Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
+1 for 2.0 for CDI 2.0 don't know about 1.5... 2014-08-30 16:16 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > tomcat does +1 on all major for each spec release (2.5 -> 6, 3.0 -> 7, > 3.1 -> 8...) > > I don't like 1.5 cause it doesn't make any sense but I don't care > enough about version to fight for it. > > Seems it passed Mark ;) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-08-30 14:20 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener : > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Mark Struberg > wrote: > >> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > > > > +1, awfully confusing w/o it. > > > > -- > > Eric Covener > > cove...@gmail.com >
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
tomcat does +1 on all major for each spec release (2.5 -> 6, 3.0 -> 7, 3.1 -> 8...) I don't like 1.5 cause it doesn't make any sense but I don't care enough about version to fight for it. Seems it passed Mark ;) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-30 14:20 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener : > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > > +1, awfully confusing w/o it. > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? +1, awfully confusing w/o it. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
+1 This is not because we did not do it that we can not try to do better. >From a user point of view I also think it's easier Le 30 août 2014 09:01, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Hi! > > with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers > are somehow in sync with the spec. > > What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > We did not do any release yet... > > LieGrue, > strub >
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
@mark: +1 (that's what we are doing in myfaces as well and it's way easier for users) @romain: i know what you mean, but we can keep it in sync with v2+ regards, gerhard 2014-08-30 10:26 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg : > +1 for that > > > Am 30.08.14 09:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter : > > >Hi! > > > >with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our > >numbers are somehow in sync with the spec. > > > >What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > >We did not do any release yet... > > > >LieGrue, > >strub > >
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
What's the tomcat way? Disregard sync? On 30 August 2014 10:26, Arne Limburg wrote: > +1 for that > > > Am 30.08.14 09:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter : > > >Hi! > > > >with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our > >numbers are somehow in sync with the spec. > > > >What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > >We did not do any release yet... > > > >LieGrue, > >strub > >
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
+1 for that Am 30.08.14 09:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter : >Hi! > >with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our >numbers are somehow in sync with the spec. > >What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? >We did not do any release yet... > >LieGrue, >strub
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
-1. Would have been great if 1.1 and 1.2 would have been aligned as well. Id just do as tomcat now Le 30 août 2014 08:01, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Hi! > > with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers > are somehow in sync with the spec. > > What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > We did not do any release yet... > > LieGrue, > strub >
rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Hi! with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers are somehow in sync with the spec. What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT? We did not do any release yet... LieGrue, strub
