> Yanping
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Debo Dutta (dedutta) [mailto:dedu...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:57 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: discuss website, logo, release, and integration ideas
>
> Also I setup 2 irc channels on freenode
>
> #apache-mnemonic
> #apache-mnemonic-dev
>
> Debo
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Wang, Yanping 
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Uma for setting cwiki up. I added the link to the status page.
> > So as off now the Infrastructure side for this project is complete.
> >
> > Thanks Debo created website structure, and Gary now is moving contents
> from original github to Apache site.
> >
> > Uma, Gary, and I discussed Logo again, we think it is a good idea to
> have 2 logos. one is
> http://nonvolatilecomputing.github.io/Mnemonic/images/mnemonic_logo.png
> with an option to add "Apache" above "Mnemonic" after graduation.
> > We can have another Square logo with just the Brain and "M", for
> twitter, cwiki, pages' header. What do you think?
> >
> > Many application developers do not familiar with library code. We now
> are preparing first 0.1.0 apache release, then we can discuss with other
> apache projects for integration ideas. Once we start integrating with other
> projects, we expect develop activities will pick up.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanping
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 11:54 AM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Kudos and keeping the status page updated.
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Cwiki space has been created for Mnemonic project now.
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/Apache+Mnemonic+Home
> >
> > Please create your accounts and get the access for creating/editing the
> > pages.
> >
> > @Yanping, you can also create presentations page and upload your
> > presentation talk tutorials in that page.
> > I will try to work on create "How to contribute² page.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Uma
> >
> >> On 4/15/16, 11:12 AM, "Gangumalla, Uma" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>  Here is the INFRA ticket for Cwiki space for Mnemonic.
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11693
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Uma
> >>
> >>> On 4/14/16, 7:37 AM, "Patrick Hunt"  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> cwiki is something like this:
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Index
> >>> (not that you should template based on what ZK does). vs the web site
> >>> http://zookeeper.apache.org/
> >>>
> >>> They are different things. You might peruse what other projects are
> >>> doing to get more insight.
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Wang, Yanping <
> yanping.w...@intel.com>
> >>> wrote:
>  Thanks Patrick for the advice. I will get a few things done based on
>  this list in next two days.
>  Does cwiki mean website? Debo and Gary is working on building project
>  website. Do we need to create infra such as
>  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-Mnemonic-site.git ?
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Yanping
> 
>  -Original Message-
>  From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org]
>  Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 3:49 PM
>  To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>  Subject: Kudos and keeping the status page updated.
> 
>  Hi folks. Kudos on getting bootstrapped and filing your first report.
>  I have been very impressed with the progress.
> 
>  One thing you should get into the habit of doing is reviewing your
>  incubation status page each/every time you file a report (prior to
>  filing the report really).
> 
>  I'm talking about this page:
>  http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>  and more specifically the "Incubation work items" section.  Please go
>  through the list ASAP and ensure that whatever is completed is noted
>  ("NA" is also possible) along with the date of _completion_. For
>  example it's very important to verify that all mentors are signed up
>  for the lists, hence an early item is "Subscribe all Mentors on the
>  pmc and general lists.", etc
> 
>  Additionally a few comments:
>  1) You should get your cwiki setup, I can help you with this if you
>  give me a cwiki account id for 1 or 2 folks that would like to start
>  as administrators for your "space".
> 
>  Typically you want all your "non product documentation" on the wiki,
>

Re: Mnemonic website go alive.

[Henry Saputra]

Great work, Gary!

Thanks for the update.

- Henry

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi, Mnemonic website has been online, Please visit following URL to check.
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>
> We continue to improve and add contents to this website, please give us
> your advice and contribute your code.
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mnemonic-site.git
>
> Thanks.
> +Gary.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Code review tools for Arrow patches

[Henry Saputra]

How about using Github Pull Requests as mechanism to do review?

So, all patches need to be done via Github mirror PRs, similar to Flink and
Spark and other new projects have been doing.

At AsterixDB we did Gerrit and has to do some tooling to make sure it
comply with ASF way.

- Henry

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Wang, Yanping 
wrote:

> I agree, we need a code review tools as well for Mnemonic. We are going to
> submit large patches. I include mnemonic dev list here for discussion.
>
> Thanks
>
> > On Apr 14, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Wes McKinney  wrote:
> >
> > hello all,
> >
> > We're reaching a junction where larger patches to the Arrow codebase
> > will become more frequent, and effective code reviews will be
> > important part of maintaining a high quality project going forward.
> >
> > In general, the GitHub pull request UI is not generally thought of as
> > very productive in large code reviews (some recent exposition on this
> > topic:
> http://www.beepsend.com/2016/04/05/abandoning-gitflow-github-favour-gerrit/
> ).
> > Many large engineering teams prefer such (git-centric) tools as
> > Gerrit, though there are other code review tools available.
> >
> > I don't think we are at a point where a particular code review process
> > should be enforced, but more that we should have more tools available
> > for groups of Arrow committers who wish to collaborate in a particular
> > way.
> >
> > As I'm familiar with Gerrit from working on Apache projects that
> > Cloudera's involved with, my bias would be to try to get an instance
> > set up so that larger patches can be reviewed in a more detailed and
> > transactional way. For example: we could use gerrit.cloudera.org (like
> > Kudu and Impala), but I would be happy to use any infrastructure
> > provider.
> >
> > There has been some resistance / inaction within the ASF to create an
> > ASF-managed Gerrit instance:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2205.
> >
> > I'm interested to hear other perspectives.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes
>

Re: Maintaining CHANGES.txt file for capturing project change log

[Henry Saputra]

Manual CHANGES.txt is not  very useful.

I am proposing big changes or any changes that change existing
functionalities should be accompanied with JIRA to help manage and track
changes.

- Henry

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> I think Yetus project has a tool to generate release notes from git log
> itself.
> I feel adding one entry for every commit in CHANGES.txt this is
> unnecessary step.
> In recent days we stopped tracking commit details in CHANGES.txt in Hadoop
> project as well, thinking this is unnecessary and Yetus can generate.
>
> May be until we integrate such tools, we can track CHANGES.txt as
> temporary solution? This would  basically useful for generating Release
> notes.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan  rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org>"  >
> Date: Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 10:24 AM
> To: "dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org>"  >
> Subject: Maintaining CHANGES.txt file for capturing project change log
>
> Hi All,
>
> I think we need to maintain CHANGES.txt file to capture the change log
> details which can be used for a full list of changes in a release. I'm
> attaching one sample file with this mail. This can be used and fill the
> change log details while committing next change in the project.
>
> Location of this file:
>
> master/CHANGES.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Rakesh
>

Re: Propose the first version v0.1.0

[Henry Saputra]

Please also review the incubator release guide:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html

It is not fully complete but should give idea on how to release in ASF as
incubator podling.

- Henry

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Yes I agree, Thanks.
>
> On 4/8/2016 5:08 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> > Hi, Gary
> >
> > I think the new features (Arrow integration and Native Computing) are
> not required for 0.1.0 release since they are in very early stage.
> >
> > 0.1.0 release will be the one we already fully tested and successfully
> used in integration.
> > I'd suggest we let the community to go through the code for a week.
> let's see if there is any issues. Then we can do a vote.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanping
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:21 PM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Propose the first version v0.1.0
> >
> > Hi dev
> >
> >I have closed the #MNEMONIC-15,  the code has been re-formatted
> > according to the rules from #Mnemonic-10 as well as Apache License,  so
> > by this point, should we based on the correct codebase to release the
> > first Mnemonic version v0.1.0 ? thanks.
> >
> > B.R,
> > +Gary.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.

[Henry Saputra]

Yep, just closed the issue

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi Henry,
>
>Thank you for your confirmation and advices, I just have tried to
> resolve that ticket but It looks I have no permission to close it,
> probably It is a different project from Mnemonic therefore that ticket
> have to be resolved/closed by your side so could you please help to
> resolve/close that ticket ?  Thanks.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>
>
> On 4/6/2016 11:25 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> > Yes, I think we are in good shape. Please do close the ticket as
> resolved.
> >
> > We need to manually merged the PR to ASF git repo instead of using Github
> > merge.
> >
> > If the commit message contains "This closes " the ASF bot will
> > automatically close the Github PR.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Gary  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed
> >> to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known,
> >> we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we
> >> can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
> >>
> >> On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> >>> It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is
> >> waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change
> of
> >> current Infra.
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
> >>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>
> >>> I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for
> user'.
> >>> Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rakesh
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.sapu...@gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
> >>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>>
> >>>> This one looks good to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do
> not
> >>>> think it is necessary.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Henry
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <
> yanping.w...@intel.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks all for the feedback.
> >>>>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as
> needed.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> >>>>> structured data processing and computing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> >>>>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Various metrics for March are as follows:
> >>>>>   ++
> >>>>>   |   Metric | counts  |
> >>>>>   ++
> >>>>>   | Non Merge Commits  |  82 |
> >>>>>   | Contributors   |  10 |
> >>>>>   | Jira New Issues   |  13 |
> >>>>>   | Resolved Issues   |   4 |
> >>>>>   | Pull Requests merged | |
> >>>>>   | Pull Requests proposed  |   3 |
> >>>>>   ++
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> >>>>>   2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list
> >> discussions,
> >>>>> adding new contributors
> 

Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.

[Henry Saputra]

Yes, I think we are in good shape. Please do close the ticket as resolved.

We need to manually merged the PR to ASF git repo instead of using Github
merge.

If the commit message contains "This closes " the ASF bot will
automatically close the Github PR.

- Henry

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed
> to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known,
> we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we
> can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
>
> On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> > It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is
> waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change of
> current Infra.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >
> > I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'.
> > Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
> >
> >
> > Rakesh
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sure :-)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.sapu...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
> >> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>
> >> This one looks good to me.
> >>
> >> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
> >> think it is necessary.
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks all for the feedback.
> >>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> >>> 
> >>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> >>> structured data processing and computing.
> >>>
> >>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> >>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
> >>>
> >>>  Various metrics for March are as follows:
> >>>   ++
> >>>   |   Metric | counts  |
> >>>   ++
> >>>   | Non Merge Commits  |  82 |
> >>>   | Contributors   |  10 |
> >>>   | Jira New Issues   |  13 |
> >>>   | Resolved Issues   |   4 |
> >>>   | Pull Requests merged | |
> >>>   | Pull Requests proposed  |   3 |
> >>>   ++
> >>>
> >>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> >>>
> >>>   1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> >>>   2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list
> discussions,
> >>> adding new contributors
> >>>   3. Develop new features
> >>>
> >>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> >>> aware of?
> >>> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How has the community developed since the last report?
> >>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> >>> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> >>> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are
> actively
> >>> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> >>> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> >>> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> >>> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
> >> Apache
> >>> project standard.
> >>> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> >>> pool

Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.

[Henry Saputra]

This one looks good to me.

Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
think it is necessary.

- Henry

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping 
wrote:

> Thanks all for the feedback.
> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> 
> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> structured data processing and computing.
>
> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
>
>  Various metrics for March are as follows:
>   ++
>   |   Metric | counts  |
>   ++
>   | Non Merge Commits  |  82 |
>   | Contributors   |  10 |
>   | Jira New Issues   |  13 |
>   | Resolved Issues   |   4 |
>   | Pull Requests merged | |
>   | Pull Requests proposed  |   3 |
>   ++
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
>   2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
> adding new contributors
>   3. Develop new features
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively
> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit Apache
> project standard.
> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> solved.
> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure,
> code standard, features for the project.
>
>
> Date of last release:
> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> No election, since the project is just starting.
> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
> proposed and added.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: saint@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> > Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> >
> > =
> >  Summary of podling reports 
> > * Still getting started at the Incubator
> > Mnemonic
> >
> >
> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>
>
> > 
> > Mnemonic
> > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > structured data processing and computing.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> >
> >
> s/in/into/
>
> FYI, delays are normal.
>
>
>
> > >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> > 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> > "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> > 2.
> > 3.
> >
> >
> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>
> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to work
> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
>
>
>
> > >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > aware of?
> > None
> >
> > >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> > No new development as the project was just moved in.
> > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other than
> 10
> > listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> >
> > Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> example reports on what folks do in here)
>
>
>
> > >>How has the project

Re: Please add me as a member of Apache Mnemonic in Github if appropriate

[Henry Saputra]

I have submitted INFRA ticket to follow up with this:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577

- Henry

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Thanks Henry for the explanation, Yes, That way would be great, I'm
> looking forward to this new feature :)
>
> On 3/30/2016 5:45 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> > No, the Github repository for Apache Mnemonic is only a mirror to ASF git
> > repository [1].
> > So you can not accept pull requests from github.
> >
> > But we could ask for advance integration with github so we when a merge
> to
> > ASF Git happen with comment This closes # it would
> automatically
> > close the PR.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Zheng, Kai  wrote:
> >
> >> There must be some setup to go with the PR push/pull process. Currently
> >> it's still read-only. Please fire a INFRA jira for this.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kai
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:27 AM
> >> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Please add me as a member of Apache Mnemonic in Github if
> >> appropriate
> >>
> >> I found I cannot accept pull request in Github so should I request to
> >> become a member of Apache Mnemonic in Github ? or what I can do for this
> >> case ? Thanks.
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Re: Please add me as a member of Apache Mnemonic in Github if appropriate

[Henry Saputra]

No, the Github repository for Apache Mnemonic is only a mirror to ASF git
repository [1].
So you can not accept pull requests from github.

But we could ask for advance integration with github so we when a merge to
ASF Git happen with comment This closes # it would automatically
close the PR.

- Henry

[1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Zheng, Kai  wrote:

> There must be some setup to go with the PR push/pull process. Currently
> it's still read-only. Please fire a INFRA jira for this.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:27 AM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Please add me as a member of Apache Mnemonic in Github if
> appropriate
>
> I found I cannot accept pull request in Github so should I request to
> become a member of Apache Mnemonic in Github ? or what I can do for this
> case ? Thanks.
>
>

[jira] [Commented] (MNEMONIC-3) set up http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org web page

[Henry Saputra (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-3?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15219110#comment-15219110
 ] 

Henry Saputra commented on MNEMONIC-3:
--

It is actually combination of JS and MD files converted via Jekyll [1]

[1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/blob/asf-site/improve-website.md

> set up http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org web page
> 
>
> Key: MNEMONIC-3
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-3
> Project: Mnemonic
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Yanping Wang
>Assignee: Debo Dutta
>
> After source code move into  Git 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mnemonic.git  and JIRA set 
> at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC  we shall build 
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Re: A Proposal Apache Incubator Mnemonic as an alternative infra. for Apache Arrow

[Henry Saputra]

The community for both podlings are bigger than the ones show up at Strata
=)

Would love to have the summary of the discussions in the dev@ list if
indeed some discussions happening at Strata.

- Henry

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Wang, Yanping 
wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> I met with Jacques today at Strata, we think it would be great that Arrow
> and Mnemonic communities can have a F2F meeting together to talk about our
> integration.
> I have following two days, 4/11 Monday afternoon, or 4/15 Friday.
> We can meet at  intel SC campus.
>
> Would you let me know if you are able to join us and which day you'd
> prefer?
>
> Thanks
> Yanping
>
>
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Gary  ga...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree with you and that's great if we could brainstorm here to
> collect more ideas about enabling non-volatile memory usage for Apache
> Arrow through Mnemonic.
>
> for the questions, my ideas are:
>
>
> - Right now you are using unpooled persistent memory. Does that make sense
> or does chunking make more sense?
>
> Gary: I think it could make some sense if developer knows that their
> datasets are very big and they want Apache Arrow to keep most of them in
> memory for intensive computing e.g. sort.
>   the developer certainly can spill their Mnemonic managed
> datasets into disk but this way seems a bit inefficient in some scenarios
> that might depend on concrete application logic .
>
>
> - What do you think is the right way to transition back and forth between
> persistent and ephemeral memory? What do you think will be the first
> pattern to be adopted. For example, do you think we should try to use it as
> a tiered storage for sort spilling (before hitting the disk), or should we
> use it for caching?
> Gary: my 2 cents, the netty library looks not yet provide a elegant switch
> mechanism for Arrow to use, probably we can change the logic around
> "initialCapacity > directArena.chunkSize" to control which buffer put on
> off-heap or managed by Mnemonic, another approach is to let memory
> clustering mechanism of Mnemonic managing hybrid memory-like spaces instead
> of part logics of class PooledByteBufAllocatorL.
> Regarding the sorting, I think it is a typical case of random access to
> the data, we should avoid spilling as much as possible.
> my 2 cents, the performance could be
> all in off-heap if possible > mnemonic used as cache > all in mnemonic
> using NVMe/disk >  off-heap + spilling
> the code simplicity would be
> all in off-heap if possible >  all in mnemonic using NVMe/disk > mnemonic
> used as cache >  off-heap + spilling
>
> the reason why the mode "mnemonic used as cache + spilling" probably
> unnecessary is mnemonic could provide nearly equivalent capacity of disk.
>
> Thanks.
> Gary.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Jacques Nadeau [mailto:jacq...@apache.org]
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:05 AM
>
> To:  d...@arrow.apache.org d...@arrow.apache.org>
>
> Subject: Re: A Proposal Apache Incubator Mnemonic as an alternative infra.
> for Apache Arrow
>
>
>
> This is super cool. A couple of questions:
>
>
>
> - Right now you are using unpooled persistent memory. Does that make sense
> or does chunking make more sense?
>
> - What do you think is the right way to transition back and forth between
> persistent and ephemeral memory? What do you think will be the first
> pattern to be adopted. For example, do you think we should try to use it as
> a tiered storage for sort spilling (before hitting the disk), or should we
> use it for caching?
>
>
>
> I think it will be much easier to think about this in the context of a
> primary or first use case. Do you have something in mind or should we
> brainstorm here?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Gary  ga...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> >We have created a patch for Apache Arrow to leverage Apache
>
> > incubator Mnemonic as an alternative infra. for underlying memory
>
> > resources allocation, you can find it as below forked repo.
>
> >
>
> > 
> https://github.com/NonVolatileComputing/arrow
>
> >
>
> > By this way, Apache Arrow could take some structural benefits from
>
> > Mnemonic project they are
>
> >
>
> > - Arrow is able to leverage larger capacity of high performance
>
> > hybrid storage devices. e.g. high-end SSD, NVMe
>
> >
>
> > - Mnemonic provide a potential opportunity for Arrow to
>
> > optimize/tuning its allocation algorithms as a native Arrow-oriented
>
> > allocation services
>
> >
>
> > - The non-volatile features of  Mnemonic make it possible that
>
> > Arrow could make its columnar in-memory data shared between different
>
> > applications or across life-cycle of single application
>
> >
>
> > - Arrow could take advantages of coming Mnemonic features of
>
> > memory clustering/DOG (distributed object graph) and massive native
>
> > computing
>
> >
>
> > - Mnemonic h

Re: A Proposal Apache Incubator Mnemonic as an alternative infra. for Apache Arrow

[Henry Saputra]

+1

Let's focus on bringing code to ASF as soon as possible for now

On Thursday, March 24, 2016, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> >By the way, I thought we should try to boost this project up in the ASF
> >space and have the first release out as soon as possible. Is there any
> >plan or update for that?
>
> >Note Apache Arrow itself is still in the very early stage. The
> >integration would be good to happen when the both have their first
> >releases out.
>
> Agreed. It should move on from now and just noticed a mail from secretary
> about CCLA mail from Intel. So, code movement should happen now.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On 3/24/16, 2:03 AM, "Zheng, Kai" >
> wrote:
>
> >By the way, I thought we should try to boost this project up in the ASF
> >space and have the first release out as soon as possible. Is there any
> >plan or update for that?
> >
> >Note Apache Arrow itself is still in the very early stage. The
> >integration would be good to happen when the both have their first
> >releases out.
>
>

Re: Mnemonic JIRA is now live

[Henry Saputra]

We need to send INFRA ticket to allow change in mnemonic JIRA project to
allow contributor to assign issue to themselves.

This is due to stupid change requested by Spark PMC while back to change
default contributor to not able to assign issue to themselves.

- Henry

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> Hi Yanping,
>
> My username: umamaheswararao
>
> >As a new project, the jira rule may be the looser the better, because we
> >may want to avoid too much overhead in the early phase. For example, any
> >contributor can create issue and then assign it. Not sure if this is
> >doable in a jira system.
>
> I think for this, we need to set them in project permissions, it should be
> possible. IMO, its ok to give that permissions to Contributors(some one
> can request a committer to add him to contributors list) to assign JIRA.
> But yes, any jira user should be able to create issues.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On 3/11/16, 1:25 PM, "Henry Saputra"  wrote:
>
> >Yanping, please do add all initial comitters and mentors to committer role
> >in the JIRA project.
> >
> >My JIRA username: hsaputra
> >
> >- Henry
> >
> >On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> >> The jira is now active. Please contact Yanping about getting role
> >> permissions.
> >>
> >> Role permissions are needed in order to manage the jiras for the
> >> project. e.g. who can be assigned jiras (e.g. contributor role) or who
> >> can move jiras through the workflow (e.g. committer role), etc...
> >>
> >> Note that when you request a role you need to specify your _JIRA_
> >> username, which might not be the same as your apache id.
> >>
> >> I currently listed Yanping as an Admin, if there are other that would
> >> like admin privs Yanping can address that as well.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
>
>

Re: Mnemonic JIRA is now live

[Henry Saputra]

Yanping, please do add all initial comitters and mentors to committer role
in the JIRA project.

My JIRA username: hsaputra

- Henry

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> The jira is now active. Please contact Yanping about getting role
> permissions.
>
> Role permissions are needed in order to manage the jiras for the
> project. e.g. who can be assigned jiras (e.g. contributor role) or who
> can move jiras through the workflow (e.g. committer role), etc...
>
> Note that when you request a role you need to specify your _JIRA_
> username, which might not be the same as your apache id.
>
> I currently listed Yanping as an Admin, if there are other that would
> like admin privs Yanping can address that as well.
>
> Patrick
>

Re: "Additional Interested Contributors" question

[Henry Saputra]

The proposal does not indicate them as initial committers so we should not
accept the request, for now.

But they definitely welcomed with contributions to the project.

- Henry

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> I got a request to join private@ from someone on the "additional
> interested contributors" list from the incubator proposal document
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MnemonicProposal
>
> Is the intent for these folks to be listed as PPMC/Committers from the
> get-go or not? (if not then they can't be on the private@ list).
> Typically the initial committers are also the initial PPMC members.
>
> You folks will need to decide pretty soon whether you automatically
> want to make new committers PPMC members or not.
>
> Patrick
>
> ps. you'll also need to decide whether you want to use CTR or RTC.
>

Re: Mnemonic JIRA is now live

[Henry Saputra]

Yes, good call =)

- Henry

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Note that I've cc'd the dev list, I just assumed most folks hadn't
> signed up yet (please do so asap).
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
> > Thanks so much for driving the bootstrapping of the project, Patrick.
> >
> > Let's move the discussions to dev@ list.
> >
> > Please subscribe to the newly minted lists by send email to :
> >
> > private-subscr...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > dev-subscr...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > commits-subscr...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > and follow the instruction listed in the response email.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >>
> >> The jira is now active. Please contact Yanping about getting role
> >> permissions.
> >>
> >> Role permissions are needed in order to manage the jiras for the
> >> project. e.g. who can be assigned jiras (e.g. contributor role) or who
> >> can move jiras through the workflow (e.g. committer role), etc...
> >>
> >> Note that when you request a role you need to specify your _JIRA_
> >> username, which might not be the same as your apache id.
> >>
> >> I currently listed Yanping as an Admin, if there are other that would
> >> like admin privs Yanping can address that as well.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >
> >
>

Re: Mnemonic JIRA is now live

[Henry Saputra]

Thanks so much for driving the bootstrapping of the project, Patrick.

Let's move the discussions to dev@ list.

Please subscribe to the newly minted lists by send email to :

private-subscr...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
dev-subscr...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
commits-subscr...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org

and follow the instruction listed in the response email.

Thanks,

- Henry

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> The jira is now active. Please contact Yanping about getting role
> permissions.
>
> Role permissions are needed in order to manage the jiras for the
> project. e.g. who can be assigned jiras (e.g. contributor role) or who
> can move jiras through the workflow (e.g. committer role), etc...
>
> Note that when you request a role you need to specify your _JIRA_
> username, which might not be the same as your apache id.
>
> I currently listed Yanping as an Admin, if there are other that would
> like admin privs Yanping can address that as well.
>
> Patrick
>