Re: In regards to Open Office
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > > and a very little bit is my opinion also: > MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to > grumble about MS > > Maybe, but sponsoring the ASF also shouldn't undermine contributors' free speech. > > > Greetings, > Jörg > > Damjan
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Hello, for my understanding, beside doing a good build it is necessary to have and totest defined reference builds. The way I see it, it is not easy to do a good build if you didn't have enough practice doing it. I didn't myself any C/C++ build before. So IHMO I will waste time to improve my build environment instead of testing a reference build My results of testing belong to the reference builds published as RC1 at dist.apache.org. Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries. Otherwise support becomes hell. Kind regards Am 04.10.2016 um 01:58 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > Mechtilde Stehmann -- ## Apache OpenOffice.org ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client ## PGP encryption welcome ## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
Hello all, I would like to propose to publish _Open Office_ as _Apache Foundation_ on the Apple store. I am always dissapointed when I see some unknown developer publishes Open Source, and the Project itself is not present. Afaik this costs money (99$/year). Here is a blog post that explains the details what is involved as effort: https://www.raywenderlich.com/127936/submit-an-app-part-1 Does the Apache Foundation allow this? What does such a move involve on our side? Where can we get the money from? Do we want to do this on a general thought? I would volunteer as a Apple Store publisher, if it comes down for volunteers who do it. But I think this is only the last piece to think about. all the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:52:50PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > There were German dictionary changes. In this case, we only update the dictionaries to the latest version available at the time, but there is nothing else to check here, the dictionaries do not belong to the AOO source nor this project; if they have issues, they should be reported to their respective maintainers. > Can you tell the difference between > de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each of the > other dialects? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference > between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each > of the other dialects? > There are differences between the german languages spoken and written (officially) in Switzerland, Austria and Germany. For an example de_CH do not know a "ß", they write "ss" alltimes. There are also distinctions in vocabulary. You can find more information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_German Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: In regards to Open Office
On 03.10.2016 12:14, Jörg Schmidt wrote: But [MS Office] OOXML is not what we could label a real open format. There are parts that still refer to proprietary bits. fud, or show me exactly what parts you mean Well, I dont know if it is exactly a fud. There is a cornerstone truce to this. Do not forget Microsoft was pretty much surprised by the success of ODF specification becoming a public ISO Standard. Their first definition was hastely published, in Microsoft style. It was a agressive reponse. The stake back then was high for both sides. Media did support all sorts of sides in this time. With ODF becoming ISO standard, the doors into US public service were open. This was acclaimed as a break of the Microsoft Office monopol. As much as I remeber the OOXML allows you to add binary files directly into the document, which are not further defined. I mean it could be anything, and only Microsoft Office did know what it saved in these spots. So yea the standard could techicly be only a shell and still remain intransparent. But IMHO it was only a specification flaw. For OpenSource warriors this was of course the invitation battle MS. I think on Open source front, the success of ODF changed the attitude of embracing other Formats. Before that there was a strong drive to make the Microsoft binary formats work. And support to support other Formats. This will dropped after the success of ODF. But with OOXML tied to MS, and OO focusing on ODF the seperation on the market was imident, which was bad for bizzness. So I think it turned a little when Novell (looking back, who had already bad experience with a similar situation n the UNIX market ;) ) made the cooperation deal with Microsoft to jointly work on both formats. It is the turning point for Microsoft from fighting open source to embrace it. However I think the bad Karma from the days still sticks for most people. Ballmer style just broke to much Glass in his time and MS just was to good Empire for the Rebellion. I do belive that real openess is about choice, not about transparency. Transperency is about trust. ODF has a better trancperency then OOXML. But beeing open we need to embrace and value both formats. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Apache OpenOffice release notification
The Apache OpenOffice project is currently preparing and testing a release candidate, 4.1.3-rc1. The total size of the artifacts, including the binary files, exceeds a gigabyte, so the release policy calls for notifying Infrastructure. I do not expect significant Infrastructure impact because AOO is normally downloaded from SourceForge, not ASF or its mirrors. Please contact me or post to dev@openoffice.apache.org if you need more details. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Infra notification?
Hi Patricia, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > What is the total size of our binaries? Linux 32 12759M Linux 64 13328M Windows 6178M macOS 7185M This includes hashes and signatures. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3
On 10/03/2016 10:20 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Carl, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/ with ./configure \ --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" \ --enable-verbose \ --with-system-stdlibs \ --enable-crashdump=yes \ --enable-category-b \ --enable-wiki-publisher \ --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ --enable-opengl \ --enable-dbus \ --enable-gstreamer \ --with-package-format="rpm deb" \ --with-lang="${LANGS}" \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --with-package-format="installed" \ --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60 and getting ... downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 downloading to /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part download from http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed (404 Not Found) download failed epm-3.7.tar.gz exists making and entering /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/ can not find the dmake package Should I be using a different dmake? apache-extras used googlecode, which is dead. Both the building guide and configure's help point to a working dmake url: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO413/main/configure.in?revision=1761303&view=markup#l29 http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 Regards Thanks Ariel !! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Hi Carl, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: > On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there > >are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we > >have a complete release candidate. > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/ > > with > ./configure \ > --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" > \ > --enable-verbose \ > --with-system-stdlibs \ > --enable-crashdump=yes \ > --enable-category-b \ > --enable-wiki-publisher \ > --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ > --enable-opengl \ > --enable-dbus \ > --enable-gstreamer \ > --with-package-format="rpm deb" \ > --with-lang="${LANGS}" \ > --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > \ > --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ > --with-package-format="installed" \ > --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60 > > > and getting > ... > downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > downloading to > /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part > download from > http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed > (404 Not Found) > download failed > epm-3.7.tar.gz exists > making and entering > /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/ > can not find the dmake package > > Should I be using a different dmake? apache-extras used googlecode, which is dead. Both the building guide and configure's help point to a working dmake url: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO413/main/configure.in?revision=1761303&view=markup#l29 http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3
On 10/03/2016 09:58 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/ with ./configure \ --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" \ --enable-verbose \ --with-system-stdlibs \ --enable-crashdump=yes \ --enable-category-b \ --enable-wiki-publisher \ --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ --enable-opengl \ --enable-dbus \ --enable-gstreamer \ --with-package-format="rpm deb" \ --with-lang="${LANGS}" \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --with-package-format="installed" \ --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60 and getting ... downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 downloading to /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part download from http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed (404 Not Found) download failed epm-3.7.tar.gz exists making and entering /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/ can not find the dmake package Should I be using a different dmake? Sorry, I just found the updated build scripts. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Infra notification?
According to http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#heads-up, infra needs to be notified in advance of releases of more than 1GB. What is the total size of our binaries? Do our releases really count for this, because most downloading will be from SourceForge, not ASF mirrors. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/ with ./configure \ --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" \ --enable-verbose \ --with-system-stdlibs \ --enable-crashdump=yes \ --enable-category-b \ --enable-wiki-publisher \ --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ --enable-opengl \ --enable-dbus \ --enable-gstreamer \ --with-package-format="rpm deb" \ --with-lang="${LANGS}" \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --with-package-format="installed" \ --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60 and getting ... downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 downloading to /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part download from http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed (404 Not Found) download failed epm-3.7.tar.gz exists making and entering /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/ can not find the dmake package Should I be using a different dmake? Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record, trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used the .bz2 for my tests!). For my testing, I'm assuming that it is enough to be sure a package is identical to one I've tested. In particular, the .bz2 and .gz decompress to the same .tar file, so I don't even plan to extract one of the tar files for further checks. ah, great hint. I've uncompressed all 3 files, diff'ed the .tar.bz2 and .tar.gz files, and finally uncompressed all files until the actual dirs/files. All 3 dirs had the same total file size of 1,541,414,704 bytes. This has to be enough when it comes to "you have to check all source files". Tomorrow I'll build the release from a package file. @Andrea: Can you please check the "apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion. I am doing a build directly from the source distribution, but I've also done a "diff -r" between it and the svn, and only found the expected differences. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record, trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used the .bz2 for my tests!). For my testing, I'm assuming that it is enough to be sure a package is identical to one I've tested. In particular, the .bz2 and .gz decompress to the same .tar file, so I don't even plan to extract one of the tar files for further checks. ah, great hint. I've uncompressed all 3 files, diff'ed the .tar.bz2 and .tar.gz files, and finally uncompressed all files until the actual dirs/files. All 3 dirs had the same total file size of 1,541,414,704 bytes. This has to be enough when it comes to "you have to check all source files". Tomorrow I'll build the release from a package file. @Andrea: Can you please check the "apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record, trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used the .bz2 for my tests!). For my testing, I'm assuming that it is enough to be sure a package is identical to one I've tested. In particular, the .bz2 and .gz decompress to the same .tar file, so I don't even plan to extract one of the tar files for further checks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Translate offline
On 30/09/2016 Claudio Ferreia Filho wrote: i continue doing some translations to AOO, but I saw that translate.apache.org is offline. If someone can do something to warn the infra, is a good thing. It is one of the monitored services by Apache Infra, so notifications are sent out when it is offline and it is usually promptly restored. I see it is working normally now, but I didn't receive any downtime notifications for it during the last week. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record, trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used the .bz2 for my tests!). Nevertheless, when there are still no objections we should start the vote in the very next days. I understand that we want to reduce the vote to a pure formality (meaning: being sure that the vote passes), and this is good to do to avoid waste of time. Based on what I've done/seen so far, personally and through feedback from the list, I'm already quite sure of my +1 when the vote starts. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
No problem so far with some use with Writer, Impress and Calc (not much). Both with EN-US core install with French package (on kids account). Hagar Le 25/09/2016 à 20:33, Marcus a écrit : Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: In regards to Open Office
Le 03/10/2016 à 12:14, Jörg Schmidt a écrit : From: Hagar Delest [mailto:hagar.del...@laposte.net] I think that ODF was designed to be a fully open standard to give the users back the property of their own data. No, that's not correct. ODF was written this it was compatible with the capabilities of the program OOo. This is a purely technical issue, and does not mean the ODF would therefore not designed open. Even if it came from a previous format, the goal was to make a documented format to allow compatibility with other applications. So not designed from scratch, agreed, but changes made for interoperability. That's how I understand the target of ODF. But [MS Office] OOXML is not what we could label a real open format. There are parts that still refer to proprietary bits. fud, or show me exactly what parts you mean e.g. the old binary formats has MS disclosed, see: https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/office/cc313105(v=office.14).aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/office/gg615407(v=office.14).aspx I admit that most of my knowledge come from the time when the OOXML was being ISO approved. I found this as a more recent reference : http://courseweb.ischool.illinois.edu/~stanley8/LIS590DPL/standards/docformats.html I remember also the groklaw site: http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20051216153153504 There was plenty of technical details. But maybe it has changed. I've not really followed what happened afterward. and please respect one: I'm working for free and open source software for over 10 years, however therefore I do not work primary against MS - for my thinking MS is a competitor, not an enemy for me. There is no enemy. Agreed. But Users should be aware of the rules. BTW, you say that MS is a Platinum sponsor, but you mean for Apache? Or for AOO? That's not the same IMHO. Well, I'm just a user in the end. If you technical guys think that it's fine as it is, so be it. Hagar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Do you know which particular changes I should look for? The dictionaries are from december 2015, so I had them already in use in 4.1.2. But I can confirm that the difference between "schließen" (de/de-AT) and "schliessen" (de-CH) is recognised. Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference > between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in > each of the other dialects? > > On 10/3/2016 12:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I installed and tested the german version (de) on: >> >> - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) >> - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit) >> >> Everything is working as expected. >> >> regards >> >> Matthias >> >> >> Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. >>> >>> I did also some work with it without problems >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Mechtilde >>> >>> Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: > Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as >> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote >> period >> until we have a complete release candidate. > thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows > builds. I've done the following for testing: Installation Windows 10 -- Windows deOK Windows de langpackOK Windows en-USOK Windows en-US langpackOK Fedora 21 64-bit Linux x86-64 rpm deOK Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK Quick test == Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK Release data Version number, "About" dialogOK Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, this quick test should be good enough. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as > there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period > until we have a complete release candidate. Testing latest 4.1.3 Development en-US on Windows with the following configuration: System Configuration: Processor: Intel Core i5 CPU M560 @2.67GHz Installed Memory: 2.00 GB (1.6 usable) Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit With the following results: Download Files fileStatus exe Completed pgp signature Completed md5 hashCompleted sha256 hash Completed Verify exe against Files Status pgp signature Verified md5 hasfVerified sha256 hash Verified Install AOO413m1(Build:9783) - Rev. 1761381 2016-09-29 02:39:19 Successful Using as installed version with no problems at this time. Regard Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Am 10/03/2016 09:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the PMC member's control. See http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me decide when to start a vote. I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file? I believe it does have to be from the zip etc. but I am not sure. The actual wording is: "Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform." wow, *all signed source code packages* ? What a bummer. ;-) OK, I'll do that testing tomorrow. Nevertheless, when there are still no objections we should start the vote in the very next days. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell
Thank you Yakov very much . I will check the resources you have sent to me. Regards, Giorgi On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Yakov Reztsov wrote: > Hello, > I think you can make Georgia hunspell dictionary in UTF-8 encoding. > After creating the hunspell dictionary it needs to be packed to OpenOffice > extension like this: > http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english- > dictionaries-apache-openoffice > The author of this expansion has created a utility for easy editing > OpenOffice dictionary - Proofing Tool GUI http://marcoagpinto. > cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html > > > > >Понедельник, 3 октября 2016, 14:42 +03:00 от Giorgi Vakhtangishvili <>: > > > >Hello OpenOffice, > > > >I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't > >know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am. > > > >We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from > >Georgia. > > > >The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in > >Georgia, that we are now trying to solve and we think that you can help us > >a lot: > > > >As you may know, Georgia has it's own alphabet but there is no support of > >our written language's SpellChecker in such big softwares, like > OpenOffice, > >LibreOffice, Chrome, Opera, Safari and etc. These softwares are used in > >Georgia everyday and there's a big demand for integration of Georgian > Spell > >Checker in them. > > > >Currently, our team is working on it and as one of the options of > >fulfilling our goal is to create Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell's Open > >Source library. As long as, Hunspell is used by the Softwares mentioned > >above, it will automatically add support of Georgian spell checker to them > >too. > > > >This is the reason I'm writing to you. > > > >What do you think about it ? Are we on a right track ? > >We tried to contact to Nemeth but unfortunately got no answer from him. > Can > >you help me with contacting Hunspell team ? > >Is it possible to contribute to Hunspell Library and add Georgian spell > >checker to it ? > >What are the steps and requirements to get through this process ? > > > > > >We hope for your support and guidance. > > > >Regards, > >Giorgi Vakhtangishvili. > > > >-- > >*Giorgi Vakhtangishvili* > > > >*CTO, Developer* > > > >*GeoLab* > > > >*g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge < g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge >* > > > -- > > Yakov Reztsov > -- *Giorgi Vakhtangishvili* *CTO, Developer* *GeoLab* *g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge *
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me decide when to start a vote. Done on Linux-64, successful. I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file? I believe it does have to be from the zip etc. but I am not sure. This might is an assumption in the documentation, but the differences between the two are documented at https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127148 and are really minimal: the build is not affected at all, so I would consider them equivalent in practice. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each of the other dialects? On 10/3/2016 12:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hello, I installed and tested the german version (de) on: - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit) Everything is working as expected. regards Matthias Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde: Hello, I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. I did also some work with it without problems Regards Mechtilde Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds. I've done the following for testing: Installation Windows 10 -- Windows deOK Windows de langpackOK Windows en-USOK Windows en-US langpackOK Fedora 21 64-bit Linux x86-64 rpm deOK Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK Quick test == Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK Release data Version number, "About" dialogOK Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, this quick test should be good enough. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the PMC member's control. See http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me decide when to start a vote. I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file? I believe it does have to be from the zip etc. but I am not sure. The actual wording is: "Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the PMC member's control. See http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me decide when to start a vote. I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file? Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Testing 4.1.3 - source builds
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the PMC member's control. See http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me decide when to start a vote. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Am 10/03/2016 09:19 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: I installed and tested the german version (de) on: - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit) Everything is working as expected. I got a mail from Jan that his tests on Win 7 were successful, too. I hope he can post this also on his own here. Marcus Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde: Hello, I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. I did also some work with it without problems Regards Mechtilde Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds. I've done the following for testing: Installation Windows 10 -- Windows deOK Windows de langpackOK Windows en-USOK Windows en-US langpackOK Fedora 21 64-bit Linux x86-64 rpm deOK Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK Quick test == Starting, creating files, saving, copy& pasting and quittingOK Release data Version number, "About" dialogOK Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, this quick test should be good enough. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Hello, I installed and tested the german version (de) on: - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit) Everything is working as expected. regards Matthias Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello, > > I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. > > I did also some work with it without problems > > Regards > > Mechtilde > > Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: >> Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. >>> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows >>> builds. >> I've done the following for testing: >> >> Installation >> >> >> Windows 10 >> -- >> Windows deOK >> Windows de langpackOK >> Windows en-USOK >> Windows en-US langpackOK >> >> Fedora 21 64-bit >> >> Linux x86-64 rpm deOK >> Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK >> Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK >> Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK >> >> Quick test >> == >> Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK >> >> Release data >> >> Version number, "About" dialogOK >> >> Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, >> this quick test should be good enough. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?
+1 :) Keith N. McKenna schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016, 18:09: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release > >> manager to decide on them. > > > > If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with > > me. > > > > > > Regards > > > +1 here also > > Keith > > -- Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu verhandeln.
Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE
Well, I would like to check first if the report is an issue or not. I am happy with the Answer as is for now. John D'Orazio schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016, 16:53: > > > > does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? > >> > > > > Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please > > note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. > So > > you don't can open the properties for a control.) > > Select a control and open the properties for it. > > > I believe he is referring to the source code, to fix a bad string. He is > asking, if I understand correctly, which module in the source code is used > for building the AOO dialogs... > > Regards, John > -- Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu verhandeln.
Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release >> manager to decide on them. > > If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with > me. > > > Regards > +1 here also Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell
Hello, I think you can make Georgia hunspell dictionary in UTF-8 encoding. After creating the hunspell dictionary it needs to be packed to OpenOffice extension like this: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice The author of this expansion has created a utility for easy editing OpenOffice dictionary - Proofing Tool GUI http://marcoagpinto.cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html >Понедельник, 3 октября 2016, 14:42 +03:00 от Giorgi Vakhtangishvili <>: > >Hello OpenOffice, > >I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't >know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am. > >We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from >Georgia. > >The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in >Georgia, that we are now trying to solve and we think that you can help us >a lot: > >As you may know, Georgia has it's own alphabet but there is no support of >our written language's SpellChecker in such big softwares, like OpenOffice, >LibreOffice, Chrome, Opera, Safari and etc. These softwares are used in >Georgia everyday and there's a big demand for integration of Georgian Spell >Checker in them. > >Currently, our team is working on it and as one of the options of >fulfilling our goal is to create Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell's Open >Source library. As long as, Hunspell is used by the Softwares mentioned >above, it will automatically add support of Georgian spell checker to them >too. > >This is the reason I'm writing to you. > >What do you think about it ? Are we on a right track ? >We tried to contact to Nemeth but unfortunately got no answer from him. Can >you help me with contacting Hunspell team ? >Is it possible to contribute to Hunspell Library and add Georgian spell >checker to it ? >What are the steps and requirements to get through this process ? > > >We hope for your support and guidance. > >Regards, >Giorgi Vakhtangishvili. > >-- >*Giorgi Vakhtangishvili* > >*CTO, Developer* > >*GeoLab* > >*g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge < g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge >* -- Yakov Reztsov
Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE
> > does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? >> > > Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please > note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. So > you don't can open the properties for a control.) > Select a control and open the properties for it. > I believe he is referring to the source code, to fix a bad string. He is asking, if I understand correctly, which module in the source code is used for building the AOO dialogs... Regards, John
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Out of an irresistible curiosity I built my own ApacheOO in Debian Unstable (Sid). It took me several build iterations, starting out with trunk and proceeding to: svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO413 On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:29:26 +0200 > Mechtilde wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. >> >> I did also some work with it without problems >> >> Regards >> >> Mechtilde > > > I installed the Linux x86-64 DEB en-GB and am using it for routine text > editing on reasonable sized files (70-300K words) and a little spreadsheet > work. Running on Xubuntu 16.04. > Working correctly. > > Rory > > >> >> Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: >> > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >> >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as >> >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period >> >>> until we have a complete release candidate. >> >> >> >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows >> >> builds. >> > >> > I've done the following for testing: >> > >> > Installation >> > >> > >> > Windows 10 >> > -- >> > Windows deOK >> > Windows de langpackOK >> > Windows en-USOK >> > Windows en-US langpackOK >> > >> > Fedora 21 64-bit >> > >> > Linux x86-64 rpm deOK >> > Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK >> > Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK >> > Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK >> > >> > Quick test >> > == >> > Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK >> > >> > Release data >> > >> > Version number, "About" dialogOK >> > >> > Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, >> > this quick test should be good enough. >> > >> > Marcus >> > patched epm-3.7 (otherwise, produces 'intel' instead of 'amd64' and won't install in Debian AMD64) autoconf ./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") `uname -nsm`" --with-dmake-path=/usr/local/bin/dmake --with-epm=/usr/bin/epm --disable-odk --enable-graphite --enable-category-b --enable-bundled-dictionaries --enable-pdfimport --enable-wiki-publisher --with-package-format="rpm deb" --with-lang="en-US ru de" ./bootstrap sudo su (as this did not work: fakeroot /usr/bin/ksh ) source ./LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh cd instsetoo_native/ build --all -P8 -- -P8 Love the generated OO in Debian ;-) using with approximately 70 k word document and it's cool. < https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtxF6h8VUAEdnhx.png:large > Thank you for wonderful software release. Best Professional Regards. -- Jose R R http://metztli.it - Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS - from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:29:26 +0200 Mechtilde wrote: > Hello, > > I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. > > I did also some work with it without problems > > Regards > > Mechtilde I installed the Linux x86-64 DEB en-GB and am using it for routine text editing on reasonable sized files (70-300K words) and a little spreadsheet work. Running on Xubuntu 16.04. Working correctly. Rory > > Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: > > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: > >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as > >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period > >>> until we have a complete release candidate. > >> > >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows > >> builds. > > > > I've done the following for testing: > > > > Installation > > > > > > Windows 10 > > -- > > Windows deOK > > Windows de langpackOK > > Windows en-USOK > > Windows en-US langpackOK > > > > Fedora 21 64-bit > > > > Linux x86-64 rpm deOK > > Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK > > Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK > > Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK > > > > Quick test > > == > > Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK > > > > Release data > > > > Version number, "About" dialogOK > > > > Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, > > this quick test should be good enough. > > > > Marcus > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > -- > Mechtilde Stehmann > -- > ## Apache OpenOffice.org > ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows > ## Debian > ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client > ## PGP encryption welcome > ## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F > -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell
Hello OpenOffice, I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am. We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from Georgia. The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in Georgia, that we are now trying to solve and we think that you can help us a lot: As you may know, Georgia has it's own alphabet but there is no support of our written language's SpellChecker in such big softwares, like OpenOffice, LibreOffice, Chrome, Opera, Safari and etc. These softwares are used in Georgia everyday and there's a big demand for integration of Georgian Spell Checker in them. Currently, our team is working on it and as one of the options of fulfilling our goal is to create Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell's Open Source library. As long as, Hunspell is used by the Softwares mentioned above, it will automatically add support of Georgian spell checker to them too. This is the reason I'm writing to you. What do you think about it ? Are we on a right track ? We tried to contact to Nemeth but unfortunately got no answer from him. Can you help me with contacting Hunspell team ? Is it possible to contribute to Hunspell Library and add Georgian spell checker to it ? What are the steps and requirements to get through this process ? We hope for your support and guidance. Regards, Giorgi Vakhtangishvili. -- *Giorgi Vakhtangishvili* *CTO, Developer* *GeoLab* *g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge *
Re: Updates
Am 10/02/2016 10:57 PM, schrieb David Batchelor: I am using open office 4.1.2 and I love this product very much. thank you :-) We appreciate this very much. How do I automatically or manually update any and all new versions that may come in the future? For a new version you need to uninstall the old and then install the new version. Will I be notified by open office? Yes. When OpenOffice is running there will be a little yellow update notification shown in the top right corner. What steps do I need to take to do any updates, as I want to insure I am using the latest version at all times? In order to see the currently installed version, you can have a look into the About dialog (see menu "Help - About OpenOffice"). HTH Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Hello, I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. I did also some work with it without problems Regards Mechtilde Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period >>> until we have a complete release candidate. >> >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows >> builds. > > I've done the following for testing: > > Installation > > > Windows 10 > -- > Windows deOK > Windows de langpackOK > Windows en-USOK > Windows en-US langpackOK > > Fedora 21 64-bit > > Linux x86-64 rpm deOK > Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK > Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK > Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK > > Quick test > == > Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK > > Release data > > Version number, "About" dialogOK > > Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, > this quick test should be good enough. > > Marcus > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- Mechtilde Stehmann -- ## Apache OpenOffice.org ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client ## PGP encryption welcome ## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?
Am 09/30/2016 07:15 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with me. I would be very happy to have Ariel as Release Manager. +1 me, too. :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate. thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds. I've done the following for testing: Installation Windows 10 -- Windows de OK Windows de langpack OK Windows en-US OK Windows en-US langpack OK Fedora 21 64-bit Linux x86-64 rpm de OK Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK Linux x86-64 rpm en-US OK Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpack OK Quick test == Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quitting OK Release data Version number, "About" dialogOK Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small, this quick test should be good enough. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE
Hello Peter! does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. So you don't can open the properties for a control.) Select a control and open the properties for it. Regards, Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: In regards to Open Office
> From: Hagar Delest [mailto:hagar.del...@laposte.net] > I think that ODF was designed to be a fully open standard to > give the users back the property of their own data. No, that's not correct. ODF was written this it was compatible with the capabilities of the program OOo. This is a purely technical issue, and does not mean the ODF would therefore not designed open. > But [MS Office] OOXML is not what we could label a real open > format. There are parts that still refer to proprietary bits. fud, or show me exactly what parts you mean e.g. the old binary formats has MS disclosed, see: https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/office/cc313105(v=office.14).aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/office/gg615407(v=office.14).aspx and please respect one: I'm working for free and open source software for over 10 years, however therefore I do not work primary against MS - for my thinking MS is a competitor, not an enemy for me. Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: In regards to Open Office
+1 exactly, that's what I meant and a little bit is my opinion also: MS is not longer a _fundamental_ opponent of free software more and a very little bit is my opinion also: MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to grumble about MS Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: In regards to Open Office
> -Original Message- > From: Xen [mailto:l...@xenhideout.nl] > Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 7:29 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: In regards to Open Office > > Rory O'Farrell schreef op 02-10-2016 15:59: > > Top posting: > > > > This thread is going off at half cock! > > > > Hagar's implied point was that any change in editor is > almost certain > > to cause some alteration (greater or lesser) in formatting. > Why this > > should be and whether the precise file format is > responsible is hardly > > relevant. > > > > Rory > > Jörg was only mentioning that the ODF format was also > designed without > compatibility in mind, and that it is an equal situation. exactly, that's what I meant and a little bit is my opinion also: MS is not longer a _fundamental_ opponent of free software more and a very little bit is my opinion also: MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to grumble about MS Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE
Hi, does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? I do not know what the modul udk is? I am not sure if this became obsolete with time. all the best Peter