Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0
To clarify, what on Maven staging repository (search for "sedona", 12 artifacts in total): https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories Is not source distribution. It’s the Maven Java repository of artifacts (binaries) Again the office ASF vote is on src. On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:12 AM vongosling wrote: > Hi, > > I also checked the source code, the name of the decompressed file is > incubator-sedona-sedona-1.0.0-incubator... It's confusing. > > And I see that the size of files reaches almost 600 MB +. There are a lot > of HDF files. I just wonder do we have a plan to optimize here :-) > > Here's a list of the Apache Incubation Project releases[1] memo, which > could solve some of my words. Remember, this is just a reference. For the > initial release in apache, I generally recommend that we could solve some > of the key issues at the beginning. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469 > > vongosling 于2021年1月13日周三 下午3:43写道： > > > > > I would like to make some more comments since the broken message as Felix > > said. > > > > 4. It is recommended that the final package name be > > sedona-core_2.11-incubating instead of [2](the source code is too large). > > You must have at least src distribution(That's ok now, but do we only > > distribute source code?). Use the sha512 signature. > > > > 5. I have not checked the copyright-related issues and the compilation is > > not passed. I hope that the compilation can pass in rc2. At the same > time, > > I also call on our committer to help verify it carefully and carefully. > We > > are more strict in the first release. If careful enough, I'm sure we'll > be > > able to publish it before rc3. > > > > If you have any questions, refer to the voting results of other items in > > the incubation list. Of course, you are welcome to discuss it in your > email. > > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;quick-sedona > > > > Felix Cheung 于2021年1月13日周三 下午1:59写道： > > > >> We should definitely have the source release on > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > >> > >> We are voting for source release (and the git tag) - binaries are for > >> convenience. > >> > >> Von, can you clarify the final package name inline? I think you are > >> looking > >> at the artifact ID not a package name? > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 6:09 PM vongosling wrote: > >> > >> > I'd love to vote +1, but after I've looked at this release, I'm > sorry, I > >> > have to vote -1. This is just the early stage of release, and I think > >> we > >> > have the ability to smooth the release standardization process for > >> apache. > >> > Here, I'll point out some of the issues I've identified: > >> > > >> > 1. The recommended name of the GitHub tag is 1.0.0-rc1(rc2, rc3...). > >> This > >> > allows you to trace the number of times before a successful release. > >> > 2. The source code tarball needs to be uploaded to the Apache dist > >> > repository [1] instead of the Stage repository. > >> > 3. You are advised to use the Apache email address instead of > >> > ja...@asu.edu > >> > for GPG signatures. > >> > 4. It is recommended that the final package name be > >> > sedona-core_2.11-incubing instead of [1]. You must have at least src > >> > distribution. Use the sha512 signature. > >> > >> > >> Can you clarify? The link below is broken, and I’m not sure which you > are > >> referencing. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > 5. I have not checked the copyright-related issues and the compilation > >> is > >> > not passed. I hope that the compilation can pass in rc2. At the same > >> time, > >> > I also call on our committer to help verify it carefully and > carefully. > >> We > >> > are more strict in the first release. If careful enough, I'm sure > we'll > >> be > >> > able to publish it before rc3. > >> > > >> > If you have any questions, refer to the voting results of other items > in > >> > the incubation list. Of course, you are welcome to discuss it in your > >> > email. > >> > > >> > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > >> > [1] https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;quick-sedona > >> > > >> > Netanel Malka 于2021年1月12日周二 下午2:13写道： > >> > > >> > > Great Job!! > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > Netanel Malka > >> > > > >> > > On 2021/01/07 10:16:11, Jia Yu wrote: > >> > > > Hi All, > >> > > > > >> > > > After a fruitful discussion about our first Apache Sedona release > >> > > > 1.0.0-incubator, the release has been created. This is a call for > >> vote > >> > to > >> > > > release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0. > >> > > > > >> > > > Note that: the current sha1 and checksum verification of Sedona > will > >> > > > require us to manually download artifact jars, sha1, asc from > >> > > > repository.apache.org 12 times each. It is very annoying. Please > >> let > >> > me > >> > > > know if you have any suggestions to speed up the process. > >> > > > > >> > > > Release
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0
Hi, I also checked the source code, the name of the decompressed file is incubator-sedona-sedona-1.0.0-incubator... It's confusing. And I see that the size of files reaches almost 600 MB +. There are a lot of HDF files. I just wonder do we have a plan to optimize here :-) Here's a list of the Apache Incubation Project releases[1] memo, which could solve some of my words. Remember, this is just a reference. For the initial release in apache, I generally recommend that we could solve some of the key issues at the beginning. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469 vongosling 于2021年1月13日周三 下午3:43写道： > > I would like to make some more comments since the broken message as Felix > said. > > 4. It is recommended that the final package name be > sedona-core_2.11-incubating instead of [2](the source code is too large). > You must have at least src distribution(That's ok now, but do we only > distribute source code?). Use the sha512 signature. > > 5. I have not checked the copyright-related issues and the compilation is > not passed. I hope that the compilation can pass in rc2. At the same time, > I also call on our committer to help verify it carefully and carefully. We > are more strict in the first release. If careful enough, I'm sure we'll be > able to publish it before rc3. > > If you have any questions, refer to the voting results of other items in > the incubation list. Of course, you are welcome to discuss it in your email. > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > [1] https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;quick-sedona > > Felix Cheung 于2021年1月13日周三 下午1:59写道： > >> We should definitely have the source release on >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ >> >> We are voting for source release (and the git tag) - binaries are for >> convenience. >> >> Von, can you clarify the final package name inline? I think you are >> looking >> at the artifact ID not a package name? >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 6:09 PM vongosling wrote: >> >> > I'd love to vote +1, but after I've looked at this release, I'm sorry, I >> > have to vote -1. This is just the early stage of release, and I think >> we >> > have the ability to smooth the release standardization process for >> apache. >> > Here, I'll point out some of the issues I've identified: >> > >> > 1. The recommended name of the GitHub tag is 1.0.0-rc1(rc2, rc3...). >> This >> > allows you to trace the number of times before a successful release. >> > 2. The source code tarball needs to be uploaded to the Apache dist >> > repository [1] instead of the Stage repository. >> > 3. You are advised to use the Apache email address instead of >> > ja...@asu.edu >> > for GPG signatures. >> > 4. It is recommended that the final package name be >> > sedona-core_2.11-incubing instead of [1]. You must have at least src >> > distribution. Use the sha512 signature. >> >> >> Can you clarify? The link below is broken, and I’m not sure which you are >> referencing. >> >> >> >> > >> > 5. I have not checked the copyright-related issues and the compilation >> is >> > not passed. I hope that the compilation can pass in rc2. At the same >> time, >> > I also call on our committer to help verify it carefully and carefully. >> We >> > are more strict in the first release. If careful enough, I'm sure we'll >> be >> > able to publish it before rc3. >> > >> > If you have any questions, refer to the voting results of other items in >> > the incubation list. Of course, you are welcome to discuss it in your >> > email. >> > >> > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ >> > [1] https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;quick-sedona >> > >> > Netanel Malka 于2021年1月12日周二 下午2:13写道： >> > >> > > Great Job!! >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > Netanel Malka >> > > >> > > On 2021/01/07 10:16:11, Jia Yu wrote: >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > >> > > > After a fruitful discussion about our first Apache Sedona release >> > > > 1.0.0-incubator, the release has been created. This is a call for >> vote >> > to >> > > > release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0. >> > > > >> > > > Note that: the current sha1 and checksum verification of Sedona will >> > > > require us to manually download artifact jars, sha1, asc from >> > > > repository.apache.org 12 times each. It is very annoying. Please >> let >> > me >> > > > know if you have any suggestions to speed up the process. >> > > > >> > > > Release note: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://sedona.staged.apache.org/download/GeoSpark-All-Modules-Release-notes/#sedona-100 >> > > > >> > > > Build instructions: >> > > > https://sedona.staged.apache.org/download/compile/ >> > > > >> > > > Git tag: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/releases/tag/sedona-1.0.0-incubator >> > > > >> > > > Maven staging repository (search for "sedona", 12 artifacts in >> total): >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories >> > > > >> > > > Release Commit ID: >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
