Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall

[Yuzhen Fan]

Hi Oliver and all,

It also happens on OOo 3.3.0 besides on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0 and AOO 4.1.0
RC2.
There is an existing bug 13669[1] in Bugzilla which was closed as
irreproducible in 2003, I reopen it with reproducible steps and confirmed
versions above.

[1] *Issue 13669*
 - program
group does not get removed after uninstall


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> Hi Oliver,
>
> It has same problem on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0.
>
> I am downloading OOo 3.3.0, will check it when I get the installation
> package.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when
>>> it
>>> recovers to me:
>>>
>>> 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install)
>>> 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of
>>> installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below)
>>> 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish
>>>
>>> Problem: the startup group "OpenOffice 4.1.0" is empty(it is expected)
>>> while the group icon still remains
>>>
>>>
>> Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO
>> 3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Oliver.
>>
>>  Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's
>>> uninstaller
>>> in Control Panel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Empty startup group remains, should be removed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Display About OpenOffice

[osimeno]

 Hi,
I had installed the openoffice 4,there are some problems maybe you can 
help me.
My system is rhel6.3_X64 and use chinese .
My first step :   tar -xvf openoffice -C /usr/src/
My second step : cd /usr/src/zh-CN/RPMS
 rpm - ivh openoffice-*
My third step :  cd  desktop*
 rpm -ivh openoffice4.0-redhat*
And i had reboot the system.
the problem is that:

so can you help me?

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Carl Marcum]

On 04/10/2014 07:15 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

Carl,

I have the new Netbeans plugin. I created a new Add-on project (just an empty 
one that does nothing), compiled and generated the .OXT. The Extension manager 
still rejects it and OpenOffice crashes. I was able to install the extension 
mentioned here with success.

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the
dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I
developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works
fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a
recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below
please). However, the extension manager will take the module located
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
e-openoffice

Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was 
not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!

-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 
3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice 
Netbeans module to create the Add-on.

-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what 
is wrong with my extension

http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac
h
e-openoffice


it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with 
extensions.

I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in
a few sentences what exactly you try

- which programming language do you use
- which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
- ...

Juergen





-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do 
not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash is 
cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because 
pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to the 
RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.

=>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = 
CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
   [2] 
dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
 = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = 
CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
   [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, 
doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 
675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
   [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = 
'\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in "dp_backend.cxx"

I really need to get over this hurdle.

-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  addExtension is 
called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and 
caught on line 819.  Then on line 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original 
status"  then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which 
happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am 
not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not 
correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).

[1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, 
nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), 
at 0xf83516a2 [3] 
dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = 
CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

Carl, 

I have the new Netbeans plugin. I created a new Add-on project (just an empty 
one that does nothing), compiled and generated the .OXT. The Extension manager 
still rejects it and OpenOffice crashes. I was able to install the extension 
mentioned here with success.

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the 
> dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I 
> developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works 
> fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a 
> recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below 
> please). However, the extension manager will take the module located 
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
> e-openoffice
>
> Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was 
> not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 
> OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the 
> OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>> I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so 
>> what is wrong with my extension
>>
>> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac
>> h
>> e-openoffice
>
> it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes 
> with extensions.
>
> I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in 
> a few sentences what exactly you try
>
> - which programming language do you use
> - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
> - ...
>
> Juergen
>
>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steele, Raymond
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
>> To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>>
>> Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I 
>> do not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash is 
>> cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because 
>> pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to the 
>> RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.
>>
>> =>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 
>> 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
>>   [2] 
>> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
>>  = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, 
>> abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
>>   [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 
>> 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = 
>> CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
>>   [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, 
>> startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in 
>> "dp_backend.cxx"
>>
>> I really need to get over this hurdle.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steele, Raymond
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>>
>> I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  
>> addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a 
>> RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819.  Then on line 
>> 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original status"  then call 
>> activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an 
>> attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not 
>> sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something 
>> is not correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).
>>
>> [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 
>> 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
>> privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 
>> 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] 
>> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl:

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

The stack trace at the crash does lead me down into that area of the code.

[1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack 
=0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294,xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec,0x0, 
0x0), at 0xf83516a2 
[3]dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
 = 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, 
abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx

Also, I was able to install the extension mentioned here with success.

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577



-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 4:02 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

This e-mail message contained a file attachment that was blocked per Lockheed 
Martin Corporate Information Security Requirements.  Certain file types are 
being blocked from entering Lockheed Martin in order to minimize risk to 
Corporate computing and information resources. 

If a business need exists and you must receive this file, alternate methods 
have been approved for use by Corporate Information Security for receipt and 
review of files/attachments.  For more information and options for handling 
blocked attachments, visit E-mail Attachment Security, at
http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/isafe/topics.e-attachments.cfm

The current list of allowed attachment types is located at:  

http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/awareness/e-msging/allowed_attachments.cfm

If additional assistance is required, please contact the Lockheed Martin 
Service Desk at 1-800-435-7063.

==
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:41:28PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Thanks, but I am totally lost when you mention "bridge".

Literally, a bridge, for example a bridge from your compiler's C++ ABI to UNO 
and back. See the stuff under /trunk/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/

Strange crashes not reproducible on other platforms like the ones you describe 
here and in "RE: EXTERNAL: Re: DisposedException" may point to something broken 
there.


Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:41:28PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Thanks, but I am totally lost when you mention "bridge".

Literally, a bridge, for example a bridge from your compiler's C++ ABI
to UNO and back. See the stuff under /trunk/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/

Strange crashes not reproducible on other platforms like the ones you
describe here and in "RE: EXTERNAL: Re: DisposedException" may point to
something broken there.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpj3wV_5ofqa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

Thanks, but I am totally lost when you mention "bridge".

-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:40 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

This e-mail message contained a file attachment that was blocked per Lockheed 
Martin Corporate Information Security Requirements.  Certain file types are 
being blocked from entering Lockheed Martin in order to minimize risk to 
Corporate computing and information resources. 

If a business need exists and you must receive this file, alternate methods 
have been approved for use by Corporate Information Security for receipt and 
review of files/attachments.  For more information and options for handling 
blocked attachments, visit E-mail Attachment Security, at
http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/isafe/topics.e-attachments.cfm

The current list of allowed attachment types is located at:  

http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/awareness/e-msging/allowed_attachments.cfm

If additional assistance is required, please contact the Lockheed Martin 
Service Desk at 1-800-435-7063.

==
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:01:22PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Thanks Ariel.  I compiled the code myself for Solaris 11 using Solaris Studio 
> 12.3 compilers.

This might be the difference between OOo 3.3 and the AOO 4 you built
yourself: OOo 3.3 was compiled with Sun Studio 12 / C++-5.9 according to 
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers
Studio 12.3 comes with C++ 5.12 according to 
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24457_01/html/E21991/bkabe.html#scrolltoc
The compiler might have changed in a way that broke the bridge.


Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:01:22PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Thanks Ariel.  I compiled the code myself for Solaris 11 using Solaris Studio 
> 12.3 compilers.

This might be the difference between OOo 3.3 and the AOO 4 you built
yourself: OOo 3.3 was compiled with Sun Studio 12 / C++-5.9 according to
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers
Studio 12.3 comes with C++ 5.12 according to
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24457_01/html/E21991/bkabe.html#scrolltoc
The compiler might have changed in a way that broke the bridge.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpQjeAqnJ0s6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

Carl, 

I could scan and email you files if you could tell me which ones would be 
interesting to you.

Thanks,

Raymond

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the 
> dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I 
> developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works 
> fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a 
> recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below 
> please). However, the extension manager will take the module located 
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
> e-openoffice
>
> Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was 
> not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 
> OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the 
> OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>> I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so 
>> what is wrong with my extension
>>
>> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac
>> h
>> e-openoffice
>
> it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes 
> with extensions.
>
> I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in 
> a few sentences what exactly you try
>
> - which programming language do you use
> - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
> - ...
>
> Juergen
>
>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steele, Raymond
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
>> To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>>
>> Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I 
>> do not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash is 
>> cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because 
>> pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to the 
>> RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.
>>
>> =>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 
>> 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
>>   [2] 
>> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
>>  = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, 
>> abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
>>   [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 
>> 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = 
>> CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
>>   [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, 
>> startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in 
>> "dp_backend.cxx"
>>
>> I really need to get over this hurdle.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steele, Raymond
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>>
>> I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  
>> addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a 
>> RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819.  Then on line 
>> 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original status"  then call 
>> activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an 
>> attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not 
>> sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something 
>> is not correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).
>>
>> [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 
>> 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
>> privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 
>> 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] 
>> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
>>  0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = 
>> false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
>>
>>
>>
>> -

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

Thanks Ariel.  I compiled the code myself for Solaris 11 using Solaris Studio 
12.3 compilers.

-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:58 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

This e-mail message contained a file attachment that was blocked per Lockheed 
Martin Corporate Information Security Requirements.  Certain file types are 
being blocked from entering Lockheed Martin in order to minimize risk to 
Corporate computing and information resources. 

If a business need exists and you must receive this file, alternate methods 
have been approved for use by Corporate Information Security for receipt and 
review of files/attachments.  For more information and options for handling 
blocked attachments, visit E-mail Attachment Security, at
http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/isafe/topics.e-attachments.cfm

The current list of allowed attachment types is located at:  

http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/awareness/e-msging/allowed_attachments.cfm

If additional assistance is required, please contact the Lockheed Martin 
Service Desk at 1-800-435-7063.

==
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:31:39PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the 
> dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I 
> developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works 
> fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a 
> recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below 
> please). However, the extension manager will take the module located 
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
> e-openoffice
> 
> Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt 
> that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!

You don't mention from where you got that AOO 4 for Solaris; nobody here builds 
on Solaris, so all that strange crashes you mention on your mails sound like a 
broken bridge on that platform (and that's where the bug you quote in one of 
your mails is pointing to, but in that case to a broken bridge after a GCC 
version update on Linux).

That said, I know nothing about the bridge related code, so sorry I cannot help.

Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

Thanks Carl!  Unfortunately,  I will not be able to send you the .oxt file. 
Sorry. I am now looking over the additional information that you and Kay Schenk 
provided.

-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the 
> dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I 
> developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works 
> fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a 
> recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below 
> please). However, the extension manager will take the module located 
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
> e-openoffice
>
> Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was 
> not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 
> OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the 
> OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>> I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so 
>> what is wrong with my extension
>>
>> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac
>> h
>> e-openoffice
>
> it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes 
> with extensions.
>
> I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in 
> a few sentences what exactly you try
>
> - which programming language do you use
> - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
> - ...
>
> Juergen
>
>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steele, Raymond
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
>> To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>>
>> Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I 
>> do not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash is 
>> cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because 
>> pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to the 
>> RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.
>>
>> =>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 
>> 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
>>   [2] 
>> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
>>  = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, 
>> abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
>>   [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 
>> 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = 
>> CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
>>   [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, 
>> startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in 
>> "dp_backend.cxx"
>>
>> I really need to get over this hurdle.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steele, Raymond
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>>
>> I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  
>> addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a 
>> RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819.  Then on line 
>> 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original status"  then call 
>> activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an 
>> attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not 
>> sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something 
>> is not correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).
>>
>> [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 
>> 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
>> privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 
>> 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] 
>> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
>>  0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = 
>> false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS)

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:31:39PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the
> dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that
> I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works
> fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after
> a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below
> please). However, the extension manager will take the module located
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice
> 
> Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt
> that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!

You don't mention from where you got that AOO 4 for Solaris; nobody here
builds on Solaris, so all that strange crashes you mention on your mails
sound like a broken bridge on that platform (and that's where the bug
you quote in one of your mails is pointing to, but in that case to
a broken bridge after a GCC version update on Linux).

That said, I know nothing about the bridge related code, so sorry
I cannot help.

Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpdQywmCqbgg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Carl Marcum]

On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the dev list 
and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using 
the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since 
I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not 
take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the 
module located 
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice

Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was 
not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!

-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 
3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice 
Netbeans module to create the Add-on.

-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:

I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what 
is wrong with my extension

http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
e-openoffice


it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with 
extensions.

I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few 
sentences what exactly you try

- which programming language do you use
- which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
- ...

Juergen





-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do 
not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash is 
cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because 
pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to the 
RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.

=>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = 
CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
  [2] 
dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
 = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = 
CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
  [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, 
doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 
675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
  [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = 
'\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in "dp_backend.cxx"

I really need to get over this hurdle.

-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  addExtension is 
called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and 
caught on line 819.  Then on line 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original 
status"  then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which 
happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am 
not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not 
correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).

[1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, 
nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), 
at 0xf83516a2 [3] 
dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = 
CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"



-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum  wrote:


On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:


I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created
another simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive
the same crash.  I don't know where to go from here.

   ...


Raymond,

What version of AOO and netbeans are you using.

For

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Kay Schenk]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steele, Raymond
wrote:

> I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the dev
> list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I
> developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine
> on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the
> Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the
> extension manager will take the module located
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice
>
> Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that
> was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!
>

You might take a look at this wiki page:

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions/Extensions_and_Apache_OpenOffice_4.0

I will try to make it easier to find.


>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10
> OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used
> the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
>
> On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> > I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so
> what is wrong with my extension
> >
> > http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
> > e-openoffice
>
> it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes
> with extensions.
>
> I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a
> few sentences what exactly you try
>
> - which programming language do you use
> - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
> - ...
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steele, Raymond
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
> > To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
> > Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
> >
> > Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a
> hand. I do not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash
> is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx
> because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to
> the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.
> >
> > =>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface =
> 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
> >  [2]
> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
> = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false,
> abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
> >  [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this =
> 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel =
> CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
> >  [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this =
> 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line
> 725 in "dp_backend.cxx"
> >
> > I really need to get over this hurdle.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steele, Raymond
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
> >
> > I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.
>  addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a
> RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819.  Then on line
> 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original status"  then call
> activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an
> attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not
> sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something
> is not correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).
> >
> > [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack =
> 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2]
> privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250,
> 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3]
> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
> 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup =
> false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in
> "dp_component.cxx"
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net]
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashe

Re: Error

[FR web forum]

Read this: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=65670

- Mail original -
De: "David Center" 
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 10 Avril 2014 18:53:11
Objet: Error

When I try to install OO 4.0.1, I get a message saying to exit 4.0.1. How can 
one exit a program that is in the process of being installed? 
The program is definitely not installed on my computer. 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

[Steele, Raymond]

I am cross posting here since I am not getting  much traction on the dev list 
and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using 
the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since 
I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not 
take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the 
module located 
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice

Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was 
not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great!

-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 
3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice 
Netbeans module to create the Add-on. 

-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what 
> is wrong with my extension
>  
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach
> e-openoffice

it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with 
extensions.

I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few 
sentences what exactly you try

- which programming language do you use
- which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ...
- ...

Juergen


> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM
> To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
> 
> Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I 
> do not understand what is going on here.  I suspect that the crash is 
> cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because 
> pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the  stack trace leading up to the 
> RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file.  
> 
> =>[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 
> 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in "Reference.hxx"
>  [2] 
> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this
>  = 0xea4f9a88,   _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, 
> abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
>  [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 
> 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, 
> xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in "dp_backend.cxx"
>  [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, 
> startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in 
> "dp_backend.cxx"
> 
> I really need to get over this hurdle.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
> 
> I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined.  
> addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However,  a 
> RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819.  Then on line 
> 830,  the code then tries to recover the "original status"  then call 
> activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an 
> attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not 
> sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is 
> not correct.  Here is high level stack trace (typed out).
> 
> [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 
> 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] 
> privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 
> 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] 
> dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this-
>  0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = 
> false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in "dp_component.cxx"
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
> 
> On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
>>>
 I am not convinced the issue is with the extension.  I created 
 another simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive 
 the same crash.

Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599

[Kay Schenk]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Andre Fischer  wrote:

> On 10.04.2014 06:55, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors
>> and comments provided in this bug, the "expected behaviors" for upgrade on
>> Windows could be:
>>
>
> Good idea.  Good text but maybe a native speaker can tweek the wording.
>
> -Andre
>
>
>
>> 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation
>> Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version
>> - If select "Remove all older product versions", then 3.x will be removed
>> and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry
>> in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x
>> - If de-select "Remove all older product versions", then 4.x will be
>> installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop
>> icons
>> and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one
>> suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x
>>
>> 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing
>> one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and
>> the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1
>> entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one.
>>
>> I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the
>> installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any
>> objections?
>>
>
This sounds good. We can tweak the wording as needed. It would also be very
helpful to provide a screen shot of the installation wizard for case #1 I
think.


>> [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.
>> html#winoverview
>> [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
>> versions correctly
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>>
>>  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,

 The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26)

>>> does
>>>
 not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for
 Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old
 version for an upgrade installation.

 I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when

>>> submit
>>>
 the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with

>>> details
>>>
 as below:

 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to
 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc)
 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows,
 Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on

>>> Linux
>>>
 and Mac, but need confirmation

 That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for
 testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding.

  You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate!
>>> Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit
>>> patches which we can review.  We could use help from all folks using our
>>> installation binaries on this.
>>>
>>>
>>>  [1]
 http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview
 [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
 versions correctly

 --
 Regards,
 Yu Zhen


>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> 
>>> -
>>> MzK
>>>
>>> "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
>>>   for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
>>> -- James Mason
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-
MzK

"Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
 for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
   -- James Mason

Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599

[Pedro Lino]

Sounds perfect. Adding options (instead of assuming and deciding for the
user) is always positive ;)

Please make sure that the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors
> and comments provided in this bug, the "expected behaviors" for upgrade on
> Windows could be:
>
> 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation
> Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version
> - If select "Remove all older product versions", then 3.x will be removed
> and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry
> in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x
> - If de-select "Remove all older product versions", then 4.x will be
> installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons
> and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one
> suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x
>
> 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing
> one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and
> the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1
> entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one.
>
> I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the
> installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any
> objections?
>
> [1]
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview
> [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
> versions correctly
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26)
> > does
> > > not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for
> > > Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old
> > > version for an upgrade installation.
> > >
> > > I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when
> > submit
> > > the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with
> > details
> > > as below:
> > >
> > > 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to
> > > 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc)
> > > 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows,
> > > Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on
> > Linux
> > > and Mac, but need confirmation
> > >
> > > That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for
> > > testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding.
> > >
> >
> > You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate!
> > Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit
> > patches which we can review.  We could use help from all folks using our
> > installation binaries on this.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview
> > > [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
> > > versions correctly
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> -
> > MzK
> >
> > "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
> >  for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
> >-- James Mason
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

[CANCELED][VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)

[Jürgen Schmidt]

as reported earlier we found additional showstopper that are critical
enough to prepare a further RC candidate and start a new vote.

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639

and potentially
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124636
I am not sure if it is really a showstopper it is broken since 4.0. Well
the related code is sub optimal to say it careful and the behaviour
changed indirectly because of other changes.


Juergen



On 4/8/14 11:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>  Hi all,
> 
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
> 
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
> 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
> iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step
> forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on
> Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A long
> and overdue "must do" shift forward to support newer APIs (replace
> deprecated APIs)  and platforms on MacOS.
> And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now
> support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to
> 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai.
> 
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the
> success of OpenOffice.
> 
> An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RC2_fixes.html
> 
> The RC2 fixed 4 further problems:
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124509
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124394
> 
> The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary
> releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and
> review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1585426! And a
> fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
> 
> The vote starts now and will be open until:
> 
>Friday, 11 April: 2014-04-11 11:00am UTC+2.
> 
> But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
> to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
> members.
> 
>[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
>[ ]  0 Don't care
>[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> 
> 
> (1) the upload for the Linux artifacts is still ongoing, expected to be
> available in 2-3 hours.
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 4/9/14 5:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 2014, at 8:46 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt"  wrote:
>>
>> We found a new showstopper 124639 and have to prepare a new RC 3.
>>
> 
> IMHO it would be best if, in such cases, the Release Manager formally
> propose to end the previous vote. This reinforces the fact that the
> PMC decides when a vote fails or not.
> 
> An easy way to do this is to send a note like, "I propose to cancel
> the current vote because . If there are no objections
> the vote is canceled"
> 
> That gives the opportunity for someone to object. In that case the
> vote would continue.

Objection is possible at any time but to me it is clear that we don't
want release with existing critical showstopper. And of course we
clearly differentiate between issues that are edge cases for one
platform only, issues that are reproducible on all platforms and are
crashes or regressions or issues less critical but requested as
showstopper and where a fix is in place.

Juergen

> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> But nevertheless we found several showstopper issues late in RC builds.
>> Even in code that is in the product since December last year.
>>
>> I would like to invite all volunteers to test the current available RC2
>> more intensive and report potential problems.
>>
>> A new RC 3 build will be prepared later this week.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>>> On 4/8/14 11:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
>>> (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>>>
>>> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
>>> 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
>>> iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step
>>> forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on
>>> Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A long
>>> and overdue "must do" shift forward to support newer APIs (replace
>>> deprecated APIs)  and platforms on MacOS.
>>> And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now
>>> support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to
>>> 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai.
>>>
>>> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the
>>> success of OpenOffice.
>>>
>>> An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RC2_fixes.html
>>>
>>> The RC2 fixed 4 further problems:
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4599
>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4607
>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4509
>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4394
>>>
>>> The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary
>>> releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and
>>> review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>
>>> The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1585426! And a
>>> fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
>>>
>>> The vote starts now and will be open until:
>>>
>>>   Friday, 11 April: 2014-04-11 11:00am UTC+2.
>>>
>>> But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
>>> to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
>>> members.
>>>
>>>   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
>>>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>>>   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (1) the upload for the Linux artifacts is still ongoing, expected to be
>>> available in 2-3 hours.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall

[Yuzhen Fan]

Hi Oliver,

It has same problem on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0.

I am downloading OOo 3.3.0, will check it when I get the installation
package.


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when
>> it
>> recovers to me:
>>
>> 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install)
>> 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of
>> installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below)
>> 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish
>>
>> Problem: the startup group "OpenOffice 4.1.0" is empty(it is expected)
>> while the group icon still remains
>>
>>
> Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO
> 3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Oliver.
>
>  Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's
>> uninstaller
>> in Control Panel
>>
>>
>>
>> Empty startup group remains, should be removed
>>
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: ApacheCon Denver, genLang and buildsystem talk.

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 4/10/14 5:40 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi
> 
> For those interested, my presentations around AOO can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~jani/genlang.pdf

do you have any concrete time plan for the integration of genLang in
AOOs build env? It would be a huge step forward

> http://people.apache.org/~jani/buildSysAOO.pdf

if the numbers become true I can't wait to see this in practise ;-) But
of course I am a little bit skeptical and have many questions in my
mind... Anyway nice outlook and I hope we can move on here.

Juergen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: review requested: [Issue 124639] 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) : [Attachment 83159] patch to solve the defect

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 10.04.2014 10:37, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann  has asked  for review:
Issue 124639: 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing
(without error message)
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639

Attachment 83159: patch to solve the defect
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83159&action=edit



A fix is available as attachment to the issue and as a commit on trunk.

Please provide a code review.
It is intended to integrate this fix into branch AOO410 for our 4.1.0 
release.



Best regards, Oliver.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

review requested: [Issue 124639] 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) : [Attachment 83159] patch to solve the defect

[bugzilla]

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann  has asked  for review:
Issue 124639: 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing
(without error message)
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639

Attachment 83159: patch to solve the defect
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83159&action=edit

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.0_release_blocker granted: [Issue 124617] no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC

[bugzilla]

j...@apache.org has granted h...@apache.org 's request for
4.1.0_release_blocker:
Issue 124617: no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617


--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
grant showstopper flag, crash

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124617] no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC

[bugzilla]

h...@apache.org  has asked  for 4.1.0_release_blocker:
Issue 124617: no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.0_release_blocker granted: [Issue 124639] 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message)

[bugzilla]

j...@apache.org has granted Shenfeng Liu 's request for
4.1.0_release_blocker:
Issue 124639: 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing
(without error message)
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599

[Alexandro Colorado]

On 4/8/14, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26)
>> does
>> not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for
>> Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old
>> version for an upgrade installation.
>>
>> I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when
>> submit
>> the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with
>> details
>> as below:
>>
>> 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to
>> 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc)
>> 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows,
>> Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on
>> Linux
>> and Mac, but need confirmation
>>
>> That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for
>> testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding.
>>
>
> You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate!
> Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit
> patches which we can review.  We could use help from all folks using our
> installation binaries on this.

Should this be on d...@openoffice.apache.org?

>
>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview
>> [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
>> versions correctly
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Yu Zhen
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -
> MzK
>
> "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
>  for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
>-- James Mason
>


-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599

[Andre Fischer]

On 10.04.2014 06:55, Yuzhen Fan wrote:

Hi all,

Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors
and comments provided in this bug, the "expected behaviors" for upgrade on
Windows could be:


Good idea.  Good text but maybe a native speaker can tweek the wording.

-Andre



1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation
Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version
- If select "Remove all older product versions", then 3.x will be removed
and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry
in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x
- If de-select "Remove all older product versions", then 4.x will be
installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons
and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one
suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x

2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing
one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and
the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1
entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one.

I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the
installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any
objections?

[1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview
[2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
versions correctly


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:


Hi,

The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26)

does

not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for
Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old
version for an upgrade installation.

I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when

submit

the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with

details

as below:

1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to
3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc)
2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows,
Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on

Linux

and Mac, but need confirmation

That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for
testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding.


You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate!
Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit
patches which we can review.  We could use help from all folks using our
installation binaries on this.



[1]
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview
[2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former
versions correctly

--
Regards,
Yu Zhen




--

-
MzK

"Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
  for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
-- James Mason







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Apply for editing permission of AOO 4.1 发行说明（简体中文）

[Andrea Pescetti]

lilinuuup wrote:

I am going to help translate the English version of AOO 4.1 into
zh_CN Chinese version. Could you give me the editing permission ? My
username is "Celine". Thank you very much.


Permission granted. Make sure you work on the translated version and not 
on the original one (i.e., if a zh_CN version does not exist yet, create 
it by copying the English page; ask if you have doubts).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote:

Hi all,

Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it
recovers to me:

1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install)
2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of
installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below)
3. Check startup group after uninstall finish

Problem: the startup group "OpenOffice 4.1.0" is empty(it is expected)
while the group icon still remains



Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO 
3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well?


Thanks in advance,
Oliver.


Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller
in Control Panel



Empty startup group remains, should be removed




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Apply for editing permission of AOO 4.1 发行说明（简体中文）

[lilinuuup]

Hi,
 
I am going to help translate the English version of AOO 4.1 into zh_CN Chinese 
version. Could you give me the editing permission ? My username is "Celine". 
Thank you very much.

Best Regards,
Celine